Connect with us

Published

on

Manchester United has confirmed its chief executive of two years, Richard Arnold, “has decided to step down” as part of a “management transition”.

The development was revealed shortly after Sky News reported that Mr Arnold would be replaced by the club’s general counsel, Patrick Stewart, on an interim basis.

The change is taking place as the club’s owners finalise the sale of a minority stake to the petrochemicals billionaire Sir Jim Ratcliffe.

Sir Jim Ratcliffe outside Old Trafford
Image:
Sir Jim Ratcliffe outside Old Trafford

The club’s statement to the New York Stock Exchange said that Mr Arnold, who has held roles at United for 16 years, would provide transitional support until the end of December.

Executive co-chairman, Joel Glazer, said: “I would like to thank Richard for his outstanding service to Manchester United over the past 16 years and wish him all the best for his future endeavours.

“We are fortunate to be able to call on the deep knowledge and experience of Patrick Stewart to provide interim stability and continuity as we embark on a search for a new permanent CEO.”

Mr Arnold said of his departure: “It has been an incredible privilege to serve this great football club for the past 16 years.

More from Business

“Through highs and lows, the constant has been the dedication of our employees and fans. I would like to thank all of them for their loyalty and commitment and wish everyone associated with the club the very best for the future.”

Neither the club nor Mr Arnold gave any reason for the decision but its statement suggested that it was of his own making.

One source told Sky’s City editor Mark Kleinman that Mr Stewart’s appointment as interim CEO would allow United’s new joint owners to identify the right long-term candidate to run the club.

Soccer Football - Carabao Cup - Third Round - Manchester United v Crystal Palace - Old Trafford, Manchester, Britain - September 26, 2023.General view of Manchester United fans outside the stadium before the match REUTERS/Peter Powell NO USE WITH UNAUTHORIZED AUDIO, VIDEO, DATA, FIXTURE LISTS, CLUB/LEAGUE LOGOS OR 'LIVE' SERVICES. ONLINE IN-MATCH USE LIMITED TO 45 IMAGES, NO VIDEO EMULATION. NO USE IN BETTING, GAMES OR SINGLE CLUB/LEAGUE/PLAYER PUBLICATIONS.
Image:
United fans have long been critical of the Glazer family’s tenure as the club’s owners

United is expected to confirm, within days, Sky News’ exclusive revelations that Sir Jim’s Ineos Sports is acquiring a 25% stake.

Kleinman revealed earlier this month that Sir Jim is to commit $300m (£245m) from his multibillion pound fortune to overhauling United’s ageing infrastructure, in addition to the roughly £1.3bn he will spend on acquiring the stake.

The funds will be financed by Sir Jim personally and will not add to Manchester United’s existing borrowings.

Reports in recent weeks have suggested that the billionaire will take immediate control of football matters at the club, alongside Ineos Sports colleagues including Sir Dave Brailsford, the former cycling supremo.

Many United fans have expressed disquiet at the prospect of Sir Jim buying a minority stake given that it paves the way for the Glazers’ continued control.

The family, who paid just under £800m to buy the club in 2005, has remained inscrutable throughout the process and has said nothing of substance to the NYSE since the process of engaging with prospective buyers kicked off.

Earlier iterations of Sir Jim’s offers for the club, which focused on gaining outright control, included put-and-call arrangements that would become exercisable three years after a takeover to enable him to buy out the remainder of the club’s shares.

The Monaco-based billionaire, who owns the Ligue 1 side Nice, pitched a restructured deal last month in an attempt to unblock the ongoing impasse over United’s future.

In addition to the competing bids from Sir Jim and Sheikh Jassim, the Glazers received several credible offers for minority stakes or financing to fund investment in the club.

The Glazers’ tenure has been dogged by controversy and protests, with the absence of a Premier League title since Sir Alex Ferguson’s retirement as manager in 2013 fuelling fans’ anger at the debt-fuelled nature of their takeover.

“Love United, Hate Glazers” has become a familiar refrain during their tenure, with supporters critical of a perceived lack of investment in the club, even as the owners have reaped large dividends as a result of its ability to generate sizeable profits.

Continue Reading

Business

UK economy shrank by 0.1% in October, official figures show

Published

on

By

UK economy shrank by 0.1% in October, official figures show

The UK economy contracted by 0.1% in October, according to official figures.

The surprise fall in gross domestic product (GDP) – a measure of economic output – comes after a similar unexpected 0.1% drop in September and 0% growth in August.

Economists polled by the Reuters news agency had predicted that October GDP would grow by 0.1%.

The figures, from the Office for National Statistics (ONS), represent more bad news for the chancellor over the state of the UK economy.

Commentators had warned that consumer spending was likely to be restrained in the run-up to November’s budget, amid concerns about the impact of Rachel Reeves’s potential measures on households and businesses.

UK GDP has also been hit hard by disruption to car production caused by a cyber attack on Jaguar Land Rover.

The ONS said that during October, the UK’s services sector fell by 0.3%, while construction was down 0.6%. However, production grew by 1.1%.

It found that GDP on a rolling three-month basis, to October, also fell by 0.1%.

Read more from Sky News:
Appeal court delay for first Post Office Capture case

Mail owner lines up NatWest to help fund Telegraph bid
Burger King UK lands new backing

The ONS’s director of economic statistics, Liz McKeown, said: “Within production, there was continued weakness in car manufacturing, with the industry only making a slight recovery in October from the substantial fall in output seen in the previous month.

“Overall services showed no growth in the latest three months, continuing the recent trend of slowing in this sector. There were falls in wholesale and scientific research, offset by growth in rental and leasing and retail.”

Interest rate cut ‘nailed on’

Commentators also blamed rumours and leaks in the run-up to the budget for dampening demand.

Scott Gardner, from banking giant JP Morgan, said that despite expectations of a return to growth, the economy continued to “battle a period of inconsistent productivity”.

He added: “Speculation about potential budget announcements had a numbing effect on consumers and businesses in the lead up to the chancellor’s speech at the end of November.”

Suren Thiru, from the Institute of Chartered Accountants, said the data increased the likelihood of the Bank of England cutting interest rates next week.

He said: “With these downbeat figures likely to further fuel fears among rate-setters over the health of the UK economy, a December policy loosening looks nailed on, particularly given the likely deflationary impact of the budget.”

Figures ‘extremely concerning’

Barret Kupelian, chief economist at PwC, said that while some of the blame could be attributed to the Jaguar Land Rover cyber attack, “the bigger story is that speculation around the autumn budget kept households and businesses in wait-and-see mode”.

He added: “Given the timing of the budget, November’s GDP print is likely to look similarly subdued before any post-budget effects start to show up.”

Sir Mel Stride, the Tory shadow chancellor, described the figures as “extremely concerning”, claiming they were “a direct result of Labour’s economic mismanagement”.

A Treasury spokesperson said: “We are determined to defy the forecasts on growth and create good jobs, so everyone is better off, while also helping us invest in better public services.”

Continue Reading

Business

Appeal court delay for first Capture case as Post Office requests extension

Published

on

By

Appeal court delay for first Capture case as Post Office requests extension

The first-ever Capture case has been delayed at the Court of Appeal as the Post Office asks for an extension to respond, Sky News has learned.

Pat Owen, a former sub postmistress who has since passed away, was convicted of stealing in 1998 based on evidence from computer software.

The system, known as Capture, was used in up to 2,500 branches in the 1990s, before the infamous Horizon system was introduced.

Hundreds of sub-postmasters were wrongfully convicted between 1999 and 2015 as part of the Horizon scandal.

Earlier this year, Sky News unearthed a 1998 report showing the Capture software was also faulty.

That report, commissioned by the solicitors acting for Mrs Owen in 1998, was served on the Post Office and may never have been seen by the jury in her case.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘All we want is her name cleared’

Ms Owen was given a suspended prison sentence and fought to clear her name subsequently – but died in 2003.

More on Post Office Scandal

Her case was referred by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) to the Court of Appeal in October.

The Post Office had until 5 December to respond to papers put forward by Mrs Owen’s defence team but they have now asked for an extension until 30 January.

Ms Owen’s daughter, Juliet Shardlow, described the family’s suffering at the lengthening wait.

“I need to emphasise the profound impact the ongoing delay is having on our family,” she said.

“The continuous uncertainty only compounds our heartache, stress, and anxiety.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Alan Bates: New redress scheme ‘half-baked’

“It has become the last thing I think about before I go to sleep and the first thing when I wake up.

“We have waited 27 years for justice, and this additional wait feels never-ending.”

Ms Owen’s case is the first time a conviction based on Capture has reached the Court of Appeal since the scandal was exposed.

Read more from Sky News:
Corporate manslaughter charges considered in Post Office scandal
21 ‘Capture’ cases investigated for miscarriages of justice

Lawyers have said that if Ms Owen is exonerated posthumously, it may “speed up” the handling of others.

CCRC chair Dame Vera Baird also told Sky News in the summer it could be a “touchstone case” for other victims.

The CCRC is also continuing to investigate around 30 other “pre-Horizon” convictions.

A Post Office spokesperson said: “We have sought an extension of time to fully consider and respond to the CCRC’s Statement of Reasons in Ms Owen’s case.

“We deeply regret the impact our request for further time will have on Ms Owen’s family.

“We have a duty to carefully consider the evidence presented in the Statement of Reasons submitted by the CCRC and do everything we can to fully assist the Court when it considers this conviction.”

Meanwhile, the first-ever redress scheme for victims of the Post Office Capture IT scandal was launched this autumn.

The Capture Redress Scheme will provide payments of up to £300,000, and more in “exceptional” cases, to former postmasters who suffered financial losses.

Continue Reading

Business

Daily Mail owner lines up NatWest to help fund £500m Telegraph bid

Published

on

By

Daily Mail owner lines up NatWest to help fund £500m Telegraph bid

The owner of the Daily Mail is lining up one of Britain’s biggest high street lenders to help bankroll its £500m deal to buy The Daily Telegraph.

Sky News has learnt that DMGT has turned to its long-standing bank, NatWest Group, to lend a substantial chunk of the Telegraph purchase price.

City sources said on Thursday that discussions between the two were still in progress.

It was unclear how much of the consideration NatWest might finance, or how much equity DMGT intended to put up as part of the deal.

Money latest: Urgent warning over tumble dryers

Last month’s announcement that DMGT was in exclusive talks to buy Telegraph Media Group achieved a long-standing ambition of the Mail proprietor, Lord Rothermere, to own the rival right-leaning newspaper.

However, the transaction still needs to be formally submitted to the culture secretary, Lisa Nandy, who has effectively asked for details of the proposed deal by early next week.

More from Money

Lengthy inquiries by the Competition and Markets Authority and Ofcom are also expected to follow.

DMGT’s exclusivity period came within days of a consortium led by RedBird Capital Partners abandoning its own deal amid opposition from within the Telegraph newsroom.

NatWest’s position as a principal lender would, in theory, be advantageous to Lord Rothermere, who will not want to be reliant on overseas financing for the deal.

The DMGT owner had originally intended to acquire a minority stake of just under 10% in the Telegraph titles as part of the RedBird-led transaction.

A previous deal proposed by a consortium including RedBird and the Abu Dhabi state-owned investment firm IMI collapsed after the government changed the law regarding foreign state ownership of national newspapers.

“I have long admired the Daily Telegraph,” Lord Rothermere said last month.

“My family and I have an enduring love of newspapers and for the journalists who make them.

“The Daily Telegraph is Britain’s largest and best quality broadsheet newspaper, and I have grown up respecting it.

“It has a remarkable history and has played a vital role in shaping Britain’s national debate over many decades.”

If the deal is completed, it would bring the Telegraph newspapers under the same stable of ownership as titles including Metro, The i Paper and New Scientist.

DMGT said in November that it planned “to invest substantially in TMG with the aim of accelerating its international expansion”.

“It will focus particularly on the USA, where the Daily Mail is already successful, with established editorial and commercial operations.”

NatWest declined to comment.

Continue Reading

Trending