Connect with us

Published

on

For eight years, Sophia* has been living a double life. She is not cheating on her husband and isn’t doing anything illegal, but her clandestine activities are something she plans with military precision to avoid getting caught.

Sophia, who is in her early 30s and lives in north London, is hiding her secret in plain sight. She is one of the hundreds of thousands of Brits who get non-surgical cosmetic treatments every year and lip filler is her beautifier of choice. But her husband doesn’t know.

Welcome to the world of cosmetic infidelity.

It started with a small amount of filler in her top lip. Then she had to go back to discreetly top it up. Before she knew it, she was hooked. She has a separate bank account, which helps cover her tracks, and she plans appointments around her husband’s football practice. She makes sure they’re first thing in the morning, in the hope the swelling will reduce by the evening. But it’s not always easy to keep it secret.

“It doesn’t matter what time of day you get lip filler, by the evening you look like a baboon’s backside,” she says.

Sophia just needs 24 hours or so for the swelling in her lips to subside, leaving her with a plump but natural-looking pout. But in that tricky transition period? “I get into bed and pretend I have period pains while covering my mouth under the duvet in the dark, with just the TV on.”

Can hiding your cosmetic treatments from your partner cause cracks in the relationship?

Honesty is not an option, she says, as her husband has made it clear he is against cosmetic treatments. “Or so he thinks,” she adds, recalling him telling her how pretty she looked after one procedure. “I think men assume you’ll look over-filled and I can’t be bothered to argue. I’d rather hide it, it’s a lot easier.”

Whether it’s Botox, fillers or other injectables, there are lots of Brits giving their natural beauty a helping hand with “tweakments” – but the majority, according to practitioners, are keeping it secret from their partner or other significant people in their lives. While most people in relationships tell the odd white lie here and there, is hiding the truth about cosmetic work a betrayal of trust – or is it a case of your body, your business?

Justifying the money was one of the reasons given by the secret tweakers we spoke to. Injectables don’t come cheap in a cost of living crisis, with the NHS saying prices vary from about £100 to £350, depending on the clinic and the area being treated.

There’s also societal pressure, especially on women, to look effortlessly wrinkle-free – but do this naturally, please. And so the occasional post-treatment bump or bruise might be blamed on children, pets or cupboard doors – one woman even convinced her husband he had injured her in his sleep.

Once a preserve of the rich and famous, an estimated 900,000 Botox injections are now carried out in the UK each year, according to the government. Skin boosters, which hydrate and add moisture, are also growing in popularity, and a recent report in a British plastic surgery journal predicted the UK injectables market will reach a value of £11.7bn by 2026.

Some people go to great lengths to hide the cost of their Botox and fillers

The world is becoming more open about it, with influencers often filming their treatments to show how it all works. Love Island star Zara McDermott and former Made In Chelsea star Millie Mackintosh are among the British influencers who have been open about their injectables.

And yet, for many of those investing in these treatments there is still a stigma attached to it.

Pamela*, a 34-year-old mum from southwest London, has Botox in her forehead and between her eyebrows. For years, she kept it secret from her husband, including when they lived abroad in a country where treatments weren’t always up to scratch.

“Sometimes my husband would look at me like he knew something was different but he couldn’t identify what,” she says. “And these were not good Botox jobs either.” On one occasion, she says she was left looking like Dr Spock. “My eyebrows shot up… it was so bad, an absolute shocker.”

Still, even with vampiric brows, she managed to hide it. Her husband had previously told her she would be wasting money and that she “didn’t need it”. So she always paid cash. “I couldn’t leave a trail,” she explains.

Once after a less successful trip to her injector she was left with bruising so bad that no amount of make-up could cover it up. “I convinced my husband he’d elbowed me in the middle of the night and given me a black eye,” she says. “He felt so bad about it.”

Secret botox is more common than you think

Dr Rina Bajaj, a London-based relationship and counselling psychologist, says honest communication is crucial in any relationship – but individuals also have the right to make choices about their bodies.

“In relationships that value individual freedom and independence, these choices may be seen as personal and not necessarily shared information,” she says. But, in a different kind of relationship, one partner discovering the other has been keeping cosmetic procedures a secret can break trust.”

Understanding the motivations behind the secrecy is important, she adds, as if fear of judgement or negative reactions from a partner is a driving factor, it could be indicative of underlying issues.

But fellow behavioural psychologist and relationship coach Jo Hemmings says keeping small cosmetic procedures secret from a partner is an omission rather than a lie. “It’s not a betrayal of trust because you’re doing it for yourself,” she says. “You’re not deceiving somebody else in the way you would be if you were cheating.”

Even the A-listers are doing it. Oscar-winner Olivia Colman has previously said she tried Botox and “LOVED IT” in an interview with The Times in 2015, but admitted to initially keeping it from her husband. “For about six months he kept saying, ‘Hello, Pretty!’,” she told the newspaper. When she eventually told him, “he found it hilarious”.

Botox and other skin boosters remain a complicated issue for many. For every influencer, beauty journalist or celebrity speaking openly about their cosmetic work, there are more insisting their never-ageing faces are down to the magic formula of drinking lots of water and mindfulness.

Paula*, a 43-year-old mum from Hertfordshire, started getting Botox for her “Gordon Ramsay” frown lines after discovering some friends had been doing it “for years”. After her first treatment, she was nervous her husband would notice, but he didn’t. “I panic every time but he’s not the most observant.”

At the other end of the spectrum, Anna, 40, is open about her Botox and fillers with her husband but doesn’t volunteer the information to friends. “I try not to do the school run for the next couple of days,” she says. “Maybe because I’m a mum, there’s a kind of pressure to dress a certain way and not enhance yourself.”

Men are also indulging in secret botox

While practitioners say it is more common for women to keep their treatments hidden, there are a fair few male patients telling white lies about their beauty habits.

Simon*, a 60-year-old man who lives in the home counties, has been with his partner for 24 years. In that time, he has had a cocktail of treatments, including Botox, fillers and BBL (Brazilian Butt Lift), as well as tightening and fat-reducing procedures.

It’s a lot to keep quiet about, but he wants his partner to think his youthful looks are all down to his healthy lifestyle. Is he ever worried about him finding out? “Not at all, blind as a bat.”

But it’s not just his partner he keeps it secret from. “Everyone,” he says. “It all looks so natural and I don’t have giveaway scars round my ears or missing bits of my face. They just think it’s the Peloton and smoothies.”

Euan Mackinnon, a maxillofacial surgeon and aesthetic doctor who treats cosmetic patients at The Lovely Clinic, has been carrying out tweakments for more than 10 years and says about 70% of clients are keeping it secret from someone.

“There’s a lot of people who are worried about being found out by a partner,” he says. It is usually women not wanting their husband or boyfriend discovering their secret, because men will give examples of celebrity horror stories, not realising there are hundreds for whom it has gone well. Men fear their partners looking caricature-like, “with overly inflated lips or frozen foreheads”, he adds. “In reality, that’s not what we do at all.”

Read more:
How to make Botox and other non-surgical cosmetic treatments safer?
Two-thirds of cosmetic surgery injections not carried out by doctors – study
Botulism in patients who had weight loss injections sparks warning

Patients will often tell him excuses they have given for any temporary bruising that might occur immediately after injections. “You do what you’ve got to do to get through those first few days. But most treatments don’t lead to significant bruising.”

On a more serious note, patients are worried about being judged, he says. “Partners might make them feel like they’re being silly or being vain… But you shouldn’t feel shameful if you look in the mirror and you just don’t like something… if there’s a very safe solution to that problem then why not make yourself feel good?”

Some people don't know why they keep Botox secret

There are also contradictory societal pressures, he says: age gracefully, but don’t age. “It seems to be a success to look incredibly good and have had nothing done because you’re winning at life, and if you have some help along the way it’s seen by some as cheating or a weakness – which it’s obviously not.”

And there is a difference across generations. Younger millennials have grown up watching influencers filming from their beauty beds as the needles go in, and are more likely to view cosmetic treatments as self-care. Older millennials, Gen X-ers and Boomers are more likely to keep it private.

“But it’s not just a vanity project,” Mr Mackinnon adds. “I’m constantly seeing patients who tell me their confidence has improved – ‘I got this promotion’, ‘I took the plunge with something’ – it can change everything for them.”

Lee Garrett, advanced aesthetic nurse practitioner and prescriber and clinical lead at The Cosmetic Skin Clinic, carries out about 3,000 treatments a year and has more than 20 years’ experience in the field.

He agrees it is common for patients to keep treatments secret from partners, and work colleagues as well – some have even told him that working in a very young environment makes them worry about their looks and being “pushed out by a younger version”.

Secret or no secret, both Mr Mackinnon and Mr Garrett agree the most important thing is to do your research and go to a healthcare professional. “Avoid at all costs people who say they can do it cheap,” says Mr Garrett. “They can, but they are not qualified, not insured and so when it goes badly wrong, you’re on your own.”

And if that happens, the secret definitely will be out.

Meanwhile, Sophia is hoping to get beauty vouchers for Christmas to cover her next lot of secret lip filler. Last time, her husband thought he was gifting her a facial. “He asked me how it went and I responded, ‘really relaxing, thank you!'”

Cosmetic infidelity, it seems, is a hard habit to shake.

*Names have been changed

Continue Reading

UK

England crowned Women’s Rugby World Cup champions after emphatic win over Canada

Published

on

By

England crowned Women's Rugby World Cup champions after emphatic win over Canada

England have been crowned Women’s Rugby World Cup champions for the third time after crushing Canada 33-13.

Two tries by Alex Matthews, plus one each from Ellie Kildunne, Amy Cokayne and Abbie Ward sealed it for the Red Roses.

England, ranked as the world number one going into the match, were ahead by 13 points by the end of the first half – as they played in front of a record-breaking home crowd of 81,885 at the Allianz Stadium in Twickenham, west London.

(L-R) Megan Jones, Ellie Kildunne and Helena Rowland celebrate at the final whistle after the Women's Rugby World Cup. Pic: PA
Image:
(L-R) Megan Jones, Ellie Kildunne and Helena Rowland celebrate at the final whistle after the Women’s Rugby World Cup. Pic: PA

England's Zoe Aldcroft lifts the trophy as she celebrates with teammates after winning the Womens Rugby World Cup final. Pic: Reuters
Image:
England’s Zoe Aldcroft lifts the trophy as she celebrates with teammates after winning the Womens Rugby World Cup final. Pic: Reuters

England's Alex Matthews celebrates scoring a try in the Womens Rugby World Cup final. Pic: Reuters
Image:
England’s Alex Matthews celebrates scoring a try in the Womens Rugby World Cup final. Pic: Reuters

Canada mounted a spirited effort in the second half, but a decent spell of pressure was cut off when Matthews scored her second try of the afternoon.

A conversion took the Red Roses to 33 points, giving them a comfortable 20 point lead over the Maple Leafs.

England's Ellie Kildunne runs in to score a try. Pic: PA
Image:
England’s Ellie Kildunne runs in to score a try. Pic: PA

England's Tatyana Heard is tackled by Canada's Alysha Corrigan. Pic: PA
Image:
England’s Tatyana Heard is tackled by Canada’s Alysha Corrigan. Pic: PA

England's Amy Cokayne scores a try during the Women's Rugby World Cup final. Pic: PA
Image:
England’s Amy Cokayne scores a try during the Women’s Rugby World Cup final. Pic: PA

The win marks the first time England won the Women’s Rugby World Cup in 11 years, after losing finals in 2017 and 2022.

Among the first to congratulate the Red Roses were the Prince and Princess of Wales, who also praised Canada and said: “You had an outstanding tournament. Both teams should be so proud!”

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer also praised the team and said: “You have shown the very best of England and inspired a generation.”

After watching the game with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, London’s mayor Sir Sadiq Khan posted a photo of the pair while congratulating England.

“Huge congratulations to (the Red Roses) on their fantastic victory,” he said, “another proud moment for women’s rugby.”

‘Pinch me moment’

Speaking to the BBC after being named player of the match, England’s 23-year-old flanker Sadia Kabeya said: “It’s a pinch me moment. It’s been years and years in the making, I am so happy we could pull it off.

“All props to Canada they are a great side and they put up a great fight here today.”

Ward also told the broadcaster: “Honestly as soon as the whistle went I just burst into tears. It’s truly been such a special day. A sold-out crowd at Twickenham. It was electric, in front of friends, family, it’s amazing.

“The last final loss, that was then. This is a new team, this is a new chapter of women’s rugby.”

Read more from Sky News:
Prince of Wales says 2024 was ‘hardest year’ of his life
Unite threatens to break link with Labour
Nuno Espirito Santo made new West Ham head coach

Headed into the final, the Red Roses were on a 32-game winning streak and won their seventh straight Six Nations title back in April.

England also won every one of their matches in the World Cup group stages, then secured victories over Scotland and France in the quarter and semi-finals, respectively.

It also marked the second-ever Rugby World Cup final for Canada, ranked second in the world behind England.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney was spotted in the stands. Pic: PA
Image:
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney was spotted in the stands. Pic: PA

Canada's Asia Hogan-Rochester scores her team's first try of the match. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Canada’s Asia Hogan-Rochester scores her team’s first try of the match. Pic: Reuters

But despite their world ranking, Canada’s women’s team had to partly fund their way to the tournament.

A crowdfunding page under the name Mission: Win Rugby World Cup 2025 raised nearly $1m (£534,000) to help cover the costs of sending the team to England.

Continue Reading

UK

Inside the courts where migrants appeal removal from Britain – amid clamour to leave ECHR

Published

on

By

Inside the courts where migrants appeal removal from Britain - amid clamour to leave ECHR

How often do migrants successfully fight their removal from Britain on the basis of their human rights?

The clamour from the right for the UK to withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights has been growing – even some high-profile Labour figures say it needs reform.

So, I’ve come to an immigration appeal court – unannounced – to find out how it is used by migrants and their lawyers here.

Decisions delayed, outcomes unpublished

I get to the fourth floor of a large court building in Birmingham.

The first case I’m ushered into to see is a 38-year-old Nigerian man. He came on a student visa – but that ran out.

Just before he did, he put in a claim to stay on the basis of his relationship with a woman, who is originally from Barbados but has lived and worked in Britain since 2015.

The judge, who will decide their fate, dials in via video link. He hears the man’s partner has a 17-year-old daughter.

She lives with her biological father, but the couple insist she is so close to the Nigerian man she calls him “Dad”. This is an appeal being made under Article 8 of the ECHR – the right to a family life.

The following day, it’s a different judge – this time he’s here in person.

The man in front of him is appealing against deportation to Kenya. He came to the UK as a baby with his mother and siblings.

As a teenager, he was jailed for almost 10 years for stabbing a man, causing serious injuries.

It emerges that his case is also based on Article 8 of the ECHR. Since leaving prison, he’s fathered a child who has just turned two.

There are arguments made too under Article 3 of the ECHR – which protects against torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment – due to the man being diagnosed with “generalised anxiety” and depression.

It will be a few weeks before decisions are made on these cases – and the results won’t be published by the court.

I leave, thinking how opaque the process feels.

It’s also easy to see why some politicians are pointing to the ECHR – a treaty signed after the Second World War to protect the rights of everyone in the Council of Europe – as a barrier to removing more migrants.

Between April 2008 and June 2021, 21,521 foreign nationals were due to be deported because of crimes they'd committed
Image:
Between April 2008 and June 2021, 21,521 foreign nationals were due to be deported because of crimes they’d committed

Is the ECHR really a barrier to deportation?

“I think there’s a strong kind of political dynamic there which has led to, in some ways, you might say, a kind of scapegoating of the European Convention,” says Alice Donald, Professor of Human Rights law at Middlesex University, London.

She’s not convinced that withdrawal from ECHR would make a big difference to the number of people the UK is able to remove or deport.

“The honest answer is we don’t know, we don’t have enough data to say that,” she says.

“The data that we do have, for example, in relation to the number of human rights appeals against deportation by foreign national offenders, which has been very much in the news this year, suggests that it would really make only a marginal difference.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘What did we do wrong?’ – Asylum seekers on protests

Read more from Sky News:
What is a digital ID card, and will it be mandatory?
Farage on course to be next PM, mega poll projects

Those figures, published by the Home Office, reveal that between April 2008 and June 2021, 21,521 foreign nationals due to be deported because of crimes they’d committed appealed, and 2,392 were successful on human rights grounds only. That’s around 181 on average per year.

We don’t have figures for how many other types of immigrants are allowed to stay on the basis of human rights. Small boat migrants who claim asylum would usually rely on another convention.

“In terms of asylum claims, it is governed by the 1951 Refugee Convention as a different treaty,” Prof Donald explains.

“There is, of course, overlapping protection with the prohibition of torture in the European Convention… so if the Refugee Convention were still in place, then of course people seeking asylum would rely on that.”

She also believes there have been “a number of erroneous stories or exaggerated stories”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Reform would deport legal migrants

Debunking the chicken nugget myth

In February 2025, it was widely reported that an Albanian criminal’s deportation was halted over his son’s dislike of foreign chicken nuggets.

“What actually happened in that case is that it went to the upper tribunal (second-tier immigration appeal court) which ordered that he could be deported. And also specifically said that the evidence to do with chicken nuggets was nowhere near the level required,” Prof Donald says.

What leaving the ECHR would mean

Withdrawal from the ECHR would mean the guarantees it provides would be removed for everyone in the UK, not just migrants.

It not only protects the rights to life, liberty, fair trial and freedom of expression among others, but also prohibits torture, slavery and discrimination.

Pulling out of the treaty could also breach the Belfast Good Friday Agreement – though some say such an outcome is avoidable.

However, in a country where immigration is the top issue of concern for voters, there are some who now think that is a price worth paying.

Continue Reading

UK

King and Queen set to meet Pope Leo in Vatican state visit

Published

on

By

King and Queen set to meet Pope Leo in Vatican state visit

The King and Queen will meet the new Pope during a state visit to Vatican City next month.

The couple will join Leo XIV, who was elected pope earlier this year after the death of Pope Francis, in late October to celebrate the 2025 jubilee year, Buckingham Palace said.

The Catholic Church typically marks a papal jubilee every 25 years.

Charles and Camilla‘s visit is expected to celebrate the ecumenical work by the Church of England and the Catholic Church, reflecting the Jubilee year’s theme of walking together as “Pilgrims of Hope”.

The King is Supreme Governor of the Church of England, a role which dates back to Henry VIII, who named himself Supreme Head of the Church of England after he was excommunicated by Pope Paul III and broke from the Catholic Church in the 16th century to marry Anne Boleyn.

State visit has diplomatic and spiritual significance

Postponed from the Italian state visit earlier this year, the King’s invitation to the Holy See has both diplomatic and spiritual significance.

It symbolises a shared desire from the King and Pope Leo to overcome denominational divisions of the past.

The King has a deep respect for religious diversity. Five hundred years ago, it was another Pope Leo – Leo X – who gave Henry VIII the title Defender of the Faith.

King Charles has long reflected on the meaning of this title within our modern, multi-faith and increasingly secular society.

This has been a year of change for many Christians. Very soon, a new Archbishop of Canterbury will be announced. A protracted process compared with the two-day conclave in Rome. As the Supreme Governor of the Church of England, the King will approve the appointment.

The King’s recent presence at Westminster Cathedral, attending the requiem mass of the Catholic Duchess of Kent, was seen as an important moment of Christian unity.

This state visit will be another example of the continued commitment between the Church of England and the Catholic Church.

The King and Queen had a meeting with Pope Francis just 12 days before he died.

The King and Queen meeting Pope Francis before his death. Pic: PA
Image:
The King and Queen meeting Pope Francis before his death. Pic: PA

Their historic state visit to the Vatican in early April was cancelled due to the then-pontiff’s poor health, but they managed to visit him privately during their trip to Italy.

More on Pope Leo

The meeting with Francis, in what would be the final weeks of his life, was arranged at the last minute and took place on their 20th wedding anniversary on 9 April, with the pontiff wanting to personally wish them a happy anniversary.

Read more from Sky News:
Elon Musk and Prince Andrew named in latest Epstein files release
Watch moment diplomats walk out as Israeli PM speaks at UN

In an official message released following the news of Francis’s death on 21 April, the King said he and the Queen were “most deeply saddened”.

In May, Charles sent a private message to Pope Leo XIV congratulating him on his election, Buckingham Palace said.

Continue Reading

Trending