Connect with us

Published

on

A once-popular YouTube parent vlogger was arrested in August after her son was found emaciated and with duct tape on his limbs by a neighbour. 

Ruby Franke faced six child abuse charges in the US state of Utah. She admitted four of them today.

Who is she, what controversy has she stirred before and what led to her arrest? Here is everything you need to know.

Who is Ruby Franke and what was her YouTube channel?

Ruby Franke and her husband launched their family YouTube channel, 8 Passengers, in early 2015.

The channel chronicled the lives of the parents and their six children and focused on parenting style, the children’s upbringing and discipline.

The parents, members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (known as the Mormon Church), also shared their children’s home-schooling.

The channel gained 2.3 million subscribers before it was removed earlier this year.

What is Ruby Franke charged with?

Franke and her business partner Jodi Hildebrandt were both charged with six counts of aggravated child abuse.

Each count carries a prison sentence of up to 15 years and a fine of up to $10,000 (£8,044).

In Utah, aggravated child abuse is defined as an act that “inflicts upon a child serious physical injury” or “causes or permits another to inflict serious physical injury upon a child”.

“Each defendant is accused of causing or permitting serious physical injury to the victims in three different ways: (1) a combination of multiple physical injuries or torture, (2) starvation or malnutrition that jeopardises life, and (3) causing severe emotional harm,” the Washington County Attorney in Utah told Sky News’s sister outlet NBC News.

Who is Jodi Hildebrandt?

Hildebrandt founded the controversial life counselling organisation ConneXions, which Franke became a key part of.

The two women created advice videos that critics say promote a harsh style of parenting.

Hildebrandt has agreed not to see patients until the allegations against her are addressed by state licensing officials.

Her next court hearing is set for 27 December, according to court records.

This image from video provided by the Utah State Courts shows Jodi Hildebrandt during a virtual court appearance, Friday, Sept. 8, 2023 in St. George, Utah. Jodi Hildebrandt, 54, and Ruby Franke were charged with six felony counts of aggravated child abuse after their arrests on Aug. 30 at Hildebrandt's house in the southern Utah city of IvinsJodi Hildebrandt, 54, were charged with six felony counts of aggravated child abuse after their arrests on Aug. 30 at Hildebrandt's house in the southern Utah city of Ivins (Utah State Courts via AP)
Image:
Jodi Hildebrandt appears at a virtual court hearing. Pic: Utah State Courts via AP

What led to Ruby Franke’s arrest?

Franke’s arrest came after her 12-year-old son escaped out of the window of Hildebrandt’s house and ran to a neighbour asking for food and water.

The local police department released the audio of the neighbour’s 911 call.

“I just had a 12-year-old boy show up here in my front door asking for help,” he said.

He added: “We know there’s been problems at this neighbour’s house. He’s emaciated. He’s got tape around his legs. He’s hungry and he’s thirsty.”

The boy’s condition was judged by police to be so severe he was taken to hospital.

Franke’s 10-year-old daughter was later found malnourished and was also taken to the hospital.

The children were found at Hildebrandt’s house, but Franke had been seen on a YouTube video filmed there and posted two days earlier, indicating she was at the home and had knowledge of the abuse, malnourishment and neglect, arrest records said.

Four of Franke’s children are under 18 and have now been placed in care.

This image from video provided by the Utah State Courts shows Ruby Franke, during a virtual court appearance, Friday, Sept. 8, 2023 in St. George, Utah. Franke, a mother of six who gave parenting advice via a once-popular YouTube channel called "8 Passengers" made her initial court appearance Friday on charges that she and the owner of a relationship counseling business abused and starved her two young children. (Utah State Courts via AP)
Image:
Ruby Franke appears at a virtual court hearing. Pic: Utah State Courts via AP

Previous reports to authorities

Police were called to Franke’s home last year after a concerned neighbour said her children had been left home alone for several days, according to NBC’s account of a police report.

A police officer who visited wrote in the report that he saw children inside, but they refused to open the door.

When police returned, Franke was there with her children, but would not talk to them.

Franke’s eldest daughter, Shari Franke, called the police wanting to make sure her siblings were safe and had food after the neighbour alerted her to her mother’s absence, the report said.

In 2020, viewers of 8 Passengers launched a petition to get child protection services to investigate Franke. Insider reported that officials visited the house but closed the case “because the claims were unsupported”.

How did Franke cause controversy with viewers?

Viewers had been calling out Franke’s parenting style and discipline choices for several years before her arrest.

The incident that prompted the petition was a video in which Franke’s eldest son revealed he slept on a beanbag for seven months because he had been moved out of his brother’s room for teasing him.

Franke defended herself in an interview with Insider, saying her son had chosen a beanbag over an airbed or a pullout guest bed.

She also angered viewers with a video about her 6-year-old forgetting her school lunch. In the video, Franke said she would not drop any food at school and her daughter should use the “pain” of being hungry as a lesson not to forget her lunch in future.

Franke was also criticised for threatening to throw away her children’s possessions and denying them personal space.

Neighbours also accused Franke of withholding food as a punishment for her children.

They also claimed that, after her husband was out of the home, Franke would leave the house for weeks at a time, with the children inside.

“Everyone is just breathing a collective sigh of relief because we thought they were going to come out of that house with body bags,” one neighbour told NBC.

“I remember that she took away their Christmas one year,” he said, “and she would say things like ‘They’re not repenting correctly,’ which is a Mormon term for ‘they’re sinning.’ Just complete insanity.”

Read more:
Neighbours say they tried to warn child services
Sisters ‘did as much as we could’ to help kids

Franke’s time in court

When Franke and Hildebrandt had their first court hearing on 8 September it was derailed by tech issues as more than 1,000 people tried to join virtually.

YouTube commentator Tezzmosis provided a live commentary of the hearing to people who couldn’t get on the live stream.

He later told NBC he believed the intense public interest stems from the clear disconnect the case illustrates between the “perfect image” a parenting influencer can present online versus their family’s reality.

“They’ve been on [authorities’] radar for a couple of years,” he said, referring to the news police had previously visited Franke’s house due to concerns about her alleged treatment of her children.

“But being from an affluent family and having this notoriety in such a way, I think it was so hard for people to believe that something so bad could be going on beyond the surface,” Tezzmosis added.

‘I am not my sister’s crimes’

Two sisters of Franke used YouTube vlogs to distance themselves from her, both uploading videos on 14 September.

In a video titled “I am not my sister. I am not my sister’s crimes”, Bonnie Hoellein said she was “cut off” from the family and “did not have access to anyone”.

She said she disagreed with what she called her sister’s “extreme” parenting tactics and “did everything legally that we could do” to help the children.

Ellie Mecham, another of Franke’s sisters, also said in an Instagram post they had done “everything we could to try and make sure the kids were safe”.

Franke’s eldest daughter has also spoken out. Shari Franke, 20, said in an Instagram story after her mother’s arrest: “We’ve been trying to tell the police and CPS for years about this, and so glad they finally decided to step up.”

Other influencers have also shared their shock at her crimes.

Julie Deru, who has a family channel called Deru Crew Vlogs, said she last spoke to Franke three years ago.

“We are kind of in complete shock, still, as to what she had done, because we had no idea of what was happening,” she said.

What about the father, Kevin Franke?

Kevin Franke’s lawyer appeared on Good Morning America to distance Ruby Franke’s husband from the child abuse allegations she faces.

The lawyer said the couple had been living separately for 13 months and Kevin Franke was “distraught” after hearing about the alleged abuse.

“No one’s ever made any allegations that he’s ever physically abused those kids, or anyone else,” he told the programme.

Continue Reading

US

The stakes are high – and the unity of the alliance against Putin has never been so threatened

Published

on

By

The stakes are high - and the unity of the alliance against Putin has never been so threatened

When Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his European allies meet Donald Trump in Washington, a huge amount is at stake.

Ukrainian officials are reported to feel betrayed by the US president, who appears to have shifted position to side with Vladimir Putin on a number of key points in the wake of the meeting with him in Alaska.

Trump has undermined the unity of the Western alliance by abandoning their calls for an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy's last meeting with Donald Trump at the White House ended in disaster. Pic: AP/ Mystyslav Chernov
Image:
Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s last meeting with Donald Trump at the White House ended in disaster. Pic: AP/ Mystyslav Chernov

He is no longer threatening more severe sanctions, and more worryingly still he seems open to the idea of making the Ukrainians hand over territory the Russians have not yet captured.

He and his real estate lawyer turned rookie negotiator Steve Witkoff seem to believe the conflict can be resolved by an exchange of territory. Putin on the other hand has made it clear he is fighting to extinguish Ukraine as an independent and democratic entity.

Read more:
Putin has ‘agreed NATO-style security guarantee’
How a chaotic 24 hours unfolded
Why is Zelenskyy bringing posse of leaders to talks?

Ukrainians say that for Zelenskyy, handing over land his troops have been fighting to defend since 2014 would be politically suicidal and strategically insane.

Sergeant Andriy Poluhin, from the Ukrainian 24th Brigade, has fought the Russians in Donetsk on and off since 2015 and is currently based in the fiercely embattled town of Chasiv Yar.

👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈

He’s typical of many Ukrainians, appalled at the idea his country would have to hand over land so many of their comrades have died fighting for.

Putin’s claim that he wants to end the war and stop the killing, he says, is self-evidently false.

“It’s a lie, it’s obviously a lie. I think it’s not only my thoughts or Ukrainian ones, but everyone who deals with Russia understands he just lies,” he says.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Behind the scenes in Alaska with the Sky News team

Many would agree – except the US president himself, who says he believes the Russian leader wants the killing to end.

The challenge for Zelenskyy and his European outriders when they go to the White House is avoiding a repeat of the disastrous Oval Office encounter between him and Trump and his vice president in February.

They need to steer Trump back to their side of the argument without angering the famously thin-skinned president and driving him further towards Moscow.

The unity of the alliance against Putin has never been so threatened.

Continue Reading

US

Donald Trump says Volodymyr Zelenskyy ‘could end war with Russia’ if he wanted to – ahead of crucial White House meeting

Published

on

By

Donald Trump says Volodymyr Zelenskyy 'could end war with Russia' if he wanted to - ahead of crucial White House meeting

Volodymyr Zelenskyy could “end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to”, Donald Trump has said – ahead of crucial White House talks on the future of Ukraine.

Mr Trump made the comment in a series of social media posts throwing forward to his meeting with the Ukrainian president, who will be supported by Sir Keir Starmer and other European leaders.

The allies are travelling to Washington DC with the aim of protecting Ukraine from having to concede key regions to Russia in exchange for peace, following the US president’s high-profile meeting with Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday.

They will also be keen to avoid a repeat of Mr Zelenskyy‘s last heated visit to the White House in February, which ended with the Ukrainian leader leaving early and later resulted in US aid to Ukraine being temporarily halted.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What happened when Zelenskyy last went to the White House?

“President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight,” Mr Trump shared on his own network, Truth Social, on Sunday. “Remember how it started,” he added, before highlighting the annexation of Crimea.

Describing today as a “big day” at the White House, he added: “Never had so many European Leaders at one time. My great honor to host them!!!.”

Pic: @realDonaldTrump/ Truth Social
Image:
Pic: @realDonaldTrump/ Truth Social

Sir Keir and six other political heavyweights will present a united front alongside Mr Zelenskyy, who is expecting to face calls to surrender full control of Donetsk and Luhansk – two mineral-rich regions where large areas are currently occupied by Russian troops.

In September 2022, Moscow announced it was officially annexing them, alongside the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions, in a move rejected and condemned as illegal by the West.

Mr Putin would reportedly give up other territories held by his troops in exchange and agree to a “NATO-like” security guarantee preventing Ukraine from further incursion.

Putin and Trump held talks without Zelenskyy in Alaska on Friday. Pic: AP
Image:
Putin and Trump held talks without Zelenskyy in Alaska on Friday. Pic: AP

At today’s Oval Office encounter, Mr Zelenskyy will be joined by France’s Emmanuel Macron, Germany’s Friedrich Merz, Italy’s Giorgia Meloni and Alexander Stubb, president of Finland, as well as head of NATO Mark Rutte and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen, and Sir Keir.

They are set to arrive at midday (5pm UK time). Mr Trump and Mr Zelenskyy will hold a bilateral meeting first, before a multilateral meeting with the rest of the European leaders.

In a message on X on Sunday, before Mr Trump’s posts, the Ukrainian president said strong unity from Europe was “essential” to achieve an end to the war, and that it was “impossible” for Ukraine to “give up or trade land”.

He said a ceasefire was necessary for a deal to be worked on, writing: “We have to stop the killings. Putin has many demands but we do not know all of them.

“If there are really as many as we heard, then it will take time to go through them all. It is impossible to do this under the pressure of weapons.”

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, right, joined Mr Zelenskyy at a news conference on Sunday. Pic: AP
Image:
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, right, joined Mr Zelenskyy at a news conference on Sunday. Pic: AP

What is the ‘NATO-like’ security guarantee?

Following the Trump-Putin summit in Alaska, the two leaders said they had agreed on some points but did not elaborate further.

Speaking to CNN on Sunday, US special envoy Steve Witkoff said: “We were able to win the following concession: that the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO.”

Article 5 is a core principle of the 32-member collective, which states that an armed attack against one or more of its members shall be considered an attack against all. It has only been invoked once, by the US, in the wake of the 9/11 attacks in 2001.

Putin and Trump in Alaska, each flanked by people from their administrations. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Putin and Trump in Alaska, each flanked by people from their administrations. Pic: Reuters

Russia has repeatedly insisted that Ukraine cannot be allowed to join NATO and has dismissed the idea that NATO member forces could be peacekeepers under some sort of ceasefire deal.

Mr Witkoff, who has held previous discussions with Mr Putin on ending the war, said Friday’s summit was the first time he had heard the Russian leader agree to the suggestion of NATO-like protection – and called it “game-changing”.

Analysis and explainers:
Alliance against Putin has never been so threatened
How a chaotic 24 hours unfolded ahead of talks
Why Zelenskyy is taking a posse of leaders for talks

In a post on X, Russian envoy Mikhail Ulyanov said Russia agrees a future peace agreement “should provide reliable security assurances or guarantees for Ukraine”.

But Moscow should also get efficient security guarantees, he added. “What the West has to offer? Apparently they haven’t yet started to think about it. It is a mistake, which needs to be corrected.”

He also said efforts now should focus on the “main goal – the need to elaborate quickly an efficient long-term peace accord, not a questionable ceasefire which diverts attention”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Behind the scenes in Alaska with the Sky News team

No talk of ceasefire after summit

Despite prior threats of severe sanctions for Russia should a ceasefire not be agreed during the talks in Alaska, there was no mention of this from Mr Trump afterwards. Instead, he said he wanted to focus on a long-term deal for peace.

Mr Putin has long refused to agree to a ceasefire as a precondition for talks to end the war, prompting fears that Russia could continue gaining ground in Ukraine as negotiations take place.

Read more from Sky News:
The territory Ukraine could be told to surrender
Body language expert unpacks Alaska summit

At a news conference on Sunday, Ms von der Leyen said the aim was to “stop the killing”, and suggested a ceasefire and a peace deal would have that same impact.

Mr Trump has previously said today’s meeting with Mr Zelenskyy could potentially pave the way for a three-way meeting with Mr Putin.

Continue Reading

US

Putin has agreed Ukraine can have ‘NATO-style’ security guarantee, Trump envoy says

Published

on

By

Putin has agreed Ukraine can have 'NATO-style' security guarantee, Trump envoy says

Vladimir Putin has agreed to allow Ukraine’s allies to offer it a NATO-like security guarantee as part of an eventual deal to end the war, according to US special envoy Steve Witkoff.

Mr Witkoff said the Russian president agreed to the move when he met with Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday.

Speaking to CNN on Sunday, Mr Witkoff, who was by the US president’s side at the summit, said: “We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO.”

File pic: AP
Image:
File pic: AP

Article 5 is a core principle of the 32-member collective, which states that an armed attack against one or more of its members shall be considered an attack against all. It has only been invoked once, by the US, in the wake of the 9/11 attacks in 2001.

Russia has repeatedly insisted that Ukraine cannot be allowed to join NATO and has dismissed the idea that NATO member forces could be peacekeepers under some sort of ceasefire deal.

Mr Witkoff, who has previously met with Mr Putin to discuss an end to the Ukraine war, said Friday’s summit was the first time he had heard the Russian president agree to the suggestion of NATO-like protection – and called it “game-changing”.

Witkoff (far right) with Trump, Putin and their delegations in Alaska. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Witkoff (far right) with Trump, Putin and their delegations in Alaska. Pic: Reuters

His comments came as Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Brussels.

The Ukrainian president said in a post on X: “This is a historic decision that the United States is ready to take part in security guarantees for Ukraine.

“Security guarantees, as a result of our joint work, must really be very practical, delivering protection on land, in the air, and at sea, and must be developed with Europe’s participation.”

Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday. Pic: AP
Image:
Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday. Pic: AP

Ms von der Leyen, speaking at a news conference with the Ukrainian president, said the European Union “is ready to do its share”.

EU leaders to join Zelenskyy at White House

Sunday afternoon also saw Ms von der Leyen and Mr Zelenskyy dial in to a meeting with the coalition of the willing, a peacekeeping alliance of European leaders – some of whom will accompany Mr Zelenskyy to meet with Mr Trump tomorrow.

Ms von der Leyen will be at the crunch talks in Washington DC, as will Sir Keir Starmer, France’s Emmanuel Macron and Italy’s Giorgia Meloni.

Germany’s Chancellor Friedrich Merz and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte will also be in attendance, after the US president reportedly extended an invitation to European leaders.

Read more: Why is Zelenskyy bringing a posse of leaders?

Mr Zelenskyy clashed with Mr Trump during his trip to Washington in February. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Mr Zelenskyy clashed with Mr Trump during his trip to Washington in February. Pic: Reuters

Mr Putin has reportedly made demands to take control of the eastern Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine during his summit with Mr Trump as a condition for ending the war.

In exchange, Russia would give up other Ukrainian territories held by its troops, according to several news reports citing sources close to the matter.

Russian troops currently occupy large parts of the two regions and, in September 2022, Moscow announced it was officially annexing them, alongside the Kherson and Zaporizhia regions, in a move rejected and condemned as illegal by the West.

Mr Trump is said to be planning to urge Mr Zelenskyy to agree to the conditions as part of a peace deal to end the war.

That’s despite the Ukrainian president previously ruling out formally handing any territory to Moscow, which he says would be impossible under the country’s constitution, and would deprive Ukraine of defensive lines and open the way for Moscow to conduct further offensives.

Mr Putin and Mr Trump shake hands at the Alaska summit. Pic: AP
Image:
Mr Putin and Mr Trump shake hands at the Alaska summit. Pic: AP

In coordinated statements following the Alaska summit, European leaders said Mr Zelenskyy must play a greater role in future talks, and that peace cannot be achieved without him.

The US president said the Washington talk with Mr Zelenskyy could potentially pave the way for a three-way meeting with Mr Putin.

Read more from Sky News:
The territory Ukraine could be told to surrender
Body language expert unpacks Alaska summit

On Saturday, Downing Street insisted Sir Keir and other allies stand ready to support the next phase of talks to end the war.

“At the meeting that will take place at the White House tomorrow, the Prime Minister, with other European partners, stands ready to support this next phase of further talks and will reaffirm that his backing for Ukraine will continue as long as it takes,” a statement from No 10 said.

Continue Reading

Trending