Many predicted that Binance would never embrace regulation — it would only pretend to comply in jurisdictions like the United States.
No more.
Binance pleading guilty to money laundering and other federal charges on Nov. 21 means it’s giving up its free-booting ways. It will also pay a $4.3 billion fine, the largest in the history of the U.S. Treasury Department.
Moreover, Binance’s founder, CEO and principal owner Changpeng “CZ” Zhao — deemed by many the most powerful individual in crypto — will be sidelined from the firm for at least three years after the naming of a court-appointed monitor.
Today, I stepped down as CEO of Binance. Admittedly, it was not easy to let go emotionally. But I know it is the right thing to do. I made mistakes, and I must take responsibility. This is best for our community, for Binance, and for myself.
But those may not even be the most important effects.
“The settlement is a lot bigger than that,” Yesha Yadav, Milton R. Underwood chair, professor of law and associate dean at Vanderbilt University Law School, told Cointelegraph, adding:
“It will bring some systematic oversight to Binance by virtue of a monitorship agreement, signaling the end of an era where the exchange has been able to operate in a relatively borderless way, without headquarters and seemingly without a major domestic regulator.”
It will subject Binance to more “scrutiny over its products, risk management, governance, trading partnerships and compliance rigor” than it’s ever experienced before, Yadav continued, and the exchange will probably undergo significant structural reform to put it on a more compliant footing.
The agreement, which Binance reached with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), the Treasury Department and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), should have industry-wide consequences — and not necessarily negative, either.
Indeed, the deal is a “long-term positive” for the cryptocurrency and blockchain industry, according to Austin Campbell, founder and managing partner at Zero Knowledge Consulting and adjunct professor at Columbia University’s School of Business. He told Cointelegraph:
“This is an acknowledgment that crypto is here to stay, and people should have access to it.”
It is arguably a monumental event for the industry, in part, because stateless Binance is the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange that at times has processed two-thirds of all digital trades, while Zhao, who reached a separate plea deal, is viewed by many as the face of the industry, particularly since the downfall of FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried.
“We will get you”
“Only the U.S., with its proven and rather unique extraterritorial application of its law, can do this,” Switzerland-based attorney Markus Hammer, principal of consulting firm HammerExecution, told Cointelegraph. “The signal to the crypto world could not have been clearer,” he said, adding:
“If you are addressing U.S. users and actively involved in money laundering and circumventing U.S. sanctions in the crypto business, we will get you. We will get you, including your CEO, and even if you have no registered headquarters.’”
However, Binance may not be totally out of the woods yet with regard to federal U.S. charges. Separately, the SEC brought 13 charges against Binance in June, and those cases have yet to be heard. Moreover, these charges “are much broader than the ones brought collectively by the DOJ, CFTC and Treasury,” Carol Alexander, professor of finance at the University of Sussex, told Cointelegraph.
Binance has evolved into a multifunction organization, observed Alexander, going well beyond its exchange activities. It has a nonfungible token marketplace, for instance, and conducts market-making activities through two firms controlled by Zhao: Merit Peak and Sigma Chain.
The SEC has charged that Binance and Zhao commingled client assets in these market-making firms and used those customer assets as their own, which sounds a lot like what FTX did before its collapse. It will take some time before these latest cases are brought, however, Alexander noted.
Paving the way for crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs)?
Still, the DOJ plea deal seems to offer some relief for the crypto sector. Some feared the government might try to put Binance out of business and feared global consequences given the firm’s ubiquity. So the settlement eliminated a big “overhang” in the market by this view.
Binance was the biggest idiosyncratic overhang on this market for the entire last year. Looks like we may finally be getting some resolution on it.
Markets hate uncertainty and they love clarity and resolution.
“I see the clarity now provided by the authorities in connection with the deal as very positive for the crypto industry, in general,” said Hammer. “It should also pave the way for a [U.S.] BTC spot-market ETF, which is likely to be launched in January 2024, and perhaps an ETH Spot ETF later in the year.”
Others saw the settlement as another sign the industry is maturing and moving beyond its buccaneering origins.
The Binance of 2018 is very different from the Binance of today, according to Campbell. It’s evolved from what he called “an evasive pirate enterprise” to one that is “well-established in some jurisdictions with actual KYC/AML programs and risk professionals in place.”
“Binance has been committed to getting it right for a while,” Campbell told Cointelegraph, referencing people like Richard Teng — named Zhao’s successor as CEO — and Noah Perlman, chief compliance officer, as examples of its growing seriousness vis-a-vis compliance and regulation. The DOJ settlement “is just one more step on that road.”
Just as the internet’s early pioneers eventually became integrated into the main market and economic system, “so too is crypto coming into the fold,” Truflation founder and CEO Stefan Rust said last week in a statement. “Full regulation and taxation are now here.”
Zhao himself seemed to see the shape of things to come back in 2021, when he stated in a public letter that regulation often trails innovation, particularly with revolutionary technologies like crypto. “The adoption and development of crypto has many parallels with that of the car. When the car was first invented, there weren’t any traffic laws, traffic lights or even safety belts.” Those came later.
Allowing Binance to survive?
Some also read in the DOJ settlement a conscious decision by the U.S. government not to drive Binance out of business. Campbell said:
“One of the biggest negatives for the [crypto] space and for the United States would have been regulators embracing the goal of a crypto ban. This is very much the reverse: the settlement is explicitly about Binance continuing to exist.”
According to Yadav, “a reformed Binance might benefit the crypto industry as a whole by offering a source of private standard-setting and representing a more maturing, careful organization to the world.”
Maybe that’s going too far. Binance was already growing less dominant in the industry before the plea deal, and that trend could still continue, especially as the SEC case with its broader charges remains outstanding.
Binance could also lose market share over time as risk-seeking consumers gravitate to smaller, offshore exchanges, acknowledged Yadav, while adding:
“But this settlement offers a possible way back for Binance to shed its image as a risk-tolerant firm that has acquired market share by aggressively pursuing customer acquisition at all costs.”
Cryptocurrency services platform Nexo announced that it is reentering the US market after facing previous regulatory challenges.
According to an April 28 announcement, Nexo’s reentry event featured Donald Trump Jr., who said that he thinks “crypto is the future of finance,” adding:
“We see the opportunity for the financial sector and want to ensure we bring that back to the US.”
Trump Jr. also emphasized the need for a regulatory environment that supports the cryptocurrency industry. He said that “the key to everything crypto is going to be the regulatory framework.”
Nexo left the US at the end of 2022, citing a lack of regulatory clarity as the reason behind the decision. At the beginning of 2023, the firm agreed to pay a $45 million settlement to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over its failure to register the offer and sale of securities of its interest-earning product.
A month after settling with US regulators, Nexo also decided to shut down its interest-earning product to US-based customers. The product allowed users to earn daily compounding yields on certain cryptocurrencies by loaning them to Nexo.
In late 2022, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation also filed a desist and refrain order against the same interest-earning product managed by Nexo. The regulator claimed that the product was an unqualified security, meaning a security that the government has not approved for sale in the form of an investment contract.
Coinbase has urged the US Office of Government Ethics to remove a rule banning Securities and Exchange Commission staff from holding crypto.
SEC staff need to use crypto to better understand how it works and the best way to regulate it, Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal argued in open letters sent to OGE acting director Jamieson Greer and newly sworn-in SEC Chair Paul Atkins, which he shared to X on April 25.
“To regulate technology, you need to understand it. To understand technology, you need to use it,” Grewal said in the letter to Greer.
“Permitting commission staff to hold crypto is essential to them developing the knowledge necessary to propose and adopt workable regulatory frameworks for digital securities activity,” he added.
Legal Advisory 22-04, issued on July 4, 2022, by the OGE, prohibits SEC staff from buying, selling, or otherwise using crypto and stablecoins because they are not “publicly traded securities” and don’t qualify for an exception, unlike stocks.
SEC needs waivers for staff
Grewal said US President Donald Trump directed the SEC and other agencies to submit recommendations for crypto regulations due in around 90 days, and SEC “staff still cannot use the technology on which they are making recommendations.”
In his letter to Atkins and SEC commissioner Hester Peirce, he echoed a similar sentiment, arguing that the inability to hold crypto is a roadblock for the agency’s Crypto Task Force in creating a regulatory framework.
While it’s up to OGE to rescind the advisory, the SEC should take its own action, Grewal said.
“For example, issuing waivers to crypto task force members and other staff actively working on task force matters would be consistent with measures already taken in commensurate advisory situations,” he said.
Grewal added that a waiver would allow SEC staff on the Crypto Task Force responsible for creating crypto regulations to use crypto and “evaluate the underlying digital asset technology.”
Former SEC Chair Gary Gensler, who took office in 2021, was known for his hardline stance on crypto regulation. He resigned on Jan. 20 after spearheading an aggressive regulatory stance toward crypto, bringing upward of 100 regulatory actions against firms.
Following Gensler’s exit, the SEC opted out of a swathe of lawsuits against crypto firms, including Coinbase, on Feb. 27 and, in a more recent April 24 walkback, flagged plans to drop its enforcement against blockchain firm Dragonchain.
This week’s set of elections across England will be a series of firsts: it will be the first big ballot box test of Sir Keir Starmer’s premiership and Kemi Badenoch’s leadership of the Conservative Party.
We will have the first by-election of this parliament in Labour-held Runcorn, the inaugural elections for the mayoralty of Hull and East Yorkshire and Lincolnshire, and our first chance to see if Reform’s surge in the polls since the general election can translate into seats.
Image: Former Runcorn and Helsby Labour MP Mike Amesbury leaves court. Pic: PA
And there is plenty at stake for the party leaders with all the upside in the hands of Nigel Farage, who has barely any council seats to defend and hundreds in his sights, as he looks to translate his poll leads into proper governing – be it through mayoral wins or council control.
Sir Keir is bracing for an early verdict on his leadership, with the Runcorn by-election a test of nerves for a Labour Party that will be loathed to lose a seat in the northwest of England to a surging Reform Party.
Image: Sir Keir Starmer in the House of Commons
For the Conservatives, the pressure is obvious and acute.
Of the 23 councils up for grabs, 16 are currently controlled by the Conservative Party and when they last fought these seats in 2021, the Conservatives were riding high on the back of a then popular Boris Johnson and COVID vaccine bounce.
More on Conservatives
Related Topics:
Back then, the party’s national equivalent vote share – an estimate of how the country would have voted if everywhere had had a local election – was at 40%, with Labour at 30%, the Lib Dems at 15%, and other parties at 15%.
Their support has collapsed since then, with current polling putting the Conservatives on 22% – an 18-point drop in vote share – while Reform, lumped in with ‘other parties’ in 2021, is now polling an average 25%.
So, expect to see the Conservatives lose control of councils and hundreds of seats as it haemorrhages support to Reform in a night that is set to be miserable for Kemi Badenoch and her party.
Image: Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch. Pic: PA
The Conservatives have majorities in 18 of the 23 councils up for grabs, and could even see the Lib Dems overtake them to become the second-biggest party in local government when it comes to council control. That would be a huge symbolic blow. The only glimmer of hope is whether the party can win the Cambridge and Peterborough mayoral race where a former Peterborough MP is looking to take the mayoralty from Labour.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:26
Labour and Reform face off in Runcorn
But like the Conservatives, there is little for Labour to cling on to in this set of elections as the party prepares for a lacklustre night at the ballot box, reflecting its steady drop in the polls following the autumn budget.
Support for Sir Keir’s government dipped below 30% last November and has continued on that trajectory, with Labour currently polling on average around 23%.
Labour has been haemorrhaging council seats in council by-elections since the national poll last July, and insiders are briefing that the party looks set to lose control of Doncaster Council, the only one it has control of in this set of elections, and perhaps the mayoralty of the city. Since last July, there have been by-elections in 95 vacant Labour council seats and Labour has lost 43 of them.
But the biggest race on the night for Labour will be the Runcorn by-election, where Reform is challenging to take a parliamentary seat that has long been part of Labour’s territory.
Image: Reform UK leader Nigel Farage
While Reform set out with the aim to destroy the Conservative Party, Labour insiders know how bad the Reform surge is for their own prospects, with the party coming in second to Labour in 89 constituencies in the 2024 General Election. The party is all too aware of the threat of Nigel Farage, as Reform taps into voters’ disillusionment.
“People voted for change in 2024,” explains one Labour insider. “We came in with the double whammy of public services on their knees and the economy facing big challenges, and we promised change. People will be judging us. There is change – waiting lists for the NHS are falling six months in a row – but do people notice it yet? Arguably not.”
Labour is preparing to intensify attacks against Reform. The party is already using remarks made by Mr Farage around re-examining the NHS’s funding model to launch a series of attack ads around the local elections and is likely to step this up ahead of polling day.
But the party is right to be worried by the Reform threat and to give you a bit of flavour of that, we ran a focus group of voters in Doncaster on the latest edition of the Electoral Dysfunction podcast to get a sense of the mood in a city about to re-elect its council and mayor.
‘The country is stuck in a doom loop’
Luke Tryl, director of More in Common, who carried out that focus group in Doncaster for us, told us that the group’s disillusionment with politics and the main political parties was a common refrain all around the country.
“You know, people basically keep hitting the change button, right? You know, they did it in Brexit. They did in 2017 when [Jeremy] Corbyn does very well, Boris Johnson in 2019 was a sort of change and in 2024, change was literally the slogan of Keir Starmer’s 2024 campaign.
“And they keep hitting that change and thinking they’re not getting the change. And so actually it pervades right across the political spectrum. It’s not limited to just the Tories, Labour, Reform. It’s just this sense that something isn’t happening and the system isn’t responding to what we want,” Mr Tryl says.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
6:30
Local elections tips and predictions
The undertone of the focus group reflected this sentiment, as respondents honed in on very common top-three concerns across the country – cost of living, the NHS, immigration – but also the sense of mistrust in politicians of all hues.
“It’s not just that people think that the UK is in a bad state, you know, cost of living is bad, the NHS is bad, struggles with immigration, crime,” Mr Tryl said.
“It’s that they don’t have faith in our political class to find solutions. I said recently, I think the UK public moves in a bit of a doom loop at the moment and we can’t seem to find a way out of it and how that changes.”
This is helping Mr Farage’s Reform as voters, turned off by the Tories and disappointed in Labour, look to hit the change button again. “Britain is broken and needs Reform” is Mr Farage’s pitch.
That’s not to say that he was universally liked in our Doncaster focus group.
“It wasn’t actually massively effusive about Farage personally, and we’re starting to pick that up in a few more focus groups,” noted Mr Tryl.
“It’s rather more like, ‘I like what Reform is saying’ – people tend to particularly like what they say on immigration – but I’ve got a few questions about Farage and a word I’ve heard in other groups is baggage. He’s got a lot of baggage.”
He added: “What you’re hearing there is people are slightly willing to put that… we tried the Tories for 14 years. We’re not that happy with what we’ve had from Labour so far. So we may as well roll the dice on this guy. And I think that’s what you’re going to see next week is that rolling the dice.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:12
Who has more to lose?
The Conservatives fared particularly badly with the Doncaster focus group, with just two out of the nine respondents even being able to name their leader Kemi Badenoch.
“If you’ve got no public image whatsoever, and also no trust, then you’re not going to pull any votes,” was the brutal verdict of one respondent as Mr Johnson was brought up as a politician they thought of as more likeable, relatable and capable of taking on Reform.
As for Labour, only one of the respondents seemed prepared to give the government more time to turn around the country and deliver on election promises, with others voicing criticism over the government’s handling of the winter fuel allowance cuts, high immigration levels and the lack of progress more broadly. Voters were also hostile to Sir Keir, who they believed to be out of touch, privileged and posh.
The best Sir Keir can hope for next week is, in the words of Mr Tryl is to “tread water” as we watch to see whether Reform can translate polling gains into real governing.
A YouGov poll on Friday suggested Reform is in pole position to win the Lincolnshire mayoralty, while the party is ahead in the Hull and East Yorkshire battle, according to the polling. Labour is also nervous about Reform in the Doncaster mayoral race.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
Expectations for Reform are high, with some pollsters predicting the party could make hundreds of gains in traditionally Conservative counties and have a chance of perhaps even gaining control of Labour-held Doncaster council or Durham, where Labour is the largest party. Reform now has over 100 councillors, most of whom have defected from other parties, and is not defending any seats from 2021, so the only way for Mr Farage is up.
Mr Tryl expects the Tories to lose 500 to 600 seats and Reform to pick up the same sort of numbers if it manages to organise its support and turn out the vote.
So this will be a moment to test whether the Reform momentum in the polls translates into real progress on the ground and sees it become a major electoral force capable of challenging the two main parties across the country. In the general election, the party clocked up votes, but didn’t manage to concentrate that support into concrete wins. Can Reform change that in 2025?
Follow The World
Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday
This set of local elections is far smaller than normal when it comes to the number of councils being contested than normal (Labour’s restructuring of local government has left a number of elections postponed), while the 11 million eligible to vote in England are just a quarter of those who could cast a vote across the UK in last year’s general election.
But these polls are seriously consequential. This will be a moment when we are able to better observe if the two-party system, battered in the 2024 General Election, really is dying.
Last July, third parties secured more votes than ever and a record tally of seats as support for the two establishment parties hit a record low. These elections could be the moment that Reform tastes real power and the Liberal Democrats surge.
Voters keep saying they want real change. On 1 May, we’ll get a better sense of how serious they are in a set of elections that could point to a profoundly different future for British politics.