Connect with us

Published

on

People using their mobile phones outside the offices of Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, in King’s Cross, London.

Joshua Bratt | Pa Images | Getty Images

Lauren Wagner knows a lot about disinformation. Heading into the 2020 U.S. presidential election, she worked at Facebook, focusing on information integrity and overseeing products designed to make sure content was moderated and fact-checked.

She can’t believe what’s she’s seeing now. Since war erupted last month between Israel and Hamas, the constant deluge of misinformation and violent content spreading across the internet is hard for her to comprehend. Wagner left Facebook parent Meta last year, and her work in trust and safety feels like it was from a prior era.

“When you’re in a situation where there’s such a large volume of visual content, how do you even start managing that when it’s like long video clips and there’s multiple points of view?” Wagner said. “This idea of live-streaming terrorism, essentially at such a deep and in-depth scale, I don’t know how you manage that.”

The problem is even more pronounced because Meta, Google parent Alphabet, and X, formerly Twitter, have all eliminated jobs tied to content moderation and trust and safety as part of broader cost-cutting measures that began late last year and continued through 2023. Now, as people post and share out-of-context videos of previous wars, fabricated audio in news clips, and graphic videos of terrorist acts, the world’s most trafficked websites are struggling to keep up, experts have noted.

As the founder of a new venture capital firm, Radium Ventures, Wagner is in the midst of raising her first fund dedicated solely to startup founders working on trust and safety technologies. She said many more platforms that think they are “fairly innocuous” are seeing the need to act.

“Hopefully this is shining a light on the fact that if you house user-generated content, there’s an opportunity for misinformation, for charged information or potentially damaging information to spread,” Wagner said.

In addition to the traditional social networks, the highly polarized nature of the Israel-Hamas war affects internet platforms that weren’t typically known for hosting political discussions but now have to take precautionary measures. Popular online messaging and discussion channels such as Discord and Telegram could be exploited by terrorist groups and other bad actors who are increasingly using multiple communication services to create and conduct their propaganda campaigns.

A Discord spokesperson declined to comment. Telegram didn’t respond to a request for comment.

A demonstrator places flowers on white-shrouded body bags representing victims in the Israel-Hamas conflict, in front of the White House in Washington, DC, on November 15, 2023.

Mandel Ngan | AFP | Getty Images

On kids gaming site Roblox, thousands of users recently attended pro-Palestinian protests held within the virtual world. That has required the company to closely monitor for posts that violate its community standards, a Roblox spokesperson told CNBC in a statement.

Roblox has thousands of moderators and “automated detection tools in place to monitor,” the spokesperson said, adding that the site “allows for expressions of solidarity,” but does “not allow for content that endorses or condones violence, promotes terrorism or hatred against individuals or groups, or calls for supporting a specific political party.”

When it comes to looking for talent in the trust and safety space, there’s no shortage. Many of Wagner’s former colleagues at Meta lost their jobs and remain dedicated to the cause.

One of her first investments was in a startup called Cove, which was founded by former Meta trust and safety staffers. Cove is among a handful of emerging companies developing technology that they can sell to organizations, following an established enterprise software model. Other Meta veterans have recently started Cinder and Sero AI to go after the same general market.

“It adds some more coherence to the information ecosystem,” Wagner, who is also a senior advisor at the Responsible Innovation Labs nonprofit, said regarding the new crop of trust and safety tools. “They provide some level of standardized processes across companies where they can access tools and guidelines to be able to manage user-generated content effectively.”

‘Brilliant people out there’

It’s not just ex-Meta staffers who recognize the opportunity.

The founding team of startup TrustLab came from companies including Google, Reddit and TikTok parent ByteDance. And the founders of Intrinsic previously worked on trust and safety-related issues at Apple and Discord.

For the TrustCon conference in July, tech policy wonks and other industry experts headed to San Francisco to discuss the latest hot topics in online trust and safety, including their concerns about the potential societal effects of layoffs across the industry.

Several startups showcased their products in the exhibition hall, promoting their services, talking to potential clients and recruiting talent. ActiveFence, which describes itself as a “leader in providing Trust & Safety solutions to protect online platforms and their users from malicious behavior and content,” had a booth at the conference. So did Checkstep, a content moderation platform.

Cove also had an exhibit at the event.

“I think the cost-cutting has definitely obviously affected the labor markets and the hiring market,” said Cove CEO Michael Dworsky, who co-founded the company in 2021 after more than three years at Facebook. “There are a bunch of brilliant people out there that we can now hire.”

Cove has developed software to help manage a company’s content policy and review process. The management platform works alongside various content moderation systems, or classifiers, to detect issues such as harassment, so businesses can protect their users without needing expensive engineers to develop the code. The company, which counts anonymous social media apps YikYak and Sidechat as customers, says on its website that Cove is “the solution we wish we had at Meta.”

“When Facebook started really investing in trust and safety, it’s not like there were tools on the market that they could have bought,” said Cove technology chief Mason Silber, who previously spent seven years at Facebook. “They didn’t want to build, they didn’t want to become the experts. They did it more out of necessity than desire, and they built some of the most robust, trusted safety solutions in the world.”

A Meta spokesperson declined to comment for this story.

We can't trust Instagram with our teens over child safety: Former Instagram consultant Arturo Béjar

Wagner, who left Meta in mid-2022 after about two and a half years at the company, said that earlier content moderation was more manageable than it is today, particularly with the current Middle East crisis. In the past, for instance, a trust and safety team member could analyze a picture and determine whether it contained false information through a fairly routine scan, she said.

But the quantity and speed of photos and videos being uploaded and the ability of people to manipulate details, especially as generative AI tools become more mainstream, has created a whole new hassle.

Social media sites are now dealing with a swarm of content related to two simultaneous wars, one in the Middle East and another between Russia and Ukraine. On top of that, they have to get ready for the 2024 presidential election in less than a year. Former President Donald Trump, who is under criminal indictment in Georgia for alleged interference in the 2020 election, is the front-runner to become the Republican nominee.

Manu Aggarwal, a partner at research firm Everest Group, said trust and safety is among the fastest-growing segments of a part of the market called business process services, which includes the outsourcing of various IT-related tasks and call centers.

By 2024, Everest Group projects the overall business process services market to be about $300 billion, with trust and safety representing about $11 billion of that figure. Companies such as Accenture and Genpact, which offer outsourced trust and safety services and contract workers, currently capture the bulk of spending, primarily because Big Tech companies have been “building their own” tools, Aggarwal said.

As startups focus on selling packaged and easy-to-use technology to a wider swath of clients, Everest Group practice director Abhijnan Dasgupta estimates that spending on trust and safety tools could be between $750 million and $1 billion by the end of 2024, up from $500 million in 2023. This figure is partly dependent on whether companies adopt more AI services, thus requiring them to potentially abide by emerging AI regulations, he added.

Tech investors are circling the opportunity. Venture capital firm Accel is the lead investor in Cinder, a two-year-old startup whose founders helped build much of Meta’s internal trust and safety systems and also worked on counterterrorism efforts.

“What better team to solve this challenge than the one that played a major role in defining Facebook’s Trust and Safety operations?” Accel’s Sara Ittelson said in a press release announcing the financing in December.

Ittelson told CNBC that she expects the trust and safety technology market to grow as more platforms see the need for greater protection and as the social media market continues to fragment.

New content policy regulations have also spurred investment in the area.

The European Commission is now requiring large online platforms with big audiences in the EU to document and detail how they moderate and remove illegal and violent content on their services or face fines of up to 6% of their annual revenue.

Cinder and Cove are promoting their technologies as ways that online businesses can streamline and document their content moderation procedures to comply with the EU’s new regulations, called the Digital Services Act.

‘Frankenstein’s monster’

In the absence of specialized tech tools, Cove’s Dworsky said, many companies have tried to customize Zendesk, which sells customer support software, and Google Sheets to capture their trust and safety policies. That can result in a “very manual, unscalable approach,” he said, describing the process for some companies as “rebuilding and building a Frankenstein’s monster.”

Still, industry experts know that even the most effective trust and safety technologies aren’t a panacea for a problem as big and seemingly uncontrollable as the spread of violent content and disinformation. According to a survey published last week by the Anti-Defamation League, 70% of respondents said that on social media, they’d been exposed to at least one of several types of misinformation or hate related to the Israel-Hamas conflict.

As the problem expands, companies are dealing with the constant struggle over determining what constitutes free speech and what crosses the line into unlawful, or at least unacceptable, content.

Alex Goldenberg, the lead intelligence analyst at the Network Contagion Research Institute, said that in addition to doing their best to maintain integrity on their sites, companies should be honest with their users about their content moderation efforts.

“There’s a balance that is tough to strike, but it is strikable,” he said. “One thing I would recommend is transparency at a time where third-party access and understanding to what is going on at scale on social platforms is what is needed.”

Discord CEO Jason Citron: 15% of our workforce is dedicated to trust and safety

Noam Bardin, the former CEO of navigation firm Waze, now owned by Google, founded the social news-sharing and real-time messaging service Post last year. Bardin, who’s from Israel, said he’s been frustrated with the spread of misinformation and disinformation since the war began in October.

“The whole perception of what’s going on is fashioned and managed through social media, and this means there’s a tremendous influx of propaganda, disinformation, AI-generated content, bringing content from other conflicts into this conflict,” Bardin said.

Bardin said that Meta and X have struggled to manage and remove questionable posts, a challenge that’s become even greater with the influx of videos.

At Post, which is most similar to Twitter, Bardin said he’s been incorporating “all these moderation tools, automated tools and processes” since his company’s inception. He uses services from ActiveFence and OpenWeb, which are both based in Israel.

“Basically, anytime you comment or you post on our platform, it goes through it,” Bardin said regarding the trust and safety software. “It looks at it from an AI perspective to understand what it is and to rank it in terms of harm, pornography, violence, etc.”

Post is an example of the kinds of companies that trust and safety startups are focused on. Active online communities with live-chatting services have also emerged on video game sites, online marketplaces, dating apps and music streaming sites, opening them up to potentially harmful content from users.

Brian Fishman, co-founder of Cinder, said “militant organizations” rely on a network of services to spread propaganda, including platforms like Telegram, and sites such as Rumble and Vimeo, which have less advanced technology than Facebook.

Representatives from Rumble and Vimeo didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Fishman said customers are starting to see trust and safety tools as almost an extension of their cybersecurity budgets. In both cases, companies have to spend money to prevent possible disasters.

“Some of it is you’re paying for insurance, which means that you’re not getting full return on that investment every day,” Fishman said. “You’re investing a little bit more during black times, so that you got capability when you really, really need it, and this is one of those moments where companies really need it.”

WATCH: Lawmakers ask social media and AI companies to crack down on misinformation

Lawmakers ask social media and AI companies to crack down on misinformation

Continue Reading

Technology

Google reverses policy telling workers not to discuss DOJ antitrust case

Published

on

By

Google reverses policy telling workers not to discuss DOJ antitrust case

Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai meets with Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk in Warsaw, Poland, on February 13, 2025.

Klaudia Radecka | Nurphoto | Getty Images

Google has reversed a policy forbidding employees from discussing its antitrust woes following a settlement with workers. 

The company sent a notice to U.S. employees last week saying it rescinded “the rule requesting that workers refrain from commenting internally or externally about the on-going antitrust lawsuit filed against Google by the U.S. Department of Justice,” according to correspondence viewed by CNBC.

Google settled with the Alphabet Workers Union, which represents company employees and contractors, according to the U.S. National Labor Relations Board, or NLRB. The settlement and policy reversal mark a major victory for Google staffers, who have seen increased censorship on subjects such as politics, litigation and defense contracts by the search giant since 2019. 

The U.S. Department of Justice filed an antitrust lawsuit against Google in 2020, alleging that the company has kept its share of the general search market by creating strong barriers to entry and a feedback loop that sustained its dominance.

Google said it “will not announce or maintain overbroad rules or policies that restrict your right to comment, internally or externally, about whether and/or how the on-going antitrust lawsuit filed against Google by the U.S. Department of Justice may impact your terms and conditions of employment,” according to last week’s notice. 

The policy change was first reported by The New York Times

The reversal comes as Google and the DOJ prepare to return to the courtroom for their scheduled remedies trial on April 21. The DOJ has said it is considering structural remedies, including breaking up Google’s Chrome web browser, which it argues gives Google an unfair advantage in the search market.

A U.S. District Court judge ruled in August that Google illegally held a monopoly in the search market. Google said it would appeal the decision. The DOJ doubled down on its calls for a breakup in a March filing.

Following the August ruling, Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs, sent a companywide email directing employees to “refrain from commenting on this case, both internally and externally.”

Shortly after, the Alphabet Workers Union filed an unfair labor practice charge against Google with the NLRB. The union alleged that Walker’s message was an “overly broad directive” and said that a breakup could impact workers’ roles. The NLRB in March ruled that Google must allow workers to speak on such topics.

Google’s settlement states that the National Labor Relations Act gives employees the right to form, join or assist a union. It notes that Google is not rescinding its prior clarification that states employees may not speak on behalf of Google on this matter without approval from the company. The settlement also adds that Google will not interfere with, restrain or coerce workers in the exercise of their rights.

Despite the settlement, spokesperson Courtenay Mencini said Google did not agree with the NLRB’s ruling. 

“To avoid lengthy litigation, we agreed to remind employees that they have the right to talk about their employment, as they’ve always been free to and regularly do,” Mencini said in a statement to CNBC.

The settlement by Google comes at a “crucial moment” ahead of the remedies trial, the Alphabet Worker’s Union said Monday. 

“We think the potential remedies from this trial could have impact on our wages, working conditions and terms of employment,” said Stephen McMurtry, communications chair of the Alphabet Workers Union-CWA, told CNBC.

WATCH: Google’s cloud strategy amid tariff turmoil

Google's cloud strategy amid tariff turmoil

Continue Reading

Technology

Apple has best day since 1998 on Trump’s 90-day tariff pause

Published

on

By

Apple has best day since 1998 on Trump's 90-day tariff pause

Apple CEO Tim Cook inspects the new iPhone 16 during an Apple special event at Apple headquarters on September 09, 2024 in Cupertino, California. 

Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

Apple shares skyrocketed 15% on Wednesday after President Donald Trump announced a 90-day pause on his administration’s “reciprocal tariffs,” which would have affected the company’s production locations in Vietnam, India, and Thailand.

The rally added over $400 billion to Apple’s market cap, which now stands just under $3 trillion. It was Apple’s best day since January 1998, when late founder Steve Jobs was the interim CEO and three years before the company unveiled the first iPod. At the time, Apple’s market cap was close to $3 billion.

Apple has been the most prominent name to get whacked by Trump’s tariffs. Before Wednesday, it was on its worst four-day trading stretch since 2000. Investors worried about Apple’s outlook because the company still makes the majority of its revenue from selling physical devices, which need to be imported into the U.S.

Most of Apple’s iPhones and other hardware products are still made in China, which was not exempted from tariffs on Wednesday. In fact, Trump increased tariffs on China to 125% on Wednesday, up from 54%.

China issued an 84% tariff on U.S. goods this week, raising the possibility that Apple could get caught up in a trade war and lose ground in China, its third-largest market by sales.

Apple has worked to diversify its supply chain to lessen reliance on China in recent years.

On Wednesday, tariffs on Vietnam were reduced from 46% to 10%, and tariffs on India were cut 26% to 10%, which raises the possibility that Apple will be able to serve a large percentage of its U.S. customers from factories outside of China with lower tariffs.

Stocks skyrocketed across the board on Wednesday after Trump announced the tariff pause. The Nasdaq Composite climbed over 12%, its second-best day ever.

Apple hasn’t commented publicly on Trump’s tariffs, but CEO Tim Cook will likely address the topic on an earnings call on May 1.

WATCH: Apple falls more than 20% in four days

Apple falls more than 20% in 4 days as China tariffs loom

Continue Reading

Technology

Dot-com bust, 1987 crash had massive relief rallies similar to Wednesday’s pop

Published

on

By

Dot-com bust, 1987 crash had massive relief rallies similar to Wednesday's pop

The Nasdaq Marketsite is seen during morning trading on April 7, 2025 in New York City. 

Michael M. Santiago | Getty Images

Every bear market has days like this.

The Nasdaq soared 12% on Wednesday, the second-best day on record for the tech-heavy index and its sharpest rally since January 2001, which was the middle of the dot-com crash.

During the financial crisis in October 2008, the Nasdaq enjoyed two of its best five days ever. The other two came as the tech bubble was bursting. The index’s sixth-best day since its beginning in 1971 came on March 13, 2020, as the Covid pandemic was hitting the U.S.

Of the 25 best days for the Nasdaq, including Wednesday, 22 took place during the dot-com collapse, the 2008-09 financial crisis or the early days of Covid. One occurred on Oct. 21, 1987, two days after Black Monday. The other was in November 2022.

Call it a dead-cat bounce, a relief rally or short covering. It’s a familiar reaction during the worst of times for Wall Street.

Be prepared for plenty more volatility.

The worst month on record for the Nasdaq was October 1987, when the index plunged 27%. Second to that was a 23% drop in November 2000. In March 2020, the Nasdaq sank 10%. It’s still down 1% this month just after closing out its worst quarter since 2022.

President Donald Trump sparked the Wednesday bounce when he dropped new tariff rates on imports from most U.S. trade partners to 10% for 90 days to allow trade negotiations with those countries. The president’s social media post lifted optimism that levies would be less severe than expected and immediately boosted a market that’s been hammered since Trump rolled out his sweeping tariff plan last week.

Wealthy Trump donors and business leaders, including hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, Home Depot co-founder Ken Langone and billionaire investor Leon Cooperman have weighed in with hefty criticism of Trump’s tariffs. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said earlier on Wednesday that the tariffs will likely lead to a recession, after BlackRock CEO Larry Fink said Monday at an event in New York that, “Most CEOs I talk to would say we are probably in a recession right now.”

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk attends a cabinet meeting held by U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House on March 24, 2025.

Win McNamee | Getty Images

Tesla CEO Elon Musk, the world’s richest person and one of Trump’s closest confidantes in the White House, spent the early part of this week slamming Peter Navarro, Trump’s top trade advisor, calling him a “moron” and “dumber than a sack of bricks.”

Musk’s electric vehicle company has gotten pummeled of late, tumbling 22% in the four prior trading sessions after suffering its worst quarter since 2022. The stock soared 23% on Wednesday, its second-best day on record.

The big difference between the current market tumult and the downturns in 1987, 2000-2001, 2008 and 2020 is that many investors say this one was easily avoidable and, potentially, can be reversed based on what the president decides to do.

“What Trump unveiled Wednesday is stupid, wrong, arrogantly extreme, ignorant trade-wise and addressing a non-problem with misguided tools,” investor Ken Fisher wrote in a post on X on Monday, referring to last week’s announcement. “Yet, as near as I can tell it will fade and fail and the fear is bigger than the problem, which from here is bullish.”

Trying to predict Trump’s next move is a fool’s errand.

On Sunday evening the president told reporters that he’s not trying to push the market down, “but sometimes you have to take medicine to fix something.” He stressed the importance of fixing the country’s trade deficit with China, and said “unless we solve that problem, I’m not going to make a deal.”

The president is keeping his hard line on China, at least for now. He said on Wednesday that he was raising the tariff on China higher, to 125%. All other countries would go back to the 10% baseline tariff rate as negotiations take place.

Recession risk is higher but it won't be as deep or linger, says DWS Group's Bianco

Prior to his latest pronouncement, economic fears had spilled into the bond market, raising concerns that higher interest rates would create further problems for consumers at the worst possible time. The 10-year Treasury note yield, which helps decide rates on mortgages, credit card debt and auto loans, spiked overnight to 4.51% after hitting 3.9% last week. It’s currently at 4.38%.

As the tech industry’s megacap companies, which make up an outsized portion of the Nasdaq and the S&P 500, prepare to report quarterly results starting late this month, management teams will be looking for some visibility that can guide forecasts for the rest of the year and into 2026.

In the absence of more clarity, many of their plans will likely be on hold as they figure out how much existing and expected tariffs will raise costs and hurt revenue, and what they need to do to shore up supply chains.

Wednesday provided some relief. Investors like Ackman are celebrating.

“This was brilliantly executed by @realDonaldTrump,” Ackman wrote on X. “Textbook, Art of the Deal.”

In a note, Wedbush analyst Dan Ives called it “the news we and everyone on the Street was waiting for” after the president’s “self-inflicted Armageddon.”

But for companies that are in the crosshairs of Trump’s wavering policy decisions, all the uncertainty remains.

WATCH: Trump’s 90-day pause

Trump: The 90-day pause is on countries that didn't retaliate; China wants to make a deal

Continue Reading

Trending