Foraging, the practice of gathering wild food including flowers, fruit, and fungi for free, has become increasingly popular in recent years.
It’s often viewed as a way to connect with nature and eat locally and seasonally.
But some people are breaking the law and collecting wild food in huge quantities to sell. At one park in Nottingham, commercial foragers have become such a threat to wildlife, including deer, that officials have introduced a total ban on foraging.
For the most part, it’s legal to pick food growing wild for personal consumption as long as you have the landowner’s permission (if on private land) and you don’t pick an endangered species.
But Wollaton Park says “excessive foraging” by some individuals has forced them to also ban those who do it merely as a hobby.
The park says the situation has become “intolerable” due to the loss of chestnuts, which are a vital food source for the deer, and the damage to mature trees “due to people trying to knock off chestnuts”.
“The deer are in their breeding season so they’ll use lots of energy, so the chestnuts will be full of energy for them and they [the chestnuts] will also feed some of the bigger birds, like the crows and the magpies, and all the squirrels,” Dr Aimee Brett, a senior lecturer at Nottingham Trent University, told Sky News.
More on Nottinghamshire
Related Topics:
There have been sightings of people “collecting trolleys and carrier bags of chestnuts” and it’s thought these are being foraged to sell, perhaps to restaurants.
Lucy Buckle is a local foraging expert. She thinks the cost of living might be partly responsible for an increase in foraging, both commercial and legal.
Advertisement
Ms Buckle, 36, runs classes teaching others how to forage legally and sustainably, following her own decision to quit her job in a pharmacy to spend more time in nature.
“It’s about connecting with nature, connecting with your local space and connecting with the food that we eat. It absolutely encourages a zero waste approach to food, a seasonality approach, and you diversify your diet so much,” she says.
“Foraging absolutely saves me money on my food bills each week. I don’t think it’s the answer to the cost of living, I don’t think everyone should be aiming to be 100% [eating] from the wild, but it can certainly help you save a few pennies here and there.”
Ms Buckle also cautions would-be foragers to get clued-up, especially if they’re collecting fungi.
“There are three options with mushrooms… delicious, deadly, or just disgusting.”
Image: Foraging affects the food supply for deer in the park
Ms Buckle has noticed a surge in the popularity of foraging as a hobby since the pandemic, and she’s disappointed by Wollaton Park’s ban.
“If we start to ban foraging on public land where we legally have the right to do so, my concern is where will that stop? Will we become a nation where nobody’s allowed to forage at all?”
She also questions the feasibility of policing the park, saying: “The people who’ve been foraging there for a long time, who’ve done it responsibly and sustainably, they won’t go there any more because they’ll want to follow the rules. The people that were doing it illegally and commercially and causing the damage are going to ignore the signs.”
The problem of commercial gathering is one facing public parks and landowners across the country.
At Epping Forest, they’ve found people collecting huge quantities of protected mushrooms. Thieves on this site have been prosecuted, including one person who tried to steal almost 50kg of fungi.
But there are still plenty of public spaces to forage legally, and the advice for anyone who wants to give it a try is to be careful not to trample around as you go and leave a good amount behind for wildlife which depends on the food.
Four people have been charged after £7m of damage was caused to two Voyager aircraft at RAF Brize Norton.
The investigation into the incident early on Friday 20 June was led by counter-terror police.
They have been charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the UK – and conspiracy to commit criminal damage.
Image: Two Voyager aircraft at RAF Brize Norton were damaged. PA file pic
The four charged have been identified as:
• Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, of no fixed abode
• Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 35, from London
• Jony Cink, 24, of no fixed abode
More from UK
• Lewie Chiaramello, 22, from London
They will appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court later today.
A 41-year-old woman arrested last week on suspicion of assisting an offender has been released on bail until 19 September.
Meanwhile, a 23-year-old man detained on Saturday was released without charge.
Last month’s incident at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire was claimed by the activist group Palestine Action.
Rachel Reeves has not offered her resignation and is “going nowhere”, Downing Street has said, following her tearful appearance in the House of Commons.
A Number 10 spokesperson said the chancellor had the “full backing” of Sir Keir Starmer, despite Ms Reeves looking visibly upset during Prime Minister’s Questions.
A spokesperson for the chancellor later clarified that Ms Reeves had been affected by a “personal matter” and would be working out of Downing Street this afternoon.
UK government bond prices fell by the most since October 2022, and the pound tumbled after Ms Reeves’s Commons appearance, while the yield on the 10-year government bond, or gilt, rose as much as 22 basis points at one point to around 4.68%.
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch branded the chancellor the “human shield” for the prime minister’s “incompetence” just hours after he was forced to perform a humiliating U-turn over his controversial welfare bill.
Emotional Reeves a painful watch – and reminder of tough decisions ahead
It is hard to think of a PMQs like it – it was a painful watch.
The prime minister battled on, his tone assured, even if his actual words were not always convincing.
But it was the chancellor next to him that attracted the most attention.
Rachel Reeves looked visibly upset.
It is hard to know for sure right now what was going on behind the scenes, the reasons – predictable or otherwise – why she appeared to be emotional, but it was noticeable and it was difficult to watch.
Speaking at Prime Minister’s Questions, Ms Badenoch said: “This man has forgotten that his welfare bill was there to plug a black hole created by the chancellor. Instead they’re creating new ones.”
Turning to the chancellor, the Tory leader added: “[She] is pointing at me – she looks absolutely miserable.
“Labour MPs are going on the record saying that the chancellor is toast, and the reality is that she is a human shield for his incompetence. In January, he said that she would be in post until the next election. Will she really?”
Not fully answering the question, the prime minister replied: “[Ms Badenoch] certainly won’t.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:58
Welfare vote ‘a blow to the prime minister’
“I have to say, I’m always cheered up when she asks me questions or responds to a statement because she always makes a complete mess of it and shows just how unserious and irrelevant they are.”
Mrs Badenoch interjected: “How awful for the chancellor that he couldn’t confirm that she would stay in place.”
A total of 49 Labour MPs voted against the bill – the largest rebellion in a prime minister’s first year in office since 47 MPs voted against Tony Blair’s Lone Parent benefit in 1997, according to Professor Phil Cowley from Queen Mary University.
After multiple concessions made due to threats of a Labour rebellion, many MPs questioned what they were voting for as the bill had been severely stripped down.
They ended up voting for only one part of the plan: a cut to Universal Credit (UC) sickness benefits for new claimants from £97 a week to £50 from 2026/7.
Ms Badenoch said the climbdown was proof that Sir Keir was “too weak to get anything done”.
Ms Reeves has also borne a lot of the criticism over the handling of the vote, with some MPs believing that her strict approach to fiscal rules has meant she has approached the ballooning welfare bill from the standpoint of trying to make savings, rather than getting people into work.
Experts have now warned that the welfare U-turn, on top of reversing the cut to winter fuel, means that tax rises in the autumn are more likely – with Ms Reeves now needing to find £5bn to make up for the policy U-turns.
Asked by Ms Badenoch whether he could rule out further tax rises – something Labour promised it would not do on working people in its manifesto – Sir Keir said: “She knows that no prime minister or chancellor ever stands at the despatch box and writes budgets in the future.
“But she talks about growth, for 14 years we had stagnation, and that is what caused the problem.”
Prosecutors are considering whether to bring further criminal charges against Lucy Letby over the deaths of babies at two hospitals where she worked
The Crown Prosecution Service said it had received “a full file of evidence from Cheshire Constabulary asking us to consider further allegations in relation to deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital and Liverpool Women’s Hospital”.
“We will now carefully consider the evidence to determine whether any further criminal charges should be brought,” it added.
“As always, we will make that decision independently, based on the evidence and in line with our legal test.”
Letby, 35, was found guilty of murdering seven children and attempting to murder seven more between June 2015 and June 2016 while working in the neonatal unit of the Countess of Chester Hospital and is currently serving 15 whole-life orders.
Image: Letby worked at the Countess of Chester Hospital and Liverpool Women’s Hospital
She is understood to have carried out two work placements at Liverpool Women’s Hospital, where she trained as a student, between October and December 2012, and January and February 2015.
Police said in December that Letby was interviewed in prison as part of an investigation into more baby deaths and non-fatal collapses.
A Cheshire Constabulary spokesperson said: “We can confirm that Cheshire Constabulary has submitted a full file of evidence to the CPS for charging advice regarding the ongoing investigation into deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at the neo-natal units of both the Countess of Chester Hospital and the Liverpool Women’s Hospital as part of Operation Hummingbird.”
Detectives previously said the investigation was looking into the full period of time that Letby worked as a nurse, covering the period from 2012 to 2016 and including a review of 4,000 admissions of babies.
Letby’s lawyer Mark McDonald said: “The evidence of the innocence of Lucy Letby is overwhelming,” adding: “We will cross every bridge when we get to it but if Lucy is charged I know we have a whole army of internationally renowned medical experts who will totally undermine the prosecution’s unfounded allegations.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:09
Three managers at the hospital where Lucy Letby worked have been arrested on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter.
Earlier this year, Letby’s lawyers called for the suspension of the inquiry, claiming there was “overwhelming and compelling evidence” that her convictions were unsafe.
Their evidence has been passed to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which investigates potential miscarriages of justice, and Letby’s legal team hopes her case will be referred back to the Court of Appeal.