The United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is considering a proposal that would have sweeping consequences for the cryptocurrency industry. Investors should be concerned, because it could significantly impact the way that individuals — both inside and outside America — are allowed to engage with digital assets.
The IRS is proposing an initiative under Section 6045 of the tax code to establish new tax rules for the treatment of cryptocurrency providers. Specifically, the agency is seeking to amend the law to expand the definition of “brokers” to include nearly all crypto-service providers — including, for instance, decentralized exchanges (DEXs) and wallet providers. Those providers would be required to collect personal information from users beginning in 2025, and to begin sending (a still-unreleased) Form 1099-DA to the IRS in 2026. It would be a crypto-focused version of the 1099-MISC.
The IRS’s move to redefine “broker” is not just a regulatory tweak but a fundamental shift that could reshape the entire U.S. cryptocurrency landscape. By potentially including a wide array of cryptocurrency service providers under this definition, the IRS is extending its reach significantly. This expansion means that many more entities involved in digital asset transactions, from wallet providers to small-scale developers, could be required to report user information and transaction details to the government.
Example of a Form 1099-MISC. Source: Glassnode
For users and investors in the cryptocurrency space, this change could translate into increased reporting and compliance obligations — rolling back the anonymity and flexibility they currently offer users. For service providers, it would require the adoption of new systems and procedures for compliance, requiring them to ask users for their personal information. While the IRS is technically attempting to target American users, service providers would have no way to determine nationalities before harvesting user data.
The move would be a decisive step toward bringing the world of digital assets in line with traditional financial systems in terms of regulatory oversight and transparency. It’s crucial that the average American understand the proposal’s implications, because it represents a significant pivot point in how digital assets are perceived and managed by regulators.
The industry’s response
The industry’s response to these regulatory changes has been marked by concern and proactive engagement. Major players have expressed apprehensions about the intrusion into personal privacy, including Coinbase, whose chief legal counsel Paul Grewal, noted the change would “set a dangerous precedent for surveillance of the everyday financial activities of consumers by requiring nearly every digital asset transaction — even the purchase of a cup of coffee — to be reported.”
At their core, the proposed regs go well beyond the congressional mandate to establish tax reporting rules on par with those for traditional finance, putting digital assets at a disadvantage and threatening to harm a nascent industry when it’s just getting started. 2/4
The broader industry is similarly concerned about the possibility of regulations stifling the growth of digital assets. A primary issue is the appropriate application of conventional regulatory frameworks to decentralized systems, ensuring investor privacy protection and fostering an environment that supports innovation while maintaining market stability.
The change would have profound implications for individual investors and developers within the cryptocurrency realm. For investors, clearer regulatory guidelines could bolster market confidence, potentially leading to increased investment activity. However, excessively strict regulations risk curbing innovation and reducing the appeal of cryptocurrencies as an alternative to traditional financial systems. For developers, especially those in the DeFi sector, these regulatory shifts present both compliance challenges and opportunities to influence the development of rules that recognize the unique capabilities of blockchain technology.
Navigating the complexities of these regulatory proposals necessitates a balanced approach. The cryptocurrency industry must proactively engage with regulators to ensure the creation of fair, practical, and innovation-friendly regulations. Balancing regulatory oversight with the preservation of the ecosystem’s core values is crucial for the future of digital finance. The industry’s capacity to adapt to these regulatory changes while retaining its innovative essence is pivotal.
The requirement for regulatory adaptability and industry evolution is more apparent than ever. The cryptocurrency sector is encouraged to evolve its practices to meet emerging regulatory standards while preserving its innovative and decentralized nature. Simultaneously, regulators are challenged to comprehend the unique aspects of digital assets and decentralized systems to devise effective, sensible, and forward-thinking regulations.
Lobbying and political contributions
The cryptocurrency industry’s involvement in lobbying and political contributions has become increasingly significant. In 2022, the industry’s lobbying efforts and political contributions skyrocketed, reflecting its growing interest in shaping regulatory frameworks. This political engagement is a clear indicator of the industry’s commitment to influencing policy decisions that will affect its future. It also highlights the need for a regulatory environment that understands and accommodates the unique characteristics of digital assets and blockchain technology.
Expanding the definition of “broker” would stifle innovation for the industry, but particularly on American soil. The cryptocurrency community’s resilient response, advocating for fair and supportive regulatory measures, underscores the delicate balance between effective regulation and fostering technological progress.
As the industry actively participates in shaping these regulations, its involvement is crucial to ensuring the U.S. cryptocurrency sector continues to thrive in a competitive global landscape, balancing regulatory compliance with innovation and growth.
Tomer Warschauer Nuni is the chief marketing and business development officer at Pink Moon Studios. With more than two decades of experience in tech, gaming, and blockchain, Tomer is an adept early-stage investor and startup advisor for projects including ChainGPT and GT-Protocol. He holds degrees in governance and communication from Reichman University.
This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.
Nasdaq has filed for crypto asset manager 21Shares to list a spot Sui exchange-traded fund (ETF) in the US, initiating the Securities and Exchange Commission’s review process.
The stock market’s May 23 19b-4 filing, which asks the SEC to list the 21Shares SUI ETF, follows 21Shares’ April 30 submission of its S-1 registration statement to the SEC, which asked the regulator to approve trading of the proposed fund.
Both regulatory filings are needed for the Sui (SUI) tracking fund to gi live, with the 19b-4 filing kicking off the SEC’s review process. The agency must decide whether to accept, reject or delay the application within 45 days and it can delay its decision multiple times, for a maximum review period of 240 days.
The SEC must decide on 21Shares’ application by Jan. 18, 2026, at the latest.
21Shares proposed BitGo and Coinbase Custody as the custodians to hold SUI on behalf of the trust, however, the filing did not include details on a management fee or ticker.
Canary Capital is the only other asset manager that has submitted 19b-4 and S-1 filings to list a spot Sui ETF, filing the forms on April 8.
21Shares said in its 19b-4 filing that the SUI token powers the Sui network and serves four main purposes: it can be staked to earn rewards, used to pay gas fees, function as a liquid asset for Sui applications and serve as a governance token.
The Sui ecosystem is largely focused on decentralized applications and has been dubbed a potential Solana killer.
SUI is the 13th-largest cryptocurrency, but its $12.3 billion market cap remains a fraction of Solana (SOL)’s $92 billion market cap, according to CoinGecko.
21Shares aims to add to SUI offerings
21Shares already lists a Sui exchange-traded product in Europe, on the Euronext Paris and Euronext Amsterdam stock exchanges.
Those listings have contributed to SUI-based exchange-traded products having $317.2 million in assets under management (AUM), according to a May 26 report from CoinShares.
Flows into SUI ETPs increased by $2.9 million between May 16 and May 24, and only trails Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH), Solana and XRP (XRP) in terms of net assets.
Building a permanent US strategic Bitcoin reserve would likely require targeted legislation rather than executive action, according to VanEck’s head of digital assets, Matthew Sigel. Speaking at Bitcoin 2025 in Las Vegas, Sigel said the most viable path forward may involve inserting Bitcoin mining incentives into the congressional budget reconciliation process.
According to Sigel, the most effective path to growing a US strategic Bitcoin reserve would be through targeted amendments to congressional budget legislation. These could include tax credits for mining companies that use methane gas and other incentives aimed at encouraging miners to share a portion of their mined BTC with the federal government.
He argued that such an approach would allow the reserve to grow organically over time. Sigel also highlighted the limitations of executive actions in achieving this goal:
“The problem with executive action is that it’s going to prompt lawsuits. And anything over $100 million is going to get sued by the Elizabeth Warrens of the world. So, I would say start with something maybe in the Exchange Stabilization Fund for $100 million.”
US President Donald Trump established the US Bitcoin Strategic Reserve through a March 7 executive order. According to the order, the US government can only acquire Bitcoin through budget-neutral strategies or asset forfeiture, prompting a range of different ideas on how to add to the government’s stockpile of nearly 200,000 BTC.
From left to right, Alex Thorn, Matthew Sigel, Matthew Pines and Fred Thiel. Source: Turner Wright/Cointelegraph
Converting gold to Bitcoin would allow the US government to purchase more Bitcoin without incurring a cost to the taxpayer, Lummis said.
Bo Hines, the executive director of the President’s Council of Advisers on Digital Assets, echoed the idea in March 2025.
Hines called on the US Treasury to revalue its gold holdings, which are currently priced at just $42.22 per troy ounce, and convert a portion of those gains to Bitcoin. This strategy would also be budget-neutral, Hines said.
The price of gold reached an all-time high of $3,500 per ounce in April but experienced a minor pullback to around $3,300 on May 27.
US President Donald Trump supports the BITCOIN Act and has a team of experts in the White House working to roll out landmark digital asset legislation in the coming weeks, according to Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis.
Speaking at the Bitcoin 2025 conference in Las Vegas, Nevada, Lummis said she is bringing the BITCOIN ACT to the “attention of the American people and the world,” adding that, “President Trump supports the bill.”
In March, Lummis reintroduced the BITCOIN Act — landmark legislation that directs the US government to acquire 1 million Bitcoin (BTC) over five years. The acquisitions would be financed using existing funds within the Federal Reserve System and the Treasury Department.
As Cointelegraph reported, the Trump administration has reiterated the need to use “budget-neutral ways” to acquire Bitcoin without burdening taxpayers.
At the Bitcoin Conference, Lummis said the Trump administration has a team working on “digital asset issues,” including legislation on stablecoins, market structure and the Bitcoin Strategic Reserve.
“They will probably roll out in that order,” she said.
“The Senate Banking Committee has passed the stablecoin bill out of committee,” said Lummis, adding:
“We’re getting close to being ready to have it on the floor. We’ve worked for untold hours with the minority party to satisfy them, and we should be voting on it the week before we get back from this break.”
GENIUS Act on stablecoins is “going to pass,” says White House crypto czar
The White House seems to be in alignment with Senator Lummis.
Last week, Trump’s top crypto adviser, David Sacks, said the GENIUS stablecoin bill is “going to pass” the Senate with bipartisan support after clearing a key procedural vote on May 19.
On May 19, the Senate voted 66 to 32 to advance debate on the GENIUS Bill. Source: US Senate
Stablecoins have become one of the most prominent use cases for blockchain technology, with some industry advocates arguing that they could help extend the US dollar’s dominance as the global reserve currency.
Collateralized, dollar-backed stablecoins like Tether’s USDt (USDT) and Circle’s USDC (USDC) account for more than 85% of the $250 billion market, according to CoinMarketCap.