Connect with us

Published

on

UNIVERSITY CITY, Mo. As activists parse the results of Tuesdays vote to protect abortion rights in Ohio, Jamie Corley is already well on her way to putting a similar measure in front of Missouri voters next year.

Corley, a former Republican congressional staffer, filed not one, but six potential ballot measures in August to roll back her states near-total ban on abortion, triggered by the U.S. Supreme Courts June 2022 decision to end federal protections for terminating pregnancies. Use Our Content

It can be republished for free.

I can’t emphasize enough how dangerous it is to be pregnant in Missouri right now, Corley said at a restaurant near her home in this St. Louis suburb. There is a real urgency to pass something to change the abortion law.

Missouri is one of at least 11 states considering abortion-related ballot measures for next year, part of the wave of such actions since the Supreme Courts decision on Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization. And while November 2024 is still a year away, the groundwork for those campaigns has been in motion for months, sometimes years.

In Iowa, for example, efforts to pass a state constitutional amendment declaring no right to abortion began in 2021, although the legislature has yet to finish the process. In Colorado, competing initiatives one to enshrine abortion protections and one to ban abortion could potentially appear on the same ballot if supporters of both manage to garner enough signatures. And in Missouri, potential ballot measures to increase access to abortion have been bogged down in litigation for months, delaying the collection of signatures and highlighting internecine conflicts on both sides of the issue.

In a way, I think this is what the Supreme Court wanted, said John Matsusaka, executive director of the Initiative and Referendum Institute at the University of Southern California. They said, The people ought to figure this out.

The push for sending the contentious issue to voters comes on the heels of last years string of ballot measure wins for abortion rights in six states: California, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Montana, and Vermont. And on Tuesday, Ohio voters broadly passed a measure to establish a state constitutional right to abortion. A “Yes yard sign near Cincinnati urged voters to support adding abortion and reproductive health decision-making protections to the Ohio Constitution as part of a Nov. 7 ballot measure. (Stephanie Stapleton/KFF Health News) A competing No yard sign sought to defeat the measure. (Stephanie Stapleton/KFF Health News)

Citizen-initiated ballot measures in the 26 states that allow them are often prompted by legislatures that stray far from public opinion, Matsusaka said. Fourteen states have banned abortion since the Dobbs decision, despite polling suggesting those bans are unpopular. Two-thirds of adults expressed concern in a May KFF poll, for example, that such bans could make it difficult for doctors to safely treat patients.

But in states where abortion is legal, a push is coming from the other direction.

Colorado was actually the first state, or one of the first states, to provide abortion on demand, said Faye Barnhart, one of the anti-abortion activists who filed petitions to restrict abortions there. We were pioneers in doing the wrong thing, and so we’re hopeful that we’ll be pioneers in turning that around to do the right thing.

A similar effort in Iowa, meanwhile, is up in the air. The legislature in 2021 approved a proposed amendment declaring the Iowa Constitution does not protect abortion rights. But the measure needs to pass the Republican-controlled legislature again to get on the ballot. Lawmakers declined to take up the matter during this years legislative session but could do so in 2024. A poll published by the Des Moines Register in March found that 61% of Iowans think abortion should be legal in all or most cases. Email Sign-Up

Subscribe to KFF Health News' free Morning Briefing. Your Email Address Sign Up

If Missouris abortion ban is indeed rolled back next year, it would mark the fourth time since 2018 that the states voters rebuked their Republican leaders, who have controlled the governorship and both legislative chambers since 2017. Recent initiative petitions have succeeded in raising the minimum wage, legalizing marijuana, and expanding Medicaid, the public insurance program for people with low incomes and disabilities.

The success of those campaigns doesnt mean the petition process is easy, said Daniel Smith, a political science professor at the University of Florida who specializes in ballot initiatives. Collecting signatures is costly and often requires contracting with what he called the initiative industrial complex.

An analysis by Ballotpedia found that the cost per required signature collected for initiative campaigns in 2023 averaged $9.38. At that rate, it would cost more than $1.6 million to get an initiative on the ballot in Missouri where around 172,000 signatures are needed. And thats before adding in the cost of running campaigns to persuade voters to choose a side.

In the two months leading up to November’s vote in Ohio, the campaign to protect abortion rights raised about $29 million, and the opposing campaign raised nearly $10 million, according to The Associated Press. Much of the funding came from out-of-state groups, such as the progressive Sixteen Thirty Fund in Washington, D.C., and an Ohio organization associated with the national anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America. Stickers pile up at a polling site in Toledo, Ohio, on Election Day.(Emily Elconin/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

And more money will pour into the next efforts: Last month, Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, a billionaire Democrat whose family owns the Hyatt hotel chain, launched the Think Big America organization to help fund abortion-rights ballot measures across the country.

Still, the cost of launching a ballot campaign is a daunting obstacle, said Emily Wales, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Great Plains, which has clinics in Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas. During last years vote in Kansas, for example, the competing campaigns raised over $11.2 million combined. That may be a factor in the absence of a ballot measure in Oklahoma despite momentum for one last year.

It’s not just: Can you pull together a coalition, educate voters, and get them out? But: Can you also raise enough to combat what has been years of misinformation, miseducation, and really shaming and stigmatizing information about abortion? Wales said.

Polling in Missouri indicates voters statewide, including many Republicans, might back abortion rights in certain circumstances.

Thats what led Corley to file her petitions in August despite a political action committee called Missourians for Constitutional Freedom having already filed 11 proposals to roll back the states abortion ban. Corley said her proposals are narrower to attract support from sympathetic Republicans like herself. They provide exemptions for rape, incest, fetal abnormalities, and the health of the mother. Three would prevent restrictions on abortions for the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.

The proposals from Missourians for Constitutional Freedom would allow abortion later in pregnancy. Some versions allow regulations on abortions only after 24 weeks, while others specify after fetal viability or dont give any time frame.

One group withholding support from any effort so far is Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region and Southwest Missouri, the states other main Planned Parenthood affiliate and the final clinic to provide abortion services before Missouris ban.

My concern is that we would potentially rebuild the same system that failed so many people, said Colleen McNicholas, its chief medical officer for reproductive health services.

Missouri lawmakers long sought waysto limit abortion even while it was protected by the Supreme Courts Roe v. Wade decision, including enacting a 72-hour waiting period in 2014. The number of recorded abortions in the state dropped from 5,772 in 2011 to 150 in 2021, the last full year before the current ban.

We know what it’s like to live in a post-Roe reality, and we knew that reality well before the Dobbs decision, said McNicholas.

Still, Corley said her group is ready to push ahead with at least one measure.

People are looking for something like what we’re putting forward, which is something in the middle that provides protections against criminal prosecution, Corley said. I also don’t think people understand how much worse it can get in Missouri.

Rural editor and correspondent Tony Leys in Des Moines, Iowa, contributed to this report.

Bram Sable-Smith: brams@kff.org, @besables Related Topics Elections Public Health States Abortion Colorado Iowa Legislation Missouri Ohio Oklahoma Women's Health Contact Us Submit a Story Tip

Continue Reading

Politics

Britain must ‘lead from the front’ in Ukraine and ‘tough choices to come’, says Sir Keir Starmer

Published

on

By

Britain must 'lead from the front' in Ukraine and 'tough choices to come', says Sir Keir Starmer

There are more tough choices to come on Ukraine and Britain must “lead from the front”, Sir Keir Starmer has said.

The prime minister gave a statement in parliament after he unveiled proposals for a “coalition of the willing” to enforce any peace deal in the war-torn country, and announced a plan for Kyiv to use £1.6bn of UK export finance to buy 5,000 more air defence missiles.

Politics latest: Farage says Zelenskyy ‘rude’ to Trump

He said the “tough choices that we made last week are not done” and a “lasting peace” in Ukraine “has to be our goal”.

“Britain will lead from the front for the security of our continent, the security of our country, and the security of the British people,” he said.

It follows a hectic week of diplomacy for Sir Keir, during which he held talks with Donald Trump in the White House on Thursday, hosted Ukraine’s president in Downing Street on Saturday and then a wider summit of world leaders on Sunday.

Sandwiched in between his Washington DC trip and busy weekend back home was Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s extraordinary row with the US president in the Oval Office, which cast more doubt on America’s support for Kyiv.

More on Keir Starmer

Sir Keir said the showdown is something “nobody wants to see” but he would not pick a side.

He called America an “indispensable” ally, adding: “We will never choose between either side of the Atlantic

Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer head to a private room to hold a meeting during a Leaders' Summit on the situation in Ukraine at Lancaster House, London. Picture date: Sunday March 2, 2025.
Image:
Zelenskyy and Starmer. Pic: PA

“In fact, if anything, the past week has shown that that idea is totally unserious because while some people may enjoy the simplicity of taking a side, this week has shown with total clarity that the US is vital in securing the peace we all want to see in Ukraine.”

In front of the world’s cameras on Friday, Mr Trump accused the Ukrainian president of “disrespecting” the United States and “gambling with World War Three” after he expressed scepticism that Vladimir Putin could be trusted to honour ceasefire agreements.

It has intensified fears among some Western leaders that the US cannot be relied upon to continue supporting Ukraine, or provide a security guarantee to deter the Russian leader if a peace deal is struck.

After the PM’s statement, Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said the UK needs to “reduce our dependency on the United States” as he fears President Trump is “not a reliable ally with respect to Russia”.

However, many other opposition politicians have praised Sir Keir’s diplomacy this week, with Tory leader Kemi Badenoch backing the prime minister for “working with allies in Europe and with the United States to bring peace to Ukraine and not a surrender to Russia”.

Read More:
The ‘coalition of the willing’ that could secure peace in Ukraine

Sir Keir has been positioning himself as a peace broker between the US and Europe following Mr Trump’s ascension to the White House and his clear indication he no longer wants to bankroll NATO’s defence.

He has suggested a coalition of European allies could step up and defend a potential deal for Ukraine to “guarantee the peace” and indicated some EU nations could follow in the UK’s footsteps and increase defence spending.

However, he argues that while a security guarantee should be led by Europe, it needs US backing.

Mr Trump has not committed to such a guarantee and previously suggested a minerals deal between the US and Ukraine could act as one.

In response to a question from Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, Sir Keir told the Commons this would “not be enough on its own”.

In any case, the deal has been put on hold following Mr Trump’s row with the Ukrainian president.

Shortly after the PM finished speaking, Mr Trump hit out at Mr Zelenskyy once again, saying the US would “not put up with him” for much longer after he said the end of the war with Russia is “very far away”.

Continue Reading

World

Long-range drone strikes weakening Russia’s combat ability, senior Ukrainian commander says

Published

on

By

Long-range drone strikes weakening Russia's combat ability, senior Ukrainian commander says

Russia is finding it “significantly” harder to conduct combat operations against Ukraine because of a rise in Ukrainian long-range drone strikes on Russian weapons supplies, ammunition depots and fuel refineries, a senior commander has said.

Brigadier General Yuriy Shchygol signalled these attacks would grow, revealing that his country plans to more than quadruple the production rate of deep strike drones – with a range of hundreds of miles – to more than 2,000 aircraft a month.

Brigadier General Yuriy Shchygol
Image:
Brigadier General Yuriy Shchygol

Ukraine has been intensifying the tempo of its long-range drone strikes against targets inside Russia and Russian-occupied territory since late December – demonstrating what defence sources say is a world-leading capability that the Kremlin is struggling to counter.

The mission is an example of how Kyiv remains focused on combatting Moscow’s invasion even as world attention fixates on the fallout from a row between Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy, as well as efforts by Europe to prepare a plan for peace.

Live updates: Ukraine war latest

The comments by Brigadier Shchygol, who coordinates long-range drone strikes for Ukraine’s Defence Intelligence, offer a rare insight into the impact of the covert mission, which is also carried out by other branches of the Ukrainian military and security services.

“Russia is finding it increasingly difficult to conceal the extent of the damage,” the commander told Sky News in an interview at an undisclosed location in Kyiv.

“Headquarters have been hit, command structures weakened, and panic is spreading among their officers. Compared to a year ago, conducting full-scale combat operations has become significantly more challenging for [the Russians].”

Ukrainian drones being launched from a secret location
Image:
Ukraine’s drone technology is considered to be world-leading


Sky News analysis of long-range drone strikes last month found that since December, there had been a ramping up of attacks against oil refineries in Russia that are used to fuel Russian tanks, jets and warships.

The analysis took in strikes officially confirmed by the Ukrainian armed forces. Brigadier Shchygol said “far more” drone attacks by Ukraine are not publicly confirmed.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Ukraine ramps up attacks on oil depots

In a sign of the importance placed on long-range drones, he said Kyiv’s ability to manufacture this weapon has already jumped 100-fold since late 2022 to more than 500 per month.

While the officer would not say how many of these drones are then deployed on operations, he noted: “Nothing is just sitting in storage unused.”

He said recent operations had targeted several storage sites for Russia’s Iranian-designed Shahed one-way attack drones – used by the Russian armed forces against Ukrainian military and civilian targets.

More than 3,000 Shahed unmanned aerial vehicles were destroyed, according to the officer, who said: “As a result, their deployment of these drones has significantly decreased.”

Top secret drone mission

Sky News was given rare access to view a drone mission last week at a top-secret area.

As night fell, soldiers dressed in black – all members of the Defence Intelligence of Ukraine, an elite branch of the armed forces – prepared a line of about 10 drones.

Ukrainian drones being launched from a secret location
Image:
Ukrainian drones being launched from a secret location

Each aircraft looked like a giant, grey metal mosquito.

The model is called “Lutti”, which is Ukrainian for “Fury”.

One by one, the drones burst into life, a propeller on the back whirring, pushing the aircraft forward at ever greater speed until it took off into the darkness.

We were told their target was an ammunition depot inside Russia.

Ukrainian drones being launched from a secret location
Image:
Ukraine’s drone technology is considered to be world-leading


"Vector", the commander on the ground, spoke with a balaclava pulled up to his eyes to protect his identity
Image:
“Vector” spoke with a balaclava pulled up to his eyes to protect his identity

“Vector”, the commander on the ground, said his drones have a success rate of 70 to 80%.

He said Ukraine’s deep strike operations are “very important”.

“We change the war with these drones,” Vector said, speaking with a balaclava pulled up to his eyes to protect his identity.

“We can show [Russia] that the war can come in their houses, in their towns, cities.”

Russia’s sheer size makes it vulnerable

Using drones to strike targets hundreds of miles inside Russia is a complex challenge.

As night falls, members of an elite branch of Ukraine's armed forces prepare a line of drones
Image:
As night falls, members of an elite branch of Ukraine’s armed forces prepare a line of drones

But the sheer size of their enemy’s country works in Ukraine’s favour. The Russian military has weapons sites, ammunition storage areas, oil refineries and military headquarters dotted across its territory and lacks the air defences to be able to protect them all.

“We are reaching those targets. The slowing pace of their offensives – and in some places, even Ukrainian counter-offensives reclaiming territory – proves that our strikes are effective and growing more so,” Brigadier Shchygol said.

Read more:
Which countries could send peacekeeping troops to Ukraine?
In the room with Volodymyr Zelenskyy

A huge planning and reconnaissance effort underpins Ukraine’s long-range drone strikes.

It identifies targets and coordinates attacks between the different teams.

Varying volumes of drones are required for each mission – with some of the most complex strikes needing 100 unmanned aircraft.

From farm aircraft to fighter drone

The brigadier was speaking in a large room inside a disused building in Kyiv where five examples of different Ukrainian long-range drones were on display.

Brigadier General Yuriy Shchygol
Image:
Brigadier Shchygol spoke to Sky News from a room where long-range drones were on display

They tell the story of the evolution of vital battlefield technology that began life on a farm.

The earliest form of the long-range drone looks like an ordinary light aircraft, with rectangular wings and two propellers. It is a lot smaller than a manned plane but much larger than a regular drone – probably about the length of a car, with a similar wingspan.

This model, fitted with a camera and a large fuel tank to fly for long periods, had been used for surveillance for agricultural purposes.

It was adapted after Russia’s full-scale invasion to conduct reconnaissance and even bombing missions.

The idea was then modified further to develop similar-sized drones that look more like fighter jets, with pointed noses and triangular wings. These were designed to hold explosives in the main body of the plane.

Some of the drones are remotely piloted, others work via autopilot.

Russia’s war has forced Ukraine to use technology and innovation to fight back against its far more powerful foe.

It has accelerated the use of autonomous machines in an irreversible transformation of the warzone that everyone is watching and learning from.

Brigadier Shchygol said: “Right now, Ukraine’s battlefield experience is essentially a manual for the world.”

Continue Reading

Environment

Tesla owners get creative to distance themselves from Elon with new car logos & projectors

Published

on

By

Tesla owners get creative to distance themselves from Elon with new car logos & projectors

Tesla owners are finding creative ways to distance themselves from Elon Musk. They are now removing Tesla logos from their vehicles, replacing them with badging from other automakers, and even using projections on a Cybertruck in one case.

We previously reported on the surge in sales of stickers reading variations of “I bought this car before I knew Elon was crazy.” One particular business selling such stickers claimed to be selling hundreds per day as Tesla owners are looking to distance themselves from the automaker’s CEO.

Things have escalated since then, and the hate against Tesla has ramped up quite a bit. Some Tesla owners are even worried about people vandalizing their vehicles.

Now, some Tesla owners have found some more creative, tongue-in-cheek ways to distance their Tesla ownership from Elon Musk than slapping a sticker on their bumper.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

For example, Tesla vehicles are being spotted de-badged with the Tesla logos replaced with badges from other automakers (pictures via Stonk King):

It’s not exactly a new phenomenon, but lately, more of these Tesla vehicles with other automaker logos have been spotted.

But here’s an even more creative and clearer example of a Tesla owner trying to distance themselves from Musk.

A Tesla Cybertruck projecting images on its tailgate has been spotted several times in the last week:

It displays pleas not to graffiti the vehicle and adds things like “this truck already makes me look stupid enough.”

The short video is signed “Mussk production,” with the “ss” referencing the Schutzstaffel, a Nazi paramilitary group.

Electrek’s Take

Obviously, these are somewhat tongue-in-cheek examples, but between these, Tesla protests worldwide, and declining sales, it is genuinely mindboggling to see the destruction of Tesla’s brand in such a short period of time.

I have been covering Tesla for roughly 15 years and I remember when it was completely unknown brand, loved only by a handful of EV nerds, like myself, and hated by fossil fuel propagandists.

It took a great deal of work from Tesla employees and the EV community to build Tesla into an incredibly beloved global EV brand. A deep social media addiction, purchasing of Twitter, a move into politics, a few salutes, and now most of that incredible work is gone.

It takes years to build a reputation and seconds to destroy it.

If you are looking to install solar on your own home, to find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage. EnergySage is a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar – whether you’re a homeowner or renter. They have hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20 to 30% compared to going it alone. Some installers even offer Tesla products as shown above. Plus, it’s free to use and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and you share your phone number with them.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending