Connect with us

Published

on

A pub chef has been found guilty of murdering his ex-partner more than a decade ago after an undercover police officer befriended him and recorded a confession.

Darren Osment, 41, killed Claire Holland in early June 2012 during a drunken row.

Ms Holland, who was 32, was last seen leaving a pub in Bristol city centre – but the mother-of-four’s body has never been found and there are no forensics implicating the killer.

An undercover officer, posing as a man named Paddy O’Hara and pretending to be involved in the criminal underworld, was assigned to investigate Osment.

The trial at Bristol Crown Court was told the officer witnessed many instances of his violent temper – particularly after drinking.

Prosecutor Andrew Langdon KC told the jury that Osment had an “explosive temper with a propensity to use violence when angry”, and likely “lost his temper, lost control of himself” when he killed Ms Holland.

Crucially, police had several confessions Osment had made over the years in which he said he strangled Ms Holland, cut up her body and dumped her in the River Avon.

The court heard he confessed to six different people including the undercover officer, friends, an ex-girlfriend, a 999 operator and a prison inmate.

Osment was “carrying the burden of knowing what he did to her” and had “sought to relieve himself of the burden” through his confessions, Mr Langdon said.

Claire Holland's body has never been found
Image:
Claire Holland’s body has never been found

Ms Holland and Osment were both alcoholics and met in 2008 when they worked in a cafe.

They had a child in 2010 who was put in foster care amid claims of alcohol-fuelled domestic violence.

Police started investigating Osment again in 2019 after he dialled 999 and admitted to the murder.

The undercover officer won his confidence and the pair would play pool and snooker, go for walks together, and engage in supposed criminality.

Jurors heard conversations in which Osment discussed alibis and potentially blaming others for the murder.

‘I did what I did’

In one recording, he tells the officer: “Yeah because of what she did, f****** c*** mate, f*** her. End of, f*** em, she ain’t going to be seeing the light of day again, don’t worry about that.”

In another, Osment said he had “knife skills” due to his chef training.

He ran his hand across his chest while making a swishing sound to indicate he’d cut up Ms Holland’s body.

“Like I said, I’m not going to go into any details, I did what I did, I did what I done…” Osment said.

He suggested he killed her because he believed she was responsible for their child being taken into care.

“It makes me feel sick. But I did it for [my child]. Cause she harmed my f****** child. And how they were brought up is f****** wrong.”

Read more:
American driver flees UK after crash leaves nurse unable to walk

Prince Harry ordered to pay Mail on Sunday nearly £50,000

Osment denied murder and claimed the confessions were the ramblings of a “drunken idiot”.

Detective Superintendent Darren Hannant said it was vital to keep the undercover officer safe and that the investigation team didn’t know about him until July 2022 – a year and a half after he was first deployed.

He described the murder as “a brutal and premeditated crime motivated by his intense hatred of Claire”.

He said Osment had lured her to the pub where he worked in the Clifton area on 6 June 2012, killed her and likely disposed of her body in water.

Osment will be sentenced on 20 December.

Continue Reading

UK

King reveals ‘good news’ in his battle with cancer and urges people to get checked

Published

on

By

King reveals 'good news' in his battle with cancer and urges people to get checked

The King has shared in a television address that, thanks to early diagnosis, his cancer treatment can be reduced in the new year.

In a televised address, Charles said his “good news” was “thanks to early diagnosis, effective intervention and adherence to doctors’ orders”.

“This milestone is both a personal blessing and a testimony to the remarkable advances that have been made in cancer care in recent years,” he added.

“Testimony that I hope may give encouragement to the 50% of us who will be diagnosed with the illness at some point in our lives.”

The King announced in February 2024 that he had been diagnosed with cancer and was beginning treatment.

The monarch postponed all public-facing engagements, but continued with his duties as head of state behind palace walls, conducting audiences and Privy Council meetings.

He returned to public duties in April last year and visited University College Hospital Macmillan Cancer Centre in central London with the Queen and discussed his “shock” at being diagnosed when he spoke to a fellow cancer patient.

More on Cancer

Sources suggested last December his treatment would continue in 2025 and was “moving in a positive direction”.

The King began returning to public duties in April last year. File pic: PA
Image:
The King began returning to public duties in April last year. File pic: PA

The King has chosen not to reveal what kind of cancer he has been treated for. Palace sources have partly put that down to the fact that he doesn’t want one type of cancer to appear more significant or attract more attention than others.

In a statement after the speech aired, a Buckingham Palace spokesperson said: “His Majesty has responded exceptionally well to treatment and his doctors advise that ongoing measures will now move into a precautionary phase.”

Sir Keir Starmer praised the video message as “a powerful message,” and said: “I know I speak for the entire country when I say how glad I am that his cancer treatment will be reduced in the new year.

“Early cancer screening saves lives.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Watch: King Charles gives update on treatment

Early detection can give ‘the precious gift of hope’

His message on Friday was broadcast at 8pm in support of Stand Up To Cancer, a joint campaign by Cancer Research UK and Channel 4.

In an appeal to people to get screened for the disease early, the King said: “I know from my own experience that a cancer diagnosis can feel overwhelming.

“Yet I also know that early detection is the key that can transform treatment journeys, giving invaluable time to medical teams – and, to their patients, the precious gift of hope. These are gifts we can all help deliver.”

Charles noted that “at least nine million people in our country are not up to date with the cancer screenings available to them,” adding: “That is at least nine million opportunities for early diagnosis being missed.

“The statistics speak with stark clarity. To take just one example: When bowel cancer is caught at the earliest stage, around nine in ten people survive for at least five years.

“When diagnosed late, that falls to just one in ten. Early diagnosis quite simply saves lives.”

after months of uncertainty, some relief and reassurance for the King

This is a rare but positive update. The King in his own words speaking about his cancer.

And it’s good news.

Since his diagnosis, he’s received weekly treatment. His work schedule has had to fit around the appointments. And while it’s not stopping, it is being significantly reduced.

He’s responded well, and his recovery has reached, we understand, a very positive stage.

The King’s decision to speak publicly and so personally is unusual.

He has deliberately chosen the moment, supporting the high-profile Stand Up To Cancer campaign, and the launch of a national online screening checker.

It still hasn’t been revealed what kind of cancer he has. And there’s a reason – firstly, it’s private information.

But more importantly, the King knows the power of sharing his story. And with it, the potential to support the wider cancer community.

We are once again seeing a candid openness from the Royal Family. Earlier this year, the Princess of Wales discussed the ups and downs of her cancer journey.

These moments signal a shift towards greater transparency on matters the Royal Family once kept entirely private.

For millions facing cancer, the King’s update is empathy and encouragement from someone who understands.

And after months of uncertainty, for the King himself, some relief and reassurance.

Minor inconvenience of screening ‘a small price to pay’

The King acknowledged that people often avoid screening “because they imagine it may be frightening, embarrassing or uncomfortable”. But, he added: “If and when they do finally take up their invitation, they are glad they took part.

“A few moments of minor inconvenience are a small price to pay for the reassurance that comes for most people when they are either told either they don’t need further tests, or, for some, are given the chance to enable early detection, with the life-saving intervention that can follow.”

Read more from Sky News:
Christmas tree chopped down hours after lights switch-on
More photos from Epstein’s estate released
Taylor Swift breaks down in tears over Southport attacks

Giving his “most heartfelt thanks” to doctors, nurses, researchers and charity workers, the King added: “As I have observed before, the darkest moments of illness can be illuminated by the greatest compassion. But compassion must be paired with action.

“This December, as we gather to reflect on the year past, I pray that we can each pledge, as part of our resolutions for the year ahead, to play our part in helping to catch cancer early.

“Your life – or the life of someone you love – may depend upon it.”

Continue Reading

UK

Man found guilty of murdering wife in rare retrial

Published

on

By

Man found guilty of murdering wife in rare retrial

A 52-year-old carpenter from Surrey has been found guilty of murdering his wife in a rare retrial, eight years after being acquitted.

Robert Rhodes killed his estranged wife, Dawn Rhodes, by slitting her throat with a knife at their family home in Redhill, Surrey, in June 2016.

He was previously found not guilty after a trial at the Old Bailey in 2017, where he convinced jurors that he had acted in self-defence during an argument.

It has since emerged that this was a “cover-up”, after the couple’s child came forward with new evidence that Rhodes killed Ms Rhodes, and they were involved in the murder too.

In 2021, the child, who was under the age of 10 at the time of the murder, told police they had been manipulated into lying about the true version of events by their father.

Both Rhodes and the child were found with knife wounds at the scene, which were initially claimed to have been inflicted in an attack by Ms Rhodes.

The child’s new account stated that after Rhodes killed his wife, he inflicted two wounds to his scalp before instructing the child to inflict two more on their father’s back. He then cut his own child’s arm so deeply that it required stitches under general anaesthetic.

Under the double jeopardy rule a person cannot be tried twice for the same crime, unless new and compelling evidence comes out after an acquittal or conviction for serious offences.

On Friday, jurors at Inner London Crown Court convicted Rhodes of murder and child cruelty.

He was also found guilty of perverting the course of justice and two counts of perjury.

Rhodes will be sentenced on 16 January.

What is the law on double jeopardy?

The double jeopardy rule is a legal principle that prevents a person from being tried twice for the same crime after they have been acquitted or convicted.

It’s a protection for that person from harassment. However, the law permits a retrial where someone was acquitted of a serious offence, but new and compelling evidence has since come to light which indicates the person might actually be guilty.

In this case, the new evidence from the child was compelling enough for the Court of Appeal to quash the acquittal and a retrial to take place.

Crucially, the child’s evidence was so compelling that the Court of Appeal agreed Rhodes needed to be tried again.

Surrey Police told Sky News that the child, who was of primary school age at the time and is below the age of criminal responsibility, was “groomed” by Rhodes into lying.

The Crown Prosecution Service said “the child’s part in the plan was that they would distract the mother by saying to the mother ‘hold out your hands, I’ve got a surprise for you’, and the child would then put a drawing into the hands of the mother”.

Rhodes then cut his wife’s throat. She was found lying face down in a pool of blood in the dining room.

How the case unfolded

2 June 2016 – Dawn Rhodes killed

5 June 2016 – Robert Rhodes charged with murder

2 May 2017 – first trial begins

30 May 2017 – not guilty verdict

18 November 2021 – child gives therapist new account

Late November 2021 – police reopen case

4 June 2024 – Robert Rhodes rearrested and charged the next day

7 November 2024 – Rhodes’s acquittal quashed

2 October 2025 – second trial begins

Libby Clark, specialist prosecutor for the Crown Prosecution Service’s South East Area Complex Casework Unit, said the child showed “great bravery and strength” in coming forward with the truth.

She said: “The child has grown up with the dawning realisation, I would say, that they were part of a plan. They were complicit in the murder of the mother, Dawn Rhodes.”

Legal commentator Joshua Rozenberg said there are “very few cases” where a retrial like this happens.

He said: “It’s very unusual. I don’t think there’s been a case that I can think of where a witness who was present at the scene of the crime has come forward and given evidence, which has led to a conviction.”

Continue Reading

UK

‘They’re invisible within society’: Whistleblower says asylum seekers disappear ‘daily’ from hotels

Published

on

By

'They're invisible within society': Whistleblower says asylum seekers disappear 'daily' from hotels

An insider has told Sky News people are still disappearing “daily” from asylum seeker hotels.

In an exclusive interview, the contractor described the chaos he sees within the system as “terrifying” because undocumented people are persistently absconding from hotels.

He spoke to us because he is deeply concerned about the ongoing lack of monitoring at a time when the government has promised to tighten the asylum system.

The man, who we are not naming, works across multiple asylum hotels in one region of England.

“When someone gets to about a week away from the hotel, they’re processed as an absconder,” he said.

“Nothing really happens there. They get marked as ‘left the hotel’ and a notification is sent to the Home Office.

“It’s at least weekly. Most of the time it can be daily.”

More on Asylum

The government moved last month to reset its immigration policy by promising to toughen the process for asylum seekers.

The latest figures up to September this year show 36,272 asylum seekers living in hotels.

Failed asylum applicants are given a date to move out by, but they're not actually picked up by the authorities, the insider says
Image:
Failed asylum applicants are given a date to move out by, but they’re not actually picked up by the authorities, the insider says

Overall 110,000 people claimed asylum in the UK between September 2024 and September 2025 – higher than the previous recorded peak of 103,000 in 2002.

The hotel contractor also described to Sky News what he says happens when a resident’s claim for asylum is rejected.

“They get given a date that they need to move out by,” he said.

“You would expect immigration enforcement to go to the hotel to pick these people up. You would expect them to not even be told that they failed their asylum claim.

“You would expect them to just be collected from the hotel… that doesn’t happen.”

He told us that some residents just walk out of the door with no further checks or assistance.

The whistleblower spoke to Sky News' Tom Parmenter in the exclusive interview
Image:
The whistleblower spoke to Sky News’ Tom Parmenter in the exclusive interview

“It must be terrifying for these people as well… ‘what do I do now? I don’t have an address’.

“So what do they do? How do they survive?

“Do they then get forced… to go into an underground world?

“They’re just completely invisible within society.

“For those people to freely be allowed, undetected and unchecked, on the streets of this country is terrifying.”

His account from within the system contrasts with the government’s promises to restore control over the asylum process.

Police and protesters outside the Bell Hotel, Epping, where asylum seekers have been housed. Pic: PA
Image:
Police and protesters outside the Bell Hotel, Epping, where asylum seekers have been housed. Pic: PA

In response to the interview, a Home Office spokesperson said: “This government will end the use of hotels and have introduced major reforms to the asylum system, to scale up removals of people with no right to be here and address the factors drawing illegal migrants to the UK in the first place.

“Nearly 50,000 people with no right to be in our country have been removed and enforcement arrests to tackle illegal working are at the highest level in recent history.

“A dedicated team in the Home Office works with police, across government and commercial companies to trace absconders. Failure to return to a hotel can also lead to asylum claims and support being withdrawn.”

At a community kitchen in Greater Manchester, organisers told us they regularly see people who are living under the radar – surviving with “cash in hand” jobs.

Volunteer Shabana Yunas says the situation is 'getting worse' and 'it is dangerous'
Image:
Volunteer Shabana Yunas says the situation is ‘getting worse’ and ‘it is dangerous’

Volunteer Shabana Yunas helps many hungry and desperate people. She also feels the tension it causes in her community.

“People don’t know who they are and I understand a lot of people are afraid… but if there’s those things in place where we can monitor who is around, then everybody can feel a lot safer.

“If people are coming into the UK and we don’t know who they are and they’re just disappearing, crime rates are going to go up, slavery is going to go higher, child exploitation is going to be more exposed.

“They are too afraid to go to the authorities because they are scared of being deported to a country where their lives could be at risk.

“It’s getting worse, it is dangerous and we do need to do something about this where we can support people.”

Kitchen volunteer Khalid, from Ethiopia, has had his application for asylum rejected four times
Image:
Kitchen volunteer Khalid, from Ethiopia, has had his application for asylum rejected four times

Another volunteer at the kitchen is Khalid.

He arrived in the UK in 2015 having travelled from Ethiopia – he hid on a lorry to get into England.

Read more:
The visa overstayers living under the radar

Stats show rise in asylum seekers being housed in hotels
Britain’s immigration system changes explained

He has applied for asylum and been rejected four times.

He has recently submitted another application and told us political violence at home meant he could not return.

Crucially, he knows plenty of people living off-grid.

“Yeah, they don’t care about what the government thinks, because they already destroyed their life,” he told us.

👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈

Although Khalid now has somewhere to stay, he has previously considered turning to crime to give himself the stability of life in prison.

“I was in depression. I was like, I wanna do some criminal and go jail, to stay in a prison.

“Once upon a time, I’d prefer that way.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The visa overstayers in ‘soft’ Britain

Khalid is now volunteering to give his life more purpose as he waits for another decision from the Home Office.

He says he doesn’t blame people who think he should be deported back to Ethiopia.

When asked if he should have been, he said: “That is up to Home Office, like up to government.”

Stopping small boats, clearing backlogs, closing hotels, enforcing the rules and restoring faith in the system are all priorities for the Home Office – solving it all is one of the defining challenges for the Starmer government.

Continue Reading

Trending