Nottingham City Council has declared itself effectively bankrupt after issuing a section 114 notice.
The Labour-run local authority confirmed the announcement on Wednesday, saying its chief financial officer had decided it “isn’t able to deliver a balanced budget for this year, which is a legal requirement”.
As a result of the section 114 notice, all new spending – with the exception of protecting vulnerable people and statutory services – must stop immediately.
It becomes the second local authority this year to fail financially, after Birmingham City Council issued its own 114 notice back in September.
The council has come under financial pressures after its attempt to enter the power market with Robin Hood Energy (RHE) failed in 2020, losing the authority millions.
It later got into trouble after spending millions of pounds ring-fenced for local housing as part of its general budget.
But the authority was also hit hard by changes to central government funding under the coalition government back in 2013/14, as well as soaring inflation and growing demand for social care.
The Department for Levelling Up decided against bringing in a commissioner after the failure of RHE three years ago, but gave an advisory board more powers to ensure the council adhered to their advice – with the threat of the final option hanging over their heads if their financial performance didn’t improve.
Advertisement
But now the section 114 has been issued, commissioners will likely be brought in to take charge.
A statement from Nottingham City Council said its executive board met last week to discuss a report into its latest financial position, as rumours swirled the authority was on the brink of bankruptcy.
Local or national government – who is to blame for struggling councils?
There is only one real political question about Nottingham City Council: Who shoulders more of the blame for running out of money – central government or the local politicians themselves?
Council budgets have been squeezed ever since George Osborne became chancellor in 2010: seen as an easy target for a Treasury hunting for savings.
According to the Local Government Association, since 2010 there has been a 27% real-terms cut in core spending power.
Given the spending pressures from inflation, particularly on social care, councils everywhere are suffering.
That said, of the 113 local councils in England, only 13 councils have issued section 114 notices – the action a local authority must take when it is about to spend more than their income. Birmingham was the last council to make the order in September, with Woking, Thurrock and Croydon before that.
Research by the Institute for Government found there is no correlation between the party that has political control of an authority and the likelihood of issuing a section 114 notice.
However, the government is very keen to make this a partisan issue, since Nottingham is a Labour council, and has been since 1998 – with not a single Conservative in the council chamber.
The council themselves blamed children’s and adults’ social care, rising homelessness and the impact of inflation, and claimed the “funding model” is broken.
However, the saga of “Robin Hood Energy” left a big dent in both the accounts and their credibility.
This scheme was established in 2015, set up to help people struggling with rising bills, and was heralded by Jeremy Corbyn when he was leader of the Labour Party – however it was unable to pay its bills, and ultimately closed, costing taxpayers £38m.
A damning report by an external auditor found the council was guilty of “institutional blindness” over RHE, prioritising political objectives over reality.
It found the council did not know the scale of the risk they had taken on and criticised the culture at the council, the reporting process and the way the company was handled, as well as the lack of accountability.
Hubris or well-intentioned but misguided, the council is still paying the price.
Whether the public draws political lessons remains to be seen.
It said the report highlighted that “a significant gap remains in the authority’s budget, due to issues affecting councils across the country, including an increased demand for children’s and adult social care, rising homelessness presentations and the impact of inflation”.
But, it added: “Past issues relating to financial governance… and an overspend in the last financial year have also impacted on the council’s financial resilience and ability to draw on reserves.”
Leader of Nottingham City Council David Mellen told Sky News. “We are going to be paying our staff. We are just saying in this financial year we’ll be overspending against our budget.
“For 13 years we have been underfunded, pressures on us from services are difficult.
“Many other councils are struggling – we are not the first, we won’t be the last. We are not incompetent – the government has not funded us properly.
“We have lost £100m in our budget every year for the past 10 years.”
All of the city’s councillors will now have to hold a meeting in the next three weeks to discuss the ongoing issues.
But Nottingham City Council said both senior officers and its members “remain committed” to working with the government and its advisers to “put the council on a stable financial footing for the future”.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
However, Nottinghamshire MP and government minister Robert Jenrick attacked the Labour leadership at the council, saying they had “proven themselves utterly unfit to govern this great city”.
He added: “Their breathtaking waste and incompetence have let residents down for long enough. It’s time for the secretary of state to appoint commissioners to restore order.”
The prime minister had called on Benjamin Netanyahu’s government to take substantive steps to end the “appalling situation in Gaza“, agree to a ceasefire, commit to a long-term sustainable peace, allow the UN to restart the supply of aid, and not annex the West Bank.
The Israeli foreign ministry furiously rejected his statement, with Mr Netanyahu claiming that “Starmer rewards Hamas‘s monstrous terrorism and punishes its victims”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:28
Could recognition of Palestine change the West Bank?
Ilay David, brother of Hamas hostage Evyatar David, who was seen emaciated in a video last month, said giving recognition was “like saying to Hamas: ‘It is OK, you can keep starving the hostages, you can keep using them as human shields.’
“This kind of recognition gives Hamas power to be stubborn in negotiations. That is the last thing we need right now.”
There has been no ceasefire, and the situation in Gaza has deteriorated, with a declaration of a famine in Gaza City and the expansion of Israeli military operations.
Israel has launched a major ground offensive to seize all of Gaza City and destroy Hamas in an operation which has prompted widespread condemnation, with UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper calling it “utterly reckless and appalling”.
More on Gaza
Related Topics:
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
15:16
What changed in UK’s Gaza policy?
Earlier this month, a UN commission of inquiry concluded that Israel has committed genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. Israel said the claim was “distorted and false”.
The UK will join 147 of the 193 members of the UN who recognise Palestine ahead of the UN General Assembly in New York on Monday.
Other nations, including France, Australia and Canada, have said they plan to take the same step at the UN gathering as part of a broad international effort to put pressure on Israel.
During a joint news conference with the prime minister at Chequers on Thursday, Donald Trump said he disagreed with recognition, and US politicians have urged the UK and other allies to reverse their stance.
Image: Sir Keir Starmer is expected to deliver the announcement on Sunday. Pic: PA
Sky News understands that Israel is considering options in response to the UK’s decision, but the strength of that reaction is still under consideration.
Family members of some of the 48 hostages still in captivity, after Hamas and other militant groups stormed into Israel on 7 October 2023, have written an open letter to Sir Keir, condemning the move.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:38
Israel ramps up attacks on Gaza City
“Hamas has already celebrated the UK’s decision as a victory and reneged on a ceasefire deal,” they said.
“We write to you with a simple plea – do not take this step until our loved ones are home and in our arms.”
The UK government is understood to be looking at further sanctions on Hamas, and has demanded the group release all hostages, agree to an immediate ceasefire, accept it will have no role in governing Gaza, and commit to disarmament.
Heathrow was among a number of major airports across Europe hit by delays after a suspected cyber attack that targeted a service provider for check-in and boarding systems.
The “technical issue” affecting Collins Aerospace, which provides check-in and boarding services for various airlines, resulted in 14 flights being cancelled at Brussels Airport on Saturday, and several more being delayed at London Heathrow, Berlin, and Dublin, among others.
Passengers have reported being unable to check in online, instead queuing for hours for staff to deal with them manually at desks and departure gates, only to be told their flights are not taking off.
Helen Steel, 49, left Dorset for Heathrow at 3am to travel home to Oslo, with her cat Thomas – but was “shouted at by staff” who told her she would not be able to fly until Sunday.
Describing the situation as an “absolute nightmare”, she said: “I’ve got an animal here, so I’m very concerned about his welfare.
“I’ve been shouted at twice and I broke down in tears because I was worried about him. None of us have had any information whatsoever. Whenever we ask ground staff, they shout at us.”
Ms Steel says she spent two hours in the queue on the phone to customer service and is now having to find a hotel to stay in overnight.
Sam arrived at Heathrow expecting to drop his girlfriend off for her flight to Rio de Janeiro – but was still at the airport seven hours later.
Image: Sam has been at Heathrow for seven hours after his girlfriend’s flight to Rio was cancelled
When they arrived, it was “chaos everywhere”, he told Sky News, with “nobody seeming to know what was going on”.
The couple say they were not told about the cyber attack by airport staff, finding out about it online instead.
After queuing for three hours, they made it to the front, only to be told the plane was not taking off, he adds.
“Her flight was at 8.40am and it was held back until 10.15am. At 10.10am they sent everyone away and told them to contact the airline. But there are no representatives for any airlines whatsoever. It’s been a bit of a farce.
“Nobody knew where they were going – and they were sending people left, right, and centre.
“She’s going tomorrow now, but we’ve got to find a hotel, and no one is here to give us any hotel vouchers. They just give you a piece of paper and say ‘you’ve got to pay for it yourself’.”
Image: Passengers wait for news at Heathrow Terminal 4. Pic: PA
‘Insane queues’ and ‘skeleton staff’
Passenger Tereza Pultarova waited around 10 hours at Heathrow after she arrived at 4.30am for her flight to Cape Town via Amsterdam.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
6:32
Tereza Pultarova had to wait 10 hours at Heathrow
“We were kind of stranded here because KLM wasn’t able to issue us boarding passes digitally, and requested us to collect them at the check-in desk,” she said.
“And then they told us that there is some sort of global issue with the system they’re using for check-in and boarding, and they have to do everything manually. So then they were checking in people at the rate of, like, one person per 10 minutes.
“I’m not exaggerating. It was just insane, the queue wasn’t moving. And then suddenly they said, ‘Oh, the flight will be departing, we’re closing the gate’.
Maria Casey was due to fly to Thailand with Etihad Airways – but had to wait three hours to drop off her luggage at Heathrow, with staff taking between five and 10 minutes to deal with each passenger.
Image: Queues at Heathrow. Pic: PA
“The queues are terrible,” she told Sky News. “It was an absolute skeleton staff. Out of six of the desks there were probably two people”.
A Heathrow spokesperson advised people to arrive no more than three hours early for a flight and apologised for any inconvenience.
It is understood British Airways at Terminal 5 remains unaffected and is operating as normal.
Collins Aerospace said it is working to resolve the issue as soon as possible.
“We have become aware of a cyber-related disruption to our Muse (Multi-User System Environment) software in select airports, the firm said in a statement.
“The impact is limited to electronic customer check-in and baggage drop and can be mitigated with manual check-in operations. We are actively working to resolve the issue and restore full functionality to our customers as quickly as possible.”
An elderly British couple who have arrived back in the UK after being detained in a maximum security Taliban prison are “delighted to be free”, their son has told Sky News.
Barbie Reynolds, 76, and her husband Peter, 80, were arrested in February after spending decades in Afghanistan, where they have dual citizenship.
They had been held without charge before being released from detention on Friday and flown to Qatar, where they were reunited with their daughter, before flying back to Heathrow Airport on Saturday.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:13
Freed couple reunites with daughter
The couple’s son, Jonathan Reynolds, told Sky News: “They’re just delighted to be free… they’re very excited to see their kids and grandkids and great grandkids, people they’ve just been wanting to catch up with and wondered if they’d ever see them again.”
Jonathan, who spoke to his parents from Wyoming in the US in a FaceTime call with some of his siblings, said: “I’ve seen photographs of them in hospital beds getting checked. I’ve seen them having full English breakfasts. So they’re jumping on that.”
Image: Peter Reynolds enjoys breakfast after his release
He described some of the conditions his parents had been kept under in a “big maximum security prison with thousands of inmates”.
“My dad described being handcuffed or chained to other criminals. And, one point he had his chest hairs ripped out,” he said.
More on Afghanistan
Related Topics:
“He was hit in the head. And, then they were moved, to more of a safe house.”
Image: Peter Reynolds gets hospital check-up
But Jonathan said his parents retained their British politeness even when calling him from a payphone in the prison yard, with his dad asking: “Is now a good time?”.
“It was totally, ‘Yeah, not too bad. Where’s the queue to get out of here?'”
The UK government advises British nationals not to travel to Afghanistan.
Abdul Qahar Balkhi, a spokesperson at the Talibangovernment’s foreign ministry, said in a statement posted on X that the couple “violated Afghan law” and were released from prison after a court hearing.
He did not say what law the couple were alleged to have broken.
Sky correspondent Cordelia Lynch was at Kabul Airport as the freed couple arrived and departed.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:51
Sky’s Cordy Lynch speaks to released couple
Mr Reynolds told her: “We are just very thankful.”
His wife added: “We’ve been treated very well. We’re looking forward to seeing our children.
“We are looking forward to returning to Afghanistan if we can. We are Afghan citizens.”
The couple have lived in Afghanistan for 18 years and run an organisation called Rebuild, which provides education and training programmes.
They have been together since the 1960s and married in the Afghan capital in 1970.