Connect with us

Published

on

Merger talks between David Zaslav of Warner Bros. Discovery and the people over at Paramount are at a very early stage, I am told. So is the air of desperation for both parties and the media industry in general.

If you havent noticed, this isnt a great time to be running a media company. For now, Comcast makes a lot of money, combining cable and broadband with NBCUniversals various programming. But its stock is well off its highs.

Investors are calculating weak earnings growth from crappy ad revenues, cord-cutting and a lot more. Comcasts cable business is sputtering. People arent going to the movies, and its streaming service, Peacock, lost $3 billion this year.

Yikes!

Disney is an even bigger train wreck. CEO Bob Iger probably wishes he was back on the beach instead of pitching his studios increasingly insipid programming. Likewise, his streaming service is equally a disaster, and no one believes his wokeness (transgender greeters at Disney parks and same-sex kissing scenes in animated movies) is going to help the bottom line.

Disney+ has lost $11.4 billion since inception in 2019.

Double yikes!

As CEO of Warner Bros. Discovery, the aforementioned Zas is doing a great job (under difficult circumstances) of combining WarnerMedia and Discovery. Hes streamlining and getting rid of merger debt. He has $5 billion in free cash flow to buy stuff. His stock is up nicely from its post-merger lows when investors bet Zas would be drowning in red ink.

Yet some red is still there in the form of debt $40 billion of it. His streaming service barely breaks even (as if thats a good thing), meaning he might be running a business slowly on the verge of doomsday.
One already there is Paramount, or course. Its difficult to know where to begin in describing this mess. If current trends continue, the companys streaming service could lose close to $2 billion this year on a market cap of around $10 billion. (By comparison, Comcasts $3 billion in streaming losses comes on a market value of $177 billion.)

Essential weekly read to fuel business lunches.

Please provide a valid email address.

By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Thanks for signing up!
Never miss a story.

Paramounts programming has been described as a melting ice cube. CBS has an NFL rights deal, but the costs are huge, and in an era of cord-cutting, even Sunday football is a ratings challenge as a younger generation watches games on their phones instead of TV.

It has a large studio in Paramount, but it loses money. It also has $15 billion in debt and scrounges to generate cash to pay bondholders, according to the ratings agency S&P.

So why does Zaslav (allegedly) want this POS? Hes a dealmaker first and foremost. Hes considered particularly adept at integrating businesses, a skill honed as a long-time executive of NBCUniversal, then owned by General Electric.

Then, GE was led by Jack Welch, also known as Neutron Jack. Zaslav, a Welch protg, has cut lots of costs and hes not finished. He also likes parts of the business (Paramount Studios and its library among them) and Paramount is desperate to sell.

Most analysts, like LightSheds Rich Greenfield, are skeptical. This is bulls–t, he tells me, noting that Zas would still be paying billions for that melting ice cube. Greenfield points to weeks of leaks about potential suitors presumably from Paramounts desperate bankers with no concrete deal on the table.

Meanwhile, Zas has held only very preliminary talks, which also shows some hesitancy. Much of it is centered on buying the interest of Shari Redstone, who controls Paramount and its various assets (CBS, MTV, a studio) through National Amusements, the holding company created by her late father, media mogul Sumner Redstone.

Her stake is worth at most $2 billion, which is less than the deal price for the whole thing, though its unclear how that translates into shareholder value.

If he does pull the trigger, Zas will be solving Redstones and Paramounts long-term problems she obviously needs to unload the melting ice cube to preserve some semblance of her inheritance but not his own.  Im told he knows the media business is coming apart, for all the reasons I outlined.

Zas also knows buying Paramount and successfully integrating it inside Warner Bros. Discovery is only delaying the market reaction to his (and Big Medias) own inevitable moment of truth.

People who know Zas say his endgame is something grander: To ultimately team with Big Tech, which has the money and is becoming the ultimate distributor of programming.

But first he needs to buy some time maybe buying Paramount with a successful integration does that and then praying for a change in DC, from the deal-hating Biden lefties who would block Big Tech from getting bigger.

Donald Trump, if hes the next president, wasnt so deal-friendly either (recall his unsuccessful lawsuit to block the AT&TTime Warner tie-up). But the regulatory types appointed by Trump will be much more free market than any of the apparatchiks in the Biden administration. And any free-market type will tell you the media businesss only real long-term solution is Big Tech.

Warner Bros. Amazon here we come or so Zas hopes.

Continue Reading

Politics

Crypto’s yield gap with TradFi narrows as staking, RWAs surge

Published

on

By

Crypto’s yield gap with TradFi narrows as staking, RWAs surge

Cryptocurrency-based yield products still lag far behind their traditional finance (TradFi) counterparts, but new blockchain sectors such as liquid staking tokens (LSTs) and real-world assets (RWAs) are steadily closing the gap, according to a new report co-authored by RedStone Oracles, Gauntlet, Stablewatch and the Tokenized Asset Coalition, shared with Cointelegraph.

Only 8% to 11% of cryptocurrencies offer passive yield-generating models, indicating a significant gap compared to 55% to 65% of TradFi assets, roughly a fivefold disparity, the report found. However, stablecoins, RWAs and “blue-chip” yield tokens are rapidly closing decentralized finance’s (DeFi) passive income gap.

Emerging regulations, such as the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act, passed in July, are helping the industry catch up, resulting in a rising demand for both yield-bearing stablecoins and RWAs, the report says. The GENIUS Act established clear rules for stablecoin collateralization and mandates compliance with Anti-Money Laundering laws.

“As clarity emerges, yield-bearing stablecoins are exploding: market capitalization is up 300% YoY, with new protocols launching monthly to capture the opportunity.”

RWAs, which are tokenized versions of traditional assets such as bonds or funds, are also introducing new sources of passive income as major institutions recognize the efficiency of onchain settlement.

Related: Sonic Labs pivots from speed to survival with business-first strategy

Ether and Solana LSTs gain traction

Blue-chip yield tokens, such as Ether (ETH) LSTs and Solana (SOL) LSTs, are also gaining traction by creating more capital efficiency for cryptocurrency stakers.

Ether Liquid Staking Tokens. Source: Redstone

ETH LSTs rose from six million to 16 million in the two years leading up to November, gaining $34 billion in notional value based on today’s prices.

LSTs, such as Lido’s stETH (STETH), offer crypto stakers an equivalent of the staked token, which can be traded or deployed in other DeFi protocols, thereby creating more capital efficiency.

Related: Bitcoin ETFs roar back with $524M inflows in best day since market crash

Crypto yield-bearing assets poised for “exponential growth” in the next months

Crypto yield-bearing assets are poised for “exponential growth” in the coming months and are set to benefit from the gap between DeFi and TradFi, according to the report, which called it “crypto’s greatest opportunity.”

“As the ‘Crypto-as-infrastructure’ thesis gains traction and onchain finance proves its superior capital efficiency, yield-generating crypto assets are positioned for exponential growth,” as institutional capital will seek more “efficiency,” it said.

Yield-generating tokens, such as Solana LSTs, are also gaining traction among institutions, as they can earn a passive yield of approximately 4% on top of their holdings.

SOL Liquid Staking Tokens. Source: RedStone

Much like Ether, Solana LSTs doubled in supply, from 20 million in January 2024 to about 40 million at the time of writing, with a total of 67% of the Solana token supply now locked in staking smart contracts.

Magazine: Crypto wanted to overthrow banks, now it’s becoming them in stablecoin fight