Connect with us

Published

on

Asda faces increased interest payments of at least £30m from February as loans taken on by the billionaire Issa brothers to fund the £6.8bn purchase of the supermarket start to become due.

Mohsin and Zuba Issa, who made their names founding the EG petrol station group, bought the Asda chain from Walmart in 2021 in a heavily leveraged takeover that has drawn scrutiny from MPs and unions.

In October, Asda in turn bought the EG group in a £2bn deal.

Addressing MPs on the business and trade select committee, Mohsin Issa insisted that despite the sharp increase in the cost of borrowing in the last 18 months, the supermarket group is stable and financially sound.

“We can give you the confidence that it is run properly,” Mr Issa said.

“What I would say is that the debt leverage at the start of the year was at 4.2 times, that has gone down to 3.8 times and that trajectory is to go down even further by the end of this year.

“At the same time, we are investing in colleague pay, customer pricing and loyalty. The business is highly cash generative.”

Asda’s chief financial officer Michael Gleeson told MPs total debt within the Asda company hierarchy was £4.2bn, £500m of which will become due in February and switch to a floating rate that will add “at least £30m” to financing costs.

He said the remainder of the debt is fixed until February 2026.

Mr Issa also faced questions about the company’s labyrinthine and opaque structure, which has 16 different entities between the owners and the supermarket operating company, many of them registered offshore.

The Issa brothers and their family own 45% of the company, with Walmart retaining a 10% stake, and the remainder owned by TDR Capital, the private equity group with whom the brothers funded the takeover.

Mohsin Issa gives evidence to MPs
Image:
Mohsin Issa gives evidence to MPs

“A structure like this is not unusual for a large corporation like Asda. All of these companies are tax registered and pay tax in the UK,” Mr Issa said.

Of the other major supermarkets Morrisons was the subject of a £6bn leveraged takeover last year, Tesco and Sainsbury’s are both publicly listed, while Lidl and Aldi are privately owned in Germany.

Mr Issa conceded that in line with the model of private equity, at some stage TDR Capital would seek to exit. “At some point they will want to go but from the conversations I have had with them, they are long-term investors.”

He also gave MPs an insight into his journey from owning a single forecourt with his brother to running a multi-billion pound retail empire.

“We started with a single petrol station, I washed the restrooms, I manned the tills when I needed to, back then these were places you could not get a snack, it was just gas, and mainly distressed sales,” he said.

“We have the vision of transforming that, we were the first to have Subway in our stations, the first to have Starbucks… we had a mission to transform that tired and sleepy industry.”

Read more:
Asda co-owner mauled by MPs on fuel prices and ‘fire and re-hire’

Earlier the GMB union told MPs it was concerned that “debt levels and the interest payments” at Asda could impact workers in its supermarkets.

Nadine Houghton, national officer for the union, said: “From an Asda perspective, we see a dramatic drop in hours available for shop floor workers, which is intensely increasing the pressure on them, their mental health.

“We’ve seen cuts to the cleaning contract, so we have concerns over the level of cleanliness and maintenance. Violent attacks on our members are up and there are unrealistic productivity measures.

“Really, I think this is a result of the fact that private equity have to pay this back somehow – one of the ways we believe they’re seeking to do this in Asda is through some of these examples we are seeing from the shop floor.”

Continue Reading

Business

£5bn Bitcoin fraud mastermind had device containing £67m in secret pocket

Published

on

By

£5bn Bitcoin fraud mastermind had device containing £67m in secret pocket

The mastermind of a £5bn Chinese investment fraud was found with a device containing £67m of cryptocurrency in a secret pocket of her jogging bottoms when she was arrested after years on the run, a court has heard.

Prosecutors are setting up a compensation scheme after Yadi Zhang, 47, conned around 128,000 Chinese investors into fraudulent wealth schemes between 2014 and 2017.

Zhang, who is also known as Zhimin Qian, admitted money laundering charges after police discovered more than 61,000 Bitcoin, now worth more than £5bn, in digital wallets, in the UK’s biggest ever cryptocurrency seizure.

She arrived in the UK on a false St Kitts and Nevis passport in September 2017 before coming to the attention of police after trying to buy some of London’s most expensive properties.

Zhang rented a £17,000-a-month house in Hampstead, north London. Pic: CPS
Image:
Zhang rented a £17,000-a-month house in Hampstead, north London. Pic: CPS

Zhang vanished after police raided her £5m six-bedroom rented house near Hampstead Heath in north London in 2018, but was finally arrested in York last year.

In written legal arguments, Martin Evans KC representing the Director of Public Prosecutions Stephen Parkinson, said a ledger and passwords were found in a purpose-made concealed pocket in the jogging bottoms she was wearing.

She revealed the access code for two wallets during interviews in prison, leading investigators to cryptocurrency worth around £67m.

The stash has been added to the £5bn Bitcoin hoard, which has reportedly been earmarked by Chancellor Rachel Reeves to help plug the hole in the public finances.

The fortune is at the centre of a High Court battle between the UK government and thousands of Chinese victims, who want to recover their investment and say it should reflect the huge rise in the value of Bitcoin.

Law firm Fieldfisher, which is representing around 1,000 victims, said some have lost their life savings and many are old and vulnerable.

The court heard the DPP is also setting up a compensation scheme for the victims not represented in court, although no further details have been given.

The judge, Mr Justice Turner, will make orders on the case at a later date.

Read more from Sky News:
Is Bitcoin’s price sustainable?
Royal Mail fined over late letters

Zhang pleaded guilty to charges of possessing criminal property and transferring criminal property on or before the 23 April 2024 last month and is in custody awaiting sentencing in November.

Jian Wen, 43, was jailed for six years and eight months last year after being found guilty of one count of money laundering between October 2017 and January 2022 relating to 150 Bitcoin, now worth around £12.5m.

Jian Wen. Pic: CPS
Image:
Jian Wen. Pic: CPS

Her trial heard that Wen, who previously worked in a Chinese takeaway, was not involved in the alleged fraud but acted as a “front person” to help disguise the source of the money.

The court heard how the two women travelled the world, spending tens of thousands of pounds on designer clothes, jewellery and shoes.

Seng Hok Ling, 47, is said to have replaced Wen as Zhang’s “butler”, organising helpers and booking Airbnbs, including in Scotland, for the fugitive while she was on the run.

Seng Hok Ling. Pic: Met Police
Image:
Seng Hok Ling. Pic: Met Police

Police found Zhang after carrying out surveillance of Ling and seized assets including encrypted devices, cash, gold and cryptocurrency.

Ling, a Malaysian national from Matlock in Derbyshire, pleaded guilty at Southwark Crown Court to entering into a money laundering arrangement with Zhang on or before 23 April 2024 and will be sentenced alongside her.

Prosecutors said Zhang masterminded a scam in China, before converting the money into cryptocurrency to get it out of the country.

Continue Reading

Business

PPE Medpro will be pursued ‘with everything we’ve got’ Wes Streeting says

Published

on

By

PPE Medpro will be pursued 'with everything we've got' Wes Streeting says

The Government has vowed to pursue a company linked to Baroness Michelle Mone for millions of pounds paid for defective PPE at the height of the COVID pandemic after a High Court deadline passed without repayment.

Earlier this month, the High Court ruled that PPE Medpro, a company founded by Baroness Mone’s husband Doug Barrowman and promoted in government by the Tory peer, was in breach of contract and gave it two weeks to repay the £122m plus interest of £23m.

In a statement, the Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: “At a time of national crisis, PPE Medpro sold the previous government substandard kit and pocketed taxpayers’ hard-earned cash.

Money latest: How to add 24% to your home’s value

“PPE Medpro has failed to meet the deadline to pay – they still owe us over £145m, with interest now accruing daily.”

It is understood that is being charged at a rate of 8%.

More from Money

“We will pursue PPE Medpro with everything we’ve got to get these funds back where they belong – in our NHS,” Mr Streeting concluded.

Earlier a spokesman for Mr Barrowman and the consortium behind the company said the government had not responded to an offer from PPE Medpro to discuss a settlement.

“Very disappointingly, the government has made no effort to respond or seek to enter into discussions,” he said.

During the trial PPE Medpro offered to pay £23m to settle the case but was rejected by the Department of Health and Social Care.

While Mr Barrowman has described himself as the “ultimate beneficial owner” of PPE Medpro, and says £29m of profit from the deal was paid into a trust benefitting his family including Baroness Mone and her children, he was never a director and the couple are not personally liable for the money.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

£122m bill that may never be paid

PPE Medpro filed for insolvency the day before Mrs Justice Cockerill’s finding of breach of contract was published, and the company’s most recent accounts show assets of just £666,000.

Court-appointed administrators will now be responsible for recovering as much money as possible on behalf of creditors, principally the DHSC.

With PPE Medpro in administration and potentially limited avenues to recover funds, there is a risk that the government may recover nothing while incurring further legal expenses.

In June 2020, PPE Medpro won contracts worth a total of £203m to provide 210m masks and 25m surgical gowns after Baroness Mone contacted ministers including Michael Gove on the company’s behalf.

While the £81m mask contract was fulfilled the gowns were rejected for failing sterility standards, and in 2022 the DHSC sued. Earlier this month Mrs Justice Cockerill ruled that PPE Medpro was in breach of contract and liable to repay the full amount.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Baroness Mone ‘should resign’

Mr Barrowman has previously named several other companies as part of the gown supply including two registered in the UK, and last week his spokesman said there was a “strong case” for the administrator to pursue them for the money.

One of the companies named has denied any connection to PPE Medpro and two others have not responded to requests for comment.

Insolvency experts say that administrators and creditors, in this case the government, may have some recourse to pursue individuals and entities beyond the liable company, but any process is likely to be lengthy and expensive.

Julie Palmer, a partner at Begbies Traynor, told Sky News: “The administrators will want to look at what’s happened to what look like significant profits made on these contracts.

“If I was looking at this I would want to establish the exact timeline, at what point were the profits taken out.

“They may also want to consider whether there is a claim for wrongful trading, because that effectively pierces the corporate veil of protection of a limited company, and can allow proceedings against company officers personally.

“The net of a director can also be expanded to shadow directors, people sitting in the background quite clearly with a degree of control of the management of the company, in which case some claims may rest against them.”

A spokesman for Forvis Mazars, one of the joint administrators of PPE Medpro, did not comment other than to confirm the firm’s appointment.

Continue Reading

Business

Royal Mail fined millions for failing to meet delivery targets again

Published

on

By

Royal Mail fined millions for failing to meet delivery targets again

Royal Mail has been fined £21m for failing to meet delivery targets for the third year in a row and warned fines are likely to continue unless there’s an improvement.

As well as failing to meet current delivery times for both first and second class mail, Royal Mail did not meet revised down targets agreed with Ofcom.

The delivery network delivered 77% of first class mail and 92.5% of second-class mail on time from April 2024 to March this year, “well short” of its 93% and 98.5% targets, the communications regulator said.

Money blog: Major changes to vet prices proposed after investigation

It’s also below the reduced goals which were set out for the delivery company at the start of the year – bringing down the percentage of first class post delivered the next day from 93% to 90%, and second class mail delivered within three days from 98.5% to 95%.

The latest fine is double that levied last year, £10.5m, and nearly quadruple the £5.6m fine in 2023 because of the repeat offending.

It’s the third-largest fine ever levied by Ofcom and would have been higher, £30m, but for Royal Mail’s admission of wrongdoing and agreement to settle.

Millions not getting what they pay for

Royal Mail has, without justification, failed to provide an acceptable level of service and breached its obligations, Ofcom said.

“It took insufficient and ineffective steps to try and prevent this failure, which is likely to have impacted millions of customers who did not get the service they paid for.”

People have also been experiencing times when letters have taken weeks to arrive.

Ian Strawhorne, director of enforcement at Ofcom, said: “Millions of important letters are arriving late, and people aren’t getting what they pay for when they buy a stamp.

“These persistent failures are unacceptable, and customers expect and deserve better.

“Royal Mail must rebuild consumers’ confidence as a matter of urgency. And that means making actual significant improvements, not more empty promises.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

December 2024: Sale of Royal Mail approved

Real world harms

In highlighting the real-life consequences of the delivery delays, Citizens Advice said it had encountered someone who got a pile of mail with their council tax bill, a court summons for a passed court hearing date and a liability order for the debt, all at the same time.

Another client of the service was sent an eviction notice, which had not arrived more than a week after a copy came from the landlord’s solicitors.

They were unsure if the warrant would arrive by the time the bailiffs came and were unsure how to act, Citizens Advice said.

What next?

Royal Mail has been ordered by Ofcom to urgently and publicly set out and implement a “credible plan” on how it is going to change.

The regulator said it expects to see “meaningful progress soon”, rather than “more empty promises”.

Improvements Ofcom had pressed for have not materialised, it said, and Royal Mail has been called on to make “actual significant improvements”.

“If this doesn’t happen, fines are likely to continue,” the regulator warned.

Ofcom said the “persistent failures” are unacceptable, and customers expect and deserve better.

“Royal Mail must rebuild consumers’ confidence as a matter of urgency,” it added.

The company has also been set a new enforceable target for 99% of mail to be delivered no more than two days late.

How has Royal Mail responded?

A Royal Mail spokesperson said: “We acknowledge the decision made by Ofcom today and we will continue to work hard to deliver further sustained improvements to our quality of service.”

The company has implemented “important changes across our network including recruiting, retaining and training our people, and providing additional support to delivery offices”, they said.

“Where we have piloted universal service changes, we can see that our model is working, with improvements in deliveries,” the spokesperson added.

Continue Reading

Trending