Connect with us

Published

on

In a quiet graveyard in Gloucestershire, the only sounds are the bells ringing at the top of the hour, and the birds in the trees.

You look over the fence and see the River Severn, and the hills of the valley in the distance.

It is a beautiful, peaceful spot, but it is also a place linked to crime, violence and decades of anguish.

Joanna Parrish is buried here, her gravestone written in English and French.

She was murdered 33 years ago hundreds of miles away, in the French city of Auxerre.

Joanna was 20 years old, a university student teaching in France as part of her degree.

She went missing and then, not long after, her body was found in the River Yonne.

Nobody has ever been convicted of her murder, but we know who did it.

A serial killer called Michel Fourniret, who was already in prison for seven murders, admitted to killing Joanna five years ago, but died before he could be put on trial.

But now, after decades of despair and tragic errors, justice may be within sight.

Because Fourniret did not act alone.

Joanna Parrish
Image:
Joanna Parrish was 20 years old when she went missing

He was helped in his murders by his wife, Monique Olivier, who lured girls and young women and allowed them to be attacked, raped and murdered by Fourniret.

She is still alive, now aged 74 and serving a 28-year sentence for complicity in the murders.

She once confessed to seeing Fourniret murder a young woman in Auxerre – clearly Joanna – but then retracted that statement.

Now, though, she is about to go on trial for being an accomplice in three further murders, including that of Joanna.

It has taken a third of a century, but perhaps justice is finally going to be delivered, for Joanna and for the parents who have spent decades searching for a form of closure.

Lives changed forever

At home in Gloucestershire, Pauline Murrell tends to her pet budgie and offers us a cup of tea.

From the sofa, her former husband, Roger Parrish, asks for a coffee.

The pair have been divorced for decades, but are still evidently close, caring and friendly. They finish each other’s sentences.

Joanna Parrish's parents, Pauline and Roger
Image:
Joanna’s parents, Pauline and Roger, said their daughter was a ‘kind, bright and smart person’

Their lives changed, instantly and horribly, when they were told that their daughter had been murdered.

“It’s impossible to take in,” says Pauline. “They said she was found in the water, and I was staring out of a window and I simply couldn’t take it in. I couldn’t cry for six months.

“Then I got the post-mortem report and I opened it on a Sunday morning, and I wasn’t able to get out of bed.”

Roger wipes away a tear, the memories still so haunting. “She deserved a long and happy, fulfilled life. She worked hard and she deserved it. She was helpful, part of the community. People still remember her. She did well.”

Pauline’s last phone call with her had ended with a declaration of love from the parents to their daughter. It is a memory that offers some solace.

The devastation of grief was followed by frustration about the police investigation.

Roger and Pauline heard little from the French authorities. Instead, they went to France themselves and started asking questions, looking for information and demanding more effort.

And then came the arrest of Fourniret, and the pieces began to fall into place.

Joanna Parrish

As it slowly became apparent that his wife had helped him, so Roger and Pauline became convinced that he had killed their daughter.

“Jo was a kind person,” says Roger, “but she was also bright and smart.

“She was not likely to have trusted a man who was by himself.

“When we found out that there was a female accomplice, I remember thinking that we had never thought of that. Why would we have done? But right from that moment, I thought, ‘this is it – this is the person’.”

But still the police could not put together the evidence to link Fourniret with Joanna’s murder.

In fact, they had bungled the investigation, mishandling the crime scene and mislaying crucial forensic evidence.

French police ‘lost some really important evidence’

Bernie Kinsella was a detective who worked as a liaison between British and French police.

He discovered an investigation that struggled to link multiple crimes, or to manage its resources. He’s still in touch with Roger and Pauline.

“The French lost some really important evidence,” he told me. “The semen sample from the original rape had just been lost, which is unthinkable in terms of any major investigation like that.

“Losing an exhibit like that is a glaring error, so that had a massive impact on their ability to investigate this properly.”

Desperate, Pauline even took the step of writing to Monique Olivier.

“I remember just saying that, from one mother to another mother, I wanted to know what happened. Her lawyers said it was a trick, that it wasn’t proper, and I was upset about that.

“It wasn’t a trick. It was heartfelt.

“It’s just such a horrible, horrible thing. I can’t imagine that any mother would be able to live with themselves.

“And now she’s pushing the victim bit, but I certainly don’t consider her the victim.” Her voice echoes with contempt.

Joanna Parrish

Olivier has always suggested that she was coerced and intimidated by Fourniret, a claim that has been roundly dismissed by prosecutors.

When she was first convicted, in 2008, the court concluded that, far from being easily influenced, she was highly intelligent and capable.

The convictions of Olivier and Fourniret did not bring justice for Joanna. Olivier had originally made a statement linking her husband to the murder, but she then withdrew it.

The case went quiet and was eventually closed.

But in 2018, 28 years after he killed her, Fourniret admitted to the murder.

A court case beckoned before being delayed by the pandemic. Then, to the frustration of Roger and Pauline, Fourniret died.

“When he died, it wasn’t a great surprise because we knew he’d been ill, but we did feel cheated. I wanted to face him in court and that was taken away.

“We’re glad that he died. The world is a better place without a person like that but, at the same time, we would have wanted to face him – to look him in the eye.”

Joanna Parrish

‘Trial is the last hurdle’

Now they have another chance. Both parents will be travelling to Nanterre, just outside Paris, for the trial.

“We probably look on it as the last hurdle,” says Roger. “It’s been a long time. It’s over 30 years so we’re glad it’s taking place.

“Until it’s over, we can’t get to whatever will be the next stage of our lives.”

Pauline adds: “I keep saying that it’s not going to bring her back.

“It’s almost as if you feel that once it’s over, everything will go back to normal. But it’ll never be like that.”

“No, it won’t be,” says Roger, nodding, holding his head.

“But it will stop us having to think all the time about what we are going to do next, what’s the next step, what are we going to do.

“Hopefully, that will be it – that it will clear our heads a little bit. We’ll never forget Jo. She’ll always be there.”

Roger and Pauline are warm, charming people, whose lives have been blighted in the most horrendous way.

If Olivier is convicted, it will surely bring some kind of closure.

But you wonder – after waiting so long for something so important, can it ever really be enough?

Continue Reading

UK

Prince Harry cleared of bullying claims by report into ‘damaging dispute’ at his charity

Published

on

By

Prince Harry cleared of bullying claims by report into 'damaging dispute' at his charity

The Charity Commission has found no evidence of bullying or harassment at a charity set up by Prince Harry.

But it has found that an internal dispute at Sentebale “severely impacted the charity’s reputation”.

Earlier this year its chair, Dr Sophie Chandauka, accused the Duke of Sussex of “harassment and bullying at scale”.

Her comments followed the departure of the prince and several others from the organisation in March.

They had asked her to step down, alleging it was in the “best interest of the charity”.

Dr Chandauka told Sky News that Harry had “authorised the release of a damaging piece of news to the outside world” without informing her or Sentebale directors.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex declined to offer any formal response.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why was Prince Harry accused of ‘bullying’?

‘Strong perception of ill-treatment’

The Charity Commission said it was reporting after a “damaging internal dispute emerged” and has “criticised all parties to the dispute for allowing it to play out publicly”.

That “severely impacted the charity’s reputation and risked undermining public trust in charities more generally”, it said.

But it found no evidence of “widespread or systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity”.

Nevertheless, it did acknowledge the “strong perception of ill-treatment felt by a number of parties to the dispute and the impact this may have had on them personally”.

It also found no evidence of “‘over-reach’ by either the chair or the Duke of Sussex as patron”.

‘Confusion exacerbated tensions’

But it was critical of the charity’s “lack of clarity in delegations to the chair which allowed for misunderstandings to occur”.

And it has “identified a lack of clarity around role descriptions and internal policies as the primary cause for weaknesses in the charity’s management”.

That “confusion exacerbated tensions, which culminated in a dispute and multiple resignations of trustees and both founding patrons”.

Read more:
Clintons subpoenaed in Epstein probe
First man to be executed with defibrillator fitted

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why was Prince Harry accused of ‘bullying’?

Harry: Report falls troublingly short

A spokesperson for Prince Harry said it was “unsurprising” that the commission had announced “no findings of wrongdoing in relation to Sentebale’s co-founder and former patron, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex”.

They added: “Despite all that, their report falls troublingly short in many regards, primarily the fact that the consequences of the current chair’s actions will not be borne by her, but by the children who rely on Sentebale’s support.”

They said the prince will “now focus on finding new ways to continue supporting the children of Lesotho and Botswana”.

Dr Chandauka said: “I appreciate the Charity Commission for its conclusions which confirm the governance concerns I raised privately in February 2025.”

But she added: “The unexpected adverse media campaign that was launched by those who resigned on 24 March 2025 has caused incalculable damage and offers a glimpse of the unacceptable behaviours displayed in private.”

Continue Reading

UK

Police investigating grooming gangs given AI tools to speed up cold case work

Published

on

By

Police investigating grooming gangs given AI tools to speed up cold case work

All police forces investigating grooming gangs in England and Wales will be given access to new AI tools to help speed up their investigations.

The artificial intelligence tools are already thought to have saved officers in 13 forces more than £20m and 16,000 hours of investigation time.

The apps can translate large amounts of text in foreign languages from mobile phones seized by police, and analyse a mass of digital data to find patterns and relationships between suspects.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Grooming gang inquiry: ‘Our chance for justice’

‘We must punish perpetrators’

The rollout is part of a £426,000 boost for the Tackling Organised Exploitation (TOEX) programme, which supports officers to investigate complex cases involving modern slavery, county lines and child sex abuse.

The increased access to the AI technology follows Baroness Casey’s recommendation for a national operation to review cold grooming gang cases.

That operation will review more than 1,200 closed cases of child sexual exploitation.

“The sexual exploitation of children by grooming gangs is one of the most horrific crimes, and we must punish perpetrators, provide justice for victims and survivors, and protect today’s children from harm,” said safeguarding minister Jess Phillips.

“Baroness Casey flagged the need to upgrade police information systems to improve investigations and safeguard children at risk. Today we are investing in these critical tools.”

Read more from Sky News:
Harry criticises report into charity

Reeves told to find ‘substantial’ tax rises

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Key takeaways from the Casey review

Lack of ethnicity data ‘a major failing’

Police forces have also been instructed by the home secretary to collect ethnicity data, as recommended by Baroness Casey.

Her June report found the lack of data showing sex offenders’ ethnicity and nationality in grooming gangs was “a major failing over the last decade or more”.

She found that officials avoided the issue of ethnicity for fear of being called racist, but there were enough convictions of Asian men “to have warranted closer examination”.

The government has launched a national inquiry into the abuse and further details are expected to be announced in the coming weeks.

Continue Reading

UK

Chancellor warned ‘substantial tax rises’ needed – as she faces ‘impossible trilemma’

Published

on

By

Chancellor warned 'substantial tax rises' needed - as she faces 'impossible trilemma'

Rachel Reeves will need to find more than £40bn of tax rises or spending cuts in the autumn budget to meet her fiscal rules, a leading research institute has warned.

The National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) said the government would miss its rule, which stipulates that day to day spending should be covered by tax receipts, by £41.2bn in the fiscal year 2029-30.

Politics Hub: Follow latest updates

In its latest UK economic outlook, NIESR said: “This shortfall significantly increases the pressure on the chancellor to introduce substantial tax rises in the upcoming autumn budget if she hopes to remain compliant with her fiscal rules.”

The deteriorating fiscal picture was blamed on poor economic growth, higher than expected borrowing and a reversal in welfare cuts that could have saved the government £6.25bn.

Together they have created an “impossible trilemma”, NIESR said, with the chancellor simultaneously bound to her fiscal rules, spending commitments, and manifesto pledges that oppose tax hikes.

Read more:
What is a wealth tax?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Could the rich be taxed to fill black hole?

Reeves told to consider replacing council tax

The institute urged the government to build a larger fiscal buffer through moderate but sustained tax rises.

“This will help allay bond market fears about fiscal sustainability, which may in turn reduce borrowing costs,” it said.

“It will also help to reduce policy uncertainty, which can hit both business and consumer confidence.”

It said that money could be raised by reforms to council tax bands or, in a more radical approach, by replacing the whole council tax system with a land value tax.

To reduce spending pressures, NIESR called for a greater focus on reducing economic inactivity, which could bring down welfare spending.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What’s the deal with wealth taxes?

Growth to remain sluggish

The report was released against the backdrop of poor growth, with the chancellor struggling to ignite the economy after two months of declining GDP.

The institute is forecasting modest economic growth of 1.3% in 2025 and 1.2% in 2026. That means Britain will rank mid-table among the G7 group of advanced economies.

‘Things are not looking good’

However, inflation is likely to remain persistent, with the consumer price index (CPI) likely to hit 3.5% in 2025 and around 3% by mid-2026. NIESR blamed sustained wage growth and higher government spending.

It said the Bank of England would cut interest rates twice this year and again at the beginning of next year, taking the rate from 4.25% to 3.5%.

Persistent inflation is also weighing on living standards: the poorest 10% of UK households saw their living standards fall by 1.3% in 2024-25 compared to the previous year, NIESR said. They are now 10% worse off than they were before the pandemic.

Professor Stephen Millard, deputy director for macroeconomics at NIESR, said the government faced tough choices ahead: “With growth at only 1.3% and inflation above target, things are not looking good for the chancellor, who will need to either raise taxes or reduce spending or both in the October budget.”

Continue Reading

Trending