Connect with us

Published

on

2.1K

Its happened. Its 28 Days Later, Night of the Living Dead, and The Walking Dead. Take your pick of any one of the other countless zombie apocalypse movies as your reference point, but lets say its happened and now you need to find the safest states in a zombie apocalypse to migrate to.

There are, of course, studies on this topic, but theyre flawed. Were going to look at why theyre flawed and then Im going to go into the details of my own study on this topic and go through the results that I find.

By the time youre done reading this article, youll have an understanding of my logic and Id appreciate it if you left a comment letting me know where your state ranked in my analysis and what if any criteria you think I should have included that I left out.

Alternatively, if youd rather watch than read, see my latest YouTube video on this very subject. Other Studies

Could a zombie apocalypse really happen? Its a reasonable question, but its a question that has different meanings depending on whos posing the question. Fans of zombie fiction post the question as a make believe, hypothetical imagination of a post-collapse world. Preppers, on the other hand, they often speak of the zombie apocalypse as a means to describe any type of situation where the collapse happens and everyone is fighting each other for survival. Its a safer way to describe what might one day come.

When people talk about the safest states in a zombie apocalypse, theyre often using criteria for the former, reanimated humans. The undead. That said, what makes one state safer in a zombie apocalypse also makes a state safer in a more real world collapse situation. A zombie reading zombie fiction.

Google best states for a zombie apocalypse and youll get a few results, most of which reference each other. There are a few problems with their analyses. For starters, theyre not studies performed by real preppers, so they just throw criteria at the study without really thinking it through.

The reason that they even do these studies is because their articles are whats called link magnets. Link magnets are articles that they hope other sites will link to. When that happens, it gives Google algorithm credibility to the site, making their sites rank higher in search results. And for them, it works. Unfortunately, theyre not reliable sources on this subject at all. CableTV

One of those studies is from the website Cable TV. Think about it, do you want to get your zombie apocalypse advice from CableTV.com?

You only need to look at their results to find out why their study is so flawed. Any prepper knows, California is about the WORST state in the nation to be in if you want to survive the apocalypse. If anything, the apocalypse will probably START in California.

Among the other worst states on their list include Maine, Vermont, and New Hampshire. Look, if youre going to call my home state of Maine out for anything, youd better know what youre talking about. California is a safer state to be in than Maine during a zombie apocalypse? Pfffft!

What exactly is their logic based on?

To find out where the best place to survive a zombie apocalypse was, we looked at the population density in each state, the gross receipts of farms per capita, and the states electricity percentage from solar. https://www.cabletv.com/horror/doomsday-usa

I can get behind using population density as a metric, but there are problems with using gross receipts of farms per capita and the states use of solar power. The problem with using gross receipts of farms per capita, and thats probably a big reason why they listed North Dakota as the safest, is because this favors massive farming states where gigantic, industrial scale farms plant single-season crops of one, maybe two types, and rely on RoundUp or other pesticides and commercial fertilizers to make the crops grow.

What happens when the seasons seeds dont get delivered? What happens when RoundUp doesnt roll out?

Give these farms one season without being resupplied with seeds and chemicals and the farms are done. No new seeds to plant. No fertilizer to spread. No fuel to run their massive farm equipment. No pesticides to kill insects. There are not nearly enough people in these states to farm those same lands by hand even if they could. They might be able to process enough food for themselves, but so will people in other states. Being in a large-scale farmland state doesnt offer you an inherent advantage over some other state OTHER THAN that you have low population density, which well account for separately.

Similarly, what does it matter if a state gets a lot of its power from solar? For a zombie apocalypse, it doesnt matter at all. The entire grid is going to go down. Replacement parts, skilled workers, that grid isnt going to come back up for a long time, it doesnt matter the source. And if energy resources did matter, better to favor states that have coal resources like Wyoming, West Virginia, or Pennsylvania. Or maybe the most-forested states, like Vermont, New Hampshire, and the most forested state of all Maine! Lawn Love

Another one of the top results is from a site called Lawn Love whose study covers the best cities in a zombie apocalypse. Because nothing screams zombie survival expertise like a lawn care business

Granted, this list is on the best cities for surviving a zombie apocalypse, but look at the results. Number one is Orlando, Florida? Seriously!? There are 2700 people per square mile in Orlando. Their criteria include the number of supermarkets per 100,000 residents note: this doesnt account for the many thousands of TOURISTS that would be trapped around all the Disney resorts. The zombie apocalypse could very well START at Disney.

The Lawn Love studys criteria includes the number of homes with basements, kitchens with plumbing, the number of hospitals, etc. If theres anything Night of the Living Dead taught is its DONT go into the basement in a zombie apocalypse! Also, hospitals will be the WORST places to be in a zombie apocalypse. Thats where people will go once infected.

As I said, these studies are FLAWED.

Miami, by the way, they rank as the 8th safest city, ahead of Boise, Idaho. I dont know about you, but if Im given a chance to survive the zombie apocalypse and I can choose between Miami and Boise it wouldnt be Miami. Safest States in a Zombie Apocalypse My Results

Given the poor logic Ive found in other studies, I set out to conduct my own analysis. Not everything the other studies used was flawed, and I salvaged some aspects of those studies while tossing other criteria aside.

So, this begs the question, what criteria should be used in determining the safest states to ride out a zombie apocalypse. My Methodology Population Density

Certainly, population density should be near the top. The fewer people there are, the fewer zombies there are. Simple. This alone isnt enough, because if we look just at that, Alaska wins by a landslide, but you want a balance. Trying to eke out post-collapse life by yourself in the Alaskan outback good luck with that. Too many people means too many zombies, but too few people means too few resources and partnerships for survival. Gun Ownership

Many studies on this topic also reference gun ownership as a determining factor. This is a good factor to consider. It doesnt account for ammunition per capita assuming that can be measured but its probably safe to assume that the more guns a state has the more ammo it has. Ammo will only last so long in a zombie apocalypse, however. Then it comes down to citizens ability to FIGHT. Residents Health

Residents health should also be considered. The more fit the citizens are, the faster they can run, and the longer they can fight. Access to Water

Food is an important factor, so we could look at the length of the growing season, and that would favor states in the south, but dont underestimate the power of winter in a zombie apocalypse. Yes, it will be cold, but have you ever seen a zombie tr to move in knee-deep snow? Winter would be the perfect time to walk the landscape in snowshoes and drive a spear tip into the head of the undead. For that reason, Im going to value longer summer and longer winter equally and discard growing season as a factor.

Whats more important than the availability of food is the availability of potable water. Nevada is the 9th least densely populated state, but what happens after the grid fails the tap water goes off, and youre left searching for fresh water to drink in Nevada. Good luck with that.

So, lets see what we get when we run these four factors: Population density Household firearm ownership rates Population health Water resources

I weigh them all equally. Results

Here I entered all 50 states and where they rank under each category. You can see the sources for my numbers here.

The lower the number the higher the rank, so if I total a states rank in each category and divide by four, I then have the states overall rank.

I sort the total score column from low to high and then we have the results!

Safest states in a zombie apocalypse: Alaska North Dakota Vermont Utah Idaho Wyoming Maine Montana South Dakota Minnesota

Alaska, despite my comments about how its remoteness can be a detriment, comes out as the safest state in a zombie apocalypse with a score of 10.5. Its health score was its worst score, but high rankings in population density, gun ownership and water availability compensated for it.

North Dakota, similar to the other study, tied with Vermont for the 2nd and 3rd spots, each with a score of 15. North Dakota was better in population density, but Vermont residents are much healthier, the healthiest in the nation.

The fourth safest state, with a score of 16.5, is Utah where the health of its residents helped push it into the top 10.

Idaho and Wyoming tie for the fifth and sixth spots with a score of 16.75. Wyoming is very rural with many gun owners. Idaho came out a bit ahead with water and health.

The seventh and eighth spots are a tie between Maine and Montana, each with a score of 17.25. Maine was rather well-balanced across all four categories. Montana did well in population density and gun ownership.

Ninth place, with a score of 19, goes to South Dakota. Again, low population density and high gun ownership rates pushed it up the safest state list.

Rounding out the top ten is Minnesota, with a score of 19.75. Average ratings in most categories except for health, where it ranks seventh in the nation. Safest StatesPopulation DensityGun OwnershipHealth RankWater ResourcesState ScoreAlaska13271110.5North Dakota410143215Vermont201612315Utah112352716.5Idaho74164016.75Wyoming22194416.75Maine1322211317.25Montana31244117.25South Dakota59253719Minnesota213471719.75Oregon1215223120Wisconsin262823921.5Hawaii38473222.5Washington293591923New Hampshire303662223.5Louisiana251349823.75Nebraska829174625Colorado1430104825.5Virginia3732151825.5Alabama248472526Massachusetts48502426Michigan333832126Mississippi197502826Kansas1019294726.25Arkansas176483526.5Oklahoma1611463627.25Connecticut474541427.5Nevada921354527.5Iowa1533204327.75Maryland464218527.75South Carolina3217422027.75New York4446111228.25North Carolina3626361528.25Rhode Island494813328.25West Virginia225454228.5California4043122129Kentucky2812433329New Jersey504981029.25Georgia3418402629.5New Mexico625375029.5Texas2727343029.5Missouri2320393930.25Arizona1824314930.5Delaware454130630.5Florida434033730.75Tennessee3114443430.75Illinois3944262433.25Ohio4139381633.5Pennsylvania4237282934Indiana3531413836.25The complete results of the study I conducted.

Sources of data: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_and_territories_of_the_United_States_by_population_density https://www.concealedcarry.com/firearms-ownership/which-states-have-the-most-gun-owners/ https://selecthealth.org/blog/2017/01/healthiest-states-report https://rlist.io/l/50-u-s-states-highest-water-to-land-ratio Worst States in a Zombie Apocalypse

The absolute worst states to survive a zombie apocalypse using this methodology goes to Indiana. Sorry, hoosiers, youre all gonna die. Pennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois, Tennessee, and yes, even Florida, you are all in tough shape as well.

Is the criteria I used to rank the states ideal? I dont know, but I think its better than what some other states did. There would be exceptions in every state, of course. Southern California is going to be worse off than Northern California, for example. Rural Pennsylvania will fare better than the Philadelphia area. I have years worth of experience slaying zombies. Ill survive the zombie apocalypse will you!?

Those are my thoughts. Sorry if your state didnt rank as highly as you may have liked, but hey not everyone can survive the zombie apocalypse. In fact, most wont.

Stay safe out there.

Continue Reading

Sports

Cristobal rues mistakes as Miami’s CFP hopes dim

Published

on

By

Cristobal rues mistakes as Miami's CFP hopes dim

DALLAS — For the second straight season, Miami coach Mario Cristobal lamented the “self-inflicted” mistakes that cost the Hurricanes in a conference game in November.

This time, it was a 26-20 overtime loss to SMU on Saturday, a defeat that significantly damaged Miami’s ACC championship and College Football Playoff hopes as the Hurricanes dropped their second ACC game in three weeks and fell to 6-2.

Miami had 12 penalties for 96 yards — including an unsportsmanlike conduct call against defensive end Marquise Lightfoot on the final drive in regulation, when he hit quarterback Kevin Jennings after whistles had blown for a Miami timeout. That penalty helped SMU get into Miami territory and ultimately kick a 38-yard field goal to send the game into overtime.

Carson Beck threw an interception on the goal line on the first possession of overtime, and SMU won it when T.J. Harden scored from 1 yard out, as the SMU faithful stormed the field and took down one goalpost to celebrate the Mustangs’ first home win against an AP top 10 opponent since 1974.

Miami, meanwhile, saw its playoff chances drop to 9%, according to the Allstate Playoff Predictor.

“We didn’t take care of business, and that’s completely on us,” Cristobal said. “If you’re raised the right way, and you got the right stuff inside you, you go right back to work. You don’t know how things shake out. This is certainly a wild college football season, and the focus has to be on us taking care of our business.

“You always give credit to the opponent because that’s a good football team. When you make that many mistakes, it’s on everybody in the organization. You allow yourself to be put in a position where you can get beat, and that’s what happened today.”

Among the many Miami penalties were multiple false starts on offense — something that has become an issue over the past month. Cristobal said SMU was mimicking the Hurricanes’ cadence, and that was problematic for his linemen.

“It’s the things that we’ve made a point of emphasis. but obviously we’re not getting a result so we’re not coaching it, teaching it, and executing it well enough,” Cristobal said. “We had some issues with their stems and movements. We try to report when our cadence is being mimicked, but that didn’t get any traction. That happens in football, so no excuses. There’s not enough discipline as it relates to just holding our water and not jumping.”

As for the penalty on Lightfoot, Cristobal said Miami had called timeout because SMU had fourth-and-9 and the Hurricanes wanted to see how it would be lined up. But Lightfoot never heard the whistle stopping play and continued going toward Jennings.

“He’s just playing football,” Cristobal said. “I’m not sure why that’s called in such a critical situation when we’re trying to stop play, right? It’s really loud. I imagine people should step in and prevent players from moving forward and finishing a play.”

Jennings ended up throwing for a career-high 365 yards with two total touchdowns — despite tweaking an ankle injury that has bothered him for the bulk of the season. He left the game for several plays in the first half before returning, and he was a difference-maker as SMU rallied to win.

The Mustangs could not run the ball for the entire game until overtime came around and they wore down a deflated Miami defense.

SMU coach Rhett Lashlee, who signed a two-year extension earlier Saturday to make him one of the highest-paid coaches in the country, said, “This is a big win for our program and what we’re trying to build.”

As for Miami, it is another season filled with missed opportunities. Last year, Miami was undefeated headed into November and lost two of its final four games — one to Georgia Tech and one to Syracuse. Defensive breakdowns in the final month of the season cost the Hurricanes, so they made a change at defensive coordinator.

But the bulk of the issues on Saturday were on offense, as Miami struggled to move the ball with consistency — thanks in large part to the penalties. With CJ Daniels out, Miami relied on freshman Malachi Toney in the passing game but posed little threat vertically despite playing against an SMU secondary that has struggled at times to limit explosive plays.

What SMU does do well, though, is take the football away. The Mustangs entered the game with 20 total takeaways and added two more against Miami — none bigger than Ahmaad Moses‘ interception in overtime, his second of the game.

“They had a good coverage on for our play,” Beck said. “They got us, and he made a great play on the ball, so props to him.”

Miami is now 4-11 in November or later under Cristobal, the fourth-worst win percentage in the ACC over that span. Asked how his team would respond for the remainder of the season, Cristobal said: “You don’t sit around, throw your hands up and say I don’t know. You just go to work. Like I told the guys, you’ve got to be a grown man and face it.

“When things go wrong, that’s when all the rats start to come out and try to peck at you and all that other stuff. And you’ve got to go tell them to go you-know-what. And go to work and do it emphatically, and do it with some guts, and go fix the things that we have to fix so we can go get better.”

Continue Reading

Sports

Just Sayin: OSU’s QB top Heisman fave after win

Published

on

By

Just Sayin: OSU's QB top Heisman fave after win

COLUMBUS, Ohio — Ohio State hasn’t had a Heisman Trophy winner since quarterback Troy Smith captured the award in 2006.

But heading into the final month of the regular season, the Buckeyes now boast the Heisman front-runner.

Julian Sayin delivered another scintillating performance Saturday in a 38-14 win over Penn State. The sophomore quarterback completed 20 of 23 passes for 316 yards and four touchdowns.

With this latest outing, Sayin jumped Alabama quarterback Ty Simpson and Indiana quarterback Fernando Mendoza to become the Heisman favorite (+175), according to ESPN BET.

“If Julian continues to play the way that he’s playing, he deserves to be in the [Heisman] conversation, at the very least,” Ohio State coach Ryan Day said.

Sayin now has four games this season completing 85% of his passes for more than 300 yards and at least three passing touchdowns; no other quarterback in the country has more than one such game, according to ESPN Research.

“He’s playing at an elite level,” said safety Caleb Downs, who transferred to Ohio State along with Sayin early in the 2024 offseason after Alabama coach Nick Saban retired. “I’m just excited for my guy.”

The top-ranked Buckeyes (8-0, 5-0 Big Ten) are trying to win back-to-back national titles for the first time in program history. Sayin, who backed up Will Howard during last year’s championship run, is putting up gaudy numbers in his first season as the starter. He has thrown for 2,224 yards with 24 touchdowns and only three interceptions.

Sayin came into the weekend ranked fifth nationally with a QBR of 87.9. He also leads the country by a significant margin completing almost 81% of his passes; no other quarterback has a completion rate topping 75%.

“The receivers do a great job, and the running backs do a great job in pass protection and it’s really the offensive line giving me time to be able to go through my read,” Sayin said. “So, that’s really a team stat.”

Both Jeremiah Smith and Carnell Tate caught passes from Sayin for 57 yards apiece, as the two wideouts combined for 247 receiving yards and three touchdowns.

Sayin now has eight passing touchdowns of 20 or more air yards, which is tied for third most in the FBS, according to ESPN Research.

“We were aggressive and I thought some of Julian’s deep balls were just excellent,” Day said. “Julian’s really getting more and more confidence every day.”

Continue Reading

Sports

4-star QB Bryant chooses ‘best fit,’ Texas Tech

Published

on

By

4-star QB Bryant chooses 'best fit,' Texas Tech

Texas Tech secured a commitment from one of the top quarterbacks in the 2027 cycle on Saturday night, with a pledge from four-star recruit Kavian Bryant, No. 47 in the ESPN Junior 300.

A dual-threat passer from Palestine, Texas, Bryant is ESPN’s No. 2 overall quarterback in the 2027 class. He picked the Red Raiders over finalists Texas, Florida State, Colorado and SMU.

“They reached out the most,” Bryant told ESPN of Texas Tech. “They came with the best offer and the best opportunity for me to play. I just feel like it’s the best fit.”

Bryant lands as a cornerstone commit in Red Raiders coach Joey McGuire’s 2027 recruiting class.

The 6-foot-1, 180-pound prospect is Texas Tech’s first offensive pledge and fourth overall commit in the cycle. Bryant now joins five-star defensive tackle Jalen Brewster (No. 6 overall), who picked the Red Raiders over a group of Big Ten and SEC powers on Oct. 4, as the program’s second top-100 commit in 2027. September defensive line pledges K’Adrian Redmond (No. 154) and Antonio Underwood (not ranked) round out Texas Tech’s collection of commits in the cycle.

The Red Raiders also hold the pledge of five-star linebacker LaDamion Guyton, who debuted at No. 13 in the 2026 ESPN 300 this week after reclassifying from the 2027 cycle last month.

Bryant has emerged as a highly productive quarterback across three seasons as the starter at Texas’ Palestine Westwood High School. He threw for 4,724 and 67 touchdowns to 10 interceptions across his freshman and sophomore seasons, accounting 1,521 rushing yards and 20 touchdowns on the ground over that span. Although Texas Tech was among the programs to offer Bryant in both football and basketball, he plans to focus solely on football at the next level.

Sources told ESPN that Texas, Florida State and Colorado lingered to the very end of the process late this week. But Bryant said no program recruited him more persistently than Texas Tech, highlighting his relationship with Red Raiders offensive coordinator Mack Leftwich as a key element in his decision.

Bryant worked out for Leftwich and McGuire in the summer, then returned to Texas Tech on Sept. 13 as part of a string of visits with each of his finalists this fall.

“They really, really wanted me,” Bryant said. “They watch my film every day. They show me what I’m good at and what I’m bad at, and I just listen. It’s part of why they’re the best.”

Sources expected the Red Raiders to remain aggressive in recruiting top talent in the 2027 cycle, with defensive tackle Georgia Toia (No. 29 overall), wide receiver Julian Caldwell (No. 40) and linebacker Kaden McCarty (No. 91) among their top targets. Now on board with the Red Raiders, Bryant will be tasked with helping to recruit an elite class to Texas Tech.

“I feel like I can go in there and lead a class,” Bryant said. “And whether it’s as a true freshman or the next year, I feel like I can go there and win a national championship.”

Anchored by five-star pledges in Guyton and offensive tackle Felix Ojo (No. 24), Texas Tech’s 2026 class sits at No. 18 in ESPN’s latest rankings for the cycle. The 13th-ranked Red Raiders visited Kansas State on Saturday at 7-1 with the nation’s fourth-ranked scoring offense.

Continue Reading

Trending