Rishi Sunak to face COVID inquiry – amid claims govt scientists called him ‘Dr Death’
Rishi Sunak will be challenged at the COVID inquiry on claims that government scientists branded him “Dr Death” – and called his scheme to kickstart the economy “Eat Out to Help Out the Virus”.
The inquiry has also been told that Dominic Cummings, Boris Johnson’s chief adviser in Downing Street at the time, claimed Mr Sunak’s view of COVID was: “Just let people die and that’s okay.”
Mr Sunak, who was chancellor during the pandemic, is the final witness to take the stand in the current phase of the inquiry – following on from Boris Johnson and Matt Hancock.
Politics Hub: Latest updates from Westminster
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Johnson recalls time in ICU
The inquiry’s lead counsel Hugo Keith KC – who like Mr Sunak was educated at Winchester and Oxford – is expected to give the current prime minister a torrid time after a tetchy clash with Mr Johnson last week.
Mr Keith has been nicknamed “Hugo Hindsight” and accused of a “knifing hapless public servants” at the inquiry, and being obsessed with X-rated language used in WhatsApp messages sent during the crisis.
The “Dr Death” slur against Mr Sunak was said to have been made by Angela McLean, now the government’s chief scientific adviser, while the attack over Eat Out to Help Out was made by chief medical officer Sir Chris Whitty.
The “let people die” claim attributed to Mr Cummings appeared in the diary entries of former chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance, who has been strongly critical of Mr Sunak in his evidence to the inquiry.
Mr Sunak will be questioned on claims that Eat Out to Help Out led to a spike in COVID cases and excess deaths – and that scientists were not consulted before it was launched.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2020: Sunak explains Eat Out to Help Out
But in a defiant witness statement to the inquiry, the PM insisted: “Any suggestion that Eat Out to Help Out caused the second wave of infections is not borne out with reference to the discussions at the time.”
Michael Gove strongly defended Mr Sunak on Sky News yesterday.
On Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips, he was asked about Sir Patrick Vallance’s claim that Eat Out to Help Out almost certainly increased the number of excess deaths.
Mr Gove said: “That’s Patrick’s view and I have enormous respect for Sir Patrick, having worked with him closely.
“However, I think it’s important to say that the Eat Out to Help Out scheme was announced a month before it was implemented and in the period post-announcement and pre-implementation, it was not the case that there was a public critique of it.
“It was an effective way of ensuring that the hospitality industry was supported through a very difficult period. And it was entirely within the broad outlines of rules about social mixing that prevailed at the time.”
Read more:
Analysis: PM is facing a crisis sooner or later
Sunak faces crunch week as Rwanda vote looms
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2020: Sunak tries to be a waiter
In his evidence, former deputy chief medical officer Professor Sir Jonathan Van-Tam said Eat Out to Help Out – which provided 50% off the cost of food and non-alcoholic drinks – “didn’t feel sensible” because it was encouraging exactly what officials had been trying to stop in previous months.
Mr Sunak is also expected to be asked about lockdown-sceptic views he expressed during the 2022 Tory leadership election campaign, when he claimed too much power was given to government scientists.
He had told the Spectator magazine in August 2022: “We shouldn’t have empowered the scientists in the way we did. And you have to acknowledge trade-offs from the beginning.
“If we’d done all of that we could be in a very different place. We’d probably have made different decisions on things like schools, for example.
“Could a more frank discussion have helped Britain avoid lockdown entirely, as Sweden did? I don’t know, but it could have been shorter. Different. Quicker.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
‘Sorry’ Johnson heckled
In that interview, Mr Sunak also claimed many of his objections to draconian COVID rules were met with a “big silence” from government colleagues.
“Those meetings were literally me around that table, just fighting. It was incredibly uncomfortable, every single time,” he said.
Click to subscribe to Politics at Jack and Sam’s wherever you get your podcasts
One of Sir Patrick’s diary entries said of Mr Sunak at a meeting: “Pushes very hard for faster opening up and fuller opening up, getting rid of all restrictions. Repeats his mantra: ‘We either believe in the vaccine or we don’t.'”
Mr Sunak may also face questions over his WhatsApp messages, or lack of them.
He has told the inquiry that “having changed my phone a number of times over the last three years” he no longer has access to them.
The crash involving a cargo ship and oil tanker off the East Yorkshire coast is bad news for the sea, fish and air in the area. What we don’t know yet is quite how bad it will be.
That depends on a few things – but the speed of the collision, clouds of filthy black smoke from the fires and the leaked fuel are certainly worrying.
Firstly, it matters what was on board those two massive vessels.
Follow live: Jet fuel spilling into sea after tanker collision
Analytics firm Vortexa estimates the 183m-long tanker was carrying about 130,000 barrels of jet fuel (kerosene), which is now leaking into the sea.
Jet fuel is not as sticky or viscous as heavier types of oil, thankfully, so it’s less likely to clog the feathers and fur of birds and seals. It can also be broken down by natural bacteria.
But it can still poison fish and kill animals and plants on the shoreline if it makes its way into the soil there.
The Marine Conservation Society has pointed out the site in the Humber estuary is close to some protected areas and is important for seabirds and harbour porpoises.
And both ships will have been powered by a dirtier, heavier kind of oil – likely marine gas oil or heavy fuel oil, though we don’t know the details yet.
Heavy fuel oil is nasty stuff.
Pic: Bartek Smialek/PA
Cheap, thick and tar-like, it can smother animals and is very dangerous if they consume it, and is extremely difficult to clean up. Let’s hope this isn’t creeping around the North Sea already.
We don’t know how much of either the jet fuel or the oil powering the ships has leaked, or how much will be burned off in the violent fires – which themselves are ploughing black smoke and filthy air pollution into the surrounding atmosphere.
And we don’t know for sure what was on the Solong cargo ship and if, or what, will go into the sea.
Cargo ship ‘had sodium cyanide on board’
It was carrying 15 containers of sodium cyanide among other cargo, according to a report from maritime data provider Lloyd’s List Intelligence.
The container vessel was also transporting an unknown quantity of alcohol, said the casualty report – an assessment of incidents at sea – citing a message from the local coastguard.
Plastic takes hundreds of years to break down, and potentially can choke or trap animals.
Many of us have seen that uncomfortable viral video of a turtle having a straw yanked out of its nose. Previous accidents on cargo ships have seen plastic Lego pieces wash up in Cornwall 25 years later.
Read more:
How UK North Sea platforms dump gas
Secondly, the impact depends on the sea and weather conditions around it.
Things like the wind and currents affect how an oil spill spreads in the sea. Scientists can draw up computer models to simulate how the oil could behave.
Thirdly, it matters how quickly this is all tackled and then cleaned up, if necessary, and if it can be.
Usually the slower the response, the worse the impact.
The coastguard has said the incident “remains ongoing” and it has started assessing the “likely counter pollution response” that will be required.
Such a response might need the help of numerous public bodies: the government environment department, the transport department, the Environment Agency and the Maritime and Coastguard Agency.
So for now the best we can hope for – aside from the welfare of the people involved – is that not all the oil is spilled or burnt, that conditions are calm and that rescuers and those cleaning up can work swiftly.
-
Sports2 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports11 months agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports1 year agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports3 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business2 years agoBank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway