Connect with us

Published

on

Jan 17 2024 KFF Health News

Photos show blood splattered across a small bare-walled room in a North Carolina school where a second grader repeatedly punched himself in the face in the fall of 2019, according to the child's mom.

His mother, Michelle Staten, said her son, who has autism and other conditions, reacted as many children with disabilities would when he was confined to the seclusion room at Buckhorn Creek Elementary.

"I still feel a lot of guilt about it as a parent," said Staten, who sent the photos to the federal government in a 2022 complaint letter. "My child was traumatized."

Documents show that restraint and seclusion were part of the special education plan the Wake County Public School System designed for Staten's son. Starting when he was in kindergarten in 2017, Staten said, her son was repeatedly restrained or forced to stay alone in a seclusion room.

Federal law requires school districts like Wake County to tell the U.S. Department of Education every time they physically restrain or seclude a student.

But the district, one of the largest in the nation, with nearly 160,000 children and more than 190 schools, reported for nearly a decade, starting in 2011, that it had zero incidents of restraint or seclusion, according to federal data.

Staten said she was alarmed to learn about the district's reporting practices, and in March 2022 she sent a complaint letter to the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights. When the district set up her son's special education plan, she wrote, "they said things like 'it’s for his safety and the safety of others.'"

Further, she wrote, in his district files, "nowhere in the record was there documentation of the restraints and seclusion."

The practice is "used and is used at often very high rates in ways that are quite damaging to students," said Catherine Lhamon, assistant secretary for the Office for Civil Rights.

The Department of Education says it is meeting with schools that underreport cases of restraint and seclusion, tactics used disproportionately on students with disabilities and children of color like Staten's son.

Lhamon called the practices "a life-or-death topic" and noted the importance of collecting accurate federal data. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona announced new guidance to schools in 2022, saying that, "too often, students with disabilities face harsh and exclusionary disciplinary action." ‘Children with bruises'

For more than a decade, school nurses, pediatricians, lawmakers, and others have warned that restraint and seclusion can cause long-lasting trauma and escalate negative behaviors. In the worst cases, children have reportedly died or suffered serious injury.

“In an ideal world, it should be banned," said Stacey Gahagan, an attorney and civil rights expert who has successfully represented families in seclusion and restraint cases. The tactics are "being used in ways that are inappropriate. I’m seeing parents with pictures of children with bruises and children afraid to go to school.”

No federal law prohibits restraint and seclusion, leaving a patchwork of practices across states and school districts with little oversight and accountability, according to parents and advocates for people with disabilities.

Tens of thousands of restraint and seclusion cases are reported to the federal government in any given year. But those are likely undercounts, say parents and advocates for students, because the system relies on school staff and administrators to self-report. It's a failing even the Department of Education acknowledges.

"Sometimes school communities are making a deliberate choice not to record," Lhamon said.

The Wake County Public School System declined to answer questions about Staten's case for this article, citing student privacy law.

A 2022 report to Congress found North Carolina schools handed lengthy suspensions or expulsions to students with disabilities at the highest rate in the nation.

The district in 2022 submitted revised restraint and seclusion data to the federal government dating to the 2015-16 school year, said Matt Dees, a spokesperson for the Wake County Public School System, where Staten's son attended school. In a written statement, he said federal reporting rules had been confusing. "There are different guidelines for state and federal reporting, which has contributed to issues with the reporting data," Dees said.

But parents and advocates for children with disabilities don't buy that reasoning. “That explanation would be plausible if they reported any" cases, Gahagan said. "But they reported zero for years in the largest school district in our state.”

Hannah Russell, who is part of a network of parents and advocates in North Carolina that helps families navigate the system, said even when parents present pictures of their injured children, the school systems will say "it didn't happen."

In North Carolina, 91% of districts reported zero incidents of restraint and seclusion during the 2015-16 academic year, the second-highest percentage in the nation after Hawaii, a federal report found.

"This was a problem before covid," said Russell, a former special education teacher who said one of her own children with special needs was restrained and secluded in school. "It is an astronomical problem now."

North Carolina's Department of Public Instruction, which oversees public schools statewide, did not make officials available for interviews and did not answer written questions.

In an email, spokesperson Jeanie McDowell said only that schools receive training on restraint and seclusion reporting requirements.

Educators are generally allowed to use restraint and seclusion to protect students and others from imminent threats to safety. But critics point to cases in which children have died or suffered post-traumatic stress disorder and other injuries for minor transgressions such as failing to stay seated or being "uncooperative." Zero incidents reported

In 2019, the Government Accountability Office, which conducts research for Congress, said some school systems almost never tell the federal government about the use of restraint and seclusion. About 70% of U.S. school districts report zero incidents.

The Department of Education's "quality control processes for data it collects from public school districts on incidents of restraint and seclusion are largely ineffective or do not exist," a 2020 GAO report said.

Lhamon said her office is conducting investigations across the country and asking districts to correct inaccurate data. The Department of Education wants school districts to voluntarily comply with federal civil rights law protecting students with disabilities. If they don't, officials can terminate federal financial assistance to districts or refer cases to the Department of Justice. Related StoriesStudy links cord blood lipid levels to early ADHD and autism symptomsStudy explores intratumoral microbiota as a novel frontier in cancer researchPandemic impact: Significant rise in sleep disturbances among children and adolescents worldwide

The Wake County Public School System settled a lawsuit last year after the district did not report any use of restraint or seclusion in the 2017-18 school year, even though a student was secluded or restrained and witnessed the practices used with other children, according to Gahagan, who represented the student's family.

As part of the settlement, the district agreed to notify parents by the end of each school day if their child had been restrained or secluded that day.

Gahagan said transparency would increase in Wake County but that problems persist across the country. Schools sometimes keep seclusion incidents hidden from parents by calling them "timeouts" or other euphemisms, Gahagan said.

"For most parents a 'timeout' doesn't mean being put in a closet," Gahagan said. "What is the recourse for a parent? There are not a lot of checks and balances. There is not enough accountability."

Still, Gahagan, a former teacher, expressed sympathy for educators. Schools lack money for counselors and training that would help teachers, principals, and other staff learn de-escalation techniques, which could reduce reliance on physical interventions, she said.

Jessica Ryan said that in New York City, her son, who has autism, received counseling, occupational therapy, and a classroom with a standard education teacher and a special education teacher.

But when Ryan's family moved last year to Wake County, home to more than 1 million people and part of the famed Research Triangle region, she was told he didn't qualify for any of those services in the district, she said. Soon, her son started getting in trouble at school. He skipped classes or was written up for disruptive behavior.

Then in March, she said, her husband got a phone call from their son, who whispered, "Come get me. I'm not safe here."

After the 9-year-old allegedly kicked a foam soccer ball and hit a school employee, he was physically restrained by two male school staffers, according to Ryan. The incident left the boy with a bloody nose and bruises on his leg, spine, and thigh, the medical records say.

The Wake County school district did not respond to questions about the events described in the documents.

After the incident, Ryan said, her son refused to go to school. He missed the remainder of fourth grade.

"It is disgusting," said Ryan, 39, who said she was a special education teacher in Wake County schools until she resigned in June. "Our kids are being abused."

The district did not record the incident in PowerSchool, a software system that alerts parents to grades, test scores, attendance, and discipline, Ryan said.

In August, Ryan's son began classes at another Wake County school. By late October, school and medical records say, he was restrained or secluded twice in less than two months.

Guy Stephens, founder and executive director of the Alliance Against Seclusion and Restraint, a nonprofit advocacy group based in Maryland, said he founded the group more than four years ago after he learned his own son was afraid to go to school because he had been repeatedly restrained and secluded.

Stephens said some children subjected to the practice may start to act out violently at home, harm themselves, or fall into severe depression — impacts so adverse, he said, that they are a common part of the "school-to-prison pipeline."

"When you go hands-on, you are putting more people in danger," Stephens said. "These lives are being set on a path to ruin."

In May, federal lawmakers proposed the Keeping All Students Safe Act, a bill that would make it illegal for schools receiving federal taxpayer money to seclude children or use restraint techniques that restrict breathing. Sen. Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, and other supporters have said a federal law is needed, in part, because some districts have intentionally misreported numbers of restraints and seclusions.

Advocates acknowledge Congress is unlikely to pass the bill anytime soon.

School administrators, including AASA, a national association of school superintendents, have historically opposed similar legislation, saying that restraint and seclusion are sometimes needed to protect students and staff in dangerous situations.

AASA spokesperson James Minichello declined comment for this article.

Staten said she begged officials at Buckhorn Creek Elementary and the district to remove restraint and seclusion from her child's special education plan, documents show. Officials denied the request.

"I feel like they were gaslighting me into accepting restraint and seclusion," Staten said. "It was manipulative."

Staten and her husband now home-school their son. She said he no longer has emotional outbursts like he did when he was in public school, because he feels safe.

"It's like a whole new kid," Staten said. "It sometimes feels like that was all a bad dream."

This article was reprinted from khn.org, a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF – the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism. Source:

KFF Health News

Continue Reading

Politics

NATO will force the UK to increase defence spending to 3.5% of GDP to keep US on side, Sky News understands

Published

on

By

UK will be forced to increase defence spending to 3.5% to keep US on side, Sky News understands

The UK will be forced to agree this month to increase defence spending to 3.5% of national income within a decade as part of a NATO push to rearm and keep the US on side, Sky News understands.

The certainty of a major policy shift means there is bemusement in the Ministry of Defence (MoD) about why Sir Keir Starmer‘s government has tied itself in knots over whether to describe an earlier plan to hit 3% of GDP by the 2030s as an ambition or a commitment, when it is about to change.

The problem is seen as political, with the prime minister needing to balance warfare against welfare – more money for bombs and bullets or for winter fuel payments and childcare.

Follow live updates: Does the UK need an ‘Iron Dome’ system?

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer stands next to a New Zealand soldier during a visit to a military base during a visit to a military base training Ukrainian troops in the West of England. Picture date: Tuesday April 22, 2025. PA Photo. See PA story POLITICS Ukraine. Photo credit should read: Finnbarr Webster/PA Wire
Image:
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer during a visit to a military base training Ukrainian troops in April. File pic: PA

Sir Keir is due to hold a discussion to decide on the defence spending target as early as today, it is understood.

As well as a rise in pure defence spending to 3.5% by 2035, he will also likely be forced to commit a further 1.5% of GDP to defence-related areas such as spy agencies and infrastructure. Militaries need roads, railway networks, and airports to deploy at speed.

This would bolster total broader defence spending to 5% – a target Mark Rutte, the head of NATO, wants all allies to sign up to at a major summit in the Netherlands later this month.

It is being referred to as the “Hague investment plan”.

Asked what would happen at the summit, a defence source said: “3.5% without a doubt.”

Yet the prime minister reiterated the 3% ambition when he published a major defence review on Monday that placed “NATO first” at the heart of UK defence policy.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What’s in the UK Strategic Defence Review?

The defence source said: “How can you have a defence review that says NATO first” and then be among the last of the alliance’s 32 member states – along with countries like Spain – to back this new goal?

Unlike Madrid, London presents itself as the leading European nation in the alliance.

A British commander is always the deputy supreme allied commander in Europe – the second most senior operational military officer – under an American commander, while the UK’s nuclear weapons are committed to defending the whole of NATO.

Even Germany, which has a track record of weak defence spending despite boasting the largest economy, has recently signalled it plans to move investment towards the 5% level, while Canada, also previously feeble, is making similar noises.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Is the UK battle ready?

The source signalled it was inconceivable the UK would not follow suit and said officials across Whitehall understand the spending target will rise to 3.5%.

The source said it would be met by 2035, so three years later than the timeline Mr Rutte has proposed.

Defence spending is currently at 2.3%.

A second defence source said the UK has to commit to this spending target, “or else we can no longer call ourselves a leader within NATO”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PM challenged on NATO, defence and Gaza

Read more:
UK to build weapons factories
Russian-linked hackers targeted MoD

Sky News’s political editor Beth Rigby challenged the prime minister on the discrepancy between his spending ambitions and those of his allies at a press conference on Monday.

Sir Keir seemed to hint change might be coming.

“Of course, there are discussions about what the contribution should be going into the NATO conference in two or three weeks’ time,” he said.

“But that conference is much more about what sort of NATO will be capable of being as effective in the future as it’s been in the last 80 years. It is a vital conversation that we do need to have, and we are right at the heart of that.”

New Sky News podcast launches on 10 June – The Wargame simulates an attack by Russia to test UK defences

Mr Rutte, a former Dutch prime minister, said last week he assumes alliance members will agree to a broad defence spending target of 5% of gross domestic product during the summit in The Hague on 24 and 25 June.

NATO can only act if all member states agree.

“Let’s say that this 5%, but I will not say what is the individual breakup, but it will be considerably north of 3% when it comes to the hard spend [on defence], and it will be also a target on defence-related spending,” the secretary general said.

The call for more funding comes at a time when allies are warning of growing threats from Russia, Iran, and North Korea as well as challenges posed by China.

But it also comes as European member states need to make NATO membership seem like a good deal for Donald Trump.

The leaders of all allies will meet in The Hague for the two-day summit.

👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈

The US president has repeatedly criticised other member states for failing to meet a current target of spending 2% of national income on defence and has warned the United States would not come to the aid of any nation that is falling short.

Since returning to the White House, he has called for European countries to allocate 5% of their GDP to defence. This is more than the 3.4% of GDP currently spent by the US.

Mr Rutte is being credited with squaring away a new deal with Mr Trump in a meeting that would see allies increase their defence spending in line with the US president’s wishes.

The NATO chief is due to visit London on Monday, it is understood.

Continue Reading

Environment

Nissan reveals new photos of the next-gen LEAF EV and confirms its global debut

Published

on

By

Nissan reveals new photos of the next-gen LEAF EV and confirms its global debut

The iconic electric hatch is all grown up and will arrive later this month. Nissan’s iconic EV is now a stylish crossover with more range, faster charging, and several other upgrades. Ahead of its global debut, Nissan is offering us a closer look at the third-gen LEAF EV with a few new photos and details.

Nissan LEAF EV photos and global debut date

Nissan is upgrading its best-selling EV in nearly every way possible. We got a sneak peek of the new model in March, but it was essentially a preview.

On Tuesday, Nissan shared several new photos and a few insights we can expect to see from the updated LEAF EV when it arrives later this month.

The LEAF is dropping the hatchback style we’ve grown to love (or hate) for a “sleek and spacious family-friendly crossover” design. Nissan’s design and engineering teams worked together to give it a bold new look, but it’s also surprisingly efficient.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

With a drag coefficient of just 0.26, the new model (US and Japan-spec) is about as aerodynamic as an average sports car. In Europe, it’s even more impressive at just 0.25 Cd, down from 0.28 Cd in the outgoing LEAF.

Nissan-LEAF-EV-photos
Richard Candler, Vice President, Nissan global product strategy, next to the third-generation LEAF EV (Source: Nissan)

All new models (US, Japan, and Europe) feature added flush door handles, an active grille shutter, improved wheel design, a new fastback silhouette, and a flat underbody for better efficiency.

“Every design choice was optimized for aero and energy efficiency, even the panoramic glass roof contributes to exceptional aerodynamics,” according to Nissan’s program design director, Nobutaka Tase.

The third-gen LEAF is based on Nissan’s CMF-EV platform, the same one that underpins the Ariya electric SUV. Although Nissan has yet to confirm the battery specs, it promises that the new model will have “significant range improvements” compared to the outgoing LEAF.

We may have an idea after Nissan’s vehicle programs chief, François Bailly, told TopGear.com that the new LEAF will arrive with a 373-mile (600 km) WLTP driving range.

Nissan-new-LEAF-EV-photos
Nissan’s new LEAF EV (Source: Nissan)

On the EPA scale, it could be closer to a 300-mile range, but that would still be a significant improvement from the 212 EPA-estimated miles offered on the 2025 LEAF SV Plus.

In North America, the new Nissan LEAF will also feature a built-in NACS port, unlocking access to Tesla’s Supercharger network.

You can learn more about the updated model in the video above. The short series features the planning, design, and engineers who helped bring the third-gen EV to life.

We will find out more later this month when Nissan officially launches the updated LEAF. Check back soon for more info. We’ll keep you updated with the latest.

Do you like the updated LEAF design? The crossover style gives it a fresh new look. Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

NIO shares plans to enter seven additional European markets

Published

on

By

NIO shares plans to enter seven additional European markets

Chinese EV automaker NIO took to social media to announce expansion plans to seven new European markets. This multi-brand strategy will bring even more BEVs from NIO and Firefly to EU customers.

NIO ($NIO) is looking to add clout to its status as a rising global brand. It was only four years ago that the Chinese EV automaker announced its first expansion plans into European markets, beginning in Norway. The company has since set up sales in Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden.

Those EU models include the NIO ES6, ES7, ES8, ET5, ET5T, and ET7. However, due to a trademark dispute with Audi, the “ES” models have been renamed “EL” in the EU (EL6, EL7, etc).

Additionally, NIO has recently begun selling the two flagship EVs from its sub-brands, the Onvo L60 and Firefly, to European customers.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Earlier today, NIO took to X and Weibo to announce additional expansion plans for Europe, including sales of the Firefly.

NIO European
The Firefly on display at the Shanghai Auto Show / Source: Scooter Doll

NIO and Firefly to expand to these seven European markets

Per the post on X, NIO intends to begin selling its BEVs in the following European markets through 2025 and 2026:

  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • The Czech Republic
  • Hungary
  • Luxembourg
  • Poland
  • Romania

NIO divulged even more details on Weibo, including what models will be sold in those additional EU markets. Those BEVs include the EL6, EL8, ET5, ET5 Touring (ET5T), and the Firefly EV (seen above). Per the post:

In the Belgian and Luxembourg markets, NIO will cooperate with Hedin Mobility Group, a leading European travel service group. In Central and Eastern Europe, NIO will join hands with AutoWallis, a leading regional travel service group, to first cover the Austrian and Hungarian markets in 2025, and plans to start deliveries in the Czech Republic, Poland and Romania in 2026, bringing innovative, sustainable and high-quality smart electric travel experiences to local users.

There you have it. Five BEV models across two NIO brands, reaching new European customers as early as this year. We’re sure this won’t be the last we hear about Firefly in Europe, as the NIO sub-brand was supposed to initially launch overseas ahead of China. NIO co-founder and president, Qin Lihong, recently told CnEVPost that Firefly would enter approximately 20 overseas markets by the end of 2025, with the right-hand drive version expected to hit the market in October at the latest.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending