Connect with us

Published

on

Rishi Sunak has essentially told Met Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley that if there’s violence at the pro-Palestine march in London on Saturday, it’s his fault.

But it’s a petulant response to Sir Mark’s defiance in the face of the enormous pressure from the PM and other ministers for the Armistice Day march to be banned.

Picking a fight with the UK’s top cop is probably not the most sensible move for a prime minister or home secretary – especially for a Conservative.

Remember the Tories’ claim to be the party of law and order?

Politics live: Johnson’s team ‘brutal and useless’, inquiry hears

The only targets for attack that might have been more unwise would be the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Pope, Harry Kane, David Beckham or a national treasure like Joanna Lumley.

Having said that, former England football manager Glenn Hoddle still claims Tony Blair hounded him out in 1999 after he said the disabled were being punished for sins committed in a previous life.

More on Mark Rowley

But once Suella Braverman had made her incendiary “hate marches” attack on pro-ceasefire protesters last week, the battlelines were drawn and the Tories declared war on Sir Mark.

The climax in this power struggle came when Mr Sunak summoned the commissioner to Downing Street on Wednesday in the hope – no doubt – of persuading him to back down and veto the march.

But he failed. Sir Mark stood his ground, and the PM – along with his fiercely combative home secretary – were forced into an embarrassing retreat.

The march goes ahead, and Mr Sunak has been outmanoeuvred.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Braverman criticises protests

Stepping back from the current dispute for a moment, what Met commissioner is going to admit to a prime minister that he or she can’t police a big demo – however large – and protect the public?

Supporters of the demands for a ceasefire have argued that – despite some of the offensive slogans and allegations of intimidation – there are more arrests at Premier League football matches than these marches.

That’s highly debatable. But the organisers of the Armistice Day march did help Sir Mark’s defiant stand by pledging to stay away from the Cenotaph in Whitehall and wait nearly two hours until after the two-minute silence before they begin.

Even before the Downing Street showdown, Mr Sunak appeared to concede that he was losing the battle with Sir Mark.

“This is a decision that the Metropolitan Police commissioner has made,” said the PM.

“He has said that he can ensure that we safeguard remembrance for the country this weekend as well as keep the public safe.”

Then the prime minister declared: “Now, my job is to hold him accountable for that.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Met Police chief ‘accountable’ over protest

That sounded very much like a threat. And no doubt if there is serious violence on Saturday, Mr Sunak – and his controversial home secretary – will gloat: “Told you so!”

In a tetchy statement admitting defeat after the Downing Street meeting, Mr Sunak talked rather sheepishly about the freedom of the right to protest peacefully.

Yet at the same time, he repeated his claim that the protest was disrespectful and offensive to the memory of Britain’s war heroes.

And then, in a bizarre comment, he said the commissioner had committed to keep the Met’s “posture” under constant review based on the latest intelligence about the nature of the protests.

Posture? That’s a loaded word. Was Mr Sunak suggesting Sir Mark had been posturing in his stand-off with the government?

Despite all his talk about policing of the march being an operational matter for the Met, if the PM is indeed guilty of misjudgement in his strategy, who is to blame?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘We can’t enforce taste or decency’

Many MPs will point the figure at his inflammatory home secretary, accused by Sir Keir Starmer in the King’s Speech debate this week of pursuing a “divisive brand of politics … as a platform for her own ambitions”.

That was after Ms Braverman’s “lifestyle choice” slur on the homeless sleeping in tents in town centres, which came just days after her “hate marches” attack.

Plenty of Tory MPs want Mr Sunak to sack his home secretary. Some even believe she’s goading him into sack her so she can launch a Tory leadership bid.

Whatever her motives, if she’s responsible for Mr Sunak’s ill-judged attacks on Sir Mark and his force, she’s done the PM no favours.

The Met chief will obviously be desperately hoping there isn’t serious trouble at Saturday’s march. Because he knows Mr Sunak – and Ms Braverman – will blame him and say it’s his fault.

Continue Reading

UK

Lucy Letby’s father ‘threatened guns to my head’ during meeting, hospital boss tells inquiry

Published

on

By

Lucy Letby's father 'threatened guns to my head' during meeting, hospital boss tells inquiry

Lucy Letby’s father threatened a hospital boss while the trust was examining claims that the neonatal nurse was attacking babies in her care, an inquiry has heard.

Tony Chambers, the former chief executive of the Countess of Chester Hospital, described how Mr Letby became very upset during a meeting about the allegations surrounding his daughter in December 2016.

Mr Chambers led the NHS trust where neonatal nurse Letby, who fatally attacked babies between June 2015 and June 2016, worked.

It was the following year in 2017 that the NHS trust alerted the police about the suspicions Letby had been deliberately harming babies on the unit.

“Her father was very angry, he was making threats that would have just made an already difficult situation even worse,” Mr Chambers told the Thirlwall Inquiry.

“He was threatening guns to my head and all sorts of things.”

Earlier, Mr Chambers apologised to the families of the victims of Letby, but said the failure to “identify what was happening” sooner was “not a personal” one.

He was questioned on how he and colleagues responded when senior doctors raised concerns about Letby, 34, who has been sentenced to 15 whole-life terms for seven murders and seven attempted murders.

Mr Chambers started his evidence by saying: “I just want to offer my heartfelt condolences to all of the families whose babies are at the heart of this inquiry.

“I can’t imagine the impact it has had on their lives.

“I am truly sorry for the pain that may have been prolonged by any decisions that I took in good faith.”

He was then pressed on how much personal responsibility he should take for failings at the trust that permitted Letby to carry on working after suspicions had been raised with him.

“I wholeheartedly accept that the operation of the Trust’s systems failed and there were opportunities missed to take earlier steps to identify what was happening,” he said.

“It was not a personal failing,” he added.

“I have reflected long and hard as to why the board was not aware of the unexplained increase in mortality.”

Read more:
Lucy Letby likely murdered or attacked more children, doctor tells inquiry
Lucy Letby: Nursing boss tells inquiry she had ‘best intentions’

Mr Chambers also said he believed the hospital should have worked more closely with the families involved, saying “on reflection the communications with the families could have and should have been better”.

The Thirlwall Inquiry is examining events at the Countess of Chester Hospital, following the multiple convictions of Letby.

Earlier this week her former boss, Alison Kelly, told the inquiry she “didn’t get everything right” but had the “best intentions” in dealing with concerns about the baby killer.

Ms Kelly was director of nursing, as well as lead for children’s safeguarding, at Countess of Chester Hospital when Letby attacked the babies.

She was in charge when Letby was moved to admin duties in July 2016 after consultants said they were worried she might be harming babies.

However, police were not called until May 2017 – following hospital bosses commissioning several reviews into the increased mortality rate.

Continue Reading

UK

Man and woman charged after injured baby boy taken to hospital in critical condition

Published

on

By

Man and woman charged after injured baby boy taken to hospital in critical condition

Police have charged a man and a woman with serious assault after an injured and unresponsive baby boy was taken to hospital.

Merseyside Police say the baby was found at a house in Seacombe, Wirral, on Sunday.

Officers were called to reports of concern for a child at a property on Percy Road at around midday, the force said.

The boy was taken to hospital, where injuries were found on his body.

His condition was described as “critical”.

Klevi Pirjani, 36, and Nivalda Santos Pirjani, 33, both of Seacombe, have been charged with causing grievous bodily harm and wounding with intent.

They were remanded into custody to appear at Liverpool Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday.

They were then further remanded to appear at Liverpool Crown Court on 23 December.

Continue Reading

UK

£50,000 reward offered in hunt for rare early Scottish coins stolen in 2007

Published

on

By

£50,000 reward offered in hunt for rare early Scottish coins stolen in 2007

A £50,000 reward is being offered over the unsolved theft of a batch of early Scottish coins that were stolen 17 years ago.

More than 1,000 coins from the 12th and 13th centuries were taken from the home of Lord and Lady Stewartby in Broughton, near Peebles in the Scottish Borders, in June 2007.

The stolen haul spans a period of almost 150 years, from around 1136 when the first Scottish coins were minted during the reign of David I up to around 1280 and the reign of Alexander III.

The late Lord Stewartby entrusted the remainder of his collection to The Hunterian Museum at the University of Glasgow in 2017, but the missing coins have never been found.

A £50,000 reward is being offered over the unsolved theft of a batch of early Scottish coins that were stolen 17 years ago. Pic: Crimestoppers
Image:
Pic: Crimestoppers Scotland

A £50,000 reward is being offered over the unsolved theft of a batch of early Scottish coins that were stolen 17 years ago. Pic: Crimestoppers
Image:
Pic: Crimestoppers Scotland

Crimestoppers announced its maximum reward of £20,000 – which is available for three months until 27 February – in a fresh appeal on Wednesday. An anonymous donor is helping to boost the total reward amount to £50,000.

It is hoped it will prompt people to come forward with information which could lead to the recovery of the missing treasures and the conviction of those responsible for the crime.

A £50,000 reward is being offered over the unsolved theft of a batch of early Scottish coins that were stolen 17 years ago. Pic: Crimestoppers
Image:
Pic: Crimestoppers Scotland

A £50,000 reward is being offered over the unsolved theft of a batch of early Scottish coins that were stolen 17 years ago. Pic: Crimestoppers
Image:
Pic: Crimestoppers Scotland

Angela Parker, national manager at Crimestoppers Scotland, said Lord Stewartby’s haul was the “best collection of Scottish coins ever assembled by a private individual”.

More on Scotland

Jesper Ericsson, curator of numismatics at The Hunterian, described the medieval coins as smaller than a modern penny.

He added: “Portraits of kings and inscriptions may be worn down to almost nothing and the coins might be oddly shaped, perhaps even cut in half or quarters.

“You could fit 1,000 into a plastic takeaway container, so they don’t take up a lot of space. They may look unremarkable, but these coins are the earliest symbols of Scotland’s monetary independence.

“They are of truly significant national importance. Their safe return will not only benefit generations of scholars, researchers, students and visitors to come, but will also right a wrong that Lord Stewartby never got to see resolved before he died.”

Read more from Sky News:
Scientists reveal recreated voice of King Richard III

Robert the Bruce 3D model ‘most realistic ever created’

A £50,000 reward is being offered over the unsolved theft of a batch of early Scottish coins that were stolen 17 years ago. Pic: Crimestoppers
Image:
Angela Parker, national manager at Crimestoppers Scotland, and Jesper Ericsson, curator of numismatics at The Hunterian. Pic: Crimestoppers Scotland

Mr Ericsson pleaded with whoever has the coins to “return them to where they belong”.

He added: “Give Scotland back its coins.”

Lady Stewartby said her husband, who was a renowned numismatist, was just five-years-old when he was given his first Scottish coin.

She added: “Over the next 50 years, he put together a collection which included some of the earliest Scottish coins.

“Lord Stewartby told me and our children that they represented Scotland’s history at a time when few people had access to books or pictures.”

Continue Reading

Trending