Connect with us

Published

on

Rishi Sunak has introduced emergency legislation in a bid to salvage his embattled Rwanda asylum plan and deliver on his pledge to “stop the boats”.

The goal is to ensure those not entering the UK by legal means face being sent on a one-way trip to the east African country.

But last month, the Supreme Court ruled the policy unlawful and could not go ahead as it was, concluding there was a real risk genuine refugees sent to Rwanda could be returned to their home country, where they would face “ill-treatment”.

Politics news – latest

In a bid to address the concerns, Home Secretary James Cleverly travelled to the country’s capital Kigali to sign a fresh deportation treaty before setting out the details of a proposed bill, which faces its first parliamentary test on Tuesday.

What is the latest Rwanda plan?

It is made up of two parts, aimed at making the deal legally watertight and so avoiding further setbacks, which have so far blocked all deportation flights amid soaring costs of the stalled policy.

The treaty, which needs to be ratified by the UK and Rwandan parliaments to make it internationally binding, centres on providing assurances to the Supreme Court that asylum seekers sent to Rwanda will not be removed and sent to another country where they face persecution.

As part of this, a new appeals process will be established to deal with exceptional cases, such as if someone living in the country under the scheme commits a crime.

British and Commonwealth judges, as well as Rwandan judges, will preside over the appeal hearings and decide whether the individual remains in Rwanda or is sent back to the UK.

Meanwhile, the legislation is designed to enable parliament to confirm Rwanda is a “safe country”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Rwanda scheme ‘will do the job’

In a bid to reduce the scope for domestic court hold-ups, the legislation gives ministers the powers to disregard sections of the Human Rights Act, but does not go as far as allowing them to dismiss the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

The UK was among the first to ratify the international treaty which commits its 46 signatories to abide by rules on rights to life, liberty and expression, and protection from torture, degrading treatment and slavery.

It is not linked to the European Union, so Brexit did not affect the UK’s obligations.

Why does this matter?

Because Tory hardliners argue without making the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill more robust and allowing ministers to ignore asylum rulings by both domestic judges and the European Court of Human Rights, which makes binding judgments on the convention, the policy is destined to fail.

It led to the resignation of immigration minister Robert Jenrick, who argued the legislation was “a triumph of hope over experience”.

At the same time, centrist Conservative MPs are insisting the government respects the rule of law and the UK’s international obligations.

The public divisions causes a further headache for Mr Sunak as he seeks to take the legislation through parliament and reassert his authority over fractious backbenchers.

Read more:
Whatever happens in Rwanda vote, PM is in deep trouble
What is the European Court of Human Rights?

As well as differing positions on the ECHR, the Conservatives’ poor showing in the polls has heightened the tensions within the party.

A number of Tory MPs believe reducing immigration, and particularly ending the scenes of asylum seekers arriving on Kent’s beaches, will be key to narrowing Labour’s lead and want to see the government do everything possible to achieve that.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘My patience has worn thin, right?’

Although the government argues the proposed bill goes as far as it can as the Rwandan government will pull out of a deal that involves leaving the ECHR altogether, ministers have hinted at compromises with rebels.

Is party infighting the only problem facing the government?

No. As well as having to navigate the bill through the Commons, it also has to clear the House of Lords, where the Tory administration does not have a majority.

Any move to relax human rights safeguards are likely to encounter stiff opposition, not least among the many leading lawyers who sit on the red benches.

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

The inability of the home secretary to guarantee the proposed law is compatible with the ECHR will only fuel concerns.

As the Rwanda plan was not a manifesto commitment, critics in the unelected chamber will also argue the usual convention of not delaying the delivery of an election pledge does not apply.

With an upcoming election, the timing also means the government cannot use powers under the Parliament Act to force through the legislation.

Continue Reading

Politics

Wes Streeting rules out pay rises for striking resident doctors saying they have ‘squandered goodwill’

Published

on

By

Wes Streeting rules out pay rises for striking resident doctors saying they have 'squandered goodwill'

Resident doctors have “squandered the considerable goodwill” they had with the government by going on strike, Health Secretary Wes Streeting has told them.

The medics – formerly known as junior doctors – finished a five-day strike over pay on Wednesday morning. The group were awarded a close to 30% raise last year but say they want more in an attempt to bring their pay back in line with what they had in 2008.

Mr Streeting previously said he would not negotiate further on pay but would consider taking steps on working conditions.

He has reiterated that stance – and continued to put pressure on negotiations to start again on the government’s terms.

The British Medical Association Resident Doctors Committee, which represents the doctors, have not ruled out further action.

In a letter sent today to the co-chairs of the committee, Mr Streeting thanked them for an invitation to “get back to the negotiating table” – but added the barb that it was “ironic because I never left”.

“I am ready to continue the conversation from where you left it,” he added.

More on Strikes

He went on to say the strikes were “deeply disappointing and entirely unnecessary” – adding that there were “seemingly promising discussions” about improving doctors’ working lives.

Read more:
BMA defends refusing ‘critical’ work
Tories vow to ban doctor strikes
Labour doesn’t have what doctors want

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘No doctor wants to go out on strike’

‘We cannot move on pay’

Mr Streeting criticised the committee, saying they “rushed to strike”.

His letter added: “The consequences of your strike action have been a detrimental impact on patients, your members, your colleagues and the NHS, which might have been worse were it not for the considerable efforts of NHS leaders and front-line staff who stepped up.

“Your action has also been self-defeating, because you have squandered the considerable goodwill you had with me and this government. I cannot in good conscience let patients, or other NHS staff, pay the price for the costs of your decision.”

The health secretary said he wanted to “reset the relationship” between the government and young doctors following the previous industrial action.

Mr Streeting went on to say he is “serious about improving working conditions” but has been clear “we cannot move on pay”.

“This government is prepared to negotiate on areas related to your conditions at work, career progression and tangible measures which would put money in your members’ pockets,” he added.

👉Listen to Politics At Sam And Anne’s on your podcast app👈

Mr Streeting concluded: “I was critical of my predecessors when they closed the door to the Junior Doctors Committee.

“My door remains open to the hope that we can still build the partnership with resident doctors I aspired to when I came in a year ago and, in that spirit, I am happy to meet with you early next week.”

A BMA spokesperson said: “The resident doctors committee has received the letter from Mr Streeting and is considering its response.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Companies who pay suppliers late to be fined

Published

on

By

Companies who pay suppliers late to be fined

Companies which continually pay their suppliers late will face fines worth potentially millions of pounds, the prime minister has announced.

Sir Keir Starmer said “It’s time to pay up” as the government is set to unveil plans to give the small business commissioner powers to fine large companies that persistently pay their suppliers late.

Under the new legislation, businesses will have to pay their suppliers within 30 days of receiving a valid invoice, unless otherwise agreed, with spot checks to help identify breaches.

Maximum payment terms of 60 days, reducing to 45 days, will also be introduced as part of the legislation to ensure businesses are paid on time.

Late payments cost the UK economy £11 billion a year and shut down 38 businesses a day, the government said.

The new law will save small and medium businesses time so they can focus on growing their revenue, it added.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer at the launch of the 10-year health plan in east London. Pic: PA
Image:
Chancellor Rachel Reeves and PM Sir Keir Starmer. Pic: PA

Sir Keir said: “From builders and electricians to freelance designers and manufacturers – too many hardworking people are being forced to spend precious hours chasing payments instead of doing what they do best – growing their businesses.

More on Sir Keir Starmer

“It’s unfair, it’s exhausting, and it’s holding Britain back. So, our message is clear: it’s time to pay up.

“Through our Small Business Plan, we’re not only tackling the scourge of late payments once and for all, but we’re giving small business owners the backing and stability they need for their business to thrive, driving growth across the country through our Plan for Change.”

The late payment crackdown is part of a wider government package, including a move to pump £4bn of financial support into small business start-ups and growth.

This will include £1bn for new firms, with 69,000 start-up loans and mentoring support.

Read more:
Sainsbury’s blames Visa card issues for online payment failure
Streeting rules out pay rises for striking doctors

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The value of ‘de minimis’ imports into Britain

The Conservatives said the crackdown will be welcome, but fails to address the “218,000 businesses that have closed under Labour”.

Andrew Griffith, the Tory shadow business secretary, added: “The reality for businesses under Labour is a doubling of business rates, a £25billion jobs tax and a full-on strangulation of employment red tape.

“Only the Conservatives are on the side of the makers and will support businesses across Britain to create jobs and wealth.”

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has increased employers’ national insurance, raised the minimum wage and lowered the threshold at which employers’ national insurance is paid.

The Resolution Foundation said this hits the cost of low-paid and part-time workers the most.

Continue Reading

Politics

How is Starmer’s government doing? Here’s what ‘end-of-term’ report from voters says

Published

on

By

How is Starmer's government doing? Here's what 'end-of-term' report from voters says

One year on, how’s Keir Starmer’s government going? We’ve put together an end-of-term report with the help of pollster YouGov.

First, here are the government’s approval ratings – drifting downwards.

It didn’t start particularly high. There has never been a honeymoon.

But here is the big change. Last year’s Labour voters now disapprove of their own government. That wasn’t true at the start – but is now.

And remember, it’s easier to keep your existing voter coalition together than to get new ones from elsewhere.

So we have looked at where voters who backed Labour last year have gone now.

YouGov’s last mega poll shows half of Labour voters last year – 51% – say they would vote for them again if an election was held tomorrow.

Around one in five (19%) say they don’t know who they’d vote for – or wouldn’t vote.

But Labour are also leaking votes to the Lib Dems, Greens and Reform.

These are the main reasons why.

A sense that Labour haven’t delivered on their promises is top – just above the cost of living. Some 22% say they’ve been too right-wing, with a similar number saying Labour have “made no difference”. Immigration and public services are also up there.

Now, YouGov asked people whether they think the cabinet is doing a good or a bad job, and combined the two figures together to get a net score.

John Healey and Bridget Phillipson are on top, but the big beats of Angela Rayner, Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves bottom.

But it’s not over for Labour.

Here’s one scenario – 2024 Labour voters say they would much prefer a Labour-led government over a Conservative one.

But what about a Reform UK-led government? Well, Labour polls even better against them – just 11% of people who voted Labour in 2024 want to see them enter Number 10.

Signs of hope for Keir Starmer. But as Labour MPs head off for their summer holidays, few of their voters would give this government an A*.

Continue Reading

Trending