Connect with us

Published

on

In the end, Thursday’s drama involving Suella Braverman is – at its heart – not about the rights and wrongs of marches, the judgement of the police or potential breaches of the ministerial code, although each and all have been subplots at various points.

Actually, the story about the home secretary boils down to a trial of political strength between her and the prime minister.

In our system, there can only be one winner – which is why it is a question of when, not if, she leaves her job in order to prepare for office on the other side of a general election.

Politics Hub: No 10 suggested changes to Braverman article before publication

Her article prepared for The Times was politically important for three reasons.

In it, she attacked the judgement of the police on a specific matter – thereby allowing critics to say she compromised the operational independence of the Metropolitan Police.

She also allowed a gap to emerge between her and the PM, who by the end of Wednesday was indicating he understood why the Met was allowing the pro-Palestinian march to go ahead.

More on Rishi Sunak

Thirdly, and most egregiously in the eyes of some in the Conservative Party, it allowed her to grab headlines once again with inflammatory languages about officers, marches and Northern Ireland – sending Number 10 in a spin over whether to echo, condemn, agree or repudiate.

This routine is now such a common occurrence. It has happened more than once this week, for example, over whether homelessness is a “lifestyle choice”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Suella Braverman branded pro-Palestinian protests in London as ‘hate marches’.

Tory MPs divide both ways over whether the essential judgement in the Braverman article is correct.

Some believe the Metropolitan Police is making the wrong call by allowing the march on Armistice Day to proceed.

Others believe that a law-and-order party should not be second guessing the Met, and are furious with the way she invoked Northern Ireland.

Meanwhile, Number 10 will be nervous of backing the march too strongly in case it ends up getting ugly on Saturday.

They don’t want Braverman to look vindicated if the march goes wrong.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Is the prime minister too weak to sack Suella Braverman?’

So where does this leave Number 10?

Firstly, they are trying to shift the argument away from whether Braverman is right or wrong – and on to a question of whether she should go because she is disrespecting the office of prime minister.

Number 10 has briefed the entire media that the article in The Times was not “cleared” – approved for publication – and we understand Downing Street asked for substantial changes that were not done.

Discourteous and politically untenable, yes, but not a clear breach of collective responsibility – since that only applies to policy not language.

Secondly, there’s a question of timing. She could be sacked on Friday, but Number 10 will not know how the march has gone at that point.

Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge

Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge

Sky News Monday to Thursday at 7pm.
Watch live on Sky channel 501, Freeview 233, Virgin 602, the Sky News website and app or YouTube.

Tap here for more

Furthermore, perhaps Sunak will take the opportunity to conduct the wider reshuffle he has long wanted but not felt able to do – promoting allies to better positions and sidelining those he reluctantly inherited. That will take all weekend to prepare.

Mr Sunak might not be able to wait as long as long as Wednesday, when at 10am the Supreme Court rules on the government’s Rwanda policy – another moment and another issue over which Braverman might walk.

So, all of that points to a Monday medium-to-big reshuffle.

Nothing is confirmed, and maybe he will duck it. But right now – after a mediocre King’s Speech and little sense of momentum felt by Tory MPs – that might be his best chance of a reset.

Continue Reading

Politics

RWAs build mirrors where they need building blocks

Published

on

By

RWAs build mirrors where they need building blocks

RWAs build mirrors where they need building blocks

Most RWAs remain isolated and underutilized instead of composable, DeFi-ready building blocks. It’s time to change that.

Continue Reading

Politics

Collapsed crypto firm Ziglu faces $2.7M deficit amid special administration

Published

on

By

Collapsed crypto firm Ziglu faces .7M deficit amid special administration

Collapsed crypto firm Ziglu faces .7M deficit amid special administration

Thousands of savers face potential losses after a $2.7 million shortfall was discovered at Ziglu, a British crypto fintech that entered special administration.

Continue Reading

Politics

Heidi Alexander says ‘fairness’ will be government’s ‘guiding principle’ when it comes to taxes at next budget

Published

on

By

Heidi Alexander says 'fairness' will be government's 'guiding principle' when it comes to taxes at next budget

Another hint that tax rises are coming in this autumn’s budget has been given by a senior minister.

Speaking to Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander was asked if Sir Keir Starmer and the rest of the cabinet had discussed hiking taxes in the wake of the government’s failed welfare reforms, which were shot down by their own MPs.

Trevor Phillips asked specifically if tax rises were discussed among the cabinet last week – including on an away day on Friday.

Politics Hub: Catch up on the latest

Tax increases were not discussed “directly”, Ms Alexander said, but ministers were “cognisant” of the challenges facing them.

Asked what this means, Ms Alexander added: “I think your viewers would be surprised if we didn’t recognise that at the budget, the chancellor will need to look at the OBR forecast that is given to her and will make decisions in line with the fiscal rules that she has set out.

“We made a commitment in our manifesto not to be putting up taxes on people on modest incomes, working people. We have stuck to that.”

Ms Alexander said she wouldn’t comment directly on taxes and the budget at this point, adding: “So, the chancellor will set her budget. I’m not going to sit in a TV studio today and speculate on what the contents of that budget might be.

“When it comes to taxation, fairness is going to be our guiding principle.”

Read more:
Reeves won’t rule out tax rises

What is a wealth tax and how would it work?

👉Listen to Politics at Sam and Anne’s on your podcast app👈      

Afterwards, shadow home secretary Chris Philp told Phillips: “That sounds to me like a barely disguised reference to tax rises coming in the autumn.”

He then went on to repeat the Conservative attack lines that Labour are “crashing the economy”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Chris Philp also criticsed the government’s migration deal with France

Mr Philp then attacked the prime minister as “weak” for being unable to get his welfare reforms through the Commons.

Discussions about potential tax rises have come to the fore after the government had to gut its welfare reforms.

Sir Keir had wanted to change Personal Independence Payments (PIP), but a large Labour rebellion forced him to axe the changes.

With the savings from these proposed changes – around £5bn – already worked into the government’s sums, they will now need to find the money somewhere else.

The general belief is that this will take the form of tax rises, rather than spending cuts, with more money needed for military spending commitments, as well as other areas of priority for the government, such as the NHS.

Continue Reading

Trending