Connect with us

Published

on

Rishi Sunak has kicked off 2024’s political season with a hint at when the next general election will be – saying it’s his “working assumption” it will happen in the second half of the year.

Speculation has been rife for months about when the prime minister will choose to go to the polls, with some pundits believing he would call one in May to coincide with the local elections.

UK general elections have to be held no more than five years apart, so the next one must take place by 28 January 2025 at the latest.

This is five years from the day the current parliament first met (17 December 2019), plus the time required to run an election campaign.

The phrase “working assumption” does give Mr Sunak wriggle room should circumstances change, and he has not ruled out a spring election.

Sky News spoke to pollsters about the factors the prime minister will be weighing up in making his decision – and when they think the election should be.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

When will the next general election be?

“I am absolutely clear it will and should be the autumn,” Conservative peer and pollster Lord Robert Hayward told us.

More on Rishi Sunak

He said the National Insurance tax cut announced by Chancellor Jeremy Hunt in November will “take time to filter through”, as will the “perception inflation is really on its way down”.

He added that the Conservatives are “still carrying the burden of the events of 2020 to 2022, and they need to put them as far away as possible”.

Lord Hayward predicts the Tory party conference in October will be the “launchpad for the election”, meaning voters will be casting their ballots “probably on 14 November or around that date”.

With a US election set for 5 November, that would mean the campaigns on each side of the Atlantic colliding – a scenario that has not happened in decades.

Officials in Whitehall are said to have warned Downing Street against this because of “security risks”.

However, Lord Hayward said while the US election may be of “slight concern” he doesn’t believe it will be a “deciding factor” in when we go to the polls.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sunak ‘squatting’ in No 10

PM ‘may copy Thatcher’s wait-and-see strategy’

Sky’s election analyst Professor Michael Thrasher has predicted a slightly earlier date of late September or early October – though he says Mr Sunak may “wait and see” how the first half of the year plays out.

He said: “The Conservatives trail Labour by 18 points in the latest polling, a swing sufficient to give Sir Keir Starmer a healthy majority at the coming election.

“A series of record-breaking by-election defeats this parliament confirm the Tory predicament. Clawing back the deficit, and recovering trust among electors is going to take time.”

Prof Thrasher said the outcome of the May local elections could affect the timing of when the prime minister sends voters to the polls.

“Sunak may copy Margaret Thatcher’s wait-and-see strategy,” Prof Thrasher said.

“The May local election results in both 1983 and 1987 were favourable, and she went for general elections a month later.

“But Labour’s lead over the Conservatives is so large that this option might not be available. This suggests a contest in autumn 2024, late September/early October, is favourite.”

The bleak assessments are a remarkable turnaround for a party that just four years ago won a thumping 80-seat majority under Boris Johnson.

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

But the scandals that led to his downfall, and the economic chaos unleashed by the Liz Truss mini-budget – all against the backdrop of rising NHS waiting lists and a cost of living crisis – is why some strategists believe a Tory defeat at the next general election is all but inevitable.

PM ‘may call election for 14 November’

Or, as polling expert Professor Sir John Curtice put it: “Frankly, they are heading for crucifixion.”

He said that, despite the noise from Conservatives about immigration, the economy “is the most important issue for voters”, followed by the NHS, and the government needs time to make progress in these areas.

Like Lord Hayward, he believes Mr Sunak may fire the starting gun for the election in his speech to close the Conservative Party conference in Birmingham on 2 October, which “could mean an election on 14 November”.

He said all parties are holding their conferences earlier than usual this autumn, with the Tory one happening last – perhaps giving an insight into the prime minister’s thinking.

He was never convinced by the May election rumours – saying it is unlikely Mr Sunak “would risk” cutting a two-year term to 18 months for an election he is expected to lose.

“At the moment, there is no good reason for them to do anything other than play it long.”

So where did the May rumours come from?

Spring election ‘could minimise Tory losses’

There have been signs recently the government is at least keeping the door open for the possibility of a spring election.

The National Insurance cut announced in the autumn statement is coming into effect in January, rather the start of the new tax year in April, while the spring budget is being held earlier than usual – prompting speculation of a May election off the back of tax giveaways to boost the Tories’ chances of victory.

Shadow frontbencher Emily Thornberry even told Sky News recently that a May election was “Westminster’s worst kept secret”.

That may no longer be the case, but some strategists believe it may be in the Tory party’s best interests to go early in order to stem losses.

Lord Daniel Finkelstein, a former adviser to Sir John Major, warned there are costs of holding onto power.

“When I look back on the 1997 election, I think one thing we could have done to mitigate the size of our defeat is to have gone slightly earlier,” he told Sky News.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

UK is ‘desperate for an election’

Lord Finkelstein said while he can “understand the temptation” for Mr Sunak to wait it out in the hope of turning things around, that “serendipitous occasion” may not occur and things could even get worse.

He pointed to potentially bruising local election results in May and the fact that Channel crossings are likely to rise over the summer, while the mortgage crisis may deepen as more people face the end of their current fixed rates.

This would be damaging going into an election where opposition parties will be making the case for change, and the Tories’ best bet is to argue “the country is on the right track, and we are turning things around”.

Read more:
Sir Keir Starmer says he will take on Rishi Sunak in general election TV debates
A delay in Rishi Sunak calling the election is the last thing Sir Keir Starmer needs

He said: “It’s very hard for any prime minister to call an election which they are quite likely to lose. While the temptation to go on will be strong, putting it off will make things more difficult if more problems arise.

“The timing of the election will not be the predeterminer of the outcome. It will be the fact that Boris Johnson and Liz Truss let down the country and it will be very difficult to turn that around.”

‘Spring election rumours keeping Labour on their toes’

Labour have accused Mr Sunak of “squatting in Downing Street” by refusing to call an election earlier.

They have been preparing for office for some time and have factored in the possibility of a spring election.

“Our job is to be ready whenever it comes, and we will be,” said one Labour source.

Click to subscribe to Politics at Jack and Sam’s wherever you get your podcasts

However, Sir John believes the leaks of a spring election were designed purely “to keep the Opposition on their toes… creating uncertainty around campaign plans and policy announcements”.

“If the Labour lead is halved to eight or nine points, then there may be an argument to say ‘let’s go early, we might lose, but we will keep some seats, there could even be the possibility of a hung parliament’. But the Tories are at rock bottom”, he said.

So does this mean Mr Sunak could even wait until January 2025 to go to the polls?

“There is a risk the economy will get even worse by November,” Sir John said. “I think October is as long as they will have before having to admit the game is up.”

Continue Reading

Politics

US court pauses 18-state lawsuit against SEC after agency’s leadership change

Published

on

By

US court pauses 18-state lawsuit against SEC after agency’s leadership change

US court pauses 18-state lawsuit against SEC after agency’s leadership change

A US federal judge has agreed to pause a lawsuit filed by 18 state attorneys general and the crypto lobby group DeFi Education Fund against the Securities and Exchange Commission after all parties said new SEC leadership could make the action moot.

Kentucky District Court Judge Gregory Van Tatenhove ordered a 60-day stay on the case on April 16, noting a mid-March filing from the SEC that “this case could potentially be resolved” due to a leadership transition at the regulator.

He added that the parties must file a joint status report within 30 days.

Paul Atkins, a Wall Street adviser who has held board positions with crypto advocacy groups, was sworn in as the new SEC chair earlier this month, replacing acting chair Mark Uyeda and taking over from Gary Gensler.

The 18 attorneys general, all hailing from Republican states, filed the lawsuit with the DeFi Education Fund against the securities regulator in November, alleging that the SEC exceeded its authority when targeting crypto exchanges with lawsuits, accusing the regulator and then-chair Gensler of “gross government overreach.” 

The plaintiffs included attorneys general from Nebraska, Tennessee, Wyoming, Kentucky, West Virginia, Iowa, Texas, Mississippi, Ohio, Montana, Indiana, Oklahoma and Florida, among others.

“Without Congressional authorization, the SEC has sought to unilaterally wrest regulatory authority away from the States through an ongoing series of enforcement actions,” the lawsuit stated. 

US court pauses 18-state lawsuit against SEC after agency’s leadership change
Screenshot from filing ordering pause of proceedings. Source: CourtListener

DeFi groups drop case against IRS over killed broker rule

Meanwhile, the DeFi Education Fund, Blockchain Association, and Texas Blockchain Council dropped their lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service on April 16. 

“The parties hereby stipulate to voluntary dismissal of this action without prejudice because the case has become moot,” stated the filing

The lawsuit, filed in December, argued that the so-called IRS DeFi broker rule went beyond the agency’s authority and was unconstitutional.

Related: NY attorney general urges Congress to keep pensions crypto-free — ‘No intrinsic value’

On April 11, President Donald Trump signed a bill to revoke the rule that would have required DeFi protocols to report transactions to the IRS.

It comes as the SEC has paused or dropped several high-profile lawsuits against crypto companies this year under its new leadership.

Magazine: Illegal arcade disguised as … a fake Bitcoin mine? Soldier scams in China: Asia Express

Continue Reading

Politics

Panama’s capital to accept crypto for taxes, municipal fees

Published

on

By

<div>Panama's capital to accept crypto for taxes, municipal fees</div>

<div>Panama's capital to accept crypto for taxes, municipal fees</div>

Panama’s capital city will accept cryptocurrency payments for taxes and municipal fees, including bus tickets and permits, Panama City mayor Mayer Mizrachi announced on April 15, joining a growing list of jurisdictions globally that have voted to accept such payments.

Panama City will begin accepting Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH), Circle’s USDC (USDC), and Tether’s USDt (USDT) stablecoin for payment once the crypto-to-fiat payment rails are established, Mizrachi posted on the X platform.

Mizrachi said previous administrations attempted to push through similar legislation but failed to overcome stipulations requiring the local government to accept funds denominated in US dollars.

In a translated statement, the Panama City mayor said that the local government partnered with a bank that will immediately convert any digital assets received into US dollars, allowing the municipality to accept crypto without introducing new legislation.

Panama City joins a growing list of global jurisdictions on the municipal and state level accepting cryptocurrency payments for taxes, exploring Bitcoin strategic reserves to protect public treasuries from inflation and passing pro-crypto policies to attract investment.

Taxes, Panama, Bitcoin Adoption
Source: Mayer Mizrachi

Related: New York bill proposes legalizing Bitcoin, crypto for state payments

Municipalities and states embrace digital assets

Several municipalities and territories around the globe already accept crypto for tax payments or are exploring various implementations of blockchain technology for government spending.

The US state of Colorado started accepting crypto payments for taxes in September 2022. Much like Panama City said it will do, Colorado immediately converts the crypto to fiat.

In December 2023, the city of Lugano, Switzerland, announced taxes and city fees could be paid in Bitcoin, which was one of the developments that earned it the reputation of being a globally recognized Bitcoin city.

The city council of Vancouver, Canada, passed a motion to become “Bitcoin-friendly city” in December 2024. As part of that motion, the Vancouver local government will explore integrating BTC into the financial system, including tax payments.

North Carolina lawmaker Neal Jackson introduced legislation titled “The North Carolina Digital Asset Freedom Act” on April 10. If passed, the bill will recognize cryptocurrencies as an official form of payment that can be used to pay taxes.

Magazine: Crypto City: The ultimate guide to Miami

Continue Reading

Politics

Fed’s Powell reasserts support for stablecoin legislation

Published

on

By

<div>Fed's Powell reasserts support for stablecoin legislation</div>

<div>Fed's Powell reasserts support for stablecoin legislation</div>

As digital assets gain mainstream adoption, establishing a legal framework for stablecoins is a “good idea,” said US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.

In an April 16 panel at the Economic Club of Chicago, Powell commented on the evolution of the cryptocurrency industry, which has delivered a consumer use case that “could have wide appeal” following a difficult “wave of failures and frauds,” he said.

Fed's Powell reasserts support for stablecoin legislation

Powell delivers remarks at the Economic Club of Chicago. Source: Bloomberg Television

During crypto’s difficult years, which culminated in 2022 and 2023 with several high-profile business failures, the Fed “worked with Congress to try to get a […] legal framework for stablecoins, which would have been a nice place to start,” said Powell. “We were not successful.”

“I think that the climate is changing and you’re moving into more mainstreaming of that whole sector, so Congress is again looking […] at a legal framework for stablecoins,” he said. 

“Depending on what’s in it, that’s a good idea. We need that. There isn’t one now,” said Powell.

This isn’t the first time Powell acknowledged the need for stablecoin legislation. In June 2023, the Fed boss told the House Financial Services Committee that stablecoins were “a form of money” that requires “robust” federal oversight.

Related: Stablecoins are the best way to ensure US dollar dominance — Web3 CEO

Support for stablecoin legislation is growing

The election of US President Donald Trump has ushered in a new era of pro-crypto appointments and policy shifts that could make America a digital asset superpower

Washington’s formal embrace of cryptocurrency began earlier this year when Trump established the President’s Council of Advisers on Digital Assets, with Bo Hines as the executive director. 

Hines told a digital asset summit in New York last month that a comprehensive stablecoin bill was a top priority for the current administration. After the Senate Banking Committee passed the GENIUS Act, a final stablecoin bill could arrive at the president’s desk “in the next two months,” said Hines.

Fed's Powell reasserts support for stablecoin legislation

Bo Hines (right) speaks of “imminent” stablecoin legislation at the Digital Asset Summit on March 18. Source: Cointelegraph

Stablecoins pegged to the US dollar are by far the most popular tokens used for remittances and cryptocurrency trading.

The combined value of all stablecoins is currently $227 billion, according to RWA.xyz. The dollar-pegged USDC (USDC) and USDt (USDT) account for more than 88% of the total market. 

Magazine: Unstablecoins: Depegging, bank runs and other risks loom

Continue Reading

Trending