The Greek prime minister’s party got the call that Rishi Sunak was cancelling his meeting with Kyriakos Mitsotakis when they were on the way to talks with Sir Keir Starmer in parliament.
It did not feel like a coincidence.
With the Conservatives trailing a disastrous average of 19 points behind Labour in the opinion polls, the thin-skinned British PM and his entourage are increasingly uptight about Starmer being treated as a prime minister in waiting – PMiW for short – especially by fellow VIPs.
It is fascinating to observe the shuffling in the corridors of power when an opponent starts to look like a credible challenger to the incumbent.
The PM cannot get away from them in a parliamentary democracy but how should they treat political rivals when they are on an upward arc? Ignore them? Snub them? Patronise them graciously?
None of these is a comfortable option. Not least because other foreign leaders and power brokers quite legitimately want to get to know someone who they anticipate could be taking over soon.
UK prime ministers behave no differently. Tony Blair made a point of meeting the conservative candidate Angela Merkel in the run-up to a German election, even though he was in Berlin on a final visit to the outgoing chancellor, and fellow social democrat, Gerhard Schroder.
More on Rishi Sunak
Related Topics:
Sunak told MPs that he cancelled the invitation to the recently re-elected centre-right prime minister of a friendly European power “when it was clear that the purpose of the meeting was not to discuss substantive issues but rather to grandstand” about the Parthenon Marbles, sold to the British Museum by Lord Elgin.
The official-looking meeting
Advertisement
Far from impressing his audience, Sunak handed the Leader of the Opposition a grandstand opportunity to whack him with a severe PMQs spanking and to advertise his own credentials as a PMiW. Few would have noticed Starmer’s talks without the row.
Starmer wasted no time retorting that he had met “a fellow NATO member, an economic ally and one of our most important partners in tackling illegal immigration” and that “I discussed the economy, security and immigration with the Greek prime minister. I also told him we would not change the law regarding the marbles – it is not that difficult”.
By agreement, Starmer’s meeting with Mitsotakis was an official-looking affair – complete with pool camera pictures. Yvette Cooper, the shadow home secretary, David Lammy, the shadow foreign secretary, and other officials joined them around a conference table.
Trying to look like a prime minister has meant Starmer frequently falls in line with government plans to avoid controversy. With the scent of power in the air, and the Corbynistas largely sidelined, Labour MPs are going along with this in public. By contrast the Conservatives seldom miss an opportunity to disagree among themselves.
A previous Labour PMiW, sitting on a similar poll lead, might find the situation familiar. Tony Blair notes in his memoirs: “[John] Major decided on a long campaign… the hope was I would trip up, I would suddenly lose my head, or by some trick of fate or fortune the mood of the public would change… instead and rather more predictably the Tories fell apart.
“Every time Major tried to get them on the front foot, someone in his ranks resigned, said something stupid or got caught in a scandal.”
Leaders in office are well aware they are conferring status when they meet PMiWs.
In the run-up to the 1987 General Election, Neil Kinnock secured an audience with President Reagan, coinciding with Margaret Thatcher’s high-profile trip to Mikhail Gorbachev in Moscow.
Point one on the confidential State Department memo to the president spelt it out: “WHAT DOES KINNOCK WANT? * To meet with the President as Leader of the British Opposition and potential prime minister to demonstrate that he is a serious figure in international affairs.”
Not surprisingly, given Reagan’s fondness for Thatcher, that encounter did not go well – Labour felt slighted by White House briefings afterwards and retaliated by claiming Reagan was not on the ball.
Presidents are also heads of state, which means they can rise above party politics when it suits them.
US presidents usually hold at least one meeting with British opposition leaders.
Party allegiances, between Conservatives and Republicans on the right or Labour and Democrats on the left, do not matter much.
Shortly after taking office in 2009, Barack Obama insisted on a half-hour meeting with David Cameron, then leader of the opposition, at the US ambassador’s residence, Winfield House.
Both sides fielded top teams of officials, including Tim Geithner, US treasury secretary and Hillary Clinton, then secretary of state.
The British monarch, Queen or King, may also facilitate contacts because opposition leaders are invited to state occasions.
Ever the iconoclast, on his state visit in 2019 Trump claimed he had turned down a request from then Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn: “He wanted to meet today. I said no. He is somewhat of a negative force.”
Rachel Reeves and David Lammy have been on official trips to Washington DC, but Starmer has not yet had a formal meeting with Joe Biden even though this president has been to the UK five times, though never on a state visit.
Perhaps this is just as well given the polarisation of US politics with an election year approaching in both countries. For now, Sunak or Starmer are transparently eager not to be seen anywhere near Donald Trump.
Opposition ‘left out’
Number 10 and the Foreign Office are certainly not making it easy for Labour.
Reportedly, the prime minister has not yet given the green light to the civil service to begin the briefings for the opposition, which are normal courtesy in the run-up to an election.
There was no invitation to a Labour minister to join in the recent international talks on AI security at Bletchley Park.
This week, Business Secretary Kemi Badenoch posted on X from the government’s investor conference: “It was sad to hear from some investors yesterday that they’d move their HQs out of UK if Labour win.
“They tell me Labour relentlessly talk down the economy. Labour are like one of those candidates on The Apprentice who get fired early on. All talk no substance.”
She did not respond to challenges to name any such investors.
In the business community, a different rumour has been circulating; that attendees were quietly warned their invitations to the Hampton Court junket would be withdrawn if they committed prominently to one of shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves’ over-subscribed events.
Labour says the chancellor pressured “a load of businesses” not to sign up to their “British Infrastructure Council”.
This autumn, French President Emmanuel Macron invited Starmer and colleagues to the Elysee for talks.
Rishi Sunak is Britain’s only Brexiteer prime minister by life-long conviction.
He is super sensitive about relations with Europe and turned down an EU invitation to hold regular EU-UK ministerial summits.
Barbs at PMQs
During PMQs he chided Starmer, with no justification beyond the Greek meeting, that “no one will be surprised that he is backing an EU country over Britain”.
Starmer stuttered back that the PM was digging himself into a deeper hole: “Let me get this straight: the prime minister is now saying that meeting the prime minister of Greece is somehow supporting the EU, instead of discussing serious issues”.
If the prime minister was trying to energise a group of voters, the pickings may be slim. Well over 60% now tell pollsters that Brexit has not gone well and would like better relations with the EU.
Is it important for a PMiW to mix with current leaders on equal terms? It is surely good preparation if they end up getting the job. For some voters, it will be reassuring that a new leader might already count for something in international negotiations.
Sunak and Starmer both attended the COP28 climate summit in the UAE this weekend, where the King made a speech.
The PM dashed in for less than 24 hours. Starmer stayed three days until Sunday – to fulfil requests for meetings from a number of heads of state and government, according to his staff.
Neither the Elgin Marbles nor, frankly, Greece, are at the top of the diplomatic agenda. The UK government and opposition agree they are not going to change the law so the sculptures can be handed over.
The difference is that Sunak has made a diplomatic incident of it and, unlike Starmer, he has also obstructed the attempts to broker a compromise by a former Conservative colleague George Osborne, who is now chairman of the British Museum.
Perhaps the most painful swipe at PMQs for the prime minister came when Starmer risked a question, with the merest hint of a sizeist jibe at Sunak’s diminutive stature: “Why such small politics, prime minister?”
Or was it more humiliating when the Speaker rose to quell rowdies drowning out the PM’s peroration that “the British people aren’t listening” – to Starmer, he meant?
Whether they are listening now or not, come the general election the wait will be over for Sunak and Starmer. It will be up to the British people to choose who they think looks like the next PM.
Finnish police have seized more than $2.6 million worth of luxury watches from Hex founder Richard Heart, who is wanted on tax fraud and assault charges in the country.
Judge Katherine Failla granted Coinbase’s request for an interlocutory appeal, citing different courts’ interpretations of what constituted a security under the SEC’s purview.
The grooming gangs scandal is back in the headlines after Elon Musk attacked Sir Keir Starmer and minister Jess Phillips for failing children.
The tech billionaire has accused Sir Keir of being “complicit” in the failure of authorities to protect victims and prosecute abusers while the PM was director of public prosecutions from 2008-2013.
Sir Keir has hit back at Musk, saying his record shows how he tackled the issue head-on.
Sky News looks at a timeline of the grooming gangs scandal, inquiries and Sir Keir’s role.
How did the grooming gangs scandal unfold and what prosecutions have there been?
2001: Names of taxi drivers who allegedly picked up girls from care homes in Rotherham to abuse them are passed to the police and council from 2001. The first convictions were not until 2010, with the latest in 2024 – a total of 61.
2004: A Channel 4 documentary about claims young white girls in Bradford were being groomed for sex by Asian abusers is delayed as police forces warn it could inflame racial tensions. It was finally shown three months later.
2010: 11 men, predominantly of an Asian background, are convicted of offences connected with the sexual exploitation of children in Derbyshire.
2011: Times journalist Andrew Norfolk starts receiving tip-offs about child sexual exploitation by predominantly Asian men in Rotherham. It was his insistence on pursuing the story, despite being called racist and concerns the far-right would latch on to it, that eventually led to a national inquiry.
2011: A girl abused by a grooming gang in Huddersfield writes a letter to a judge about the abuse she had suffered. It was not until 2013 that another victim came forward to police to make formal allegations, then dozens of girls and men were interviewed over the next three years. Victims and their families said they repeatedly told police and authorities but nothing happened.
2011: Operation Bullfinch is launched by the police and council in Oxford to look into a child sex abuse ring in the city. The first convictions are secured in May 2013, then 2015, 2016, 2019 and 2020.
May 2012: The first grooming gangs convictions of men from Rochdale and Oldham see nine found guilty of being part of a child sexual exploitation ring run out of two takeaways in Greater Manchester since 2008. A further five from the Rochdale area were jailed the following year.
May 2013: Seven men have been jailed, it emerges, at the conclusion of child sex abuse trials relating to offences in the Telford area.
2017: A total of 29 men from a Huddersfield grooming gang are charged but a reporting restriction prevents media from reporting on the case to avoid prejudicing other cases. The ban was criticised by far-right groups, with Tommy Robinson – also known as Stephen Yaxley-Lennon – jailed for 13 months (later reduced to nine months) after admitting contempt for filming outside a court during the trial.
2018: Twenty men, mainly of Pakistani origin but the ringleader was Sikh, who were part of the Huddersfield child sex abuse ring are convicted of 120 rape and abuse offences against 15 girls, and sentenced to a total of 221 years.
Three separate trials had to be held as there were so many of them. More men have been convicted since then, bringing the total number to 41 by August 2021.
2023: A Grooming Gangs Taskforce is set up by Rishi Sunak’s government, with qualified officers from all 43 police forces in England and Wales, and data analysts. In May 2024, 550 suspects had been arrested and 4,000 victims identified.
2023: Nine further men are charged with sexual offences in Rotherham under Operation Stovewood. Most of the offences took place between 2003 and 2008.
2024: Operation Stovewood sees 11 more men from Rotherham convicted for the abuse of vulnerable girls.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:31
‘Lies’ over grooming gangs
What inquiries have there been?
There have been 10 inquiries and reports into the grooming gangs.
2013: The Home Affairs Select Committee publishes a report into the Rochdale cases, finding the failure to protect children fell to police, social workers and Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) prosecutors.
2014: An inquiry into grooming gangs in Rotherham, led by Professor Alexis Jay and commissioned by the council in 2013, finds 1,400 children were sexually abused between 1997 and 2013 by predominantly British-Pakistani men.
Then home secretary Theresa May commissions the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse in England and Wales following the Jimmy Savile scandal. Professor Jay became the chair after three others resigned.
2015: A West Midlands Police report from 2010 is released publicly after a Freedom of Information request by the Birmingham Mail.
It shows police knew five years before that Asian grooming gangs were targeting children outside schools in Birmingham but were worried about community tensions if it was made public.
2015: A report into Rotherham Council’s handling of child sexual abuse, commissioned by the government and led by Baroness Casey, finds the council had a bullying, sexist culture of covering up information and silencing whistleblowers.
A new police inquiry into child sexual abuse in Rotherham is launched, with 19 men and two women convicted in 2016 and 2017 of sexual offences dating back to the late 1980s.
2015: A serious case review by Oxfordshire Safeguarding Children’s Partnership finds 373 children (including 50 boys) could have been groomed and sexually exploited in the city. It accused Thames Valley Police of not believing children when they complained.
2019: An independent review into historic child sexual exploitation in Oldham shisha bars from 2011 to 2014 is commissioned by Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham after Oldham council requested it.
2020: The Home Office refuses to release research into grooming gangs as it said it is not in the public interest. Following public pressure it releases the report, which finds no credible evidence any one ethnic group is over represented in child sexual exploitation. It is branded a whitewash by critics.
2022: The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuseby Professor Jay is published after 12 years. It finds police and councils downplayed the scale of the problem and children were often blamed for their abuse.
It makes recommendations, including mandatory reporting of child sexual abuse by people working with children, the establishment of a national financial compensation scheme for victims “let down by institutions” and the creation of a child protection authority.
2022: Oldham councillors called for a government inquiry into grooming gangs in the town but the Conservative government rejected it and said the local authority should commission a review.
2022:Greater Manchester’s inquiry into Oldham grooming gangs was released. It found the police and council failed to protect vulnerable children and covered up their failings.
2022: The Telford independent inquiry was published and found more than 1,000 children in the town were sexually exploited and the abuse was allowed to continue for years, with children often blamed.
The inquiry found issues were not investigated because of nervousness about race, with teachers and youth workers discouraged from reporting child sexual exploitation.
2024: Oldham councillors again called for a government inquiry but safeguarding minister Jess Phillips said the council had to carry it out.
What is Sir Keir Starmer’s involvement?
2008-2013: Sir Keir Starmer was director of public prosecutions (DPP), head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) which conducts criminal prosecutions in England and Wales, for five years.
2009: The CPS was criticised for not prosecuting Rochdale grooming gang suspects in 2008 and 2009. It said the main victim was “unreliable” so dropped the case.
2010-2011: In that financial year, child sexual abuse prosecutions reached 4,794 – the highest during Sir Keir’s time as DPP. In 2016/17, nearly there were nearly 7,200 prosecutions.
2011: The decision to not prosecute in Rochdale was overturned by Nazir Afzal, chief prosecutor for northwest England, appointed by Sir Keir.
2013: A Home Affairs Committee report said unlike other agencies, the CPS had “readily admitted victims had been let down by them and have attempted both to discover the cause of this systemic failure and to improve the way things are done so as to avoid a repetition of such events”.
The report added: “Mr Starmer has striven to improve the treatment of victims of sexual assault within the criminal justice system throughout his term as DPP.”
Maggie Oliver, a former Manchester detective and whistleblower, told the BBC the CPS “bears a great deal of responsibility for the failures around this issue”, including bringing inadequate charges and blaming victims.
2013: Sir Keir revised guidance on child sexual exploitation to make future prosecutions easier. Before, victims may not have been viewed as credible if they had not complained immediately, if they had used drugs or alcohol, or dressed and acted in particular ways.
2013: The Child Sexual Abuse Review Panel was created by Sir Keir to review CPS decisions not to bring charges or terminate proceedings after 5 June 2013.
What has Elon Musk said?
The billionaire, who posts on X, which he owns, many times every day, has also given a series of interviews, and has commented on the grooming gangs and child sex exploitation cases in the past. He has shown support for both Reform and Tommy Robinson and began to post about the grooming gangs scandal regularly, in response to others, in late December and early January.
31 December: In response to an X post referencing the grooming gangs and claiming “out of political correctness, the government did everything it could to cover up the crimes”, Mr Musk replied: “The government officials responsible, including those in the judiciary, need to fired in shame over this”
In response to a post that claimed that “Parents who attempted to rescue their children were arrested when the police arrived”, he said on X: “So many people at all levels of power in the UK need to be in prison for this.”
1 January: Then, after a series of other posts responding to people expressing similar views, including sympathy for Tommy Robinson and support for Reform, he responded to a post saying “Labour’s Jess Phillips, Minister for Safeguarding, refused to back a public inquiry into child exploitation in Oldham” by saying: “Shameful conduct by Jess Phillips. Throw her out.”
2 January: He responds to a poster by calling for a new election, then…
He posts: “In the UK, serious crimes such as rape require the Crown Prosecution Service’s approval for the police to charge suspects. Who was the head of the CPS when rape gangs were allowed to exploit young girls without facing justice? Keir Starmer, 2008 -2013
“Who is the boss of Jess Phillips right now? Keir Stamer. The real reason she’s refusing to investigate the rape gangs is that it would obviously lead to the blaming of Keir Stamer (head of the CPS at the time).”
Responding to a post criticising what someone called the legacy media, he said: “This is the same media that hid the fact that a quarter million little girls were – still are – being systematically raped by migrant gangs in Britain. They are beneath contempt. Despicable human beings.”
3 January: In response to a post talking about the cost of another public inquiry, he says: “No UK government inquiry for the gang rape of innocent little girls, but £22M spent on an obviously violent lunatic. Shame, shame, shame.”
He went on to accuse Keir Starmer of being “guilty of complicity” and accusing Jess Phillips of being a “rape genocide apologist”.
4 January: He responded to an article in The Daily Telegraph, which claimed to show how the grooming scandal was “covered up”, by saying “How the rape of Britain was covered up” and then later added: “The sniveling cowards who allowed the mass rape of little girls in Britain are still in power … for now”.