The lawsuit, filed on Nov. 20, is based on the SEC’s allegations that Kraken has been operating as an unregistered exchange, broker, dealer and clearing agency and claims that it mixes customer assets with its own.
Since the news broke, the crypto community on social media, Kraken executives and prominent lawyers have been vocal in expressing their views on the SEC’s action.
Kraken founder Jesse Powell called the action an “assault on America” and called the SEC the U.S.’s “top decel.” Powell even warned other companies to depart the country.
On Nov. 21, the current CEO of Kraken, Dave Ripley, took to X (formerly Twitter) and said the company “strongly disagrees” with the SEC claims and plans to “vigorously” defend its position.
We strongly disagree with the SEC claims, stand firm in our view that we do not list securities, and plan to vigorously defend our position.
As we have seen before, the SEC argues that @krakenfx should “come in and register” with the agency, when there is no clear path to…
As an industry leader, we will stand up to these allegations and defend the crypto industry’s right to exist in the U.S.,” he said. Ripley said that the “lack of regulatory clarity in the U.S.” will only be resolved by Congressional action, adding:
“[We] will continue to support these efforts to bring clarity and certainty to the chaotic environment that has been created in the U.S.”
@GaryGensler is a despicable and dishonorable regulator. He knew that @krakenfx believed it was buying peace for the $30M. I know some people are critical of it’s choice to settle and pay the $30M. I wanted them to fight as well. But when you decide to fight, $30M takes you only… https://t.co/WeF4YTMfip
Deaton said he believes Gensler does not care about any of the parties involved — employees or investors — and said, “he’s a disgrace, and I can’t wait to see him go down.”
When asked if Kraken stands a chance against the SEC in court for round two, crypto criminal defense lawyer Carlo D’Angelo said he doesn’t see the odds being in the SEC’s favor.
“Similar arguments have been tried and failed in other circuits. The judge in the Kraken case will likely look closely at those decisions. Judges like consistent precedents—less chance of getting reversed on appeal.”
One X user responded by saying, “Just because the sec says something, [doesn’t] make it true! Get them to explain in detail to the court how to come on and register and operate normally.”
The SEC has received a lot of backlash for its harsh crackdown on crypto, particularly as the industry is operating in a legal system that has not yet provided clear legislation for cryptocurrencies and exchanges working with digital assets.
However, the crypto space also has allies on the regulatory side. U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis posted a response to the lawsuit, saying the SEC cannot continue to “rule by enforcement.”
The SEC cannot continue ruling by enforcement. My statement on the Kraken lawsuit below: pic.twitter.com/J3qhzU624N
She said crypto companies’ have made repeated attempts to receive guidance from the SEC but have seen no progress. U.S. Representative Tom Emmer is also backing the industry and recently proposed defunding the SEC’s crusade against crypto.
Doctors in England planning to go on strike in the run-up to Christmas are considering a new offer from the government to end the long-running dispute.
Resident doctors, formerly junior doctors, will walk out from 7am on 17 December until 7am on 22 December.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting has appealed to doctors to accept the government’s latest package.
The British Medical Association (BMA) said it will consult members by surveying them online on whether or not the deal from the government is enough to call off next week’s walkout.
The poll will close on Monday – just two days before the five-day strike is set to start.
Image: The number of people in hospital with flu in England is at a record level for this time of year. File pic: PA
The union said the new offer includes new legislation to ensure UK medical graduates are prioritised for speciality training roles.
It also includes an increase in the number of speciality training posts over the next three years – from 1,000 to 4,000 – with more to start in 2026.
Funding for mandatory Royal College examination and membership fees for resident doctors is also part of the deal.
It does not address resident doctors’ demand for a 26% salary rise over the next few years to make up for the erosion in their pay in real terms since 2008 – this is on top of a 28.9% increase they have had over the last three years.
Monterosa
This content is provided by Monterosa, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Monterosa cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Monterosa cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Monterosa cookies for this session only.
Mr Streeting warned a resident doctors’ strike over Christmas would have a “much different degree of risk” than previous walkouts.
It coincides with pressures facing the NHS, with health chiefs raising concerns over a “tidal wave” of illness and a “very nasty strain of flu”.
A new strain of the flu virus is thought to be much more infectious than previous strains and has already led to a record number of patients needing urgent hospital care.
The union’s mandate to strike is set to expire shortly, but Mr Streeting has offered to extend it to allow the medics to take action later in January if they reject his offer.
He called the union’s decision not to take it up “inexplicable”.
Last week, NHS England chief executive Sir Jim Mackey branded the decision by doctors to strike as “something that feels cruel” and which is “calculated to cause mayhem at a time when the service is really pulling all the stops out to try and avoid that and keep people safe”.
BMA resident doctors committee chair Dr Jack Fletcher said the latest government offer “is the result of thousands of resident doctors showing that they are prepared to stand up for their profession and its future”.
“It should not have taken strike action, but make no mistake: it was strike action that got us this far,” he said.
“We have forced the government to recognise the scale of the problems and to respond with measures on training numbers and prioritisation.
“However, this offer does not increase the overall number of doctors working in England and does nothing to restore pay for doctors, which remains well within the government’s power to do.”
Polish lawmakers have doubled down on crypto regulation rejected by President Karol Nawrocki, deepening tensions between the president and Prime Minister Donald Tusk.
Polska2050, part of the ruling coalition in the Sejm — Poland’s lower house of parliament — reintroduced the extensive crypto bill on Tuesday, just days after Nawrocki vetoed an identical bill.
The bill’s backers, including Adam Gomoła — a member of Poland2050 — called Bill 2050 an “improved” successor to the vetoed Bill 1424, but government spokesman Adam Szłapka reportedly declared that “not even a comma” had been changed.
The division over Poland’s crypto bill comes amid the rollout of the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) across member states ahead of a July 2026 compliance deadline for EU crypto businesses.
Critics say Bill 2050 is “exactly same bill”
The new version of Poland’s draft crypto bill provides an 84-page-long document that essentially replicates the original Bill 1424, aiming to designate the Polish Financial Supervision Authority as the country’s primary crypto asset market regulator.
He also mocked Tusk’s claim that the president’s earlier veto was tied to the alleged involvement of the “Russian mafia,” saying: “The bill is perfect, and anyone who thinks otherwise is funded by Putin.”
Government spokesman Szłapka reportedly claimed that Nawrocki will likely not veto the proposed bill this time, following a classified security briefing in parliament last week and “now has full knowledge” of the implications on national security.
The issue with MiCA: Local versus centralized EU oversight
Poland’s debate over its crypto bill sets an important precedent for implementing the EU-wide MiCA regulation, as the proposed legislation would place responsibility for market supervision on the local financial regulator.
The issue is particularly significant amid calls from some member states for more centralized MiCA supervision under the Paris-based European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA).
In October, the Bank of France urged the EU to give the ESMA direct supervisory powers, warning that a fragmented approach to oversight could undermine the bloc’s financial sovereignty.
Notably, Polish economist Krzysztof Piech — a prominent critic of Poland’s proposed crypto bill — has questioned the need for the local legislation, noting that MiCA protections will take effect in 2026.
While local reports suggest that Nawrocki may not veto the bill this time, there is also speculation that his office has been presented with an “alternative” draft aimed at creating more favorable market conditions. The proposed alternative is reportedly designed to align with the EU-wide MiCA framework and remove direct oversight from the local regulator.
Norway rules that a digital krone is unnecessary for now, highlighting its strong payment rails and the uncertain benefits of both retail and wholesale CBDCs.