Connect with us

Published

on

At the centre of Prince Harry’s High Court battle with Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) were a selection of 33 articles dated between 1996 and 2009.

The stories, published in the Daily Mirror, the Sunday Mirror and the People, covered the Duke of Sussex’s relationship with his family and ex-girlfriend Chelsy Davy, his military service, injuries and illnesses, and allegations of drug use.

Mr Justice Fancourt found that 15 out of the 33 articles were the product of phone hacking or other unlawful information gathering.

Follow latest: Prince Harry v Mirror group

The judge said Harry’s phone was “hacked to a modest extent”, which was probably “carefully controlled by certain people at each newspaper” and happened on occasions from about the end of 2003 to April 2009.

Articles Harry won

“Harry took drugs” and “Cool it Harry” – Sunday Mirror on 13 January 2002

“Harry’s cocaine ecstasy and GHB parties” – The Mirror on 14 January 2002

“Wills.. Seeing Burrell is only way to stop him selling more Diana secrets. Harry no.. Burrell’s a two-faced s*** who’ll use visit to make money” – The People on 28 December 2003

“Harry is a Chelsy fan” – Daily Mirror on 29 November 2004

“When Harry met Daddy… The biggest danger to wildlife in Africa” – Daily Mirror on 13 December 2004

“Harry’s girl ‘to dump him'” – Daily Mirror on 15 January 2005

“Chelsy is not happy” – Daily Mirror on 15 January 2005

“Chelsy’s gap EIIR” – The People on 24 April 2005

“Chel shocked” – The People on 9 April 2006

“Davy stated” – The People on 16 September 2007

“Er, OK if I drop you off here?” – Sunday Mirror on 2 December 2007

“Soldier Harry’s Taliban” – The People on 28 September 2008

“He just loves boozing & army she is fed up & is heading home” – Sunday Mirror on 25 January 2009

“Harry’s date with Gladiators star” – The People on 19 April 2009

“Chelsy’s new fella” – The People on 26 April 2009

Drugs allegations

The judge found articles relating to Harry’s alleged drug taking had likely been the product of unlawful information gathering.

More on Prince Harry

“Harry took drugs” and “Cool it Harry” – Sunday Mirror on 13 January 2002

Harry said that whilst this article, which contained allegations he had smoked cannabis, was a follow-up to stories in the News of the World, there were invoices concerning his friend Guy Pelly and people connected to the story at the time.

MGN denied any unlawful information gathering and said that news agencies, a freelance journalist, and a source were paid for the articles.

“Harry’s cocaine ecstasy and GHB parties” – The Mirror on 14 January 2002

This front-page story claimed that some of the duke’s friends had taken “hard drugs” in front of him, including ecstasy, cocaine and GHB, reporting that the Prince of Wales – now the King – was “terrified”.

Harry said in his evidence “it is not clear to me where the defendant’s journalists could have possibly obtained these quotes from”. But MGN denied unlawful activity and said there is no evidence of phone hacking.

In relation to both stories, Mr Justice Fancourt said: “I find that it is very likely that unlawful methods were used, including voicemail interception (VMI), though I am not persuaded that this included the duke’s own phone.

“I am persuaded that VMI of some of the duke’s associates probably took place, though not of the duke himself.”

Harry’s relationship with Chelsy Davy

Many of the articles the judge sided with Harry on related to his relationship with Chelsy Davy, who he first met while she was a boarder at Stowe School in Buckinghamshire.

“Er, OK if I drop you off here?” – Sunday Mirror on 2 December 2007

This article claimed that a photo of Ms Davy leaving Kensington Palace was “proof” the duke had “patched things up” with her.

Harry questioned “what are the chances” that a photographer was there to capture the moment, adding that MGN made a “mind-boggling” amount of inquiries and payments. The publisher said there is no evidence of phone hacking and that the duke had “no reasonable expectation of privacy” in dropping Ms Davy off outside the palace gates.

The judge found “information about the whereabouts of Ms Davy and the arrangements for her to spend the night in Kensington Palace are likely to have been obtained by voicemail interception”.

“Harry is a Chelsy fan” – Daily Mirror on 29 November 2004

Harry said the author of a story showing a picture of Ms Davy, whom the duke had started dating, was a “prolific” user of private investigators who were known phone hackers, while MGN said the details came from a previous report in the Mail on Sunday, as well as two confidential sources.

Read more: Key findings in Prince Harry v Mirror Group Newspapers judgment

The judge said the story was “probably stood up by the Mirror by commissioning PIs to blag flight information, credit card details or phone billing data”, adding: “That unlawful activity was, I find, specifically instructed from London.”

Harry’s military career

“Soldier Harry’s Taliban” – The People on 28 September 2008

This article claimed Harry had been “banned from going back to war” in Afghanistan, despite his “desperation” to return.

He alleged details were obtained by “unlawful means” and that people with the information would not want to “jeopardise my career by speaking about it”, but the publisher said there is no evidence of phone hacking and the “public interest” in the story outweighed “any minimal privacy interest”.

Mr Justice Fancourt said: “There is likely to have been VMI or other unlawful information gathering (UIG) involved in reporting this story.”

The articles Harry lost

The judge said the other 18 articles didn’t stand up to careful analysis, noting “there was a tendency for the duke in his evidence to assume that everything published was the product of voicemail interception because phone hacking was rife within Mirror Group at the time”.

Articles Harry lost

“Diana so sad on Harry’s big day” – Daily Mirror on 16 September 1996

“Princes take to the hills for gala” – Daily Mirror on 17 July 2000

“3am – Harry’s time at the bar” – Daily Mirror on 19 September 2000

“Snap… Harry breaks thumb like William; Exclusive” – Daily Mirror on 11 November 2000

“Rugger off Harry” – Sunday Mirror on 11 November 2000

“Harry’s sick with kissing disease” – Daily Mirror on 29 March 2002

“No Eton trifles for Harry, 18” – Daily Mirror on 16 September 2002

“Matured Harry is a godfather” – The People on 20 April 2003

“Harry to lead cadet’s march” – Daily Mirror on 29 April 2003

“Harry is ready to quit Oz” – Daily Mirror on 27 September 2003

“Beach bum Harry” – Daily Mirror on 16 December 2003

You did what!” – Sunday Mirror on 6 February 2005

“Who dares Windsors” – Daily Mirror on 4 March 2005

“Harry carry!” – The People on 15 May 2005

“Hooray Harry’s dumped” – Sunday Mirror on 11 November 2007

“Down in the dumped” – Daily Mirror on 12 November 2007

“Harry fear as mobile is swiped” – Daily Mirror on 26 July 2008

“3am: What a way to Harry on” – Daily Mirror on 26 March 2009

Lazy journalism

Mr Justice Fancourt said some of the articles were just “lazy journalism”, such as:

“3am: What a way to Harry on” – Daily Mirror on 26 March 2009

This article claimed Harry “openly cavorted” with a new girlfriend at a Twickenham rugby match.

The duke said details in the article are incorrect and that payments to a private investigator show the woman was of interest to MGN, while the publisher said information came from a prior Press Association report.

The judge said: “This 3am article was just lazy journalism, “our spy” was an invention, and no UIG was involved in relation to the duke’s private information, which in any event could not include what happened in a hospitality box at a public event.”

Hopeless

Other claims were dismissed as “hopeless”, including:

“Snap… Harry breaks thumb like William; Exclusive” – Daily Mirror on 11 November 2000

An article reported that Harry had chipped a bone in his thumb and had a minor operation following an accident during a game of football.

The duke said he found the level of detail in the story as “surprising” and that he believed the palace had been approached for comment rather than being a source. However, MGN said the information was in the public domain and had been repeatedly reported the previous day.

Mr Justice Fancourt said “this claim is hopeless”, adding: “There is no evidence and no inherent likelihood that VMI or UIG were used in this case.”

“Harry is ready to quit Oz” – Daily Mirror on 27 September 2003

This page-seven story reported that the duke was considering leaving his gap year in Australia due to press intrusion.

Harry said evidence showed that MGN was paying to have him watched as the piece describes that he was inside “watching videos”, while the publisher said the information came from press statements by Clarence House, and also appeared in other outlets.

The judge said: “The claim in respect of this article is also hopeless.”

Pure speculation

“Rugger off Harry” – Sunday Mirror on 11 November 2000

This article described an injury the duke had suffered while playing polo which had resulted in him having to stop playing rugby.

Harry said the article is “brazen” and attributes some details to an unnamed royal source despite there being no comment from the palace, while MGN said the information came from a “confidential Eton source” with no evidence of unlawful information gathering.

“That is pure speculation,” the judge said of Harry’s claim. “I consider that it is more likely than not that there was no unlawful means used to obtain this information.”

Continue Reading

UK

Premier League opener halted after Antoine Semenyo reports racist abuse

Published

on

By

Premier League opener halted after Antoine Semenyo reports racist abuse

A man was ejected from Anfield after reports of racial abuse directed at Bournemouth winger Antoine Semenyo during the season’s opening Premier League game against Liverpool.

Match referee Anthony Taylor paused play in the 29th minute after Semenyo accused a spectator of racist abuse.

An anti-discrimination message was read out to the Anfield crowd, and it is understood that police officers went into the referee’s room at half-time.

Merseyside Police said an investigation is under way after the 47-year-old man’s identity was confirmed and he was removed from the ground.

Chief Inspector Kev Chatterton, the match commander for the Liverpool v Bournemouth game, said: “Merseyside Police will not tolerate hate crime of any form.

“We take incidents like this very seriously, and in cases like this we will be proactively seeking football banning orders, with the club, against those responsible.”

He added: “There is no place for racism and it is vital that anyone who witnesses such an offence reports it to stewards, or the police immediately, so we can take the necessary action like we did this evening.

More on Racism In Football

“As with all matches, we work very closely with both Liverpool and Everton FC to ensure the safety of the public, and the players.”

A spokesperson for Liverpool said the club was “aware of an allegation of racist abuse made during our Premier League game against Bournemouth”.

Semenyo with his teammates during the match. Pic: PA
Image:
Semenyo with his teammates during the match. Pic: PA

The Liverpool spokesperson said: “We condemn racism and discrimination in all forms, it has no place in society, or football.

“The club is unable to comment further as tonight’s alleged is incident is the subject of an ongoing police investigation, which we will support fully.”

After the incident, Semenyo scored twice in the second half to help bring Bournemouth back from two goals down at Anfield before Liverpool went on to eventually win the contest 4-2.

Bournemouth captain Adam Smith told Sky Sports News afterwards: “It shouldn’t be happening. I don’t know how Ant’s played on to be honest and come up with those goals. It’s totally unacceptable.

“Something needs to be done. Taking the knee isn’t having an effect. We’re supporting him and hopefully he’ll be OK.

“I wanted him to react because that’s what I would have done, but this shows what type of man he is…to come up with those goals showed the type of guy he is.

“To be fair the Liverpool players were very supportive as well towards Antoine and the rest of the team. It was handled in the right way but… so angry.

“I don’t know what else we can do. No one’s getting it. I don’t know what to say anymore. I just feel for Ant… shocking.”

The Premier League said in a statement that its “on-field anti-discrimination protocol” had been followed and the incident “will now be fully investigated”.

“We offer our full support to the player and both clubs,” it added. “Racism has no place in our game, or anywhere in society. We will continue to work with stakeholders and authorities to ensure our stadiums are an inclusive and welcoming environment for all.”

Read more from Sky News:
Thousands more Afghans affected by second data breach – minister

Sonic boom heard after fighter jets scrambled to intercept passenger jet

The Football Association said it was “concerned” about the allegation of racism towards Semenyo and that it would ensure “appropriate action” would be taken.

The incident comes two days after Tottenham Hotspur player Mathys Tel faced racist abuse online following a missed penalty in his team’s UEFA Super Cup victory over Paris Saint-Germain.

Continue Reading

UK

Sam Rimmer: Mum’s plea to find e-bike riders who shot dead son in Liverpool three years ago

Published

on

By

Sam Rimmer: Mum's plea to find e-bike riders who shot dead son in Liverpool three years ago

The mother of a man shot dead by attackers on electric bikes three years ago has appealed for help finding his killers.

Sam Rimmer was shot in the back on 16 August 2022 when the bikes rode into Lavrock Bank in Liverpool and fired at him and his friends.

The 22-year-old was injured and died a short while later in hospital. Ten people have been arrested since then but no charges have followed.

Sam’s mum, Joanne, said the last three years have been “agonising” and “the passing of time has not eased the pain”.

“People say to cherish the memories, but when I think of Sam, the memory I have is of his body in the morgue, staring at his chest, willing him to breathe. No parent should ever have to identify their child’s body,” she said.

Joanne pleaded: “If you know something and you are reading this, please, please speak up.

“No one will ever know as it will be completely anonymous. Sam was shot in his back. He was turned away from his killers. This image haunts me. In his final moments, was he scared? Was he in pain?”

More on Liverpool

She added: “I died the day Sam did. I function but I do not live.”

Detective Chief Inspector Steve McGrath, from Merseyside Police, said they “just need the final piece of the puzzle”.

“We know that there are people out there who live in the Dingle/Toxteth area who know who is responsible and my appeal is for those people to come forward and tell us what they know,” he urged.

“Do you know who was riding on the bikes that arrived in Lavrock Bank that night? Do you know where they went afterwards or where they are being stored?”

He said any information would be handled carefully and “extensive measures” put in place to protect anyone who comes forward.

Anyone who witnessed the incident, was in the area at the time, or has any other information is urged to contact Merseyside Police on their public portal.

They can also be reached on @MerPolCC on X, or information can be left anonymously with Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.

Continue Reading

UK

Thousands more Afghans affected by second data breach, ministers say

Published

on

By

Thousands more Afghans affected by second data breach, ministers say

Thousands more Afghan nationals may have been affected by another data breach, the government has said.

Up to 3,700 Afghans brought to the UK between January and March 2024 have potentially been impacted as names, passport details and information from the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy has been compromised again, this time by a breach on a third party supplier used by the Ministry of Defence (MoD).

This was not an attack directly on the government but a cyber security incident on a sub-contractor named Inflite – The Jet Centre – an MoD supplier that provides ground handling services for flights at London Stansted Airport.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

July: UK spies exposed in Afghan data breach

The flights were used to bring Afghans to the UK, travel to routine military exercises, and official engagements. It was also used to fly British troops and government officials.

Those involved were informed of it on Friday afternoon by the MoD, marking the second time information about Afghan nationals relocated to the UK has been compromised.

It is understood former Tory ministers are also affected by the hack.

Earlier this year, it emerged that almost 7,000 Afghan nationals would have to be relocated to the UK following a massive data breach by the British military that successive governments tried to keep secret with a super-injunction.

Defence Secretary John Healey offered a “sincere apology” for the first data breach in a statement to the House of Commons, saying he was “deeply concerned about the lack of transparency” around the data breach, adding: “No government wishes to withhold information from the British public, from parliamentarians or the press in this manner.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

July: Afghan interpreter ‘betrayed’ by UK govt

The previous Conservative government set up a secret scheme in 2023 to relocate Afghan nationals impacted by the data breach, but who were not eligible for an existing programme to relocate and help people who had worked for the British government in Afghanistan.

The mistake exposed personal details of close to 20,000 individuals, endangering them and their families, with as many as 100,000 people impacted in total.

Read more from Sky News:
Data breach victims sent spam emails
Afghan data leak timeline
MoD urged to reveal details of nuclear incident

A government spokesperson said of Friday’s latest breach: “We were recently notified that a third-party sub-contractor to a supplier experienced a cyber security incident involving unauthorised access to a small number of its emails that contained basic personal information.

“We take data security extremely seriously and are going above and beyond our legal duties in informing all potentially affected individuals. The incident has not posed any threat to individuals’ safety, nor compromised any government systems.”

In a statement, Inflite – The Jet Centre confirmed the “data security incident” involving “unauthorised access to a limited number of company emails”.

“We have reported the incident to the Information Commissioner’s Office and have been actively working with the relevant UK cyber authorities, including the National Crime Agency and the National Cyber Security Centre, to support our investigation and response,” it said.

“We believe the scope of the incident was limited to email accounts only, however, as a precautionary measure, we have contacted our key stakeholders whose data may have been affected during the period of January to March 2024.”

Continue Reading

Trending