Connect with us

Published

on

Defence Secretary Grant Shapps has accused the Houthis of “thuggery” in the Red Sea, as he suggested the UK was open to carrying out further airstrikes in Yemen.

The British military joined forces with the US on Thursday night as it launched attacks in retaliation for the targeting of international trade in the key shipping lane.

Politics live: Ministers would consider further action against Houthis, says Shapps

Asked by Sky News’ Kay Burley if the government planned an escalation of the action, Mr Shapps said no, but insisted the UK would “monitor the situation very carefully”.

Our intention is not to go into Yemen or anything like that, but simply to send a very clear, unambiguous message to the Iranian-backed Houthis that their behaviour in the Red Sea is completely unacceptable,” he added.

“We cannot have that situation where they are trying to harass [Red Sea vessels] and we’ll keep a very close eye.

“If we have to take further action then that’s something that we would consider.”

More on Grant Shapps

An RAF Typhoon aircraft takes off to join the U.S.-led coalition from RAF Akrotiri to conduct air strikes against military targets in Yemen
Image:
An RAF Typhoon aircraft takes off to join the US-led air strikes in Yemen

The US carried out a further strike in Yemen on Friday, but reports suggest only 25% of the Houthi capability to carry out attacks on cargo ships has been damaged.

“We never thought that this would remove all of their facilities,” said the defence secretary. “That wasn’t the goal. The goal was to send a very clear message.”

Describing the Houthis’ behaviour as “almost like thuggery,” Mr Shapps said: “We are waiting to see now what happens.

“That international waterway in the Red Sea should be open to international shipping. That is the international law.

“We got increasingly concerned that international shipping was having to reroute and adding hugely to the cost of shipping.”

He added: “We took the action that you saw last week and we’ve made it clear that we will wait and see what happens next.

“But we can’t have a situation where freedom of navigation, the ability for ships to move around the world in international waters, effectively impugned by Iranian-backed Houthis harassing that shipping.”

Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge

Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge

Sky News Monday to Thursday at 7pm.
Watch live on Sky channel 501, Freeview 233, Virgin 602, the Sky News website and app or YouTube.

Tap here for more

A spokesman for the Yemeni armed forces in the Houthi-controlled north of the country said in a televised statement that the bombardment “will not go unanswered and unpunished”.

And it linked the strikes with the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas, saying it would not deter their support for the Palestinians.

On Sunday, Foreign Secretary Lord Cameron denied any link between the Yemen strikes and the war in Gaza, saying the action was “completely separate”.

But experts warned those in Arab nations would be unlikely to see it in the same way.

Read more:
Reaction to Shapps interview – politics live
UK deploying 20,000 troops in NATO drill
How UK’s tactics in Red Sea echo WWII

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is expected to make a statement on the military action in the Commons later on Monday.

He briefed Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer ahead of the strikes on Thursday – who has given the government his support – as well as the Speaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle.

However, some MPs are angry ministers did not bring the issue to parliament before joining the US-led operation last week, with the Liberal Democrats demanding a retrospective vote on the issue.

Asked by Burley if Labour would support further action without parliamentary approval, shadow minister Sir Chris Bryant said: “Let’s hear what the prime minister has got to say this afternoon.

“Because I think we would – everybody will – want to know what is the limit of this action, what are we trying to achieve by it, have we achieved what we wanted to achieve already, and what happens if there are further incidents in [the Red Sea].

“So I think this is kind of ‘watch this space’. Everybody is very, very careful. I think that nobody wants to escalate the situation to a position where it could get out of control.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Farmers warn mansion tax could be double whammy

Published

on

By

Farmers warn mansion tax could be double whammy

Farmers have warned the government it would be unfair to include farms in the mansion tax as they are working businesses, “not luxury homes”.

Rachel Reeves revealed homes worth £2m or more will be subject to an annual charge on top of council tax from 2028.

Politics latest: Starmer challenged over ‘misleading the public’ with budget tax rises

Her spokesman refused to rule out farms having to pay the mansion tax, which could prove a double hit for farmers after last year’s budget removed inheritance tax relief for farms worth more than £1m.

The Conservatives accused Labour of “waging a war on farmers”, while the Lib Dems said the government has “no understanding of farmers or farms”.

Farmers have been protesting since Ms Reeves’s inheritance tax announcement last year.

She gave them a small concession on Wednesday as she announced farmers and small business owners will be able to transfer up to £1m of any unused inheritance tax allowance to their spouse or civil partner if they die – bringing them in line with homeowners.

More from Politics

Farmers have said this is welcome but does not address the issue completely, as they said many farms will still have to sell land off, or sell up entirely, due to inheritance tax costs.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Farmers defy ban in budget-day protest

Ms Reeves’s spokesman said there will be “a consultation that will look at different cases” for the mansion tax.

Asked if he could rule out farms having to pay the tax, he said: “There’s a consultation on cases to be accounted for.”

He said the Valuation Office Agency (VOA), which provides property taxation advice to the government, will be carrying out the consultation.

The VOA is also responsible for valuing properties for council tax and business rates.

Read more:
How much is the mansion tax and who will have to pay it?
The main budget announcements

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘This is not the budget you wanted to deliver’

Farmer Gavin Lane, president of the Country Land and Business Association, which represents rural property, land and business owners, told Sky News: “A farm is not a luxury home. It is a working business.

“If a tax built for high-value homes were ever stretched to cover barns, grain stores, or the land a farmer needs to run their business, it would hit people the policy was never written for.

“There are already clear rules for valuing residential property. This is about council tax on homes, and this system has always been built around residential use, not the land and buildings a farmer relies on to run a business.”

Shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride. Pic: PA
Image:
Shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride. Pic: PA

Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride told Sky News: “Labour are waging a war on farmers.

“Having been whacked by the family farm tax last year, farmers now face a double hit with Rachel Reeves’s family home tax.

“Reeves’s farm tax has already placed heavy pressure on many family farms.

“At a time when certainty is essential, this budget has left people feeling that nothing is safe – not their home, their job, their savings, their pension or their farm.

“This was the benefits budget. Rachel Reeves has chosen to put taxes up on hardworking people to pay for more and more welfare.”

Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey told Sky News: “The government has once again shown it has no understanding of farmers or their farms.

“For many farmers, their home is their place of work. Some farmers who could be hit by this tax earn less than the minimum wage for doing work that is absolutely crucial to our country.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Explained: Budget 2025

Under the mansion tax, officially called the “high-value council tax surcharge”, there will be four bands.

The lowest band, for properties worth between £2m and £2.5m, will pay £2,500.

The highest band, for homes worth £5m or more, will pay £7,500.

Ms Reeves and the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) did not reveal the two middle bands and charges.

But she said the surcharge would be uprated annually by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation.

Continue Reading

Politics

Uzbekistan greenlights stablecoins for payments under new sandbox regime

Published

on

By

Uzbekistan greenlights stablecoins for payments under new sandbox regime

Uzbekistan is moving to bring stablecoins into its formal payment system, starting with a tightly controlled development sandbox, according to local media.

According to a Friday report by local news outlet Kun, Uzbekistan’s new stablecoin regulatory framework will come into force on Jan. 1, 2026. The new law, signed on Nov. 27, establishes a regulatory sandbox under the purview of the National Agency for Perspective Projects, together with the central bank.

Pilot projects are expected to be implemented to develop a stablecoin-based payment system operating on distributed ledger technology. Starting next year, Uzbekistan-based entities will reportedly be allowed to issue tokenized shares and bonds, and a separate trading platform will be created on licensed stock exchanges for those new assets.

The news follows Uzbekistan’s central bank Chairman Timur Ishmetov announcing in September that studies on digital currencies are underway. At the time, he said crypto activities “should be done under strict control, as it will have a serious impact on monetary policy.”

Related: Crypto on horseback: Journey into Kyrgyzstan’s gold-pegged digital future

CBDCs also on the table

Ishmetov also mentioned central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), but not in their retail form. He explained that “such a currency would not be used in people’s daily lives, but mainly to speed up settlements between commercial or central banks.

Kashkadarya Regional branch of the Central Bank of Uzbekistan. Source: Wikimedia

Uzbekistan’s National Agency for Prospective Projects issued a directive in late March 2024 to increase monthly fees for crypto market participants in the country. Under the new system, crypto exchanges face a monthly fee equivalent to $20,015 — about double the previous fee.

Related: Kyrgyzstan introduces state crypto reserve concept in new bill

Central Asia not left being left behind

As much of the world develops crypto regulatory frameworks, Central Asia has also progressed. In late October, Kyrgyzstan rolled out a new stablecoin pegged 1:1 to the Kyrgyzstani som, while confirming plans to issue a central bank digital currency and explore a digital asset reserve.

Still, Kazakhstan clearly leads the pack. According to October reports, Kazakhstan’s Financial Monitoring Agency took down 130 crypto platforms involved in money laundering schemes this year. Earlier that month, the country also continued implementing its dual-track approach to digital assets, piloting a CBDC while also backing a state-linked stablecoin.

This followed the launch of the Kazakhstan central bank’s stablecoin pilot project in late September. Also in September, the country established a state-backed crypto reserve in partnership with Binance, holding BNB (BNB).

Magazine: Koreans ‘pump’ alts after Upbit hack, China BTC mining surge: Asia Express