
Volkswagen ID.7 first drive: An electric love letter to the family sedan
More Videos
Published
2 years agoon
By
admin
In the age of silky-smooth and quiet electrification, big screens, cameras, and power everything, what truly defines a luxury car? It’s a question I found myself asking after two days with the Volkswagen ID.7, the new mid-size EV sedan from Wolfsburg. It’s not a luxury car, per se, but so much about it does feel luxurious. Between the amazing seats, plush ride, and abundant tech, this is a car that doesn’t want for much.
Philosophical musing aside, VW has found the proverbial sweet spot in the ID.7 — a nice but not-too-nice family car I’d genuinely love to live with. While I’m still not sure I know what makes a luxury car a luxury car anymore, the ID.7 prompts what is perhaps a better question, “What else do you really need in a car?” And maybe true luxury is the absence of need.
VW ID.7 specs and figures
- Model: Volkswagen ID.7 Pro
- Battery: 82 kWh (77 kWh available)
- Range: 386 miles (WLTP, no EPA yet)
- Charging: 11 kW AC onboard, up to 175 kW DC (CCS)
- Motor configuration: Single motor, RWD
- Power / torque : 282 hp / 402 lb-ft
- Weight: 4788 lbs
- Seating: 5-passenger
- Price: Unknown
- Release date: Late 2023 / early 2024
- Other models: GTX (AWD sport model), Touring (wagon — not coming to the US)
The luxury question
Is luxury about ride quality? If so, the ID.7 has it in spades, with adjustable adaptive dampers and quiet, confident road manners. Is luxury about space? The ID.7 and its elongated 117-inch wheelbase puts it closer to a Mercedes EQE than a Passat by layout, and a total length of over 195 inches makes it the longest sedan produced by the brand since the Phaeton. Is luxury about whizz-bang features? The ID.7 has heated and cooled massaging front seats, motorized climate control vents, VW’s most ambitious ADAS system yet, and a vast 15-inch center display (complete with HUD nav integration for the driver). Is luxury about power? The ID.7 has, well, not quite so much of that — at 282 hp and 402 lb-ft of torque, it’s more than adequate to the task of highway passes and on-ramp hustling, but typically conservative Volkswagen.

We were in quite luxurious surrounds for the ID.7’s big debut, with Volkswagen hosting journalists in the south of France — in my view, an attempt to associate the ID.7 with VW’s most bougie clientele. (Travel, accommodations, and delicious French desserts were provided to Electrek by VW.) And that leads to the one big thing Volkswagen wasn’t talking about: Money. We have no idea what the ID.7 will cost when it comes out. Based on the fully loaded ID.7 Pro trim we drove, I suspect the answer could be a pretty penny once all the order sheet option boxes are ticked. More basic configurations will be available, but none of those cars were on hand to test. Pricing is easily the biggest concern for any EV on the market, arguably even more important than form factor and range at this point to most buyers. Without that data point, the ID.7 is a bit tricky to place at the moment. But we’ll try.
Exterior & interior: A bigger, better Arteon
One way to couch the ID.7 is relative to its position in the greater VW portfolio. But even this proves a bit weird. Some of those who drove it were apparently (according to VW) keen to liken the ID.7 to an electrified Passat. But the ID.7 has a wheelbase a full seven inches longer than VW’s sedan of the people, making it a size class larger. While parking the two may be similar (the Passat is only 2 inches shorter overall), the ID.7 is inarguably a bigger vehicle to inhabit. And if you’re doing Model 3 math, stop now: The ID.7 is far more proximate to the Model S by wheelbase, length, and passenger space.
The front seats of the ID.7 offer over 40 inches of headroom — three inches more than a Passat or Arteon — making for an open and airy cabin feel. Cargo space is above average for an EV sedan, too. While there’s no frunk, the ID.7’s rear liftgate hatch has 530 liters of storage. That’s far less than a Model S (700 liters), but still a strong showing in the segment (e.g., the ID.7 is up 100 liters on the Mercedes EQE, and 40 liters on the BMW i5). Rear seat space also felt ample in the car, with more than enough head and legroom even for me, at 6’1″. It’s a true four-adult sedan; even five should be doable in a pinch. And if you fold down the rear seats, you’re ready for some medium-duty IKEAing.

As to how all that space translates to the exterior, this is not a compact car. But it’s not massive, either. At 195.3 inches, the ID.7 is only a bit longer than a Passat or Arteon, which are both smaller than electrified mid-size luxury sedans like the previously-mentioned EQE (196.9″) or i5 (199.2″). It’s by no means a difficult car to maneuver, either — getting the ID.7 up and down a very tight French manor driveway in the hills of Cassis was eminently achievable, especially with the aid of parking sensors and automatically activated exterior cameras.

With that 282 horsepower responsible for moving 4788 lbs of ID.7, a 0-62 mph time of 6.5 seconds isn’t surprising. This is a relatively heavy vehicle, though the ID.7 is a lot lighter than a Mercedes EQE (5190 lbs) and meaningfully trimmer than the BMW i5 (4916 lbs), but those are also larger cars. By comparison, a Model S Dual Motor with its 100 kWh battery and AWD comes in around 4,560 lbs. Weight is a metric worth noting, as it impacts range, performance, and tire wear. That said, this makes VW’s range claim (386 miles WLTP) all the more impressive in context of the ID.7’s 77 kWh-available battery. Pound for pound, this is a very efficient car, at least on paper. In Europe, the ID.7 with attached hitch accessory will also be able to tow 1200 kg (around 2650 lbs).

Tech and features: An Audi in Wolfsburg clothing?
Going back to our initial “luxury” question, the level of equipment available in the ID.7 pretty quickly makes it evident that VW has no intention of letting its upmarket sibling in Ingolstadt have all the fun toys. If I may be so bold, the premium ergoActive seats in the ID.7 are a revelation in a Volkswagen product. They are really freaking good. The massage mode is powerful, and my codriver and I were both turning them back on after our 30-minute “pelvis activation” (yes, really) sessions had come to an end. They were also obscenely comfortable — sporty, a bit huggy, but very supportive and well-cushioned over the three or so hours we spent on the road. If you’re in the market for an ID.7, you’d be nuts not to spring for this upgrade. Heating and ventilation both work well, and there’s a “drying” mode that heats and ventilates the seat simultaneously in the event you’re feeling a bit schweaty.

The rest of the interior is a luxurious place to be, too. The heated steering wheel is nice and chunky (and the capacitive controls seemed fine to me), and the new 15″ center screen is, at the very least, much easier to see. Interior lighting accents can be customized, most touch points feel like premium materials, and you get a Qi wireless phone charger and two 45W USB-C ports in the center console. There’s a passthrough storage area under the center storage cubby, too — no fake transmission tunnels here. And if you opt for it, the ID.7 can even be configured with a tinting and blurring panoramic glass roof. On a Volkswagen!
Of all the tech in the car, I was particularly smitten with the “augmented reality” heads-up display that VW will include as standard on all trims of the ID.7. It provides navigation tooltips so you can ignore the big nav screen entirely, keeping your eyes on the road. I want a manufacturer to write a white paper on driver focus and stress levels using something like this HUD compared to a center-mounted nav screen, because I’d have a strong hunch it positively impacts both.

The infotainment system uses the newest version of Volkswagen’s in-car OS, but I didn’t have the time to explore it in meaningful depth. Some quality-of-life tweaks to the homescreen make certain things like climate and seat controls more accessible (they’re along a permanent nav strip on the bottom of the screen), and you can customize a few shortcuts to apps along the permanent top bar of the UI to quickly get in and out of CarPlay, for example. It all seems fine, with interaction generally straightforward and performance being passable. I wasn’t a big fan of the built-in navigation UI — it’s visually busy — but Android Auto and CarPlay are available (including wireless mode), so you can use whatever mapping solution suits you best. Most folks will plug in their phones once and never look back. As for digital climate and seat controls, I’ve never been a fan, and I don’t think I ever will be. I understand this is a very attractive cost-cutting measure for the manufacturer, but it makes a multi-step process out of something that used to be straightforward and naturally tactile.

The VW “IDA” in-car voice assistant was about as refined as I’d expect of such a thing — and I should start by saying it’s not coming to the ID.7 in the US. In general, it seems to work OK, but IDA was inadvertently triggered many times on our test drive (don’t say “idea” in your Volkswagen because it will get… ideas), guaranteeing I’d turn it off in my own car on day one. I acknowledge there is likely some value from an accessibility standpoint to these interfaces for specific users. Still, the reality is that carmakers are just redoing the work Apple, Google, and Amazon have already done so much better than they ever will, and it makes all of these systems an inferior experience compared to the smartphones and smart speakers we all use every day.
On climate control, Volkswagen has talked up the electronically-actuated vents on the ID.7 (you cannot physically adjust them, a la Tesla), which you can control via the touchscreen interface. This sort of thing has always felt like reinventing the wheel to me, and I still don’t understand what it does to make blowing air “better.” It seems like one more thing to break, necessitating a trip to the dealer when it does. VW says it makes adjusting the cabin temperature more efficient without blasting you in the face so much — because the air is more evenly distributed — so that sounds like some kind of improvement. In practice, maxing the AC still basically felt like maxing the AC in most cars — just maybe quieter.
One legitimately finicky feature was the wireless Qi phone charger. That’s not surprising — most carmakers seem to struggle here because of the various sizes of phones, types of cases, and movement during driving. But the car’s OS repeatedly popped notifications that charging had been paused because the phone was too hot (it was) or the battery was full (when it definitely wasn’t). OEMs need to thoughtfully consider how they surface transient notifications like these, because they are legitimately disruptive while driving the car. Putting a giant blue box over the navigation UI that will not go away until explicitly dismissed is arguably a little unsafe, especially for information not genuinely critical while operating the vehicle. You still have those powerful 45W USB-C ports for charging, so you’re by no means required to use the pad.
Driving the ID.7: Performance, autonomy, range
As I alluded to earlier, the rear-wheel-drive ID.7 Pro we drove isn’t for those seeking thrilling performance — that will come with the AWD GTX model. That 6.5-second shuffle to 62 mph would have been quick 20 years ago for a car this size, but in 2023? In an EV? It’s firmly “acceptable.” We’ll be eagerly awaiting the GTX to see how much more go-juice VW can give us, range be damned. When it comes to handling, I only had a few short chances to toss the ID.7 around. But a tight French backroad made it clear that the low center of gravity provides the characteristic high confidence of an electric vehicle under cornering. Outside the confines of a race track, though, I’d be hard-pressed to differentiate it from most other EV sedans meaningfully. The long wheelbase and compliant suspension make it feel wonderfully composed under more restrained maneuvering — you feel like you’re driving a luxury car, down to the extremely low wind and tire noise in the cabin.

Volkswagen was keen to discuss the ID.7’s new autonomy features, including automatic lane change and speed limit-aware cruise control — but know now that neither feature is coming to the US. We couldn’t get the automatic lane change to work, and other drivers on the launch were similarly flummoxed by it. The speed limit-aware cruise control does work, arguably a little too well, as it rather abruptly decelerates when the speed limit in a given area goes down (which happens a lot in the south of France). I’d probably turn it off if were I driving this car daily.
All versions of the ID.7 at launch will share an 82 kWh battery (77 kWh available), which VW says is good for an impressive 386 miles on the European WLTP cycle. There are no EPA figures yet, but you can reasonably assume they’ll be a bit lower. As for validating VW’s claims, we had far too little seat time to tell — and we certainly weren’t hypermiling it. For those maximizing their efficiency with regenerative braking, the ID.7 offers the same “B” drive mode on the gear selector stalk to put the car in regen mode as other ID models. It’s not a one-pedal mode, and the level of regen force can’t be adjusted — you either use “D” or “B.” What’s unintuitive about all this is that moving between the “comfort” and “sport” drive settings also clearly affects the regen setting, with the latter very noticeably increasing it. This is needlessly confusing for owners — a global regen setting would make much more sense. We did not have a chance to test the 175kW DC charging claim on the press drive, but like the rest of the ID family, the ID.7 uses a CCS connector. Volkswagen has not yet announced plans to adopt NACS, either.

A quieter, more efficient drivetrain: The AP550
The ID.7 is among the first of VW’s EVs equipped with a new electric powertrain, dubbed the AP550, so named because it produces around 550 Nm of peak torque. This unit is substantially more potent than the previous powerplant in the ID family, and is already available in the VW ID.4 and ID.5. But power is plainly not the story, at least in this single-motor configuration.
The AP550’s improved efficiency was evident when VW introduced the motor on the ID.4 and ID.5 SUVs. But because the ID.7 is a proper sedan, its low profile cuts through the air substantially better than those crossovers, giving it 386 miles of range on the WLTP cycle. That’s more than a 10% gain on the ID.4 with the same battery and drivetrain.

The AP550 is VW’s quietest electric power unit to date, and I can confirm that, even from a stop with the pedal to the floor, I could never hear it. It’s that quiet. VW says that the primary improvements to the power unit, aside from much beefier windings and electrics to increase output, came in the form of cooling, mechanical efficiency, and an upgraded chipset. The AP550 uses water and oil cooling to keep the unit at optimal operating temperature, and the components translating that power to motion are more finely machined to reduce friction. Finally, a newer, more powerful Infineon real-time chipset enables smoother power delivery and more efficient switching.
In the vacuum of a press drive, it’s difficult to assess an EV powertrain’s comparative “refinement” — almost all of them are smooth and quiet! And without other cars on hand to compare, it’s tough to say how much quieter and smoother the AP550 is. The place my imagination goes with this unit is jamming two of them into a single car making 550-plus horsepower. We can dream.
The Pros
- Oodles of tech and comfort. The ID.7 is the definition of a well-equipped mid-size sedan.
- If range claims stand up (386 miles WLTP), the ID.7 delivers noteworthy efficiency, especially given its battery capacity (77 kWh available) and weight (4788 lbs).
- A roomy interior with lots of passenger space front and rear and an ample hatchback-style trunk with folding seats.
- Forthcoming Touring (wagon) version for even more storage (sadly, it’s not coming to the US).
- The “augmented reality” driver heads-up-display is legitimately helpful and handy. It just makes driving nicer.
The cons
- Options like the pano roof and premium seats seem likely to ratchet up the price quickly — but we don’t know what the ID.7 will cost yet, or what trims will be available at launch.
- The ID.7 Pro is not slow, but it’s not fast. If you want performance, wait for the all-wheel-drive GTX.
- This is a large vehicle, outsizing both the Arteon and Passat. Still, it’s smaller than an EQE or i5.
- It may have all the technology, but not all of it feels perfectly executed (ADAS, voice assist, wireless charging).
- Exterior styling is somewhere between bland and awkward. Your mileage may vary, though.
Electrek’s Take
The ID.7 is hard to place in the larger EV discussion without a price. Particularly, without the base model MSRP, it’s difficult to say how much value Volkswagen will deliver relative to the competition dollar for dollar.
The upshots with the ID.7 are clear: This is a comfortable, practical, family-ready BEV with extremely respectable range and a roomy, high-tech interior that feels next-generation. I think Volkswagen has nailed the essential Volkswagenness of a nice mid-size car here — because even if you strip away the panoramic roof, fancy seats, and big wheels, you won’t lose any of what makes the ID.7 a good car. (Though, I’d be seriously lusting after those ErgoActive seats. I’m still thinking about them.) It still has the range, the fast charging, the storage, and the cushy ride. Probably even more cushy if you drop these 20″ wheels for the standard 19″ alloys.
In an age of crossovers, I also have to give VW props for putting out an honest-to-God sedan. I love a good sedan, and while CUVs and SUVs have their place in the world, I like being (relatively) low to the ground! When you actually provide the necessary interior space for adults to fit into a sedan layout, you aren’t losing anything but an inch or two of ground clearance, either (especially given EVs have no drivetrain or exhaust components hanging off the bottom). I will always be rooting for team sedan over team crossover.
My unrepentant shilling for Big Sedan aside, life as a new sedan isn’t an easy one right now. People are buying CUVs and SUVs in droves, and sedan sales have been flagging for years. While Tesla continues to do well with the Model 3, it’s an outlier — largely due to super-aggressive pricing and the extensive Supercharger network. The ID.7 doesn’t make a great analog in that sense. And because of its size class and level of available premium options, it’s conceivable the ID.7 may end up in something of a “no man’s land” — too expensive for the masses, but too Volkswagen for buyers looking at traditional luxury brands like Mercedes, BMW, or Audi. The Arteon has ostensibly struggled to sell for very similar reasons. Granted, the Arteon is not an EV.
To me, the question with the ID.7 isn’t whether it’s a good car — it quite plainly is a Very Good Car. The question is, who will buy one? I’m not sure Volkswagen knows the answer to that any better than we do at this point. Anyone who checks out an ID.7 will be pleased with what they find, but I suspect getting them into the driver’s seat in the first place will be VW’s biggest challenge.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
You may like
Environment
Wait, is JackRabbit about to unveil a two-person e-bike?
Published
7 hours agoon
August 8, 2025By
admin

Guys, I think JackRabbit has a two-person e-bike coming, errr… electric scooter? I’m not really sure what you call this thing, but it looks wild.
I recently took a short break from riding and writing e-bikes all day to doomscroll social media, which basically just feeds me more bike content all day. And what popped up in my feed other than this peculiar thing?
Sure, it’s obscured by a surfboard mount, but there’s no getting around the fact that it looks like this shiny new silver JackRabbit isn’t quite as mini as we’re used to from the famously “micro and proud” micro e-bike maker. And there’s one other detail that’s also apparent if you look closely.
It’s a two-seater.
Advertisement – scroll for more content


I think this video was meant to be something of a teaser from JackRabbit, but it might as well be a near-unveiling.
In other parts of the same teaser video, almost the entire bike is visible. From those other shots, we can see that it’s still not quite an e-bike in the traditional “comes with pedals” sense.
Instead, JackRabbit’s somehow simultaneously chunky yet tiny folding footpegs are still visible. The wide handlebars also appear to have JackRabbit’s unique 90º turning handlebar lock, which allows the bars to spin sideways when parked. You can even see it in use in the images below.
On JackRabbit’s smaller models, that trick makes the entire bike just 7″ (17 cm) wide, making it easy to store behind a couch or under a dorm bed. Here, it’s unclear if it will be quite as narrow, but it should still make this a conveniently stowable ride.


It’s hard to tell, but it looks like the wheels might be larger than JackRabbit’s standard 20″ size, helping give it the “full-sized bike” qualifier that JackRabbit claims in the teaser video. The perspective is confusing, as the front wheel looks closer to 24″ or 26″, yet the rear wheel still disappears behind that surfboard. Could this be the first mullet JackRabbit? (Not to be confused with a JackRabbit mullet, which is a hairstyle that would pair well with what is likely the most free-spirited of all the e-bike brands out there.)
There may also be different saddle options, since we can clearly see what looks to be a conventional bicycle saddle in some images and a longer, stretched-out, banana seat-style saddle in the other shots.
We can also see two of JackRabbit’s “Rangebuster” batteries in the frame, a larger capacity pack developed by the company with a claimed 24 miles (39 km) range per battery, meaning this model might have a range of nearly 50 miles (80 km).
But there’s a lot we still don’t know. Will it get the powerfully torquey motor from the JackRabbit XG Pro? Will there be a pedal option? Will my wife agree to ride this thing with me? These are yet questions without answers, people.


One thing is for sure, though. JackRabbit says all will be revealed soon. “Everything you know about JackRabbit is changing on 8/12,” writes the company. (That’s next week, for any Europeans in the room.)
I don’t know about you, but I’m suddenly very much looking forward to Tuesday.
Electrek’s Take
I don’t know what to make of this, but I’m excited. I’ve been a JackRabbit fan since before the OG was even the OG. It’s just such a fun and free-spirited brand.
If the e-bike market was high school, JackRabbit would be that quirky, non-conformist kid that everyone kind of wondered about but who was obviously having more fun than anyone else. It’s the e-bike that just puts its hands over its ears and goes “La la la la…” when you try to tell ’em that it’s not actually an e-bike.
It’s weird. It’s wild. But it works. And being a JackRabbit fan is a hill I’m prepared to die on – though admittedly, you’d be well advised to tackle that hill on one of the Pro models instead of the OG2 for the extra power and torque.
My wife might give me a funny look every time I whip out my JackRabbit, but I still love riding it. And so it’s with that level of excitement and curiosity that I wonder what the brand that refuses to be defined is up to with this new “full-sized bike” reveal they’ve got coming. The ability to carry two riders sounds great, especially since the thing still looks so small and portable.
Of course, the over-priced elephant in the room is that JackRabbit’s Achilles heel is its pricing. These things aren’t cheap. The entry-level OG2 model only starts at $1,249, and the flagship XG Pro is almost double that. Granted, it’s an awesome bike, and one that I was able to use to tow a kayak down the road for miles, then put on top of that kayak and paddle through the Gulf of Mexico for miles (something of which I don’t know of any other e-bike that can do). But that makes me wonder what yet a bigger and presumably more impressive JackRabbit will cost.
But hey, I’m so here for this!
If you want to see the full teaser video, check it out below.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Environment
Tiny motor, massive power. New e-bike drive triples the torque
Published
7 hours agoon
August 8, 2025By
admin

Small package, big impact: that’s the story behind Maxon’s new Air S mid‑drive motor. On the surface, it looks almost identical to the original Air: sleek, nearly invisible, and designed to disappear into your bike’s frame. But beneath this minimalist exterior is a dramatic leap in capability.
Now the torque has nearly tripled, soaring to 90 Nm, all while keeping total system weight to just 3.8 kg, (8.4 lb) including the motor and 400 Wh battery.
We’ve seen smaller motors popping up here and there lately, but not mid-drives quite like this.
Just 100 g (0.22 lb) heavier than the original Air yet tripling the performance, the Air S delivers up to 90 Nm of torque and 620 W of peak power, catapulting it into the realm of powerful mid‑drive motors built for demanding trail performance. That’s the same torque you’d expect from some of the strongest mid‑drive motors in modern electric mountain biking, yet in a package that’s still feather‑light.
Advertisement – scroll for more content

Why it matters for lightweight e-bikes
As New Atlas recently pointed out, these motors are enabling super lightweight builds that previously weren’t possible: Bikes using the Air S, like the Thömus Lightrider E‑Max or Instinctiv’s Ocelot, tip the scales at barely 15 kg (33 lb), far lighter than typical full-suspension e‑MTBs, thanks largely to the slender motor and integrated battery design.
With torque now hitting 90 Nm, up from just that meager 30 Nm on the original, the Air S now delivers serious climbing power without the bulk. This brings light-assist bikes into full‑power territory, making acceleration and steep terrain feel effortless. Previously, ultra-lightweight e-bikes made serious compromises on power to achieve that level of near weightlessness. But now, they can actually compete on power, too.
Maxon’s unique split‑cylinder configuration also allows the motor to remain visually discreet. Combined with frame‑integrated batteries (400 Wh to start, with a 600 Wh option reportedly on the way), the system preserves clean lines and low weight. Many e-bikes sporting the motor simply won’t even look like e-bikes to the casual observer.
With the Air S, Maxon has struck a rare balance: ultralight design without compromise on torque. It catapults lightweight e-bikes into a new performance bracket, granting riders both agility and power. If you’ve long dreamed of an e-bike that feels like a mountain goat on the climb yet disappears under 16 kg, the Air S is probably your motor.
The trail-ready future is lighter, leaner, and looks ready to race uphill.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Environment
The oddly personal truth about ADAS: self-driving cars are like running shoes
Published
14 hours agoon
August 8, 2025By
admin

There you are, motoring along in your Volvo XC90 PHEV with the Pilot Assist engaged alongside a big 18-wheeler at a comfortable 70 mph cruise when the interstate starts to slowly sweep left. From the drivers’ seat, that semi on your right looks awfully close. As the steering wheel turns itself in your hand, you start to wonder if that truck’s a bit too close. The car isn’t doing anything wrong, but it’s too close for your comfort and you give the wheel a little nudge to hug the inside of the lane just a bit more.
These deeply personal preferences are tough to quantify, and highlight a simple fact about Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) that the industry at-large hasn’t yet to come to terms with: when it comes to self-driving cars, one size does not fit all.
The Volvo experience I outlined above was very real, happening just as the wife and I were arguing about the relative merits of our very different choice in running shoes. She prefers the supportive, cushion-y ride of the HOKA Clifton 9s, which I’ve become convinced are The Devil™, preferring instead the zero-lift, no-cushion feel of my Xero Prio runners. The intervention with the Volvo interrupted that particular argument and started another. Namely, the one about why I had chosen that moment to “interfere” with the Pilot Assist.
“It was too close to that truck,” I explained. “Freaked me out.”
Advertisement – scroll for more content
“That’s how I feel in the Honda,” she said. “I’m always afraid that it’s going to try and put me into oncoming traffic.”
That’s when the idea for this post came to me. Because, as a car brand, it’s really not possible to just say that your car has ADAS or doesn’t have ADAS in a binary sense. That’s because these systems are not just proprietary to a given brand, they can vary from vehicle-to-vehicle within that brand, and each one can have distinct lane centering behavior, steering feel, lane change aggressiveness, braking distances, timing for its hand-off warnings, and probably a bunch of other stuff that I haven’t even thought of depending on what kind of cameras, sensors, and software the specific vehicle you are in is equipped with.
It’s a bit of a mess, in other words.
Opinion: Honda Sensing gets it right
I first experienced Honda’s ADAS in 2014, driving a then-new CR-V between Chicago and Bay Harbor, Michigan for an Acura press drive. Even in its early generations, I was impressed with the way it handled stop-and-go traffic, the way it guided you through turns, but didn’t do the turning for you, and the speed and intensity it used in braking very much mirrored my own.
Last month, I had a chance to test out the 2025 Honda Civic Sport Touring Hybrid for a week on Cape Cod. I picked the car up at PreFlight Parking outside Boston Logan, jammed it with luggage, and immediately hit heavy traffic, where the Honda Sensing Low-Speed Follow function took me right back to 2014, ratatouille-style, when my experience in that car had led me to believe that self-driving cars were right around the corner.
In the decade-plus since experiencing that first autonomous Acura, I’ve had the chance to experience Ford BlueCruise, Tesla Autopilot and FSD, and Mercedes-Benz DRIVE PILOT. And all, interestingly enough, in and around the Circuit of the Americas in Austin at one time or another over my three years of hosting Electrify Expo events there.
Each different OEMs’ system had its strengths and quirks. I remember Mercedes DRIVE PILOT as impressively precise, even clinical. The Ford system faded into memory. I couldn’t tell you anything about it, which is probably high praise. The Tesla systems, though, stood out — but for all the wrong reasons. Lane changes came too quickly, it accelerated too late, and too aggressively, and I often found myself bracing for collisions that (in fairness) never came.
More than once in those years I’ve wondered if maybe I’d just got it wrong back in 2014. That the tech was so new, and I had been so wow’ed by it initially, that I had got swept up in the hype of self-driving cars … but that drive in my wife’s XC90, back-to-back as it was with the Civic Hybrid, showed me that wasn’t it. Instead, I just didn’t like the way those other cars drove. Just like I don’t like the way HOKAs feel. And, just like my wife isn’t wrong for liking her gross marshmallow shoes (probably), I’m not wrong for preferring a more restrained digital co-pilot.
It’s a matter of fit, not fact — and that’s going to be a tough sell.
Everyone but me is wrong
As the great George Carlin once asked, “Have you ever noticed that anyone who is driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone driving faster than you is a maniac?”
ADAS systems live squarely in that same subjective space occupied by other drivers. If the bots brake too hard, steer too sharply, or get too close to the car head before changing lanes, they might not be technically doing anything wrong, but they’re maniacs – and right now, there’s no real way to know how one car’s ADAS is going to behave until you’ve spent some significant time behind the wheel. Like, “Uh-oh. I bought a thing and I hate it,” amounts of time.
That’s a problem for both buyers and sellers (to say nothing of manufacturers and software developers), because why would you risk demonstrating a system that might scare someone? How do you sell “confidence” and “convenience” when what feels confident and convenient to one driver feels reckless to another, and milquetoast to a third?
Lucky for you guys, I have a solution.
Jojo’s ADAS scorecard *
System | Lane centering bias | Lane change distance (car lengths) | Follow distance (default) | Braking force (max Gs) | Hands-off time allowed | Overall “feel” |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ford BlueCruise | Centered | ~3.5 | Moderate | 0.30 G | Medium | Stable |
Honda Sensing | Slight left bias | ~2.5 | Safe | 0.35 G | Short | Balanced |
Mercedes-Benz DRIVE PILOT |
Centered | ~3.5 | Moderate | 0.40 G | Long | Confident |
Tesla Autopilot | Centered | ~1.5 | Close | 0.45 G | Long (varies) | Aggressive |
Volvo Pilot Assist | Slight right bias | ~3.0 | Moderate | 0.30 G | Moderate | Cautious |
That asterisk (*) is there because these are completely made up, imaginary values. They’re simply there to illustrate one way for manufacturers and dealers to share objective, quantifiable information about how their different ADAS systems behave. If it’s done right, it might help a car shopper get a better feel for how their next car might drive, and prevent them from spending their hard-earned cash on a car that drives like an idiot. Or a maniac.
That’s my take, anyway – what’s yours? Head down to the comments and let us know what values you’d like to see represented on an ADAS scorecard, and how much you’d be willing to base your next car buying decision on how it drives.
As for me, my X handle might be VolvoJo, but if I’m shopping for a car that’s going to drive me instead of the other way around, I might have to see if “HondaJo” is available.
Original content from Electrek.

If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Trending
-
Sports3 years ago
‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year ago
Story injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years ago
Game 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years ago
MLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Sports2 years ago
Button battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Environment2 years ago
Japan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years ago
Game-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike