Suella Braverman has launched a scathing attack on Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, accusing him of abandoning secret promises and saying “your plan is not working”.
After being sacked from her role Ms Bravermansaid that she would say “more in due course”.
And in a scathing letter released on Tuesday afternoon, the former home secretary attacked Mr Sunak’s record in government, accusing him of a “betrayal”.
This is her letter to the PM in full:
Dear prime minister,
Thank you for your phone call yesterday morning in which you asked me to leave government. While disappointing, this is for the best.
It has been my privilege to serve as home secretary and deliver on what the British people have sent us to Westminster to do.
I want to thank all of those civil servants, police, Border Force officers and security professionals with whom I have worked and whose dedication to public safety is exemplary.
I am proud of what we achieved together: delivering on our manifesto pledge to recruit 20,000 new police officers and enacting new laws such as the Public Order Act 2023 and the National Security Act 2023. I also led a programme of reform: on anti-social behaviour, police dismissals and standards, reasonable lines of enquiry, grooming gangs, knife crime, non-crime hate incidents and rape and serious sexual offences.
And I am proud of the strategic changes that I was delivering to Prevent, Contest, serious organised crime and fraud. I am sure that this work will continue with the new ministerial team.
As you know, I accepted your offer to serve as home secretary in October 2022 on certain conditions. Despite you having been rejected by a majority of party members during the summer leadership contest and thus having no personal mandate to be prime minister, I agreed to support you because of the firm assurances you gave me on key policy priorities.
These were, among other things:
1. Reduce overall legal migration as set out in the 2019 manifesto through, inter alia, reforming the international students route and increasing salary thresholds on work visas; 2. Include specific ‘notwithstanding clauses’ into new legislation to stop the boats, i.e. exclude the operation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), Human Rights Act (HRA) and other international law that had thus far obstructed progress on this issue; 3. Deliver the Northern Ireland Protocol and Retained EU Law Bills in their then existing form and timetable: 4. Issue unequivocal statutory guidance to schools that protects biological sex, safeguards single sex spaces, and empowers parents to know what is being taught to their children.
Twitter
This content is provided by Twitter, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Twitter cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Twitter cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Twitter cookies for this session only.
This was a document with clear terms to which you agreed in October 2022 during your second leadership campaign. I trusted you. It is generally agreed that my support was a pivotal factor in winning the leadership contest and thus enabling you to become prime minister.
For a year, as home secretary I have sent numerous letters to you on the key subjects contained in our agreement, made requests to discuss them with you and your team, and put forward proposals on how we might deliver these goals. I worked up the legal advice, policy detail and action to take on these issues. This was often met with equivocation, disregard and a lack of interest.
You have manifestly and repeatedly failed to deliver on every single one of these key policies. Either your distinctive style of government means you are incapable of doing so. Or, as I must surely conclude now, you never had any intention of keeping your promises.
These are not just pet interests of mine. They are what we promised the British people in our 2019 manifesto which led to a landslide victory. They are what people voted for in the 2016 Brexit referendum.
Our deal was no mere promise over dinner, to be discarded when convenient and denied when challenged. I was clear from day one that if you did not wish to leave the ECHR, the way to securely and swiftly deliver our Rwanda partnership would be to block off the ECHR, the HRA and any other obligations which inhibit our ability to remove those with no right to be in the UK. Our deal expressly referenced ‘notwithstanding clauses’ to that effect.
Your rejection of this path was not merely a betrayal of our agreement, but a betrayal of your promise to the nation that you would do “whatever it takes” to stop the boats.
At every stage of litigation I cautioned you and your team against assuming we would win. I repeatedly urged you to take legislative measures that would better secure us against the possibility of defeat.
You ignored these arguments. You opted instead for wishful thinking as a comfort blanket to avoid having to make hard choices. This irresponsibility has wasted time and left the country in an impossible position.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:30
Suella Braverman ignored questions from the media after she was sacked as home secretary
If we lose in the Supreme Court, an outcome that I have consistently argued we must be prepared for, you will have wasted a year and an Act of Parliament, only to arrive back at square one.
Worse than this, your magical thinking – believing that you can will your way through this without upsetting polite opinion has meant you have failed to prepare any sort of credible ‘Plan B’.
I wrote to you on multiple occasions setting out what a credible Plan B would entail, and making clear that unless you pursue these proposals, in the event of defeat, there is no hope of flights this side of an election. I received no reply from you.
I can only surmise that this is because you have no appetite for doing what is necessary, and therefore no real intention of fulfilling your pledge to the British people.
If, on the other hand, we win in the Supreme Court, because of the compromises that you insisted on in the Illegal Migration Act, the government will struggle to deliver our Rwanda partnership in the way that the public expects. The Act is far from secure against legal challenge.
People will not be removed as swiftly as I originally proposed. The average claimant will be entitled to months of process, challenge, and appeal. Your insistence that Rule 39 indications are binding in international law – against the views of leading lawyers, as set out in the House of Lords will leave us vulnerable to being thwarted yet again by the Strasbourg Court.
Another cause for disappointment – and the context for my recent article in The Times – has been your failure to rise to the challenge posed by the increasingly vicious antisemitism and extremism displayed on our streets since Hamas’s terrorist atrocities of 7 October.
I have become hoarse urging you to consider legislation to ban the hate marches and help stem the rising tide of racism, intimidation and terrorist glorification threatening community cohesion. Britain is at a turning point in our history and faces a threat of radicalisation and extremism in a way not seen for 20 years.
I regret to say that your response has been uncertain, weak, and lacking in the qualities of leadership that this country needs. Rather than fully acknowledge the severity of this threat, your team disagreed with me for weeks that the law needed changing.
As on so many other issues, you sought to put off tough decisions in order to minimise political risk to yourself. In doing so, you have increased the very real risk these marches present to everyone else.
In October of last year you were given an opportunity to lead our country. It is a privilege to serve and one we should not take for granted. Service requires bravery and thinking of the common good. It is not about occupying the office as an end in itself.
Someone needs to be honest: your plan is not working, we have endured record election defeats, your resets have failed and we are running out of time. You need to change course urgently.
I may not have always found the right words, but I have always striven to give voice to the quiet majority that supported us in 2019. I have endeavoured to be honest and true to the people who put us in these privileged positions.
I will, of course, continue to support the government in pursuit of policies which align with an authentic conservative agenda.
Sincerely, Suella Braverman Rt Hon Suella Braverman KC MP Member of Parliament for Fareham
In response, a No 10 spokesperson said:
The prime minister was proud to appoint a strong, united team yesterday focused on delivering for the British people.
The prime minister believes in actions not words. He is proud that this government has brought forward the toughest legislation to tackle illegal migration this country has seen and has subsequently reduced the number of boat crossings by a third this year. And whatever the outcome of the Supreme Court tomorrow, he will continue that work.
The PM thanks the former home secretary for her service.
Around 70% of non-fatal strangulation cases in the last year have been dropped due to evidential issues, exclusive data shared with Sky News shows.
It is now three years since it became a standalone offence in England and Wales, in a landmark piece of legislation designed to protect domestic abuse victims.
Data from the Institute for Addressing Strangulation (IFAS) shows that police are implementing the offence widely – but outcomes for victims are mixed.
Warning: This article contains references to domestic abuse and sexual assault
‘Sarah’ – whose name has been changed to protect her identity – vividly remembers the first time her ex-partner strangled her, one year into their relationship.
She said: “He was drunk, and he climbed on top me. He put his hands around my throat, and he pinned me down with the strength of his body.”
Terrified, she begged him repeatedly to stop, but he carried on.
More on Data And Forensics
Related Topics:
“I remember I just felt really numb and scared, but it was weird, it felt like an out-of-body experience.”
Afterwards the only words he spoke to her were “look what you made me do,” she said, and then when the ordeal was over, he carried on with his day as if nothing had happened.
This was the beginning of a pattern of abuse that continued throughout the rest of their relationship, happening on at least 30 more occasions, Sarah estimated.
It became so normalised
He strangled her when she was pregnant. He strangled her whether her children were in the house or not. It always happened during sex, though Sarah was only later able to recognise that this was rape after talking to the police, because for her it had become so normalised.
And, always, he told Sarah it was her fault – that she had somehow ‘made’ him do it.
She later went on to suffer a miscarriage because of the physical abuse.
‘A form of control’
“Looking back now I can see it was a form of control he got off on, knowing that he was in control, and he liked seeing me upset,” she said. “I thought that he was going to kill me because he used to threaten it to me. It was very, very scary.”
This fear of death is common among victims of strangulation and is a recognised tool of control and intimidation.
A US study found that victims of domestic abuse were seven times more likely to be murdered by their current or former partner if there had been an incident of non-fatal strangulation beforehand.
But this form of violence often leaves no obvious external signs of injury, meaning in some cases perpetrators could only be investigated for less serious offences like common assault, which did not reflect the severity of the crime.
Image: ‘Sarah’ speaking to Sky News correspondent Ashna Hurynag
What are the possible effects on health?
The potential health impacts are wide-ranging, including loss of consciousness, voice changes, difficulty in swallowing and breathing, bruising, haemorrhages, headaches, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), miscarriage, risk of suicide, and death (including delayed death).
Symptoms can arise weeks or months after the event.
It is for these reasons that campaigners fought for the introduction of the standalone offence, which came into effect in June 2022.
‘Much work to be done’
The IFAS has been monitoring the offence since the legislation was introduced and shared its latest report findings exclusively with Sky News.
It said there is still “much work to be done” to better protect victims of strangulation.
New figures obtained by IFAS from the Home Office reveal that over 63,000 crimes of non-fatal strangulation or suffocation were recorded by police in England and Wales in the first two years under the legislation.
There were 39,360 recorded crimes in 2023/24, on average 66 offences per 100,000 people compared with 50 per 100,000 the year before, an increase of 20%.
“Survivors who work with us have recognised time and time again how important it is to be able to see strangulation as a standalone offence and have the opportunity to progress with criminal justice proceedings,” Harriet Smailes, co-author of the report, told Sky News.
The volume of crimes recorded suggests that the offence is being widely recognised and reported by police – and the number resulting in charges, at 12%, is high compared to some other offences.
However, a significant number of investigations result in no further action due to evidential difficulties. This can happen if police or prosecutors do not believe there is enough evidence to proceed, or if the victim does not support the investigation.
This was the outcome in three in five investigations overall, including one in five investigations where the victim did support police action. Outcomes were similar in both years of available data.
“In around half of cases, there are no external, physical, visible signs of injury. That’s not to say that there aren’t internal injuries that can’t be seen just with the naked eye,” said Ms Smailes, who is a research officer at IFAS.
“It might be that that visible injury isn’t present at the time of evidence capture that might develop over time, or because there’s a difference in how individuals show bruising, for example those of different skin tones. That can contribute towards there not being enough perceived evidence to be able to progress with a police case,” she said.
Image: IFAS research officer Harriet Smailes
In some cases where a victim disengages from police proceedings, it may be that they did not feel supported and believed in the process or felt that there were “too many obstacles”.
On the other hand, not all cases where a victim did not support police action are necessarily negative. “It might be that initial needs have been met in that instance through reporting to the police, for example, initial containment of the risk of that situation, and referrals to specialist health or mental health services,” Ms Smailes explained.
Police ‘determined’ to improve
Assistant Commissioner Louisa Rolfe is the National Police Chiefs’ Council lead for domestic abuse.
She told Sky News that securing prosecutions for strangulation is a priority for tackling violence against women and girls, and a key part of national Domestic Abuse Matters training.
“For us to do well in prosecutions, we need to understand how perpetrators operate, how they use this is a sinister way of controlling their victims. And we also know that many victims are frightened to pursue prosecution,” she said.
Investigators not only have to secure detailed evidence rapidly but also present the best possible case so that prosecutors and juries understand how an abuser is operating, she said.
“That can be a challenging job, for a police service that’s under pressure, trying to deal with a myriad of priorities. I know many investigators are passionate about getting this right.”
“We know we’re up against it when it comes to securing convictions, but we’re determined to improve,” she added.
Image: AC Louisa Rolfe, National Police Chief Council lead for domestic abuse
Fewer than half were convicted
Separate research by IFAS has found that in the first year under the new legislation, only around half of the number of offences charged by police were prosecuted, and less than half of those secured a conviction.
Overall, 47% of the 1,437 prosecutions of non-fatal strangulation and suffocation offences in the year to June 2023 resulted in conviction, based on data from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) from all courts in England and Wales.
There are several potential reasons that a prosecution may be unsuccessful, including evidential difficulties or a victim withdrawing from the process.
The accused may also have been convicted of a separate offence, but not for the strangulation. Without more detailed data, it is hard to determine to what extent each is contributing to the low conviction rate.
Reflecting on the figures, head of policy and public affairs at domestic abuse support charity Refuge, Ellie Butt, told Sky News that victims often face “huge pressure” from perpetrators to drop out of the criminal justice process.
“When compounded with lengthy court delays and insufficient support, many survivors are forced to withdraw from the process. Police and prosecutors should be working to build cases that can be taken forward even when a survivor can no longer continue,” she said.
The Crown Prosecution Service highlighted to Sky News that the number of new prosecution proceedings has been consistently increasing, particularly domestic abuse-related strangulation offences.
In the latest quarter, 2,000 cases reached their first hearing at magistrates’ court.
Kate Brown, the CPS national lead for domestic abuse, said: “Three years on, we have continued to bring more charges quarter on quarter, with over 2,000 seen in court in the past three months.
“This standalone offence has shone a light on those who seek to use these violent acts to exert power over another person and harm them. We are determined to continue bringing abusers to justice for victims.”
A gendered crime
The new data from IFAS reinforces that strangulation is a gendered crime. Around 80% of victims whose gender was recorded by police were female, while 88% of suspects were male.
The data also shows that while people from all ages are impacted, most victims are younger, with three in five aged 34 or under. The age profile of suspects was slightly higher, with three in five suspects aged between 25 and 44.
‘I want to say it’s not your fault’
Sarah’s case ended in evidential difficulties.
Though her case was reported before 2022, when strangulation became a specific offence, she said she did provide substantial physical evidence to the police and she feels “let down” by the justice system.
She said she has been diagnosed with PTSD, anxiety and other health issues.
“I live with it every day. It can be a song that comes on the radio or a sign or somebody’s name and it would just bring everything back to me to that point, that moment,” she said.
“I want to say it’s not your fault. Nobody has the right to control you, nobody has the right to abuse you, rape you, strangle you.
“I would urge anyone to speak out and if you feel like you haven’t been heard and your voice has not been listened to, speak out again.”
The Data and Forensics team is a multi-skilled unit dedicated to providing transparent journalism from Sky News. We gather, analyse and visualise data to tell data-driven stories. We combine traditional reporting skills with advanced analysis of satellite images, social media and other open source information. Through multimedia storytelling, we aim to better explain the world while also showing how our journalism is done.
A body has been found in the search for a teenager who went missing more than four weeks ago.
Cole Cooper, 19, was last seen by a school friend on Wednesday 7 May, in the village of Longcroft near Falkirk, in central Scotland.
Mr Cooper was reported missing by his family on Friday 9 May, sparking a major investigation involving helicopters, divers, digital specialists and hundreds of officers.
Image: Cole Cooper. Pic: Police Scotland
Police Scotland said a man’s body was discovered in a wooded area near Kilsyth Road in Banknock, Falkirk, on Friday afternoon.
“Formal identification has yet to take place however the family of missing man Cole Cooper, 19, has been informed,” the force said in a statement. “Enquiries remain ongoing to establish the full circumstances.”
Officers said the last confirmed sighting was at 8.45pm on the A803 at its intersection with Cumbernauld Road, Longcroft, on 7 May.
Speaking to Sky News Breakfast earlier this week, his brother Connor said their family felt “lost” and described his sibling’s disappearance as “hell… for all of us”.
He described him going missing as “very much out of character” and said that even if his brother wanted some space or alone time, he would have notified family or friends beforehand – and would never “put his younger siblings through this”.
His mother Wendy Stewart described the situation as “total heartache” and was afraid he may have been “picked up by a car”.
“Is it actually happening?” she said. “I have been wanting to wake up and it’s just been a big nightmare.”
Image: A missing poster near the last place Cole Cooper was seen
During the search, police visited more than 220 properties and trawled through around 1,000 hours of CCTV footage in a bid to find Mr Cooper.
Specialist resources from across the country were mobilised, including a helicopter and drones from the air support unit, as well as officers from the dive and marine unit.
The force previously indicated there was no suggestion of any criminality.
Arrests of migrants working illegally in the UK have increased by 51% in the year since the general election, after the government targeted restaurants, nail bars, and construction sites.
From 5 July 2024 – the day after Labour won the election – to 31 May 2025, 6,410 people have been arrested on suspicion of working illegally, according to Home Office figures.
This is a rise of 51% on the previous year when the Conservatives were in government, the department says.
As part of Labour’s Plan for Change, enforcement officials have made 9,000 visits to restaurants, nail bars, and construction sites, among other premises, to root out those suspected of working without a visa – a 48% increase in activity during the previous year.
Video footage shows the moment 36 people were arrested at a construction site in Belfast‘s Titanic Quarter where enforcement officials uncovered people breaching their visa conditions and working in the UK having entered the country illegally.
Image: Enforcement officials arrest illegal workers in a nail bar in Belfast. Pic: Home Office
In Surrey last month, nine people were arrested at a caravan park after intelligence revealed it was being used for illegal delivery drivers.
In Bradford in March, a further nine people were arrested after officers identified a popular pick-up spot for illegal workers.
Image: A raid on a caravan in Surrey with suspected links to illegal workers. Pic: Home Office
People traffickers often trick migrants into deadly small boat crossings by promising they will be able to find work in the UK, when in reality, those arrive safely are instead forced into squalid conditions, for no or little money.
Employers are supposed to carry out right-to-work checks on all new employees who come from abroad – with those who fail to do so facing £60,000 fines per worker, director disqualifications, and prison sentences of up to five years.
Image: A suspect is guided into a van after arrests are made in Surrey. Pic: Home Office
Image: Immigration enforcement workers in Surrey. Pic: Home Office
30,000 returned to home countries
Alongside the arrests, since Labour came to power, almost 30,000 people who had no right to be in the UK have been returned to their home countries, according to Home Office data.
The government says it is also introducing tougher laws, extending right-to-work checks, and targeting particular sectors known to be linked to illegal workers.
Dame Angela Eagle, minister for border security and asylum, said: “For too long, employers have been able to take on and exploit migrants, with people allowed to arrive and work here illegally.
“This will no longer be tolerated on our watch. That’s why we are ramping up our enforcement activity and introducing tougher laws to finally get a grip of our immigration and asylum system.”
Eddy Montgomery, director of enforcement, compliance and crime for immigration enforcement, added: “Our work to tackle illegal working is vital in not only bringing the guilty to account, but also in protecting vulnerable people from exploitation.
“I’m incredibly proud of our enforcement teams across the country for their hard work, skill and cooperation on these often challenging but highly important operations.”