Few world leaders have been openly supportive of digital assets while in office or while they were campaigning. Though the technology is relatively young and untested as a political issue, many candidates have staked their reputations on crypto and blockchain.
Nayib Bukele, El Salvador
Now the former president of El Salvador as he campaigns for his next term in office, Nayib Bukele is arguably the most outspoken head of state in the world on cryptocurrency. He pioneered a legislative path to make Bitcoin (BTC) legal tender in El Salvador in 2021. He directly tied his presidency to the cryptocurrency, periodically boasting about buys on X — formerly Twitter.
Under Bukele, BTC kiosks have been installed across El Salvador, and the president reported in December that the country’s Bitcoin investments were profitable after the crypto market downturn of 2022. In 2024, El Salvador’s Ministry of Education plans to introduce a Bitcoin education program for public schools.
Javier Milei, Argentina
In November, Javier Milei won a presidential run-off election in Argentina against his opponent, Sergio Massa, amid staggering inflation and general discontent with the country’s economy. Milei once referred to Bitcoin (BTC) as a movement toward “the return of money to its original creator, the private sector.”
Many crypto proponents in Argentina have called on the new president to follow Bukele’s path in recognizing Bitcoin as legal tender in the country and ignore requirements for the Financial Action Task Force’s Travel Rule. At the time of publication, Milei had been in office for less than a week and had not enacted any crypto-related policies.
Donald Trump, United States of America
Donald Trump, the former president of the United States, is currently facing multiple felony charges related to his role in attempting to subvert the results of the 2020 presidential election and fraudulent business practices. He hasn’t been the most outspoken voice on crypto in the Republican Party — see Vivek Ramaswamy or Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — but has tied digital assets directly to his 2024 campaign.
Trump has had a few nonfungible token (NFT) drops, including one featuring his mugshot from his surrender to authorities in Georgia. However, following his departure from office in 2021, he referred to cryptocurrencies as “fake” and “a disaster waiting to happen.”
Rishi Sunak, United Kingdom
Coming to power after a politically and economically chaotic time in the United Kingdom, Rishi Sunak supported several policies in favor of digital assets ahead of being sworn in as U.K. Prime Minister. In 2020 and 2021, as chancellor of the Exchequer, Sunak said he planned to prioritize financial technology, and officials would consult on pioneering reforms “to support the safe adoption of cryptoassets and stablecoins.”
Since assuming office in October 2022, Sunak has largely not spoken publicly about cryptocurrencies. Shortly after Sunak became prime minister, crypto exchange FTX filed for bankruptcy, and a series of high-profile collapses and arrests shook the space.
Faustin-Archange Touadéra, Central African Republic
Like Trump and Bukele, Central African Republic (CAR) President Faustin-Archange Touadéra is an active social media user, announcing policies related to crypto and blockchain on X. In April 2022, Touadéra announced Bitcoin would be considered legal tender in the CAR alongside the franc. He later launched Sango, an initiative to establish a “legal crypto hub” in the CAR to attract businesses and global crypto enthusiasts.
— Faustin-Archange Touadéra (@FA_Touadera) June 27, 2022
Alexander Lukashenko, Belarus
Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, whose 2020 reelection was marked by claims of widespread voter fraud against opposition candidate Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, has backed policies aimed at supporting cryptocurrency mining in the Russia-allied country. In 2019, Lukashenko proposed deploying excess energy from a nuclear power plant to mine and sell crypto. He later reportedly urged Belarusian workers to pursue opportunities at crypto mining firms rather than farming positions in other countries.
Before the highly disputed election, Lukashenko was an early adopter of digital assets in Belarus, proposing legalizing cryptocurrency and certain initial coin offerings in 2017. Since the Russian military invaded Ukraine in 2022, Belarus has been subject to many of the same sanctions imposed on Russia, including the illicit uses of crypto.
Philip Davis, The Bahamas
Many in the crypto space associate the Bahamas with the island nation that used to house the headquarters of defunct crypto exchange FTX and its former CEO, Sam Bankman-Fried. Part of why a firm like FTX relocated to the Bahamas in 2021 was the country’s favorable crypto regulation, and Prime Minister Philip Davis supported such policies.
Before the collapse of FTX, Davis said the Bahamas aimed to establish a regulatory regime allowing crypto firms to “grow and prosper” on the island. The prime minister said he supported the Bahamas’ central bank digital currency (CBDC), the Sand Dollar, launched in 2020.
Biotech and BNB treasury firm Windtree Therapeutics fell 77% on Wednesday after informing the SEC that it would be delisted from the Nasdaq stock exchange.
Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller urged policymakers and bankers to stop fearing DeFi and stablecoins, saying they will drive the next wave of innovation in the US payments system.
Two Labour-run councils are considering legal action to stop the use of hotels to house migrants in their areas after Epping council won a temporary injunction.
The leaders of Wirral and Tamworth councils both say they are considering their legal options in the wake of the Epping case, citing similar concerns about the impact of the hotels on their local communities.
Epping Forest District Council won an interim High Court injunction on Tuesday to stop migrants being housed at The Bell Hotel, after arguing its owners did not have planning permission to do so.
Paula Basnett, the Labour leader of Wirral council, said: “We are actively considering all options available to us to ensure that any use of hotels or other premises in Wirral is lawful and does not ride roughshod over planning regulations or the wishes of our communities.”
She added: “If necessary, we will not hesitate to challenge such decisions in order to protect both residents and those seeking refuge.”
Carol Dean, the Labour leader of Tamworth Borough Council, said she understands the “strong feelings” of residents about the use of a local hotel to house asylum seekers.
She pointed out that under the Labour government, the use of hotels has halved from 402 to 210, with the aim of stopping the use of any hotels by 2029.
But in light of the Epping case, she said “we are closely monitoring developments and reviewing our legal position”.
Image: Epping has been the focal point of protests against migrant hotels in recent weeks. Pic: Reuters
Badenoch backs more council rebellions
Other Tory councils are also being encouraged to follow Epping’s lead by party leader Kemi Badenoch.
She has sent a letter to all the councils they control, pledging her support for them to fight migrant hotels.
She wrote: “The Epping hotel injunction is a victory for local people led by a good Conservative council working hard for their community. This is the difference Conservatives in local government deliver. Real plans. Real action.”
Conservative-run Broxbourne Council has announced it is exploring its legal options.
The Reform UK leader of Kent County Council has also said she was writing to fellow leaders in Kent to explore whether they could potentially take legal action.
Image: Police officers ahead of a demonstration outside The Bell Hotel. Pic: PA
Government under pressure
The prospect of more rulings in favour of councils will leave ministers asking where else they might be able to house asylum seekers. Other options may include flats and ex-army bases.
The prime minister and the home secretary are under huge pressure to clear the asylum backlog and stop using hotels across the country to house those waiting for their applications to be processed.
Image: Keir Starmer and Yvette Cooper are under pressure to bring down small boat crossings. Pics: PA
Protests have sprung up at migrant hotels across the country. But The Bell Hotel in Epping became a focal point in recent weeks after an asylum seeker housed there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl.
The council sought an interim High Court injunction to stop migrants from being accommodated at the hotel, owned by Somani Hotels Limited, on the basis that using it for that purpose contravened local planning regulations.
The interim injunction demanded that the hotel be cleared of its occupants within 14 days, but in his ruling on Tuesday, Mr Justice Eyre granted the temporary block, while extending the time limit by which it must stop housing asylum seekers to 12 September.
Somani Hotels said it intended to appeal the decision. Its barrister, Piers Riley-Smith, argued it would set a precedent that could affect “the wider strategy” of housing asylum seekers in hotels.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
6:18
Asylum hotels: ‘People have had enough’
Epping hotel ‘sidestepped public scrutiny’
A government attempt to delay the application was rejected by the High Court judge. Home Office barristers had argued the case had a “substantial impact” on the government performing its legal duties to asylum seekers.
But Mr Justice Eyre dismissed the Home Office’s bid, stating that the department’s involvement was “not necessary”.
The judge said the hotel’s owners “sidestepped the public scrutiny and explanation which would otherwise have taken place if an application for planning permission or for a certificate of lawful use had been made”.
Reacting to Tuesday’s judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said the government will “continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns”.
She added: “Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this parliament.”