ASLEF’s train drivers are to stage several strikes and overtime bans in December in their long-running dispute over pay.
Union members at 16 train operating companies in England will walk out on different days between 2 and 8 December.
Additionally, all members will refuse to work any overtime from 1 December to 9 December.
The union said it had previously called all its members out on strike on the same day but by spreading the action, the ramifications for the rail industry will be “greater”.
Here is a full list of the services affected by strikes and when.
Wednesday 6 December
Southeastern
Southern/Gatwick Express. Limited Southern shuttle runs calling at Gatwick Airport & Victoria only.
South Western Railway (main line and depot)
Advertisement
Thursday 7 December
CrossCountry
Great Western Railway
No Gatwick Express service. Southern & Thameslink as alternatives.
Friday 8 December
Northern
TPT
No Gatwick Express service. Southern & Thameslink as alternatives.
Strikes tend to mean services on lines where members are participating are extremely affected or cancelled entirely, whereas overtime bans often lead to reduced services.
This means that even if there isn’t a full strike on a service you plan to use between now and 9 December, the overtime ban could still affect your journey.
How can I stay in the loop?
You can use the National Rail’s journey planner to see when trains are running.
Be sure to check it close to when you plan to travel, as it will be updated regularly.
Why are the strikes still happening?
ASLEF rejected a two-year offer of 4% in 2022 and another 4% this year, saying it is way below inflation, and is linked to changes in terms and conditions.
The union has already agreed wage rises with 14 companies in the past year, including freight operators, Eurostar and passenger operators in Scotland and Wales, so its only ongoing dispute is with English train companies.
The strikes come days after members of the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union voted overwhelmingly to accept a deal to end their long-running dispute over pay and conditions.
What has been said about the strikes?
ASLEF says the new walkouts will “ratchet up the pressure” on train companies and the government to give train drivers their first pay rise in more than four years.
Image: ASLEF general secretary Mick Whelan on a picket line at Euston station
The union’s general secretary Mick Whelan said: “We are determined to win this dispute and get a significant pay rise for train drivers who have not had an increase since 2019, while the cost of living, in that time, has soared.
“The transport secretary, who has gone missing in action during this dispute, says we should put the offer to our members.
“What the minister apparently fails to understand is that, since the Rail Delivery Group’s (RDG) risible offer in April, we have received overwhelming mandates, on enormous turnouts, for more industrial action.
“We will continue to take industrial action until the train companies – and/or the government – sits down and negotiates with us in good faith.”
The Rail Delivery Group (RDG), which represents train companies, said the latest offer was “fair and affordable” and would take average driver salaries from £60,000 to nearly £65,000.
‘A perfectly fair and reasonable offer’
ASLEF has been criticised by the government and train operators for not putting the latest pay offer to its members for a vote.
In recent comments about the dispute with ASLEF, Transport Secretary Mark Harper said: “There is, most people think, a perfectly fair and reasonable offer on the table and I genuinely don’t understand why ASLEF won’t put it to their members.
“It would take the average pay of a train driver from £60,000 for a 35-hour four-day week to just under £65,000 for the same working week.
“Now I think most people will think that’s quite reasonable.
“But the most important thing is, it’s on the table, and I hope ASLEF put it to their members.”
The former BT Group chief Philip Jansen is being lined up as the next chairman of Heathrow Airport as Britain’s biggest aviation hub prepares to deliver an expansion costing close to £50bn.
Sky News has learnt that Mr Jansen, who chairs the FTSE-100 marketing services group WPP, is in advanced talks with Heathrow’s board and shareholders about taking on the role.
If the discussions reach a successful conclusion, sources said an announcement could come within weeks.
Mr Jansen is said to have emerged as the frontrunner from a shortlist of candidates compiled by headhunters at Russell Reynolds Associates.
His experience as the boss of BT, a regulated utility, is said to have been key to his selection as the preferred candidate.
Mr Jansen has also run companies including MyTravel and Worldpay.
The appointment of a successor to Lord Deighton, who has held the post for nine years, comes at a critical time for Heathrow.
In August, the airport submitted a revised expansion plan consisting of a third runway costing £21bn, £12bn for a new terminal and stand capacity, and £15bn to modernise the current airport through the expansion of Terminal 2.
The existing Terminal 3 would ultimately be closed.
Heathrow handled a record 83.9 million passengers in 2024 and is adamant that a third runway is essential to the growth of Britain’s economy, given the volume of exports which pass through the site.
“It has never been more important or urgent to expand Heathrow,” the airport’s chief executive, Thomas Woldbye, said in August.
“We are effectively operating at capacity to the detriment of trade and connectivity.
“With a green light from government and the correct policy support underpinned by a fit for purpose regulatory model, we are ready to mobilise and start investing this year in our supply chain across the country.
“We are uniquely placed to do this for the country; it is time to clear the way for take-off.”
The expansion remains opposed by many airlines alarmed by the prospective increase in charges to use the airport, as well
It has, however, been backed by the government, with Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, saying that a third runway “would unlock further growth, boost investment, increase exports, and make the UK more open and more connected as part of our Plan for Change”.
Heathrow’s next chairman will lead a board dominated by representatives of the airport’s principal shareholders.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:37
‘Serious questions’ after Heathrow fire
The airport said it would implement the recommendations of a review conducted by former transport secretary Ruth Kelly.
Heathrow’s search for a new chairman comes months after the most significant changes to its ownership structure in years.
Ardian, a French investment group, now owns 32.6% of the company following a series of transactions over the last 12 months.
Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund has also become an investor.
Heathrow has never formally announced Lord Deighton’s intention to step down, other than a disclosure in its annual report in which he wrote:
“In light of the recent changes to the HAHL [Heathrow Airport Holdings Limited] board…the nominations committee…has asked me to extend my appointment for a limited period to help ensure a smooth transition whilst new non-executive shareholder directors become familiar with the business and a new chair is appointed.
“I have therefore agreed to extend my role as chair for a limited period to ensure continuity and stability on the HAHL Board during this period of transition.”
A Heathrow spokesperson declined to comment, while Mr Jansen could not be reached for comment.
The first Post Office Capture conviction has now been formally referred to the Court of Appeal, marking a major milestone in the IT scandal.
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) made the decision to refer the case of sub-postmistress Patricia Owen back in July.
Mrs Owen was convicted of theft by a jury in 1998, based on evidence from the faulty IT software Capture.
She was given a suspended prison sentence and fought to clear her name afterwards – but died in 2003.
Capture software was used in 2,500 branches between 1992 and 1999.
More on Post Office Scandal
Related Topics:
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:45
The first Capture conviction was sent for appeal in July
It is the first time a conviction based on Capture – the predecessor to the Horizon system at the centre of the wider Post Office scandal – has reached the Court of Appeal.
It comes after Sky News revealed that a damning report into Capture, which could help overturn convictions, had been unearthed after nearly 30 years.
An investigation found the Post Office knew about the report at the time and continued to prosecute sub-postmasters based on Capture evidence.
Mrs Owen’s family submitted an application to the CCRC in January 2024 – her case has now been referred on the grounds that her prosecution was an “abuse of process”.
A ‘touchstone case’ for victims
Lawyers have said that if Mrs Owen is exonerated posthumously in the Court of Appeal, it may “speed up” the handling of others.
The CCRC is also continuing to investigate more than 30 other “pre-Horizon” convictions.
CCRC chair, Dame Vera Baird, also told Sky News in the summer it could be a “touchstone case” for other victims.
Juliet Shardlow, Mrs Owen’s daughter, has been fighting to clear her mother’s name for years.
She told Sky News the family were “so pleased” her case had finally been referred.
“This has been a very long journey for us as a family and we can now see the light at the end of the tunnel,” she said.
“It’s just sad that mum isn’t here to see it.
“The good news is that once mum’s case is heard in the High Court, it will pave the way for all the other Capture victims.”
The Post Office has previously said it is “determined that past wrongs are put right and continue to support the government’s work in this area as well as fully co-operate with the Criminal Cases Review Commission”.
Britain’s hopes of becoming a critical minerals superpower have been dealt a severe blow after one of its leading companies abandoned its plans to build a rare earths refinery near Hull.
Pensana had pledged to build a £250m refinery on the banks of the Humber, to process rare earths that would have then been used to make magnets for electric cars and wind turbines.
The plant promised to create 126 jobs and was due to receive millions of pounds of government funding.
However, Sky News has learnt that Pensana has decided to scrap the Hull plant and will instead move its refining operations to the US.
Pensana’s chairman, Paul Atherley, said the company had taken the decision after the Trump administration committed to buying rare earths from an American mine, Mountain Pass, at a guaranteed price – something no government in Europe had done.
“That’s repriced the market – and Washington is looking to do more of these deals, moving at an absolute rate of knots,” he said.
“Europe and the UK have been talking about critical minerals for ages. But when the Americans do it, they go big and hard, and make it happen. We don’t; we mostly just talk about it.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
11:18
Can Trump win the mineral war?
The decision comes at a crucial juncture in critical minerals and geopolitics. China produces roughly 90% of all finished rare earth metals – exotic elements essential for the manufacture of many technology, energy and military products.
Pensana had been seen as Britain’s answer to the periodic panics about the availability of rare earths. The site at Saltend Chemicals Park was chosen by the government to launch its critical minerals strategy in 2022.
Visiting for the official groundbreaking, the then business and energy secretary Kwasi Kwarteng said: “This incredible facility will be the only one of its kind in Europe and will help secure the resilience of Britain’s supplies into the future.”
He pledged a government grant to support the scheme. That grant was never received because Pensana never built its plant.
Image: Paul Atherley and Kwasi Kwarteng at a groundbreaking ceremony for the plant in July 2022. Pic: Pensana
Mr Atherley said he is optimistic about another project he’s involved with, to bring lithium refining to Teesside through another company, Tees Valley Lithium.
But, he said, rare earth processing is far more complex, energy-intensive and expensive, making it unviable in the UK, for the time being.
The decision is a further blow for Britain’s chemicals industry, which has faced a series of closures in recent months, including that of Vivergo, a biofuels refiner based in the same chemicals park where Pensana planned to locate its refinery.
Producers warn that Britain’s record energy costs – higher than most other leading economies – are stifling its economy and triggering an outflow of businesses.