Connect with us

Published

on

Share Tweet By Tr Goins-Phillips Editor
December 8, 2023

A Republican lawmaker in Tennessee has introduced legislation to implement age-verification requirements to protect kids from being exposed to pornography.

The “Protect Tennessee Minors Act,” sponsored by state Rep. Patsy Hazlewood (R), would mandate pornography distributors put in place age-verification measures to ensure minors in the Volunteer State are barred from accessing sexually explicit content.

Listen to them on the latestepisodeof Quick Start ?

“Exposing children to pornography is a form of child sexual abuse and exploitation that can severely damage a childs intellectual development and emotional well-being,” said Hazlewood, chair of the House Finance, Ways, and Means Committee. “It can lead to difficulty in forming and maintaining positive relationships. This legislation will apply the same safeguards and restrictions to the online world that we already have in place in the physical world. The standard should be the same.”

The legislative proposal is similar to laws already in place in Utah and Virginia, where the largest pornography distributor Pornhub is inaccessible.

Pornhub blocked Virginians’ access to its platform in retaliation to the commonwealth’s law requiring the site implement an age-verification system. Pornhub has claimed the statute violates users’ privacy.

As CBN Digital reported, there are serious legal concerns with Pornhub and other pornography distributors, not least of which are problems with child sexual abuse material or child pornography circulating online.

Hazlewood’s legislation would require companies like Pornhub to match a user profile image to a verified government-issued I.D. Sites that don’t follow through with the requirement would be charged with Class C felonies, up to 15 years in prison, and $10,000 fines.

“My top priority is the safety and health of my children,” said Jacob Levy, a Tennessee-based tech industry executive. “Pornography is a societal disaster. Modernizing existing laws to require age verification will protect children from it and help the internet stay digital, not degenerate.”

***As the number of voices facing big-tech censorship continues to grow, please sign up forFaithwires daily newsletterand download theCBN News app, developed by our parent company, to stay up-to-date with the latest news from a distinctly Christian perspective.***

Continue Reading

Technology

The question everyone in AI is asking: How long before a GPU depreciates?

Published

on

By

The question everyone in AI is asking: How long before a GPU depreciates?

Nvidia President and CEO Jensen Huang speaks about NVIDIA Omniverse as he delivers the keynote address during the Nvidia GTC (GPU Technology Conference) at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center on Oct. 28, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Anna Moneymaker | Getty Images

As a handful of the world’s most valuable companies set out to spend $1 trillion over the next five years on data centers for artificial intelligence, one line item is on the minds of executives and investors: depreciation.

In accounting, depreciation is the act of allocating the cost of a hard asset over the course of its expected useful life. It’s an increasingly important concept in the tech industry, as companies predict how long the hundreds of thousands of Nvidia graphics processing units they’re purchasing will remain useful or retain their value.

Infrastructure giants like Google, Oracle and Microsoft have said their servers could be useful for up to six years. But they could also depreciate much sooner. Microsoft said in its latest annual filing that its computer equipment lasts two to six years.

That’s a lot to consider for the investors and lenders financing the giant AI buildouts, because the longer equipment remains valuable, the more years a company can stretch out depreciation and the less it hurts profits.

Read more CNBC reporting on AI

AI GPUs represent a particular challenge because they’re still relatively new to the market. Nvidia’s first AI-focused processors for the data center came out around 2018. The current AI boom started with the launch of ChatGPT in late 2022. Since then Nvidia’s annual data center revenue has jumped from $15 billion to $115 billion in the year that ended in January.

There’s no real track record for how long GPUs last when compared with other types of heavy equipment that businesses have been using for decades, said Haim Zaltzman, vice chair of Latham & Watkins’ emerging companies and growth practice.

“Is it three years, is it five, or is it seven?” said Zaltzman, who works on GPU financings, in an interview. “It’s a huge difference in terms of how successful it is for financing purposes.”

Some of Nvidia’s customers say AI chips will retain value for a long time and that customers will continue to pay for access to older processors because they’ll still be useful for other tasks. CoreWeave, which buys GPUs and rents them out to clients, has used six-year depreciation cycles for its infrastructure since 2023.

CoreWeave CEO Michael Intrator told CNBC this week, following quarterly earnings, that his company is being “data driven” about GPU shelf life.

Intrator said that CoreWeave’s Nvidia A100 chips, which were announced in 2020, are all fully booked. He also added that a batch of Nvidia H100 chips from 2022 became available because a contract expired, and they were immediately booked at 95% of their original price.

“All of the data points that I’m getting are telling me that the infrastructure retains value,” Intrator said.

CoreWeave CEO, Michael Intrator appears on CNBC on July 17, 2024.

CNBC

Still, CoreWeave shares plunged 16% after the earnings report as delays at a third-party data center developer hit full-year guidance. The stock is down 57% from its high reached in June, part of a broader selloff reflecting concerns about overspending in AI. Oracle shares have plummeted 34% from their record high in September.

Among the most vocal skeptics of the AI trade is short seller Michael Burry, who recently disclosed bets against Nvidia and Palantir.

Burry this week suggested that companies including Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, Google and Amazon are overstating the useful life of their AI chips, and understating depreciation. He pegs the actual useful life of server equipment at around two to three years, and said companies are inflating their earnings as a result.

Amazon and Microsoft declined to comment. Meta, Google and Oracle did not respond to requests for comment.

‘You couldn’t give Hoppers away’

Microsoft Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Satya Nadella speaks during the Microsoft Build 2025, conference in Seattle, Washington, on May 19, 2025.

Jason Redmond | AFP | Getty Images

Although Microsoft plans to build AI infrastructure aggressively, CEO Satya Nadella said this week that his company is trying to space out its AI chip purchases and not overinvest in a single generation of processors. He added that the biggest competitor for any new Nvidia AI chip is its predecessor.

“One of the biggest learnings we had even with Nvidia is that their pace increased in terms of their migrations,” Nadella said. “That was a big factor. I didn’t want to go get stuck with four or five years of depreciation on one generation.”

Nvidia declined to comment.

Dustin Madsen, vice president of the Society of Depreciation Professionals and the founder of Emrydia Consulting, said depreciation is a financial estimate by management and that developments in a fast-moving industry like technology can change initial predictions.

Depreciation estimates, Madsen said, generally take into account assumptions such as technological obsolescence, maintenance, historical lifespans of similar equipment and internal engineering analysis.

“You’re going to have to convince an auditor that what you’re suggesting what its life will be is actually its life,” Madsen said. “They will look at all of those factors, like your engineering data that suggests that the life of these assets is approximately six years, and they will audit that at a very detailed level.”

— CNBC’s Jordan Novet contributed to this story.

WATCH: Chris Wood: We’ve removed Nvidia from our portfolio, prefer China AI names

Chris Wood: We've removed Nvidia from our portfolio, prefer China AI names

Continue Reading

Business

Direct cost of Jaguar Land Rover cyber attack which impacted UK economic growth revealed

Published

on

By

Direct cost of Jaguar Land Rover cyber attack which impacted UK economic growth revealed

The cyber attack on Jaguar Land Rover (JLR), which halted production for nearly six weeks at its sites, cost the company roughly £200m, it has been revealed.

Latest accounts released on Friday showed “cyber-related costs” were £196m, which does not include the fall in sales.

Profits took a nose dive, falling from nearly £400m (£398m) a year ago to a loss of £485m in the three months to the end of September.

Money blog: Apple launches £220 iPhone ‘sock’ today – fans are divided

Revenues dropped nearly 25% and the effects may continue as the manufacturing halt could slow sales in the final three months of the year, executives said.

The impact of the shutdown also hit factories across the car-making supply chain.

Slowing the UK economy

The production pause was a large contributor to a contraction in UK economic growth in September, official figures showed.

Had car output not fallen 28.6%, the UK economy would have grown by 0.1% during the month. Instead, it fell by 0.1%.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How cyber attack ‘effectively hacked GDP’

Read more from Sky News:
Telegraph future in limbo again as RedBird abandons £500m deal

Reacting to JLR’s impact on the GDP contraction, its chief financial officer, Richard Molyneux, said it was “interesting to hear” and it “goes to reinforce” that JLR is really important in the UK economy.

The company, he said, is the “biggest exporter of goods in the entire country” and the effect on GDP “is a reflection of the success JLR has had in past years”.

Recovery

The company said operations were “pretty much back running as normal” and plants were “at or approaching capacity”.

Production of all luxury vehicles resumed.

Investigations are underway into the attack, with law enforcement in “many jurisdictions” involved, the company said.

When asked about the cause of the hack and the hackers, JLR said it was not in a position to answer questions due to the live investigation.

A run of attacks

The manufacturer was just one of a number of major companies to be seriously impacted by cyber criminals in recent months.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Are we in a cyber attack ‘epidemic’?

High street retailer Marks and Spencer estimated the cost of its IT outage was roughly £136m. The sum only covers the cost of immediate incident systems response and recovery, as well as specialist legal and professional services support.

The Co-Op and Harrods also suffered service disruption caused by cyber attacks.

Four people were arrested by police investigating the incidents.

Continue Reading

Technology

StubHub stock plummets 24% after company withholds fourth-quarter guidance

Published

on

By

StubHub stock plummets 24% after company withholds fourth-quarter guidance

In this photo illustration, the StubHub logo and webpage are displayed on a cell phone and computer monitor on April 17, 2024 in Los Angeles, California. 

Mario Tama | Getty Images

StubHub‘s stock plummeted 24% on Friday after the company withheld financial guidance for the current quarter, citing a “long-term” focus.

StubHub CEO Eric Baker told investors on Thursday’s conference call that the timing of when tickets go on sale can shift from quarter to quarter, making it hard to predict consumer demand.

Baker reiterated that demand for live events is “phenomenal,” and added that the company plans to offer an outlook for 2026 when it reports fourth-quarter results.

“This year, we are observing some shifts in the timing of these on-sales,” CFO Connie James told investors on the call. “Several large tours that would typically go on sale in the fourth quarter occurred earlier in late September. It remains to be seen how this concert on-sale timing dynamic plays out in November and December.”

Wedbush analysts said in an investor note on Friday that they were “surprised” by StubHub executives’ decision not to offer any guidance.

“The lack of forward guidance will pressure shares, with investor concern building around lack of visibility over the near-term,” the analysts wrote. They have an outperform rating on StubHub stock.

The lack of guidance overshadowed the company’s stronger-than-expected results in its first earnings report as a public company. Third-quarter revenue grew 8% year over year to $468.1 million, topping the average analyst estimate of $452 million, according to LSEG.

Gross merchandise sales, which represent the total dollar value paid by ticket buyers, jumped 11% year over year to $2.43 billion. That surpassed Wall Street’s expected $2.36 billion, according to FactSet.

The ticket vendor posted a net loss of $1.33 billion, or a loss of $4.27 per share, due to one-time stock-based compensation charges related to its initial public offering in September.

Read more CNBC tech news

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

hide content

StubHub stock one-day chart.

Continue Reading

Trending