The Irish government is to bring a legal case against the UK under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
The inter-state case is over the UK‘s decision to bring in the Northern Ireland Troubles Legacy Act, deputy prime minister Micheal Martin has confirmed.
The act became UK law in September 2023. It looks to end legal proceedings relating to the Troubles by granting immunity to people who cooperate with the new Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery (ICRIR).
On the UK side, the move was welcomed by soldiers and their families, following various historical prosecutions.
But there were warnings it would breach human rights law, as granting amnesties has previously been found by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) to be incompatible with a country’s obligation to have a way for unnatural deaths and allegations of torture to be investigated.
Complying with the ECHR is part of the Good Friday Agreement.
More on Northern Ireland
Related Topics:
Victims refuse to choose between truth and justice in Northern Ireland
The Northern Ireland Legacy Bill was opposed by every victim’s group and political party.
It was 1971 when the Irish government last took a case against the UK government to the European Court of Human Rights.
The highly controversial legislation was opposed by every victim’s group and political party in Northern Ireland.
By granting a conditional amnesty to those accused of historical offences, it contravenes the European Convention on Human Rights.
The convention, which obligates countries to pursue justice for unnatural deaths, is an element of the Good Friday Agreement.
To put it simply, the act is not deemed compatible with either the convention or the Good Friday Agreement.
The UK government was under pressure to end any prosecution of military veterans who had served in Northern Ireland.
But the act also grants immunity from prosecution to the very terrorists who once murdered soldiers in Northern Ireland.
The amnesty is subject to participation with a truth recovery body, but victims refuse to choose between truth and justice.
‘People in Northern Ireland oppose UK law’
Mr Martin said the Irish government’s decision was made “after much thought and careful consideration”.
Advertisement
He added: “I have consistently adopted a victims-centred approach to this issue. We are not alone in our concerns.
“Serious reservations about this legislation have also been raised by a number of international observers, including the Council of Europe’s Commissioner for Human Rights and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.
“Most importantly, this legislation is opposed by people in Northern Ireland, especially the victims and families who will be most directly impacted by this act.
“In particular, we have concerns around provisions which allow for the granting of immunity, and which shut down existing avenues to truth and justice for historic cases, including inquests, police investigations, Police Ombudsman investigations, and civil actions.
“Even in cases in which immunity is not granted, ‘reviews’ by the proposed body, the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery, are not an adequate substitute for police investigations, carried out independently, adequately, and with sufficient participation of next of kin.”
Prime Minister Leo Varadkar said the attorney general’s advice on the matter is “very strong” – and that the UK is “in breach of the UN Convention on Human Rights”.
When the act was passing through parliament, the UK’s Northern Ireland Office said it believed the law was in compliance with the ECHR.
This was due to the immunity being matched with the investigatory power of the ICRIR.
Image: Taoiseach Leo Varadkar
Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge
Sky News Monday to Thursday at 7pm.
Watch live on Sky channel 501, Freeview 233, Virgin 602, the Sky News website and app or YouTube.
The UK government stated at the time that “there is some support for the concept of amnesties in ECtHR jurisprudence, which recognises that the use of an amnesty can further the objective of reconciliation”.
According to the House of Commons Library, the act “would create a conditional immunity scheme, providing immunity from prosecution for Troubles-related offences for individuals that cooperate by providing information to the ICRIR”.
“Future prosecutions would only be possible where immunity was not granted, following a referral from the ICRIR.
“However, it will not be possible to grant immunity to an individual who has already been convicted, or if a prosecution has already begun against them.”
It would also:
• Prevent non-ICRIR investigations into events from the Troubles;
• Prevent Troubles-era prosecutions not involving death or serious injury;
• Stop civil claims related to Troubles-era conduct;
• Stop non-advanced inquests continuing and any new inquests starting;
• Start a programme of memorialisation of the Troubles.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
Colum Eastwood, the leader of the nationalist SDLP, welcomed the move from the Irish government, saying: “No political party or institution on this island supports the British government’s approach to addressing the legacy of the past.”
More than 3,500 people were killed during the Troubles, including over 1,000 members of the security forces.
Liam Gallagher, Tyson Fury and Wayne Rooney were among those who attended the funeral of boxing champion Ricky Hatton.
While famous faces and family gathered at Manchester cathedral for the private memorial service, thousands of people lined the streets on Friday morning to pay their respects as the procession passed.
The procession was led by a Reliant Regal – the yellow three-wheeler made famous on the show Only Fools And Horses – which Hatton famously owned and used to drive.
As the funeral cortege passed the site of the pub Hatton’s parents, Ray and Carol Hatton, used to own and where he used to train in the basement – known back then as The New Inn – doves were released.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:47
Cheers as Ricky Hatton’s coffin enters cathedrall
Outside the church a brass band played Winter Wonderland, synonymous with the chant “There’s Only One Ricky Hatton”, which rang round the many stadiums Hatton fought in.
The service was played to the crowds outside the cathedral, during which Hatton’s three children Campbell, Fearne and Millie, each paid tribute to their dad.
Image: The Reliant Regal owned by Hatton led the funeral procession. Pic: Action Images/Reuters
Image: Pic: Reuters
Campbell, who has followed his father to become a boxer, said: “I can’t explain how much I’m going to miss you, Dad, and that we won’t be making any new memories – but the ones we did I will cherish forever.”
A statement from Hatton’s mother was read on her behalf, in which she described her son as “our little champion from the day he was born”.
Image: Hatton’s parents Ray and Carol. Pic: PA
Image: Wayne and Coleen Rooney. Pic: PA
Also pictured attending the service included Happy Mondays’s Shaun Ryder and Mark ‘Bez’ Berry, reality TV personality Calum Best, comedian Paddy McGuinness, former cricket star Andrew ‘Freddie’ Flintoff and actor Dean Gaffney.
Image: Former cricketer Andrew ‘Freddie’ Flintoff. Pic: PA
Image: Mark Berry ‘Bez’. Pic: PA
Boxer Frazer Clarke and former boxers Frank Bruno, Amir Khan, Scott Welch and Anthony Crolla were also at the funeral, as was pundit and former footballer Chris Kamara.
Eyewitness: A send-off for not just a great fighter, but a great Mancunian
As Ricky Hatton’s hearse moved through the streets of Manchester, some of the greatest names in British boxing began to climb the steps of the cathedral.
From Tyson Fury to Frank Bruno, Amir Khan to Tony Bellew, a collection of champions arrived to pay their respects.
In a testament to how Hatton’s legacy went beyond boxing, Liam Gallagher of Oasis was also there, as well as Andy Burnham, the mayor of Greater Manchester.
But this wasn’t just a service in tribute to “Ricky the hitman”, who fought under the brightest lights.
This was a tribute to Richard Hatton, the people’s champion, who meant so much to this city, and died at 46.
As the service was played over a sound system, many of the people gathered wiped their eyes and bowed their heads as they heard tributes from Hatton’s loved ones.
Many of the people outside were wearing the sky blue of Manchester City, mourning one of their own.
Some had met him. Like the man whose son was a boxer and benefited from Hatton’s advice, or the two women who would grab a pint and a picture with him at City games.
For one of them, the night he won the world title in Manchester Arena remains a moment, she will never forget.
When the coffin was loaded back into the hearse for a final journey through Manchester to the Etihad, the crowd parted and applauded, before one last rendition of walking in a Hatton wonderland played by a band.
This was a send-off for not just a great fighter, but a great Mancunian, who brought so many people here on his journey to becoming a legend.
Following the service, the funeral procession made its way to the Etihad Stadium, the home of Hatton’s beloved Manchester City football club.
It was met by crowds applauding and singing.
Image: Nigel Benn. Pic: PA
Image: Tyson Fury. Pic: PA
Image: Former boxer Amir Khan. Pic: PA
‘I was in awe of him’
Tributes poured in across the world of sport and beyond after Hatton’s death aged 46 at his home in Hyde, Greater Manchester, on 14 September.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:41
Tony Bellew: Ricky Hatton ‘was the standard’
The former world champion – nicknamed “The Hitman” – had only announced in July that he planned to come out of retirement in December for his first professional fight in 13 years.
Speaking to Sky News outside the church, former boxer Tony Bellew said he “was in awe” of Hatton when he first watched him training.
Image: The funeral procession at the Etihad Stadium. Pic: PA
“I’ve watched thousands of fighters train over the years, hundreds of thousands. And after watching him… I was in awe of him. He was the standard – everything he did,” he said.
“There are thousands that have turned out today, not hundreds. That speaks volumes.”
A man who stabbed a 16-year-old Syrian refugee in the neck after he brushed past his girlfriend has been jailed for life with a minimum of 23 years.
Alfie Franco, 20, was convicted on Thursday of murdering Ahmad Al Ibrahim on a busy shopping street in Huddersfield earlier this year.
Ahmad, who fled war-torn Homs as an unaccompanied child refugee after being injured in a bombing, had only been living in the West Yorkshire town for a couple of weeks.
Image: Ahmad Al Ibrahim, 16, was stabbed to death. Pic: PA/West Yorkshire Police
Jurors at Leeds Crown Court heard that on 3 April, Ahmad, whose parents said he had dreamed of being a doctor, was walking around the town with a friend – while Franco was going to buy eyelash glue with his girlfriend after a Jobcentre appointment.
When they crossed paths, prosecutors said Franco took “some petty exception” to Ahmad “innocuously” walking past his girlfriend.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:07
CCTV shows moments before man stabs refugee
CCTV footage showed Franco saying something to Ahmad, before calling him over after a short verbal altercation.
As Ahmad walked over, Franco opened the blade on a flick knife he was carrying and drove it into the teenager’s neck.
The court heard Franco had used cannabis before the encounter.
Later tests also revealed he had recently used cocaine, diazepam, ketamine and codeine.
During the trial, Franco told the court he thought he had seen Ahmad reaching for a weapon in his waistband during the altercation and said he had only been aiming for the boy’s cheek, and wanted to “cut him and get away”.
‘You were under no threat whatsoever’
Handing sentence, Judge Howard Crowson said Franco’s claims of being in fear of Ahmad were “incredible” – as CCTV footage showed him calmly eating ice cream while preparing to stab the teenager.
He told Franco: “During this trial you tried to portray Ahmad as aggressive and threatening. The CCTV reveals you were under no threat whatsoever.
“Ahmad was unarmed as he walked peacefully about Huddersfield town centre that day.”
He then said Franco’s claim to have seen a weapon on Ahmad’s waistband was “a lie,” and added: “Before Ahmad made any movement towards you, you prepared your knife for use.
“You calmly and surreptitiously removed the knife from your waistband, opened it and concealed it in your pocket.”
The judge said he was satisfied that Franco intended to kill Ahmad and that he had “lured” the boy to within striking distance before lunging at him with the knife, deliberately aiming for his neck.
Prosecutor Richard Wright KC said during the trial that “to plunge that knife into someone’s neck who has done no more than walk towards you after you’ve engaged them in some verbal argy-bargy in the street… that’s not reasonable self-defence”.
He added: “This is a case of a young man with a cocky swagger, wandering around town with his girlfriend, on drugs, who doesn’t like the fact that Ahmad has spoken back to him.”
In a victim impact statement read in court, Ahmad’s uncle, Ghazwan Al Ibrahim, said the boy was “an intelligent and outstanding student” whose dream was to become a doctor.
He said his nephew had a “sociable and ambitious personality, loved helping people and was passionate about life”.
Mr Al Ibrahim added that Ahmad spent three months travelling to the UK and initially lived in a Home Office hotel in Swansea with other people his own age before being moved to Huddersfield to be near his uncle.
An Afghan migrant has been found guilty of threatening to kill Nigel Farage in a TikTok post.
Fayaz Khan, 26, chose not to give evidence in his trial, in which he was accused of threatening the Reform UK leader between 12 and 15 October last year in a video on the social media platform.
Jurors deliberated for 11 hours and 55 minutes before finding him guilty at Southwark Crown Court.
They had been told Khan had a “very large presence online”, with his TikTok videos amassing hundreds of thousands of views as he showed himself attempting to come to the UK by small boat last autumn.
The Afghan national, who has an AK-47 tattoo on his right cheek and arm, live-streamed his journey across the English Channel from France in a small boat and was arrested on 31 October after arriving in the UK.
He had been living in Stockholm, Sweden, since 2019.
More on Afghanistan
Related Topics:
Image: Fayaz Khan posted a TikTok video of him appearing to threaten to kill Nigel Farage. Pic: PA
Jurors were told that on 12 October last year, Mr Farage uploaded a YouTube video titled “The journey of an illegal migrant”, which highlighted Khan and referenced “young males of fighting age coming into our country about whom we know very little”.
Khan responded with a video two days later in which he appeared to say: “Englishman Nigel, don’t talk s**t about me.
“You not know me. I come to England because I want to marry with your sister. You not know me.
“Don’t talk about me more. Delete the video.
“I’m coming to England. I’m going to pop, pop, pop.”
He made gun gestures with his hand and headbutted the camera during the video, while pointing to the AK-47 tattoo on his face to “emphasise he wasn’t joking”, Mr Ratliff said.
Mr Farage, who was at court for the trial, said the video was “pretty chilling”.
“Given his proximity to guns and love of guns, I was genuinely worried,” he said.
“He says he’s coming to England and he’s going to shoot me.”
A subsequent TikTok post by Khan read: “I mean what I say” on an image of a GB News report about the threat against Mr Farage.
Image: Nigel Farage outside Southwark Crown Court. Pic: PA
Other videos Khan posted on social media were shown to the jury in which he appeared to make “pop, pop, pop” noises and similar gun hand gestures.
After his arrest, Khan told police in November last year: “It was just a video, it was never an intention to threaten him.
“It was never my intention to kill him or anything – this is my character, this is how I act in my videos.
“In every video I make those sounds, I say ‘pop, pop pop’.”
Prosecutor Peter Ratliff said the threat to kill was “not some off-the-cuff comment” and the video was “sinister and menacing”.
He said Khan, who denied the charge, was a “dangerous man with an interest in firearms” and who had an AK-47 tattooed on his arm and face.
Defence lawyer Charles Royle said Khan was “remonstrating in his own idiosyncratic, moronic, comedic, eye-catching, attention-seeking way” rather than making a threat to kill in the TikTok video.
He told jurors the trial was “not about your views on illegal immigration, nor about your views on face tattoos, Brexit or Reform”.
Discussing Khan’s decision not to give evidence, Mr Royle said: “You shouldn’t hold any silence against him.”