Connect with us

Published

on

Simon Case is set to return to his role leading the civil service in January following weeks of medical leave, the Cabinet Office has confirmed.

Mr Case, who as cabinet secretary is the UK’s most senior civil servant, took a leave of absence for medical reasons in October.

Politics latest: Rishi Sunak accused of ‘legacy of failure’ after latest economic figures

It was reported at the time that he was likely to be off for a number of weeks and that he would be returning in 2024.

A spokesperson for the Cabinet Office told Sky News: “The cabinet secretary will return to work in the New Year.”

It is understood that when he returns to the civil service, he will resume the same responsibilities in his capacity as cabinet secretary.

The Cabinet Office would not comment on the medical advice he has received as it is a private matter.

More on Covid Inquiry

There have been questions surrounding Mr Case’s return to work after the Times reported his initial four-week leave of absence in October had been extended to 2024, generating concerns about a vacuum at the heart of government.

Mr Case, who was appointed in September 2020 having previously served as permanent secretary in Number 10, was initially due to give evidence to the official COVID inquiry this year.

But inquiry chair Baroness Heather Hallett formally excused him from doing so “due to ill health”.

In a ruling last month, Baroness Hallett said she would receive an update on Mr Case’s ability to give evidence at the end of January 2024 or on his return to work from sick leave, whichever is sooner.

The COVID inquiry is looking into the UK’s handling of the pandemic, including government decision-making around controversial areas such as imposing three national lockdowns.

Module 2 has examined “core UK decision-making and political governance” and has seen a number of high-profile politicians, including former prime minister Boris Johnson, give evidence.

Although the inquiry has now finished hearing evidence under module 2, Baroness Hallett said it “very much remains my intention that Mr Case should give oral evidence to the inquiry” and that she will convene a special hearing for module 2 to receive his evidence.

Despite his absence, Mr Case has featured prominently in the evidence heard at the inquiry so far via WhatsApp messages exchanged between senior figures during the pandemic.

Read more:
Simon Case accuses minsters of ‘self-defeating cowardice’ over attacks on civil service ‘blob’
Who is Simon Case – and what’s his role in recent Downing St scandals?

Messages understood to be from 14 October 2020 were disclosed to the inquiry, in which Mr Case described Mr Johnson’s wife, Carrie Johnson, as “the real person in charge”.

Mr Case also said the government was looking like a “terrible, tragic joke” and that he “cannot cope with this” in an apparent expression of frustration at how the coronavirus pandemic was being handled.

In another fractious message shown to the inquiry in October, Mr Case described “being at the end of my tether” over Mr Johnson’s indecision during the pandemic and said he “cannot lead”.

When approached for a comment by Sky News, the COVID inquiry said it does not provide a running commentary on the progress of its investigations.

Continue Reading

Politics

BNB treasury firm plunges 77% after Nasdaq delisting notice

Published

on

By

BNB treasury firm plunges 77% after Nasdaq delisting notice

BNB treasury firm plunges 77% after Nasdaq delisting notice

Biotech and BNB treasury firm Windtree Therapeutics fell 77% on Wednesday after informing the SEC that it would be delisted from the Nasdaq stock exchange.

Continue Reading

Politics

Fed governor tells bankers DeFi is ‘nothing to be afraid of’

Published

on

By

Fed governor tells bankers DeFi is ‘nothing to be afraid of’

Fed governor tells bankers DeFi is ‘nothing to be afraid of’

Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller urged policymakers and bankers to stop fearing DeFi and stablecoins, saying they will drive the next wave of innovation in the US payments system.

Continue Reading

Politics

Two Labour-run councils ‘considering all options’ to challenge migrant hotel use

Published

on

By

Two Labour-run councils 'considering all options' to challenge migrant hotel use

Two Labour-run councils are considering legal action to stop the use of hotels to house migrants in their areas after Epping council won a temporary injunction.

The leaders of Wirral and Tamworth councils both say they are considering their legal options in the wake of the Epping case, citing similar concerns about the impact of the hotels on their local communities.

Politics latest: Judge in Epping hotel case was Tory candidate four times

Epping Forest District Council won an interim High Court injunction on Tuesday to stop migrants being housed at The Bell Hotel, after arguing its owners did not have planning permission to do so.

Paula Basnett, the Labour leader of Wirral council, said: “We are actively considering all options available to us to ensure that any use of hotels or other premises in Wirral is lawful and does not ride roughshod over planning regulations or the wishes of our communities.”

She added: “If necessary, we will not hesitate to challenge such decisions in order to protect both residents and those seeking refuge.”

Carol Dean, the Labour leader of Tamworth Borough Council, said she understands the “strong feelings” of residents about the use of a local hotel to house asylum seekers.

She pointed out that under the Labour government, the use of hotels has halved from 402 to 210, with the aim of stopping the use of any hotels by 2029.

But in light of the Epping case, she said “we are closely monitoring developments and reviewing our legal position”.

Epping has been the focal point of protests against migrant hotels in recent weeks. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Epping has been the focal point of protests against migrant hotels in recent weeks. Pic: Reuters

Badenoch backs more council rebellions

Other Tory councils are also being encouraged to follow Epping’s lead by party leader Kemi Badenoch.

She has sent a letter to all the councils they control, pledging her support for them to fight migrant hotels.

She wrote: “The Epping hotel injunction is a victory for local people led by a good Conservative council working hard for their community. This is the difference Conservatives in local government deliver. Real plans. Real action.”

Conservative-run Broxbourne Council has announced it is exploring its legal options.

The Reform UK leader of Kent County Council has also said she was writing to fellow leaders in Kent to explore whether they could potentially take legal action.

Read more:
Asylum seekers face being removed from Epping hotel
Labour smell dirty tricks over asylum hotel court ruling

Police officers ahead of a demonstration outside The Bell Hotel. Pic: PA
Image:
Police officers ahead of a demonstration outside The Bell Hotel. Pic: PA

Government under pressure

The prospect of more rulings in favour of councils will leave ministers asking where else they might be able to house asylum seekers. Other options may include flats and ex-army bases.

The prime minister and the home secretary are under huge pressure to clear the asylum backlog and stop using hotels across the country to house those waiting for their applications to be processed.

Keir Starmer and Yvette Cooper are under pressure to bring down small boat crossings. Pics: PA
Image:
Keir Starmer and Yvette Cooper are under pressure to bring down small boat crossings. Pics: PA

Protests have sprung up at migrant hotels across the country. But The Bell Hotel in Epping became a focal point in recent weeks after an asylum seeker housed there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl.

The council sought an interim High Court injunction to stop migrants from being accommodated at the hotel, owned by Somani Hotels Limited, on the basis that using it for that purpose contravened local planning regulations.

The interim injunction demanded that the hotel be cleared of its occupants within 14 days, but in his ruling on Tuesday, Mr Justice Eyre granted the temporary block, while extending the time limit by which it must stop housing asylum seekers to 12 September.

Somani Hotels said it intended to appeal the decision. Its barrister, Piers Riley-Smith, argued it would set a precedent that could affect “the wider strategy” of housing asylum seekers in hotels.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Asylum hotels: ‘People have had enough’

Epping hotel ‘sidestepped public scrutiny’

A government attempt to delay the application was rejected by the High Court judge. Home Office barristers had argued the case had a “substantial impact” on the government performing its legal duties to asylum seekers.

But Mr Justice Eyre dismissed the Home Office’s bid, stating that the department’s involvement was “not necessary”.

The judge said the hotel’s owners “sidestepped the public scrutiny and explanation which would otherwise have taken place if an application for planning permission or for a certificate of lawful use had been made”.

Reacting to Tuesday’s judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said the government will “continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns”.

She added: “Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this parliament.”

Continue Reading

Trending