Three guilty of murdering woman who was ‘treated like a slave’ and fed only sachets of ketchup
Two women and a man have been found guilty of murdering a vulnerable woman who they “treated like a slave”.
Shakira Spencer died aged 35 after falling under the influence of her former neighbour Ashana Studholme, 38, Studholme’s lover Shaun Pendlebury, 26, and their friend Lisa Richardson, 44.
The defendants, from west London, scalded her feet and fed her only ketchup from sachets, the Old Bailey was told.
Ms Spencer went from being a “beautiful, happy, healthy” size 16 to a “gaunt and skeletal” size six shortly before her death, jurors heard.
Last September, her badly decomposed body was found after neighbours saw maggots coming from her flat in Ealing, west London.
Shakira Spencer, pictured in 2007, was ‘gaunt and skeletal’ shortly before her death
The three defendants had denied murder and preventing Ms Spencer’s lawful burial.
On Monday, a jury found all three guilty of both charges against them.
Pendlebury reacted by clapping his hands and walking out of the dock.
Previously, jurors heard how Ms Spencer had been subdued and dominated to the point that she was under the “complete control” of the defendants.
Over many months, she was isolated, prostituted and robbed of her self-respect and finances, the court was told.
She would be woken up in the early hours to clean the defendants’ houses and sent on errands to the shops.
Read more from Sky News:
Trio arrested over death of newborn
Mother and son killed in Derbyshire crash
Prosecutor Allison Hunter KC said: “In early 2021 Shakira Spencer had been a healthy – even voluptuous – size 16 weighing some 74kgs (11st 9lb).
“By July 2022 Shakira Spencer was just skin and bone. Gaunt and skeletal, bruised from head to foot, with hollowed black eyes. She was barely a scrawny size six in images taken by the defendants just before she died.
“For whatever was their unfathomable, cruel, sadistic motive, these three defendants tormented, tortured, starved, burned and eventually battered Shakira Spencer to death.”
The mobile phones of the accused were seized, with hundreds of messages found referencing the abuse they had subjected Ms Spencer to.
Richardson and Studholme exchanged images mocking her, and videos of Ms Spencer being beaten up while the others laughed and jeered were also discovered.
The abuse reached a “frenzied climax” on around September 11 and 12 last year when Ms Spencer was beaten “to the brink of death” at Studholme’s home.
She was bundled into the boot of a borrowed Honda Civic and driven back to her flat, where she was locked in a hallway cupboard.
Ms Hunter said ice was packed around Ms Spencer in a bid to slow decomposition.
Newspapers were then carefully laid on the floor next to the bed as if Ms Spencer had been reading and died in her sleep.
An alternative plan to dispose of the body in a caravan was abandoned because the defendants could not risk moving her due to the extent of decomposition.
As part of the attempted cover-up, the defendants cleaned the victim’s blood, bodily fluids and DNA from their homes and removed all traces of their presence from Ms Spencer’s flat.
Senior Investigating Officer, Detective Chief Inspector Brian Howie said: “Shakira was a beautiful, happy mother who was kind and had a trusting nature.
“Shakira could be vulnerable and these defendants took advantage of that by controlling and isolating her from everyone she knew in order to control and enslave her in the most dehumanising and degrading way.
“The family’s ordeal has been compounded by the behaviour of the defendants, who have each lied, providing implausible accounts and explanations to try and absolve themselves of any responsibility.
“Whatever their cruel and sadistic motives were, there is no acceptable explanation for what Shakira was put through.”
Following the verdicts, Judge Angela Rafferty KC adjourned sentencing to a later date.
Jurors had deliberated for nearly 18 hours to reach their verdicts and were excused by the judge from further jury service for life due to the “harrowing nature” of Ms Spencer’s case.
The crash involving a cargo ship and oil tanker off the East Yorkshire coast is bad news for the sea, fish and air in the area. What we don’t know yet is quite how bad it will be.
That depends on a few things – but the speed of the collision, clouds of filthy black smoke from the fires and the leaked fuel are certainly worrying.
Firstly, it matters what was on board those two massive vessels.
Follow live: Jet fuel spilling into sea after tanker collision
Analytics firm Vortexa estimates the 183m-long tanker was carrying about 130,000 barrels of jet fuel (kerosene), which is now leaking into the sea.
Jet fuel is not as sticky or viscous as heavier types of oil, thankfully, so it’s less likely to clog the feathers and fur of birds and seals. It can also be broken down by natural bacteria.
But it can still poison fish and kill animals and plants on the shoreline if it makes its way into the soil there.
The Marine Conservation Society has pointed out the site in the Humber estuary is close to some protected areas and is important for seabirds and harbour porpoises.
And both ships will have been powered by a dirtier, heavier kind of oil – likely marine gas oil or heavy fuel oil, though we don’t know the details yet.
Heavy fuel oil is nasty stuff.
Pic: Bartek Smialek/PA
Cheap, thick and tar-like, it can smother animals and is very dangerous if they consume it, and is extremely difficult to clean up. Let’s hope this isn’t creeping around the North Sea already.
We don’t know how much of either the jet fuel or the oil powering the ships has leaked, or how much will be burned off in the violent fires – which themselves are ploughing black smoke and filthy air pollution into the surrounding atmosphere.
And we don’t know for sure what was on the Solong cargo ship and if, or what, will go into the sea.
Cargo ship ‘had sodium cyanide on board’
It was carrying 15 containers of sodium cyanide among other cargo, according to a report from maritime data provider Lloyd’s List Intelligence.
The container vessel was also transporting an unknown quantity of alcohol, said the casualty report – an assessment of incidents at sea – citing a message from the local coastguard.
Plastic takes hundreds of years to break down, and potentially can choke or trap animals.
Many of us have seen that uncomfortable viral video of a turtle having a straw yanked out of its nose. Previous accidents on cargo ships have seen plastic Lego pieces wash up in Cornwall 25 years later.
Read more:
How UK North Sea platforms dump gas
Secondly, the impact depends on the sea and weather conditions around it.
Things like the wind and currents affect how an oil spill spreads in the sea. Scientists can draw up computer models to simulate how the oil could behave.
Thirdly, it matters how quickly this is all tackled and then cleaned up, if necessary, and if it can be.
Usually the slower the response, the worse the impact.
The coastguard has said the incident “remains ongoing” and it has started assessing the “likely counter pollution response” that will be required.
Such a response might need the help of numerous public bodies: the government environment department, the transport department, the Environment Agency and the Maritime and Coastguard Agency.
So for now the best we can hope for – aside from the welfare of the people involved – is that not all the oil is spilled or burnt, that conditions are calm and that rescuers and those cleaning up can work swiftly.
-
Sports2 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports11 months agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports1 year agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports3 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business2 years agoBank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway