Connect with us

Published

on

Rishi Sunak has publicly disagreed with an Israeli ambassador, who told Sky News the country rejected the idea of a two-state solution.

It is the long-standing position of the UK government that there should be an independent Palestinian state established alongside the existing one of Israel – giving both peoples their own territory.

But asked about the prospect after the war in the region ends, Tzipi Hotovely – who represents Israel in the UK – said “absolutely no”, claiming Palestinians “want to have a state from the river to the sea”.

Politics live: MP reprimanded over lobbying scandal

Asked about her comments this morning, Mr Sunak said: “We don’t agree with that.”

The prime minister added that “consistently far too many innocent people have lost their lives”, and that he had told Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu his country “must take every available precaution to protect innocent civilian lives”.

A two-state solution has long been the desired outcome, not just of the UK, but of the US and the United Nations.

It has previously been endorsed by Israel, but only if Palestinian military groups put down their arms – while Palestinians have said they would agree if they could police themselves.

But as the conflict rolls on following the terrorist attacks in Israel on 7 October, two Israeli politicians have now rejected the end goal.

Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge

Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge

Sky News Monday to Thursday at 7pm.
Watch live on Sky channel 501, Freeview 233, Virgin 602, the Sky News website and app or YouTube.

Tap here for more

“Israel knows today, and the world should know now that the Palestinians never wanted to have a state next to Israel,” Ms Hotovely told Sky News’ Mark Austin.

“They want to have a state from the river to the sea. They are saying it loud and clear. It’s now two months after the war started. The Palestinian Authority didn’t condemn this massacre (7 October). It’s such a big problem.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Israel’s ambassador to the UK has told Sky’s Mark Austin that her country would not accept a two-state solution when the war with Gaza ends

Giving his reaction to the remarks, Mr Sunak said the UK government did not “agree”, adding: “Our long-standing position remains that a two-state solution is the right outcome.”

He went on to discuss the ongoing military action by Israel in Gaza, calling what was going on “incredibly concerning”.

The prime minister added: “I’ve said consistently far too many innocent people have lost their lives. No one wants this conflict to go on for a moment longer than is necessary.

“Of course, Israel has a right to defend itself from an appalling terrorist attack that it suffered. But as I said to Prime Minister Netanyahu just last week, Israel must take every available precaution to protect innocent civilian lives.”

Rishi Sunak meets Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel
Pic:No 10 Downing Street
Image:
Rishi Sunak also said he had spoken to Benjamin Netanyahu about protecting innocent civilians Pic: No 10 Downing Street


Mr Sunak said the UK was “doing a lot” to get more aid into Gaza, and the government was “continuing to press for more access to get more support to the people who need it”.

He also said his government would continue to support calls for a “sustainable ceasefire” when hostages are released and more aid can get in, and when Hamas also stops firing rockets into Israel.

Continue Reading

Politics

US bank regulator clears national banks to facilitate crypto transactions

Published

on

By

US bank regulator clears national banks to facilitate crypto transactions

The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has affirmed that national banks can intermediate cryptocurrency trades as riskless principals without holding the assets on their balance sheets, a move that brings traditional banks a step closer to offering regulated crypto brokerage services.

In an interpretive letter released on Tuesday, the regulator said banks may act as principals in a crypto trade with one customer while simultaneously entering an offsetting trade with another, a structure that mirrors riskless principal activity in traditional markets. 

“Several applicants have discussed how conducting riskless principal crypto-asset transactions would benefit their proposed bank’s customers and business, including by offering additional services in a growing market,” notes the document.

According to the OCC, the move would allow customers “to transact crypto-assets through a regulated bank, as compared to non-regulated or less regulated options.”

Banks, United States, Donald Trump
The OCC’s interpretive letter affirms that riskless principal crypto transactions fall within the “business of banking.” Source: US OCC

The letter also reiterates that banks must confirm the legal permissibility of any crypto activity and ensure it aligns with their chartered powers. Institutions are expected to maintain procedures for monitoring operational, compliance and market risks.

“The main risk in riskless principal transactions is counterparty credit risk (in particular, settlement risk),” reads the letter, adding that “managing counterparty credit risk is integral to the business of banking, and banks are experienced in managing this risk.”

The agency’s guidance cites 12 U.S.C. § 24, which permits national banks to conduct riskless principal transactions as part of the “business of banking.” The letter also draws a distinction between crypto assets that qualify as securities, noting that riskless principal transactions involving securities were already clearly permissible under existing law.

The OCC’s interpretive letter — a nonbinding guidance that outlines the agency’s view of which activities national banks may conduct under existing law — was issued a day after the head of the OCC, Jonathan Gould, said crypto firms seeking a federal bank charter should be treated the same as traditional financial institutions.

According to Gould, the banking system has the “capacity to evolve,” and there is “no justification for considering digital assets differently” than traditional banks, which have offered custody services “electronically for decades.”

Related: Trump’s national security strategy is silent on crypto, blockchain

From ‘Choke Point 2.0’ to pro-crypto policy

Under the Biden administration, some industry groups and lawmakers accused US regulators of pursuing an “Operation Choke Point 2.0” approach that increased supervisory pressure on banks and firms interacting with crypto.

Since President Trump took office in January after pledging to support the sector, the federal government has moved in the opposite direction, adopting a more permissive posture toward digital asset activity.

Magazine: Quantum attacking Bitcoin would be a waste of time: Kevin O’Leary