Connect with us

Published

on

Rishi Sunak has said the strikes conducted against Houthi rebels in Yemen were intended as a “single, limited action” amid questions about the UK’s long-term strategy.

The British military joined forces with the US on Thursday night as it launched attacks against Houthi bases in Yemen, in retaliation for the group’s targeting of international trade in the Red Sea.

The prime minister updated MPs in the Commons for the first time since the strikes were carried out last week, following criticism that parliament was not consulted beforehand.

Mr Sunak told MPs all planned targets had been destroyed in the strikes and there had been no reports of civilian casualties.

The prime minister also explained why he had not informed parliament before the military action took place.

“I can tell the House today that our initial assessment is that all 13 planned targets were destroyed,” he said.

Politics latest: Sunak faces MPs after strikes on Houthis

More on Rishi Sunak

“We have seen no evidence thus far of civilian causalities, which we took great care to avoid.”

The prime minister said the strikes on Houthi linked sites in Yemen only came after the group, which is backed by Iran, launched almost 30 “unacceptable” attacks on commercial ships since 19 November, including an attack on British and American warships on 9 January.

“They fired on our ships and our sailors, it was the biggest attack on our navy for decades, and so we acted,” he said.

Some have raised concerns the strikes risk inflaming tensions in the Middle East.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Houthi sites before and after airstrikes

SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn asked Mr Sunak “what comes next”.

“How far is he willing to go in relation to military action? Because we cannot have an escalation which leads to further regional instability,” he said.

The prime minister said the action was contained, but that the government would “not hesitate to protect our security and our interests, where required”.

“I obviously won’t speculate on future action,” he said.

“What we conducted was intended as a single, limited action and of course we hope that the Houthis will now step back and end their reckless and destabilising attacks, but of course we will not hesitate to protect our security and our interests, where required, and we would of course follow the correct procedures as I believe we did so in this case.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Lights are flashing red on global dashboard’

A spokesman for the Yemeni armed forces in the Houthi-controlled north of Yemen said in a televised statement the bombardment would “not go unanswered and unpunished”.

They also linked strikes with the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas, saying it would not deter their support for the Palestinians.

But Mr Sunak said the UK’s decision to take part in the strikes was “completely unrelated” to the conflict between Israel and Hamas, as well as the civil war in Yemen.

In response to a question from Labour MP Apsana Begum, who cited a recent poll showing a majority of the British public “want a ceasefire in Israel-Gaza”, the prime minister said: “We shouldn’t fall for their [the Houthis’] malign narrative that this is about Israel and Gaza. They target ships from around the world.

“It is a direct response to the Houthis’ attacks on international shipping.”

Read more from Sky News:
Cameron warns of ‘danger and instability’ in the world
The firepower the UK and US have in the Gulf

During his statement to MPs, Mr Sunak came under pressure to commit to higher military investment – including by Sir Julian Lewis, the Conservative chair of parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee, and Richard Drax, the Tory MP for South Dorset, who said defence “needs a lot more money – more than 2.5%” of GDP.

The UK currently spends 2% of GDP on defence each year, but the prime minister has said he intends to increase this to 2.5% in the long-term.

Continue Reading

Politics

Supreme Court opened crypto wallets to surveillance; privacy must go onchain

Published

on

By

Supreme Court opened crypto wallets to surveillance; privacy must go onchain

Supreme Court opened crypto wallets to surveillance; privacy must go onchain

Crypto transactions are vulnerable to warrant-free surveillance, making privacy-enhancing tools essential for blockchain’s future.

Continue Reading

Politics

Indian court sentences 14 to life in Bitcoin extortion case

Published

on

By

Indian court sentences 14 to life in Bitcoin extortion case

Indian court sentences 14 to life in Bitcoin extortion case

A former BJP legislator and 11 police officials have been convicted for the 2018 abduction of a Surat businessman in a plot to seize over 750 Bitcoin.

Continue Reading

Politics

Lib Dems eye Labour-held cities as they target ‘seats not votes’

Published

on

By

Lib Dems eye Labour-held cities as they target 'seats not votes'

They demolished most of the “blue wall” at the general election, and now the Lib Dems are eyeing up Labour voters.

Strategists see an opportunity in younger people who, over the course of this parliament, may be priced out of cities and into commuter belt areas as they seek to get on the housing ladder or start a family.

Insiders say the plan is to focus more on the cost of living to shift the party’s appeal beyond the traditional southern heartlands.

“There’s a key opportunity to target people who were 30 at the last election who over the next five years might find themselves moving out of London, to areas like Surrey, Guildford,” a senior party source told Sky News.

“We also need to be better at making a case for a liberal voice in urban areas. We have not told enough of a story on the cost of living.

“We need a liberal voice back in the cities – areas like Liverpool, where there is strong support at a council level that we can use as a base to build on.”

Liverpool is a traditional Labour heartland but in January lost its first local authority by-election there in 27 years to the Lib Dems.

More on Liberal Democrats

Carl Cashman, the leader of the Lib Dems on the city council, says it’s a result that shows the potential to make gains in areas where the party came third and fourth at the general election.

Carl Cashman is the leader of the Liverpool Liberal Democrats
Image:
Carl Cashman is the leader of the Liverpool Liberal Democrats

“One of the cases I have been making to the national party is that Liverpool should be a number one target.

“We are almost at the end of the road when it comes to the Conservatives, so we need to start looking at areas like Liverpool,” he said, adding that Manchester, Sheffield and Newcastle could also be ripe for the taking.

However, the party faces a challenge of making a case for liberalism against the rising tide of populism.

Sir Ed Davey, the party leader, is trying to position himself as the only politician who is not afraid of holding Reform UK leader Nigel Farage to account.

He has recently unveiled a plan to cut energy bills by changing how renewable projects are paid for and says he will boycott Donald Trump’s state dinner. It is these green, internationalist policies that insiders hope can hoover up support of remaining Tory moderates unhappy with the direction of Kemi Badenoch’s party and progressive voters who think Labour is more of the same.

However, strategists admit it is difficult to cut through on these issues in a changing media landscape, “when you’re either viral or you’re not”.

‘Silly stunts’ here to stay

Farage has no such problem, which Davey has blamed on a national media weighted too heavily in favour of the Reform UK leader, given the size of his party (he has just four MPs compared to the Liberal Democrats’ 72).

But the two parties have very different media strategies. This week, on the same day Farage held a Trump-style press conference to announce his immigration deportation plans, with a Q&A for journalists after, the Liberal Democrat leader went to pick strawberries in Somerset to highlight the plight of farmers facing increased inheritance tax.

Sir Ed Davey takes part in strawberry picking with Tessa Munt, the MP for Wells & Mendip Hills. Pic: PA
Image:
Sir Ed Davey takes part in strawberry picking with Tessa Munt, the MP for Wells & Mendip Hills. Pic: PA

Some Lib Dems have questioned whether the “silly stunts” that proved successful during the general election are past their shelf life, but strategists say there will be no fundamental change to that, insisting Sir Ed is the “genuine nice guy” he comes across as and that offers something different.

The Lib Dems ultimately see their strength as lying not in the “airwaves war” but the “ground war” – building support on the doorstep at a local level and then turning that into seats.

“Our strategy is seats, not votes. Theirs is votes, not seats,” said the party source, suggesting Farage’s divisiveness might backfire under a first past the post system where people typically vote against the party they disklike the most.

“The next election won’t be about who is saying the meanest things.”

‘Don’t underestimate us’

There is broad support within the party behind that strategy. Cllr Cashman said a greater use of social media could help attract a younger demographic, along with putting forward “really fundamental, powerful liberal ideas” on issues such as housing.

But he said Davey is “never going to do the controversial things Farage does”.

“The way we reach people, the traditional campaigning, is what makes us strong. Just because we are not always on the airwaves, do not underestimate us.”

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage. Pic: PA
Image:
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage. Pic: PA

For Liberal Democrat peer and pollster Dr Mark Pack, there are reasons to be confident. On Friday, the party won a local council by-election in Camden, north London – “Sir Keir Starmer’s backyard” – with a swing from Labour to the Lib Dems of 19%.

It is these statistics that the party is far more focused on than national vote share – with Labour’s misfortunes opening an opportunity to strategically target areas where voters are more likely to switch.

“One of the lessons we have learned from the past is that riding high in opinion polls doesn’t translate into seats.

“We are really focused on winning seats with the system in front of us. There is a route to success by concentrating on and expanding on what we have been good at.”

Continue Reading

Trending