A woman has been found guilty of involvement in the murders of three people, including a British student, by a man dubbed the ‘Beast of the Ardennes’.
Monique Olivier, who was already serving a life prison sentence for her part in other murders, was tried 33 years after Joanna Parrish was killed in the French city of Auxerre.
Olivier was found guilty of complicity in her murder, as well as those of Marie-Angele Domece in 1988 and Estelle Mouzin in 2003.
She has now been handed a second life sentence, with a minimum prison term of 20 years.
Her head remained bowed, with her eyes almost completely closed, throughout the sentencing – in which the gruesome details about the murders were read out.
Speaking after the hearing, Joanna’s father, Roger Parrish, said his family were “satisfied” that the court had “recognised Monique Olivier’s part in the murder of our daughter and sister”.
“There’s never been any doubt in our minds at all that she was equally responsible for the murder of Joanna and the other completely innocent victims,” he said.
Image: Joanna Parrish was raped, beaten and strangled
“From the very first moment that a victim was identified, she knew exactly what would happen to them, and not only did she do nothing to help them, but she actively encouraged and participated.
“Her presence alone would have gained the confidence of all the victims, who would never have believed a woman could be a part of such an appalling and depraved act.
“Finally, we now hope after this last obstacle in our struggle to gain an element of justice for Joanna has been overcome, we can remember our daughter and sister with a smile on our faces, which is how of course her many friends remember her.”
Asked later by Sky News later how he felt about the verdict, he said: “I think relief, probably.
“We always wanted to achieve some sense of justice for our daughter because she deserved, believe me, she really deserved it.
“She deserved a long, happy, and fulfilled life, which I’m sure she would have had, had she not had the desperate, desperate misfortune to come across a couple like them.
“So we did it to bring an element of justice for Jo.”
‘The Beast of the Ardennes’
Joanna, a 20-year-old university student from Gloucestershire, was working in France as part of her university course.
She was murdered by Olivier’s husband, Michel Fourniret, in May 1990.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:30
‘She deserved a long, happy life’
Joanna had placed an advert in a paper offering English lessons and had been contacted by Fourniret, who arranged to meet her and claimed he wanted to organise lessons for his son.
Her body was found in the River Yonne and a post-mortem showed that Joanna had been raped, beaten and strangled.
Fourniret is one of the most notorious serial killers in France’s history.
He was convicted of killing eight women, but died in 2021 before he could be tried for the murders of Joanna, as well as Marie-Angele Domece, 18, and Estelle Mouzin, 9.
He may have killed other victims, who have not yet been identified.
The pair first got to know each other as pen-pals in 1984, when Fourniret was in prison for sexually assaulting five young girls.
In letters that were never checked by prison authorities, he told Olivier of his fantasies of raping and murdering young girls.
Olivier, far from being appalled, said that she would help him fulfil those dreams as long as Fourniret, in turn, murdered her husband.
In the end, her first husband, Andre Michaux, survived, although his property was burnt down.
But Fourniret’s side of the bargain was to be fulfilled in a truly horrific way.
Image: Serial killer, Michel Fourniret
Repeatedly, Olivier acted as a lure – tricking girls and young women into entering a vehicle, thinking they were safe.
Instead, Fourniret was waiting inside, ready to assault and then kill his victims.
Couple used baby son to reassure victims
Olivier and Fourniret had a son, called Selim.
Olivier used her pregnancy to further reassure victims and then, after his birth, even exploited her baby.
On one notorious occasion, she asked a 12-year-old girl, Elisabeth Brichet, for help with her crying baby, pleading for her to come to the van and give directions to a doctor.
A few minutes later, Olivier sat with her child in the front seat of their van while, behind them, Fourniret was brutally attacking Elisabeth before later killing her.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:28
Parents’ 33-year wait for justice
In court, she gave evidence for day after day, standing in a dock that was surrounded by tall glass.
Watched by the families of all three victims, Olivier admitted that what she had done had been “monstrous” but said she had been intimidated by Fourniret, and scared of defying him.
The prosecution, as at her previous trials, admitted her involvement in the murders but claimed that she had, in fact, been a willing participant and had repeatedly passed over chances to help victims escape.
‘I couldn’t cry for six months’
Olivier, now 75 years old, stood up and spoke with a clear, conversational tone, her voice occasionally slowing and softening.
She rarely showed any emotion, even when admitting her role in the deaths.
She said Joanna didn’t deserve to die and that she was “a beautiful girl.”
But she also clashed angrily with her own son when he gave evidence against her.
She mocked the disguise he wore on a video link and he responded by saying: “Now you see the real Monique Olivier”.
Image: Joanna Parrish’s parents, Pauline and Roger
Joanna’s murder left her parents devastated.
Her mother Pauline Murrell told Sky News: “They said she was found in the water, and I was staring out of a window and I simply couldn’t take it in. I couldn’t cry for six months.
“Then I got the post-mortem report and I opened it on a Sunday morning, and I wasn’t able to get out of bed.”
Roger Parrish said: “She deserved a long and happy, fulfilled life. She worked hard and she deserved it. She was helpful, part of the community. People still remember her.
“Jo was a kind person but she was also bright and smart. She was not likely to have trusted a man who was by himself.
“When we found out that there was a female accomplice, I remember thinking that we had never thought of that. Why would we have done? But right from that moment, I thought, ‘this is it – this is the person’.”
Vladimir Putin has announced a 30-hour “Easter truce” in Ukraine – but Volodymyr Zelenskyy says Russian attacks are continuing hours after it was due to begin.
The Ukrainian president shared a statement on X after his Russian counterpart said a ceasefire would last from 6pm on Saturday to midnight on Easter Sunday – both Moscow time, which is two hours ahead of the UK.
“Guided by humanitarian considerations… the Russian side declares an Easter truce,” Mr Putin said at a meeting with chief of general staff Valery Gerasimov.
“I order that all military actions be stopped for this period.
“We assume that the Ukrainian side will follow our example. At the same time, our troops must be ready to repel possible violations of the truce and provocations from the enemy, any of its aggressive actions.”
Image: Russia’s chief of general staff Valery Gerasimov meets with Vladimir Putin in Moscow. Pic: Reuters
Mr Zelenskyy claimed Russian attacks were continuing despite the truce announcement.
He wrote: “As of now… Russian assault operations continue on several frontline sectors, and Russian artillery fire has not subsided.
“Therefore, there is no trust in words coming from Moscow.”
Mr Zelenskyy said in the same statement that a US proposal for a “full and unconditional 30 days ceasefire” has gone “unanswered” by Russia for 39 days.
He added that Ukraine “responded positively” to the American proposal but “Russia ignored it”.
The Ukrainian president said that “if Russia is now suddenly ready to truly engage in a format of full and unconditional silence, Ukraine will act accordingly – mirroring Russia’s actions”.
“If a complete ceasefire truly takes hold, Ukraine proposes extending it beyond the Easter day of April 20,” he added.
“That is what will reveal Russia’s true intentions – because 30 hours is enough to make headlines, but not for genuine confidence-building measures. Thirty days could give peace a chance.”
Image: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy speaking earlier this week. Pic: AP
Shortly after the ceasefire was announced, Ukraine’s foreign minister Andrii Sybiha said there had been a “long history” of Mr Putin’s words not “matching his actions”.
“We know his words cannot be trusted and we will look at actions, not words,” he added.
The ceasefire announcement has echoes of January 2023, when Mr Putin ordered his forces in Ukraine to observe a 36-hour truce for Orthodox Christmas.
At that time, Mr Zelenskyy stopped short of stating his forces would reject Mr Putin’s request, but dismissed the Russian move as playing for time to regroup its invasion forces and prepare additional attacks.
Prisoner exchange
It comes as Ukraine and Russia conducted a swap of more than 500 prisoners of war on Saturday, the latest in a series of exchanges since Russia launched a full-scale invasion more than three years ago.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:32
Russia and Ukraine swap hundreds of prisoners
Mr Zelenskyy, in a post on the Telegram messaging app, said 277 Ukrainian service personnel had returned home from Russian captivity.
Russia’s defence ministry said 246 servicemen had been handed over by Kyiv.
It said a further 31 injured prisoners of war had been handed over to Ukraine and 15 of its own wounded servicemen had also been returned by Kyiv.
The developments come after US President Donald Trump on Friday said negotiations between Ukraine and Russia are “coming to a head” and insisted that neither side is “playing” him in his push to end the grinding three-year war.
Mr Trump spoke shortly after secretary of state Marco Rubio warned that the US may “move on” from trying to secure a Russia-Ukraine peace deal if there is no progress in the coming days, after months of efforts have failed to bring an end to the fighting.
Well it is something, but it’s by no means everything – a ceasefire for 30 hours, not 30 days.
This feels like a diplomatic dance, rather than a military, or moral, manoeuvre.
An Easter truce – announced by Vladimir Putin on Saturday – is significant in the sense that, if it holds, it’ll be the first actual cessation of hostilities since the war began.
And it’s significant in the sense that it’s the first actual concession made by Moscow since Donald Trump initiated peace negotiations two months ago.
But – and there’s always a “but” when it comes to the Kremlin – how much of a concession is it really? And how much difference will it make militarily?
It’s nowhere near what the White House has been asking for, and it’s nowhere near what Ukraine has previously consented to.
The American president’s first proposal was a full 30-day ceasefire. Kyiv agreed but Moscow didn’t, not without conditions.
Then there was the attempted maritime truce. Again, Moscow’s agreement came with strings attached, in the form of sanctions relief, so it never got off the ground.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
44:16
Ukraine: Michael Clarke Q&A
So why suddenly suggest a truce now?
America had made no secret of its growing frustration at the lack of progress in peace negotiations.
I don’t think that in itself would be a problem for Russia, given its military dominance. But I think it could be a problem if Trump blames Putin for the lack of progress, and then pulls the plug on their thaw in relations as well.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
So this feels like Putin is giving Trump just enough to keep him on side, without actually making any major concession.
And the way it’s being presented is interesting too – at Russia’s initiative, on humanitarian grounds, Ukraine must “follow our example”.
He’s trying to cast himself as the peacemaker in the eyes of the US president – as the one who give solutions, not problems – which appears contrary to Trump’s opinion of Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
Israeli strikes in Gaza have killed more than 90 people in the past 48 hours, the Hamas-run health ministry in the territory has said.
Women and children were among 15 people who were killed overnight on Friday in the southern city of Khan Younis, according to hospital staff.
At least 11 of those who were killed were sheltering in a tent in the designated humanitarian zone of al Mawasi, where hundreds of thousands of displaced people are living, the hospital workers said.
A further four people were killed in separate strikes on the city of Rafah, including a mother and her daughter, according to Gaza’s European Hospital, where the bodies were taken.
Image: Mourners at Nasser hospital in Khan Younis. Pic: Reuters
Israel – which has not commented publicly on the latest strikes – has vowed to intensify attacks across Gaza and occupy large “security zones” inside the area.
It says this is to put pressure on Hamas to release more hostages and ultimately agree to disarm and leave the territory.
For weeks, Israeli troops have also blockaded Gaza, barring the entry of food and other goods.
Last month, 15 aid workers were killed and buried in a shallow grave after being fired upon by Israeli troops.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:28
Sky reveals timeline of IDF’s Gaza aid attack
Hamas is currently holding 59 hostages, 24 of whom are believed to be alive.
The group says it will only return them in exchange for the release of more Palestinian prisoners, a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and a lasting truce, as called for in the now-defunct ceasefire agreement reached earlier this year.
Hamas’s armed wing said the fate of Israeli-American hostage Edan Alexander was unknown after a guard who was holding him was found killed.
On Tuesday, Hamas said it had lost contact with a group of militants holding Mr Alexander in Gaza.
Earlier this week, the United Nations warned that almost all of Gaza’s population of more than two million people is relying on the one million prepared meals produced daily by charity kitchens.
Image: People at a hospital in Khan Younis mourn the deaths of Palestinians killed in Israeli strikes earlier this week. Pic: Reuters
Image: Palestinians gather at the site of an Israeli strike on a house. Pic: Reuters
The only other way to get food in Gaza is from markets, but rising prices make them unaffordable for most, according to the World Food Programme. The UN humanitarian office, known as OCHA, called it Gaza’s “worst humanitarian crisis” since the escalation of hostilities in October 2023.
Dr Hanan Balkhy, head of the World Health Organisation’s eastern Mediterranean office, urged the new US ambassador in Israel, Mike Huckabee, to push Israel to lift Gaza’s blockade so medicines and other aid can enter the strip.
“I would wish for him to go in and see the situation first hand,” she said on Friday.
Image: US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee places a handwritten note in Jerusalem. Pic: Reuters
In his first appearance as ambassador, Mr Huckabee visited the Western Wall, the holiest Jewish prayer site in Jerusalem’s Old City. He inserted a prayer into the wall, which he said was handwritten by US President Donald Trump.
Mr Huckabee said every effort was being made to bring home the remaining Israeli hostages.
Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel on 7 October 2023, killing about 1,200 people and abducting 251.
Israel’s offensive has since killed more than 51,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and combatants.