Fresh blow for PM as Tory lawyers warn his Rwanda bill is not fit for purpose
Rishi Sunak has been dealt a fresh blow by members of his own party, who have concluded that his Rwanda bill is not fit for purpose.
Lawyers on the Tory right have concluded that the legislation is not “sufficiently watertight” – meaning illegal migrants could begin prolonged legal challenges in an attempt to stay in the UK.
According to The Sunday Telegraph, the European Research Group believes the law’s current wording will fail to help the government achieve its objective of deporting those who cross the Channel in small boats.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Can the new Rwanda policy work?
Tories from both the right and the left had been awaiting the findings, with MPs set to vote on the Rwanda bill this Tuesday.
More moderate Tories are weighing up whether they can support the plans amid concerns about compelling courts to find Rwanda is a “safe” country to send asylum seekers.
Last night, Mr Sunak attacked Labour’s illegal migration policy – as Sir Keir Starmer accused the Conservatives of “fighting like rats in a sack”.
The prime minister called on Labour to “rise above political games” and back his emergency legislation, even though Mr Sunak is currently battling to keep his own MPs on side.
It comes after Robert Jenrick resigned as immigration minister on Wednesday – claiming the Rwanda bill would spark a “merry-go-round” of legal challenges because it was too weak.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
‘Why did you resign, sir?’
Meanwhile, according to The Times, the attorney general has been told that the legislation has a “50% at best” chance of getting flights off the ground next year.
On Tuesday – the day of the vote – Sir Keir Starmer will use a speech to claim the Conservatives have lost the ability to govern – and insist he “won’t let the Tories take the country down with them”.
The home secretary had travelled to Rwanda to sign a revised treaty after the original proposal was ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court, which said there was a “real risk” migrants sent there would be returned home and put in danger.
Writing in The Sun on Sunday, Mr Cleverly again insisted that Rwanda is an “amazing country” that is “peaceful, safe and prosperous”.
“It is deemed safe by the UN refugee agency – and many refugees and other immigrants who have settled there, are now thriving,” he argued. “Some have also started successful businesses.”
Mr Cleverly also sought to play down concerns about the bill’s language – describing it as “the toughest immigration law ever”.
Read more:
UK paid Rwanda extra £100m for asylum deal
What has government agreed with new Rwanda deportation treaty?
Braverman urges Sunak to ‘change course’ over Rwanda bill
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
New Rwanda bill: What now?
Sunak attacks the Opposition
On Saturday night, Mr Sunak sought to defend his Rwanda bill – claiming it would be a “significant step” towards securing UK borders, “thwarting the evil trade of the smuggling gangs” and stopping the “injustice of illegal migration”.
“People in this country care deeply about stopping the boats,” he said.
“A government that governs in their interest must act on these entirely legitimate concerns.”
The PM said the Opposition is “not fit to govern” because “they have no plans to tackle illegal immigration”.
He claimed illegal migration would rise under a Labour government because it would agree a “burden sharing agreement for asylum seekers with the EU” – and he accused Sir Keir of having “blocked the deportation of dangerous criminals”.
Mr Sunak added: “This week, Labour needs for once to rise above political games.
“They need for once to stop acting in their short-term interests. They need to act in the national interest.
“The Conservatives are on the public’s side – and we will push on with our plan to stop the boats.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
‘My patience has worn thin, right?’
‘Miserable chapter of decline’
With a big lead in the polls, Sir Keir’s speech on Tuesday will pitch “fundamentally changed” Labour as a party that is ready to govern – arguing that the Tory infighting is “a cultural stain running through the modern Conservative Party”.
“While they’re all swanning around self-importantly, in their factions and their ‘star chambers’, fighting like rats in a sack, there’s a country out here that isn’t being governed,” he is expected to say.
“It is time to come together, to turn the page on this miserable chapter of decline, and walk towards a decade of national renewal,” he is set to say.
“I have dragged this Labour Party back to service, and I will do the same to British politics. I won’t let the Tories drag our country down with them. We cannot and will not let them kick the hope out of our future.”
The speech will also coincide with the four-year anniversary of the 2019 general election, which saw Boris Johnson lead the Conservatives to a huge common’s majority against Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour.
Sir Keir will say: “You know that this is a party that has fundamentally changed. Not just a paint job, but a total overhaul. A different Labour Party, driven by your values. By British values.”
The crash involving a cargo ship and oil tanker off the East Yorkshire coast is bad news for the sea, fish and air in the area. What we don’t know yet is quite how bad it will be.
That depends on a few things – but the speed of the collision, clouds of filthy black smoke from the fires and the leaked fuel are certainly worrying.
Firstly, it matters what was on board those two massive vessels.
Follow live: Jet fuel spilling into sea after tanker collision
Analytics firm Vortexa estimates the 183m-long tanker was carrying about 130,000 barrels of jet fuel (kerosene), which is now leaking into the sea.
Jet fuel is not as sticky or viscous as heavier types of oil, thankfully, so it’s less likely to clog the feathers and fur of birds and seals. It can also be broken down by natural bacteria.
But it can still poison fish and kill animals and plants on the shoreline if it makes its way into the soil there.
The Marine Conservation Society has pointed out the site in the Humber estuary is close to some protected areas and is important for seabirds and harbour porpoises.
And both ships will have been powered by a dirtier, heavier kind of oil – likely marine gas oil or heavy fuel oil, though we don’t know the details yet.
Heavy fuel oil is nasty stuff.
Pic: Bartek Smialek/PA
Cheap, thick and tar-like, it can smother animals and is very dangerous if they consume it, and is extremely difficult to clean up. Let’s hope this isn’t creeping around the North Sea already.
We don’t know how much of either the jet fuel or the oil powering the ships has leaked, or how much will be burned off in the violent fires – which themselves are ploughing black smoke and filthy air pollution into the surrounding atmosphere.
And we don’t know for sure what was on the Solong cargo ship and if, or what, will go into the sea.
Cargo ship ‘had sodium cyanide on board’
It was carrying 15 containers of sodium cyanide among other cargo, according to a report from maritime data provider Lloyd’s List Intelligence.
The container vessel was also transporting an unknown quantity of alcohol, said the casualty report – an assessment of incidents at sea – citing a message from the local coastguard.
Plastic takes hundreds of years to break down, and potentially can choke or trap animals.
Many of us have seen that uncomfortable viral video of a turtle having a straw yanked out of its nose. Previous accidents on cargo ships have seen plastic Lego pieces wash up in Cornwall 25 years later.
Read more:
How UK North Sea platforms dump gas
Secondly, the impact depends on the sea and weather conditions around it.
Things like the wind and currents affect how an oil spill spreads in the sea. Scientists can draw up computer models to simulate how the oil could behave.
Thirdly, it matters how quickly this is all tackled and then cleaned up, if necessary, and if it can be.
Usually the slower the response, the worse the impact.
The coastguard has said the incident “remains ongoing” and it has started assessing the “likely counter pollution response” that will be required.
Such a response might need the help of numerous public bodies: the government environment department, the transport department, the Environment Agency and the Maritime and Coastguard Agency.
So for now the best we can hope for – aside from the welfare of the people involved – is that not all the oil is spilled or burnt, that conditions are calm and that rescuers and those cleaning up can work swiftly.
-
Sports2 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports11 months agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports1 year agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports3 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business2 years agoBank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway