Connect with us

Published

on

On Gaza, the hard numbers reflect a hardening of the world view.

Of 193 member states in the United Nations General Assembly, 153 supported a ceasefire in Gaza.

It’s a big increase on the last time a similar vote was taken in October – a measure of how global opinion is trending with time.

A vote in New York that isn’t legally binding doesn’t change anything on the ground in Gaza, of course.

Follow latest updates on the conflict

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Gaza: UN votes for ceasefire resolution

The significance is in the symbolism. A growing majority view in favour of ceasefire increases pressure on the minority.

Countries like the United States, which voted against, and the United Kingdom, which abstained, are left increasingly isolated.

If Israel turned a deaf ear to the UN vote, it won’t have missed the voice of its biggest ally.

The United States has shuffled in its stance over the course of this conflict, amid a growing international outcry.

People search through the rubble of damaged buildings following an Israeli air strike on Palestinian houses in Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip
Image:
Israeli airstrikes have devastated huge swathes of the Gaza Strip

The US president appeared to shuffle further in pointed remarks hours before Tuesday’s vote.

In an off-camera briefing, referring to support enjoyed by Israel, Joe Biden said it was “starting to lose that support by the indiscriminate bombing that takes place”.

The president raised concerns that he had with the Israeli government, saying Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “has to change this government”.

“This government in Israel is making it very difficult,” Biden said.

He said that Israel “can’t say no” to a Palestinian state, adding: “We have an opportunity to begin to unite the region… and they still want to do it.

“But we have to make sure that Bibi [Netanyahu] understands that he’s got to make some moves to strengthen… you cannot say no Palestinian state… that’s going to be the hard part.”

Biden went as far as to highlight Israel’s far-right national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir when he spoke of “the most conservative government in Israel’s history”.

Read more:
Videos ‘show Israeli troops destroying property in Gaza’
‘I didn’t sleep for 49 days’: Released hostages describe terror of Hamas captivity

US President Joe Biden
Image:
President Biden

For his part, Netanyahu said in a statement on Tuesday that Israel had received “full backing” from the US for its ground incursion into Gaza and that Washington had blocked “international pressure to stop the war”.

But, he added: “There is disagreement about ‘the day after Hamas’ and I hope that we will reach agreement here as
well.”

Differences on a long-term plan for Gaza aren’t new between the United States and Israel, nor between Biden and Netanyahu.

The difference is in the candid nature of Biden’s remarks and a stark willingness to highlight distance between the pair and their vision – more so than at any point during the conflict.

A call for a change in government is no vote of confidence – quite the opposite.

It exposes a distinct divergence between wartime allies that strains unity going forward.

Increased isolation, as measured by the United Nations, won’t ease the pressure.

Continue Reading

US

Putin criticises Trump’s sanctions on oil firms – as Russian jets ‘briefly enter NATO airspace’

Published

on

By

Putin criticises Trump's sanctions on oil firms - as Russian jets 'briefly enter NATO airspace'

Vladimir Putin has described Donald Trump’s sanctions against two major oil firms as an “unfriendly act”.

However, the Russian president has insisted the tightened restrictions won’t affect the nation’s economy, a claim widely contradicted by most analysts.

In a major policy shift, Mr Trump imposed sanctions against Rosneft and Lukoil – Russia’s biggest oil companies – on Wednesday.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Will US sanctions on Russian oil hurt the Kremlin?

The White House said this was because of “Russia’s lack of serious commitment to a peace process to end the war in Ukraine”.

Putin has now warned the move could disrupt the global oil markets, and lead to higher prices for consumers worldwide.

A meeting between the two leaders had been proposed in Budapest, but Mr Trump said he had decided to cancel the talks because “it didn’t feel right to me”.

Speaking from the Oval Office, he had told reporters: “I have good conversations. And then, they don’t go anywhere. They just don’t go anywhere.”

More on Donald Trump

Giving a speech in Moscow yesterday, Putin said “dialogue is always better than war” – but warned that Russia will never bow to pressure from abroad.

Earlier, his long-term ally Dmitry Medvedev had described Mr Trump as a “talkative peacemaker” who had now “fully embarked on the warpath against Russia”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why did Trump sanction Russian oil?

Oil prices have witnessed a sizeable jump since the sanctions were announced, with Brent crude rising by 5% – the biggest daily percentage gains since the middle of June.

In other developments, Lithuania has claimed that two Russian military aircraft briefly entered its airspace yesterday.

A Su-30 fighter and Il-78 refuelling tanker were in the NATO member’s territory for 18 seconds, and Spanish jets were scrambled in response to the incident.

Russia’s defence ministry denied this – and said its planes did not violate the borders of any other country during a “training flight” in the Kaliningrad region.

Read more:
Sanctions could have chilling effect on market

How could new sanctions impact the UK?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Zelenskyy tells Sky News ‘ceasefire is still possible’

Volodymyr Zelenskyy attended a European Council summit in Brussels to discuss the war in Ukraine – and said the meeting had delivered “good results”.

He said Ukraine had secured political support for frozen Russian assets and “their maximum use” to defend against Russian aggression, adding the EU would “work out all the necessary details”.

Mr Zelenskyy thanked the bloc for approving its 19th sanctions package against Russia earlier today, and work was already beginning on a 20th.

European leaders are going to arrive in London later today for a “critical” meeting of the “Coalition of the Willing” – with the goal of discussing “how they can pile pressure on Putin as he continues to kill innocent civilians with indiscriminate attacks across Ukraine”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How will the Russian oil sanctions affect petrol costs?

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said: “The only person involved in this conflict who does not want to stop the war is President Putin, and his depraved strikes on young children in a nursery this week make that crystal clear.

“Time and again we offer Putin the chance to end his needless invasion, to stop the killing and recall his troops, but he repeatedly rejects those proposals and any chance of peace.

“From the battlefield to the global markets, as Putin continues to commit atrocities in Ukraine we must ratchet up the pressure on Russia and build on President Trump’s decisive action.”

Continue Reading

US

Trump’s sanctions are no slap on the wrist – they’re a punch to the gut of Moscow’s war economy

Published

on

By

Trump's sanctions are no slap on the wrist - they're a punch to the gut of Moscow's war economy

The new US sanctions are no slap on the wrist – they’re a punch to the gut of Moscow’s war economy.

Oil giants Rosneft and Lukoil are the twin engines pumping money through Russia’s military veins.

Washington framed the bold move as a bid to “degrade the Kremlin’s ability to raise revenue for its war machine”.

Oil is Russia’s bloodstream, and the Trump Treasury just cut off the blood flow.

But every blow struck in the ring comes with the risk of self-inflicted pain, and there’s potential for collateral damage.

By squeezing Russia’s oil sector, the president is tightening the global market’s chest – and America’s own pump could feel the pressure.

The White House is gambling that the geopolitical payoff will ultimately outweigh the domestic sting.

More on Donald Trump

Pic: AP
Image:
Pic: AP

“These are tremendous sanctions and I hope they don’t last long,” Mr Trump said.

That mix of swagger and caveat summed up his approach – maximum pressure, but with an eye on prices back home.

Europe rushed to mirror Washington’s stance, adding restrictions on imports and tightening loopholes in shipping.

The EU was clearly signalling that it’s in Trump’s corner, that the Western alliance holds.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump: Putin summit ‘didn’t feel right’

‘Wasted journey’

On both sides of the Atlantic, they know that Moscow will seize on any disunity and slip through the cracks.

An Oval Office meeting with the NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte provided the diplomatic stagecraft.

Mr Trump repeated that he’d cancelled a planned summit with Vladimir Putin because he “didn’t want to have a wasted journey”.

Mr Rutte played the part of loyal ally, twice labelling the US president “the only one who can get this done”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

NATO chief: Trump-Zelenskyy meeting not a disaster

Earlier, Mr Rutte played down my suggestion that his visit indicated Trump’s meeting with Zelensky last Friday had been a disaster.

It wouldn’t be the first time Mr Rutte, who famously referred to Mr Trump as “Daddy”, has poured oil on troubled waters.

But it’s Moscow’s apparent refusal to accept Trump’s terms that has put plans for another summit with Putin on hold.

China’s diplomatic influence with Russia could give it some leverage when Mr Trump meets Xi Jinping for trade talks next week.

The US president’s sanctions are more than punishment – they’re a strategic gamble to corner Putin – but the margin of error is razor thin.

If energy prices surge or allied unity splinters, Mr Trump could find himself on the ropes.

Continue Reading

US

Entire East Wing of White House will be demolished for ballroom – as Trump urged to pause project

Published

on

By

Entire East Wing of White House will be demolished for ballroom - as Trump urged to pause project

The entire East Wing of the White House will be demolished “within days” – much more bulldozing than initially expected for Donald Trump’s new ballroom construction project.

Two Trump administration officials told Sky News’ US partner NBC that the demolition is a significant expansion of the initial plans announced this summer.

“It won’t interfere with the current building,” Mr Trump had said on 31 July. “It’ll be near it, but not touching it, and pays total respect to the existing building, which I’m the biggest fan of.”

Rubble is piled higher and higher as demolition continues on the East Wing. Pic: AP
Image:
Rubble is piled higher and higher as demolition continues on the East Wing. Pic: AP

But a White House official told NBC News the “entirety” of the East Wing would eventually be “modernised and rebuilt”.

“The scope and the size of the ballroom project have always been subject to vary as the process develops,” the official added.

The East Wing was built at the beginning of the last century and was last modified in 1942.

Explainer: How Trump has changed the White House while in power

More from US

Trump shows off an artist's impressions of his new ballroom. Pic:AP
Image:
Trump shows off an artist’s impressions of his new ballroom. Pic:AP

Construction on the ballroom – which is expected to hold up to 900 people when finished – began this week.

The National Trust for Historic Preservation, a non-profit agency created by Congress to help preserve historic buildings, warned administration officials in a letter on Tuesday that the planned ballroom “will overwhelm the White House itself”.

“We respectfully urge the administration and the National Park Service (stewards of the White House) to pause demolition until plans for the proposed ballroom go through the legally required public review processes,” Carol Quillen, the trust’s chief executive, said in a statement.

Windows of the complex could be seen being torn down. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Windows of the complex could be seen being torn down. Pic: Reuters

‘Fake news’

The White House called the uproar “manufactured outrage” by “unhinged leftists and their fake news allies” in a statement.

Last week, Mr Trump said the total price would be about $250m (£187m), which would be paid for by himself and private donors will pay for. However, on Wednesday, he said the ballroom’s price is “about $300m (£225m)”.

The 90,000 sq ft ballroom will dwarf the White House itself – and would be able to accommodate almost five times more guests than the East Room, the largest current space in the mansion.

Mr Trump says the ballroom won’t cost US taxpayers at all. Instead, “donors” would pay for it.

Comcast, the parent company of Sky News, was included on a list of top donors released last week – but it is unclear how much it or others have contributed.

Continue Reading

Trending