Connect with us

Published

on

Sir Keir Starmer will thank British troops deployed near the Russian border on a visit to Estonia where he will warn of the threat Vladimir Putin poses to Europe and the UK.

The Labour leader will argue the “defence of the UK starts in Ukraine” and that the long-spanning conflict shows what happens “when politics goes soft on Putin”.

Sir Keir, who is travelling with his shadow defence secretary John Healey, will stress that the UK will stand with Kyiv for “as long as it takes to win” and that Labour will continue to support the government in supplying military aid and NATO allies on the Russian border.

The Labour leader will warn that the “sinister influence of Russian money” in Britain and attacks by Russian agents in Salisbury show that the Russian president’s “malign influence will extend beyond Ukraine and on to British soil if we fail to stand up to it”.

He will also promise to protect the British electorate from hybrid attacks and possible interference in elections.

Politics latest: Supermarket boss blasts Sunak for celebrating drop in inflation rate

In his speech, Sir Keir will say: “We have all seen what happens when politics goes soft on Putin. The defence of Britain starts in Ukraine – that’s why the defence of the UK starts in Ukraine and we will stand with Kyiv for as long as it takes to win.

More on Keir Starmer

“The Salisbury attacks and sinister influence of Russian money in Britain are a reminder that Putin’s malign influence will extend beyond Ukraine if we fail to stand up to it. We must be secure at home and strong abroad.

“I am proud of our Armed Forces for standing tall in the face of Russian aggression. Amidst dark clouds of conflict and instability, our forces are a beacon of hope and freedom this Christmas.

“In government, Labour will reinforce our NATO allies on the border with Russia, ensure Britain plays a leading role in the response to areas of Russian aggression like the high north by fulfilling our NATO commitments in full.”

On their trip Sir Keir and Mr Healey will observe military exercises at a NATO base in Estonia, which shares a 182-mile border with Russia, before joining troops in the canteen over lunch.

Sir Keir’s visit comes just days after Mr Putin held a four-hour phone in with the Russian public in which he said his war goals remain unchanged and there won’t be peace in Ukraine until they are achieved.

The Russian president said his aims were still the “de-Nazification” – a claim that has been derided by the West, “de-militarisation and a neutral status” of Ukraine.

Sir Keir will reaffirm his commitment to Ukraine just a week after President Zelenskyy visited the United States in a bid to shore up support for fresh funding.

The UK gave £4.6 billion of military aid across 2022 and 2023.

Read more:
What could happen if Russia wins war in Ukraine? Experts consider the scenarios
Ukraine will struggle without Western support – so it’s little wonder Putin is feeling emboldened

US President Joe Biden warned during the visit that his country is “rapidly coming to an end” of its ability to help Ukraine unless Congress approves more military funding for the country.

He said the US would continue to back Kyiv “as long as we can” as he announced an additional $200m (£160m) package of support on Tuesday.

But he warned: “Without supplemental funding, we’re rapidly coming to an end of our ability to help Ukraine respond to the urgent operational demands that it has.

“Putin is banking on the United States failing to deliver for Ukraine. We must prove him wrong.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Labour smell dirty tricks over asylum hotel court ruling – but the risks are clear

Published

on

By

Labour smell dirty tricks over asylum hotel court ruling - but the risks are clear

“It’s an interesting moment,” was how one government source described the High Court ruling that will force an Essex hotel to be emptied of asylum seekers within weeks.

That may prove to be the understatement of the summer.

For clues as to why, just take a glance at what the Home Office’s own lawyer told the court on Tuesday.

Granting the injunction “runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests”, the barrister said – pointing out that similar legal claims by other councils would “aggravate pressures on the asylum estate”.

Right on cue and just hours after the ruling came in, Broxbourne Council – over the border in Hertfordshire – posted online that it was urgently seeking legal advice with a view to taking similar court action.

The risks here are clear.

Police officers ahead of a demonstration outside The Bell Hotel. Pic: PA
Image:
Police officers ahead of a demonstration outside The Bell Hotel. Pic: PA

Recent figures show just over 30,000 asylum seekers being housed in hotels across the country.

If they start to empty out following a string of court claims, the Home Office will struggle to find alternative options.

After all, they are only in hotels because of a lack of other types of accommodation.

There are several caveats though.

This is just an interim injunction that will be heard in full in the autumn.

So the court could swing back in favour of the hotel chain – and by extension the Home Office.

Read more:
Who says what on asylum hotels?

Protesters in Epping on 8 August. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Protesters in Epping on 8 August. Pic: Reuters

We have been here before

Remember, this isn’t the first legal claim of this kind.

Other councils have tried to leverage the power of the courts to shut down asylum hotels, with varying degrees of success.

In 2022, Ipswich Borough Council failed to get an extension to an interim injunction to prevent migrants being sent to a Novotel in the town.

As in Epping, lawyers argued there had been a change in use under planning rules.

The hotel has been the scene of regular protests. Pic: PA
Image:
The hotel has been the scene of regular protests. Pic: PA

But the judge eventually decided that the legal duty the Home Office has to provide accommodation for asylum seekers was more important.

So there may not be a direct read across from this case to other councils.

Home Office officials are emphasising this injunction was won on the grounds of planning laws rather than national issues such as public order, and as such, each case will be different.

Failing Labour approach or Tory tricks?

But government sources also smell dirty tricks from Epping Council and are suggesting that the Tory-led local authority made the legal claim for political reasons.

Pointing to the presence of several prominent Tory MPs in the Essex area – as well as the threat posed by Reform in the county – the question being posed is why this legal challenge was not brought when asylum seekers first started being sent to the hotel in 2020 during the Conservatives‘ time in government.

Epping Council would no doubt reject that and say recent disorder prompted them to act.

But that won’t stop the Tories and Reform of seizing on this as evidence of a failing approach from Labour.

So there are political risks for the government, yes, but it’s the practicalities that could flow from this ruling that pose the bigger danger.

Continue Reading

Politics

Top Fed official: Staff should be allowed to hold a little crypto

Published

on

By

Top Fed official: Staff should be allowed to hold a little crypto

Top Fed official: Staff should be allowed to hold a little crypto

Federal Reserve vice chair for supervision, Michelle Bowman, says the central bank should roll back its restrictions that ban staff from buying crypto.

Continue Reading

Politics

SEC Chair Atkins: There are very few tokens that are securities

Published

on

By

SEC Chair Atkins: There are very few tokens that are securities

SEC Chair Atkins: There are very few tokens that are securities

Paul Atkins spoke at Wyoming Blockchain Symposium on the SEC’s Project Crypto, its relationship with the Trump administration, and its plans on handling digital asset regulations.

Continue Reading

Trending