Published
1 year agoon
By
admin1.2K
Scope details that can make – or break – a crossbow system. New-school crossbow technology: Ravin’s ultra-compact R-26. Cocked with a crank, its potent limbs can drive bolts to 400 fps. Still, the resulting trajectories are loopy enough to warrant a range-compensating scope – along with the know how to use it effectively.
Crossbow scopes are quickly becoming a standard addition to modern crossbows. The longstanding taboo associated with crossbows seems to be rapidly disappearing as a number of state wildlife management agencies attempt to control their burgeoning deer populations. Beyond the negative effects of over-populated herds upon the animals, for humans, the concerns extend to deer-vehicle collisions, the spread of tick-borne diseases (Lyme and several other strains) and the destruction of crops or ornamental shrubs.
Striking a positive chord, for both new and experienced deer hunters, this situation has provided new crossbow opportunities. And since many of us experienced hunters are no longer spring chickens the timing is fortuitous. A further win: The resulting increased demand is driving real equipment improvements. These extend to their aiming systems; some type of trajectory-compensating scope.
But my state was late to the gate. Until 2020, I was one of a small group of hunters who could legally use a crossbow during our archery deer season – but only through a special disability permit. Its issuance was far from assured (mine, granted due to an old injury, required documentation from the VA) so, for most archers crossbow technology was more of a nebulous thought. If your area is crossbow legal, and youre thinking of taking the plunge, you could be in the same boat. In that case, read my overview article on crossbow deer hunting.
Experienced vertical bow hunters could be presumed to have a leg up. Also, beyond all-important hunting skills, the rifle-type configuration of a crossbow should shorten the physical learning curve. Valid points yes but, as I discovered, horizontal bows can also introduce a number of new issues. The Crossbow Connection
My first crossbow, purchased back in 2013, was a Parker Terminator, sold with a lifetime warranty (so much for that; theyve since gone out of business). No complaints regarding its downrange performance though, even to this day. Despite subsequent developments, it was easy to master, and also quite accurate. However, it did introduce a few unexpected headaches.
For starters, the loading process was relatively complicated, requiring the aid of a rope & pulley system. And it was a true PETA to maneuver through thick woods. With game at hand, the critical timing related to the drawing a conventional bow was eliminated, but the actual shot was loud as in closer to a subsonic .22 LR! On a positive note, its 20-inch bolts departed with more speed than my vertical bows 28 arrows, although the difference was less than expected.
Trajectory was flatter but still parabolic, posing similar range and overhanging brush concerns. And, if no action transpired, uncocking required shooting the bow (I used a special bolt and portable capture target). Also, its basic fixed-power 4X trajectory-compensating scope was nothing special. Accuracy & Velocity vs Range
Todays crossbow market is more competitive, so some of these issues have been addressed (such as built-in uncocking systems). Velocities are trending upward too, although physics are still involved.
An example: Despite my Terminators s 175-pound draw weight, its shorter 13-inch power stroke was less efficient than that of my 28-inch, 65-lb. compound bow. Still, its velocity was quicker, reaching 340 fps. Some recent introductions are considerably faster but, because the entire archery industry has been busy, others arent that far ahead of todays vertical evolutions.
How about accuracy? Even from 40 yards, shooting more than one bolt at the same bullseye assured their rapid destruction. Encouraged, I stretched the range, successfully launching bolts to 70 yards well beyond the 50-yard range-compensating capabilities of its included scope. The accuracy was there, but the loopy flight of the bolts was disconcerting. Several recent model Ive since shot were as accurate, and some were 60 fps faster but, advertising hype to the contrary, trajectory is still a concern. A pair of “old school” Parker crossbows (neither more than ten years old). But both the Terminator (L) and Thunder Hawk can still perform. It takes a tough target like The Block to stop their bolts (arrows) – along with aiming systems that can deliver hits!
Range? Particularly at further distances, precise yardage is essential (bolts can also be affected by wind). In the woods, overhanging branches can cause further problems so, even with a good rangefinder, my hunting distances remained conservative. Sale Leupold RX-FullDraw 5 Rangefinder with DNA with Black/Green OLED Model #182444 – RX-FullDraw 5 RangefinderArcher’s Advantage bow ballistics uses your arrow weight, arrow velocity, and peep height to calculate more accurate ranges for steep angle and long distance shots. $399.99 Buy on Amazon
Flight time entered into this decision, too. The shot itself was loud so, given enough distance, an alert deer could jump the string. For these reasons, although my comfortable shooting distance did increase somewhat, 30 yards became a prudent outer limit.
That said, in suitable conditions, with some of todays fastest crossbows, the right scope can stretch that distance. Thats true to some extent for nearly any hunting-legal crossbow. Eventually, I upgraded mine to an illuminated 30mm, range-compensating variable that could be calibrated to specific velocities. Crossbow Scopes 101
A friend plunked down good money for a hi-tech crossbow rated to hit 400 fps. Depicted in videos accurately slinging bolts at 100 yards, it shipped with a decent scope that was similar to the one I purchased. Its special reticle could accommodate such ranges but, being an experienced hunter, he intended to hunt in thicker deer havens. Thus, after following the sighting-in procedure, he established a 40-yard max.
Once in the woods, he also followed a common rifle hunter practice, dialing the scopes magnification to a lower setting (to gain a wider a field of view). No excitement during the first few outings, but a subsequent zero check on a 3-D deer target quickly spiked his blood pressure. Somehow, his bolts were way off the mark at 30 and 40 yards begging the question, what the #$%^ is up? Ravin’s crossbows are known for their high speeds so their scopes are designed accordingly. The speed settings on this version cover velocities from 300 – 450 fps. The same adjustment ring also displays magnifications – a potential source of trouble for the uninformed. The newest iteration omits them, and the ring now has a locking feature. Details Matter
Answer: The scope was fine; the problem was operator error. As it should be to optimize the crossbows performance – like most sporting-type rifle variables – its a second focal plane design. As such, the size of its reticle (along with its trajectory compensating hold-over points) remains constant regardless of the scopes magnification setting.
But, of course, these adjustments change the apparent size of the target. And this expansion or contraction of the image against the reticle alters the relationship of its hold-points to change their ballistic values – which could be bad, or good thing, depending on how the system is used. We were able to easily sort these details out because my syste works the same way. The Basics
My present crossbow scope fits the above description. But apparently, its been designed to minimize shooter-induced errors. Devoid of magnification inscriptions, its rotating power ring displays just the velocity-settings, common to many crossbows (see photo). Excalibur’s Tact-Zone variable scope (top) substitutes velocities for magnification settings. Because the crossbow scope below it is a basic fixed 4x version, although both have trajectory-compensating reticles, such a feature would be moot. Note the protective lens caps, worthwhile accessories (he strings near the scopes are indispensable cocking-aids).
For this reason, unlike 2nd FP range-compensating rifle scopes, its reticle isnt optimized for use at a specific magnification – typically the maximum. Instead, it utilizes more or less magnification to accommodate a diverse range of trajectories. Summarizing the process, the normal power settings are replaced by speeds (in fps), a trick that alters the values of the trajectory-compensating reticle. Ill use my scope to illustrate how they work. Setting Up a Crossbow Scope
My replacement scope is an Excaliber Tact Zone. As noted above, this 30mm scope features an illuminated reticle with range-compensating hold-over points that can be calibrated to the specific velocity of the crossbow. Its speed-settings run 300 400 fps. The latest but nearly identical model is the Tact-100.
The main difference, reflecting the performance of some recent bows, appears to be extra settings to cover 450 fps. But the mounting process is identical and follows standard rifle procedures. A video in this link covers the details: Sale Excalibur Tact-100 Durable Lightweight Waterproof Fogproof Adjustable 30mm Tube Crossbow Scope with Illuminated Red/Green Reticle GREAT PERFORMANCE – The Tact-100 Crossbow scope is perfect for target shooting or long-range practice so when you shoot at sensible hunting distances, it will give you the confidence to make the shot when it countsMULTI-COATED LENSES – The Tact-100 Crossbow scope lenses incorporate multi coatings that provide crisp, clear viewing; Tact-100 Illuminated Hunting Scope is a superior optical system for ultimate accuracy; Flip-up lens caps and 30mm scope rings included $234.99 Buy on Amazon
The scopes 30mm Picatinny-type rings (included) easily mounted to the crossbows rail with enough a latitude for proper eye-relief. But I did take pains to ensure the scope was level! Otherwise, windage errors would appear while using the reticles longer-range aiming points. Velocity Calibration
Having chronographed my crossbow, I knew it did an honest 342 fps, so I adjusted the scope accordingly. Interestingly, its velocity settings were at oddball intervals of 300, 320, 350, 380 and 400 fps. Why? The scope is actually a lower-power 2-6X, so Im guessing the velocities correspond with normal magnification settings. I chose a spot just below 350 and aligned it with the reference dot. The next step involved sighting in the scope via its central crosshairs. Top view of the scope with its elevation turret cap removed to reveal its bold adjustments: 1/2″ per click – at 20 yards! The scope’s velocity scale has been set to match the speed of the crossbow; 342 fps. Establishing a Baseline Zero
The actual zero process, similar to a standard rifle scope, involves elevation and windage turret adjustments, although their click values may differ. My basic 4X offered fairly common MOA clicks, the equivalent of a half-inch at 100 yards. However, each click of the scope were discussing was worth -inches at 20 yards: 2 -MOA per click! Actually, this makes sense with a 20-yard baseline zero a familiar distance for many archers.
Of course, bore-sighting is out with a crossbow so its worth starting out closer, preferably with a generous backstop. The first bolt I shot was near enough to the mark from 10 yards for a move to 20 yards, where the turrets easily put bolts on the money (if not, a prime suspect wouldve been incompatible bolts). Zeroed at 20 yards and ready to stretch the range. The scope has been set to the crossbow’s velocity. If the reticle is properly calibrated, bolts should hit the same white circle from 30 yards through the use of the corresponding hold-point. Stretching the Range
With the 20-yard zero established, at the scopes proper speed setting, my average-weight bolts should strike close to reticles 30-, 40-, 50-, and 60-yard hold-points if the manufacturer did its part. To find out, I set up a target stout enough to capture the bolts (sometimes a challenge in itself). Then, using a rangefinder, I shot several from each distance, steadied by a set of shooting sticks (accuracy was preestablished). Better to use a bench rest and reset the target but be sure to keep your fingers clear of the string! Wrinkles?
Judging by the spot-on groups, Excaliber had done its homework. But, what if your impact points differ? In that case, play with the velocity settings while shooting more bolts.
This process can be further simplified with a steady rest. Say your bolts strike 3-inches below your bullseye at 40 yards. Leave a bolt in the target, realign the reticles 40-yard mark with the bullseye and note where your central crosshairs (the 20-yard baseline) are aiming. Then, while carefully maintaining their position, adjust the scopes speed dial until the 40-yard mark coincides with your bolt. Good chance that setting will cover the other yardages, too. Reticle calibration check, beginning at 30-yards. The bolt (dead-center in the square insert of the 3-D deer target) was shot off a set of two-legged sticks. Tip: Wipe the bolts with silicone before shooting to ease their removal. The next stop is 40 yards.
Either way, shoot enough bolts to confirm. Fixed-power Crossbow Scopes and Others
Starting with fixed-power crossbow scopes, since most have similar reticles, if yours doesn’t provide close hits, you could try a few bolts at modified distances until scoring a close match (be sure to record this data). That was the fix for my spare crossbow, sold with another basic 4X scope. Its reticle was close but not exact. But it does jibe at slightly modified yardages; 38 instead of 40-yards, etc.
Actually, you could use nearly any scope, although compensating for steep bolt trajectories would be difficult. You could dial come-ups via the elevation turret – although reality will likely dictate otherwise. See my article on bullet drop compensation for more information.
What about first focal plane scopes? Popular among long-range rifle shooters, they eliminate magnification-induced hold-over concerns because both the targets image and the reticle shift in harmony. However, at lower magnifications the reticle grows finer, making it harder to resolve in low light.
Most also feature complex grids and target turrets. Like a standard rifle scope, you could conscript one for a crossbow duty, but the result would be a fiddly system.
Dot sights fall somewhere in between. Most are spinoffs of firearms models. The few versions built for crossbows often feature multiple dots, but some are generic regarding trajectory compensation. That said, theyre small, intuitive and eye-grabbing, especially in low light. Then again, so is an illuminated crossbow scope. Parting Shots A tom turkey taken with a Ravin R-26. The scope’s reticle will cover 100 yards. The range here was 30 yards, a pretty good poke in the woods.
Most of us archers are wired to think range in 10-yard increments (frequently off a 20-yard starting point). Thus, the archery industry follows uit.
Having used all of the above optics, I much prefer a purpose-built crossbow scope, an illuminated version with a provision to match its reticle to the velocity of the bow. And the better crossbow packages have this base covered to include the right bolts, another key component of the system! Most will easily cover 50 yards; more than enough range for most of us.
An average-sized doe from 2015 is still among my more memorable archery events. If a trophy is the standard, we (the few hunters in my circle) have certainly tagged much better deer. Ranked by distance though, that 42-yard shot topped my archery list. Others particularly Western hunters will probably find this laughable. But for many Eastern archers its a pretty good poke. And for all, there are ways to muff a shot – the reason I doublechecked my scopes velocity setting before taking the shot.
My two closest compatriots hunt with fast Ravin crossbows, an R-20 (420 fps), and R-26 (400 fps). Their bows were purchased as packages with Ravin-branded scopes. Checking the latest versions, I noticed the scopes (which can cover 450 fps), now incorporate speed locks good insurance!
Still, like me, they both prefer to stick with closer distances. And we all take pains to ensure our crossbow-rated hunting broadheads fly true!
In closing, if youre looking for crossbow scope recommendations, the Internet is a better source for up-to-date reviews. The list of decent picks is growing, a good indicator of demand.

You may like
Entertainment
Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs in court as high-profile trial begins with jury selection in New York
Published
26 mins agoon
May 5, 2025By
admin
The trial of hip-hop mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs has begun, with the process to pick the jurors who will determine his fate now under way.
Combs, wearing a white shirt with a black crew-neck sweater, grey trousers and glasses, his hair and goatee now grey, hugged and shook hands with all his lawyers as he arrived at the federal courtroom in Manhattan, New York, for the start of the proceedings.
The 55-year-old has been held in detention in Brooklyn since he was arrested and charged in September 2024, accused of engaging in sex trafficking and presiding over a racketeering conspiracy over two decades.
He has pleaded not guilty to criminal charges, said all his sexual relationships and encounters were consensual, and strenuously denied all allegations of wrongdoing.

The Metropolitan Detention Center, where Combs is incarcerated. Pic: AP/ Yuki Iwamura
Due to the high-profile nature of the case, the jury selection process is expected to last all this week, with opening statements by the lawyers set to begin next week.
Unlike some other high-profile trials in the US, this one won’t be broadcast live because federal courtrooms, unlike some state courtrooms, don’t allow electronic recordings inside.
Judge Arun Subramanian started proceedings shortly after 9am on Monday (2pm UK time), first making several rulings on what issues experts will be allowed to testify on when they take to the witness stand.
He then gave an overview of the case and began the questioning of prospective jurors one by one – a process known as “voir dire” – with the aim of finding a panel of 12 jurors and six alternates who can be fair and impartial despite heavy media coverage of the case.

There are no cameras in court. Sketch: Elizabeth Williams via AP
Read more:
Diddy on trial: Everything you need to know
Sean Combs: A timeline of allegations
Jurors are being asked if they have any views on the prosecution or the defence, if they or someone close to them has been a victim of crime, and their beliefs on hiring sex workers, the use of illegal drugs, hip-hop artists and law enforcement.
They are also being questioned on whether they have heard of names included on a list of individuals, including celebrities, who may be mentioned during the trial. The list is long, the court heard, with the judge saying it reminded him of Lord Of The Rings.
What have potential jurors been asked?

Combs embraced his attorneys in court. Sketch: REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg
One prospective juror said they had heard of actors Michael B Jordan and Mike Myers, but this would not prevent them being fair and impartial should they be selected. Another said they had heard of Kanye West.
The context in which Jordan, Myers, West and other people may be mentioned is not yet known.
Other names that came up included Aubrey O’Day and Dawn Richard – former members of girl group Danity Kane, who were signed to Bad Boy – and singer Michelle Williams.
Several prospective jurors indicated they had seen news reports about Combs, and one prospective juror described a still image she had seen as “damning evidence”. She was rejected from consideration.
Another potential juror was excluded because she said a family member had experienced something that made them feel uncomfortable about hearing the case.
At one point during proceedings, Combs asked for a bathroom break, telling the judge: “I’m sorry your honour, I’m a little nervous today.”
One potential juror said they had seen a joke on social media about baby oil authorities say they found in Combs’ residences during searches in March 2024. They said they could remain impartial.
Throughout the day, as potential jurors were questioned, Combs appeared to express his approval or disapproval, either with a nod or by shaking his head no, to his attorneys.

Brian Steel, one of Combs’ attorneys, pictured outside the court. Pic: REUTERS/David Dee Delgado
What is Combs accused of?
In the indictment listing the formal charges against the rapper, he is accused of a pattern of abusive behavior over two decades, allegedly with the help of people in his entourage.
Prosecutors say he manipulated women into participating in drug-fuelled sexual performances with male sex workers, which he called “Freak Offs”.
Combs and his associates resorted to violent acts, including beatings, kidnapping and arson, when he didn’t get his way, they allege.
Lawyers for Combs say any group sex was consensual, that there was no coercion involved, and nothing that happened amounted to a criminal racket.
If convicted, he faces the possibility of decades in prison.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:53
What is Sean Combs on trial for?
The Cassie video
One issue likely to be featured in the trial is an incident in 2016, when a security camera recorded Combs allegedly kicking and hitting his then girlfriend Cassie Ventura in a Los Angeles hotel hallway.
Cassie filed a lawsuit in November 2023 saying Combs had subjected her to years of abuse, including beatings and rape, but the case was settled the following day.
The hotel footage emerged in May 2024. Shortly afterwards, Combs released a video apology, saying his behaviour in the video was at a time when he had “hit rock bottom” but nonetheless was “inexcusable” and that he was “disgusted” with himself.
One of his lawyers, Marc Agnifilo, has said Combs was “not a perfect person” and that there had been drug use and toxic relationships, but that all sexual activity between Combs, Cassie and other people was consensual.
Jury selection continues today and throughout this week, with the trial expected to last about eight weeks.
Sports
Trump plan cuts funding for brain injury research
Published
26 mins agoon
May 5, 2025By
admin
-
Michael RothsteinMay 5, 2025, 02:10 PM ET
Close- Michael Rothstein is a reporter for NFL Nation at ESPN. Rothstein covers the Atlanta Falcons. You can follow him via Twitter @MikeRothstein.
The Trump administration’s 2026 fiscal budget request to Congress eliminates major federal funding for traumatic brain injury (TBI) research and education, potentially undercutting efforts to address head injuries in sports, particularly at the high school and youth levels.
The White House’s proposed budget, released Friday, includes eliminating the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention umbrella agency responsible for TBI research, including the $8.25 million marked for brain injury research and public education about the dangers of concussions. The CDC is facing $3.59 billion in budget cuts.
Although the president proposes the federal budget, it is up to Congress to approve a final budget bill, so the TBI program could be restored or moved to a different agency. The White House did not respond to an ESPN request for comment.
The budget proposal comes after the CDC on April 1 placed all five staffers devoted to administering the government’s main traumatic brain injury program on paid administrative leave, CDC employees told ESPN. Paid administrative leave means the workers are still government employees.
The budget cuts would “roll back decades of progress,” said Dr. Owen Perlman, a brain injury specialist and board member of the Brain Injury Association of America.
Among the items targeted is Heads Up, a concussion-prevention program for youth and high school coaches, athletic trainers and other sports officials. The CDC staffers put on leave administered the program. Forty-five states participate in the program to varying degrees, a CDC official said, asking not to be identified.
Staffers interviewed by ESPN declined to speak on the record, citing fears of administration retribution.
“We’re really worried about the hundreds of thousands of coaches who have to take this training,” the CDC official said. “This is really built in, and we’ve lost the whole team” behind the program.
Some Heads Up training is part of coaches’ and other sports officials’ state compliance requirements. The CDC official said hundreds of email queries are arriving every week asking how to comply as the federal program shuts down. The Heads Up website says more than 10 million people have participated in its online training programs.
Congress first approved TBI research funding in 1996. Legislation to keep the program going expired at the end of 2024, and a House bill to renew it has yet to advance out of committee.
In a 2018 CDC survey, 12% of adult respondents reported experiencing a head injury in the previous 12 months, including but not limited to sports-related activities. A follow-up study was being prepared when the staffers were placed on leave. The research data was part of a program to measure TBI prevalence and boost prevention, care and recovery efforts.
The Heads Up website remained active Monday but offered no clues regarding the program’s endangered status.
“In the last month, I don’t think the public has felt an impact,” a laid-off CDC employee said. “But when those websites, trainings and materials get pulled down or when they can’t be updated, I think that’s when the public will feel it.”
In the proposed White House budget, the National Institutes of Health would retain an institute devoted to overall brain research, although the name would slightly change. The institute focuses on medical issues such as stroke and migraines, and it’s unclear whether TBI programs would be absorbed into it.
Hospitals and universities conducting TBI research funded by the CDC are bracing for potential funding cutbacks.
“We might not [get] the next year of renewal or the next wave of funding. And that’s sad and scary and impactful for all kinds of people, including myself in this project,” said Christine Baugh, an assistant professor at the University of Colorado’s School of Medicine who is studying how parents decide whether to let their children play contact sports and whether brain-injury awareness campaigns influence their decisions.
On April 23, the National Academy of Sciences received orders to cancel work on two TBI workshops, one of which analyzed the risks of repeated head impacts on children. Both workshops had already been held. One of the workshop organizers, Dr. Fred Rivara, a pediatrics professor at the University of Washington, told ESPN that the cancellation affected funding for publishing the information, and he called the potential cuts “tragic.”
“That’s a perfect example of how this change in, or devastation of, funding at the CDC is impacting people,” Rivara said. “They want to know, for sports: What about these repetitive impacts? Are they bad for kids? It’s a perfect example of the impact of this.”
Traumatic brain injuries have lifelong repercussions on a person’s physical, cognitive, emotional and behavioral health, Perlman said.
Even though some states fund TBI-treatment programs independently of the federal government, concerns are growing about a domino effect if Congress fails to renew funding.
“For many people with concussions or certainly moderate or severe brain injuries, there’s no endpoint,” Perlman said. “It’s a lifetime problem, and there needs to be lifetime funding for it.”
Sports
Stanley Cup playoff picks: Who wins every second-round series?
Published
26 mins agoon
May 5, 2025By
admin
The first round of the 2025 Stanley Cup playoffs is complete. Eight of the teams that made the postseason bracket have moved on, and eight others have been eliminated.
Before the second-round series begin, ESPN’s experts have identified their picks for each matchup. Which four teams will move on to the conference finals?
More: Full schedule
Betting intel
Atlantic Division
John Buccigross: Panthers in seven
Ryan Callahan: Panthers in six
Cassie Campbell-Pascall: Panthers in six
Sachin Chandan: Panthers in six
Meghan Chayka: Panthers in six
Ryan S. Clark: Panthers in seven
Linda Cohn: Panthers in six
Rachel Doerrie: Panthers in six
Ray Ferraro: Panthers in six
Emily Kaplan: Panthers in seven
Tim Kavanagh: Maple Leafs in six
Peter Lawrence-Riddell: Panthers in six
Steve Levy: Panthers in six
Vince Masi: Panthers in six
Victoria Matiash: Panthers in six
Sean McDonough: Panthers in six
Mark Messier: Panthers in six
AJ Mleczko: Panthers in six
Arda Öcal: Maple Leafs in six
Kristen Shilton: Maple Leafs in seven
John Thoering: Panthers in six
Bob Wischusen: Panthers in six
Greg Wyshynski: Panthers in six
Consensus prediction: Panthers (20 of 23 picks)
Metropolitan Division
John Buccigross: Capitals in seven
Ryan Callahan: Capitals in seven
Cassie Campbell-Pascall: Capitals in six
Sachin Chandan: Capitals in six
Meghan Chayka: Hurricanes in six
Ryan S. Clark: Capitals in seven
Linda Cohn: Capitals in six
Rachel Doerrie: Capitals in six
Ray Ferraro: Capitals in seven
Emily Kaplan: Capitals in seven
Tim Kavanagh: Capitals in six
Peter Lawrence-Riddell: Hurricanes in seven
Steve Levy: Capitals in five
Vince Masi: Hurricanes in six
Victoria Matiash: Hurricanes in six
Sean McDonough: Capitals in seven
Mark Messier: Hurricanes in six
AJ Mleczko: Hurricanes in five
Mike Monaco: Hurricanes in six
Arda Öcal: Capitals in six
Kristen Shilton: Hurricanes in six
John Thoering: Capitals in seven
Bob Wischusen: Capitals in seven
Greg Wyshynski: Capitals in seven
Consensus prediction: Capitals (16 of 24 picks)
Central Division
John Buccigross: Stars in seven
Ryan Callahan: Stars in five
Sachin Chandan: Stars in six
Ryan S. Clark: Stars in seven
Linda Cohn: Jets in seven
Rachel Doerrie: Stars in six
Ray Ferraro: Stars in six
Emily Kaplan: Stars in six
Tim Kavanagh: Stars in seven
Peter Lawrence-Riddell: Stars in six
Steve Levy: Stars in seven
Vince Masi: Jets in seven
Victoria Matiash: Jets in seven
Sean McDonough: Stars in six
Mark Messier: Stars in six
Mike Monaco: Stars in six
Arda Öcal: Stars in six
Kristen Shilton: Stars in six
John Thoering: Stars in seven
Bob Wischusen: Jets in seven
Greg Wyshynski: Stars in six
Consensus prediction: Stars (17 of 21 picks)
Pacific Division
John Buccigross: Oilers in seven
Ryan Callahan: Golden Knights in six
Cassie Campbell-Pascall: Oilers in seven
Sachin Chandan: Oilers in seven
Meghan Chayka: Golden Knights in seven
Ryan S. Clark: Golden Knights in seven
Linda Cohn: Oilers in seven
Rachel Doerrie: Golden Knights in seven
Ray Ferraro: Golden Knights in seven
Emily Kaplan: Golden Knights in seven
Tim Kavanagh: Golden Knights in six
Peter Lawrence-Riddell: Golden Knights in six
Steve Levy: Golden Knights in seven
Vince Masi: Oilers in six
Victoria Matiash: Golden Knights in six
Sean McDonough: Golden Knights in seven
Mark Messier: Oilers in seven
AJ Mleczko: Golden Knights in six
Mike Monaco: Oilers in six
Arda Öcal: Oilers in six
Kristen Shilton: Oilers in seven
John Thoering: Golden Knights in seven
Bob Wischusen: Golden Knights in seven
Greg Wyshynski: Oilers in seven
Consensus prediction: Golden Knights (14 of 24 picks)
Trending
-
Sports3 years ago
‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year ago
Story injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years ago
Game 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years ago
MLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years ago
Japan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years ago
Game-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business3 years ago
Bank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway