The King will go to hospital next week where he will be treated for an enlarged prostate.
The 75-year-old monarch’s condition is benign but his public engagements will be postponed while he recuperates after the corrective procedure in a few days, Buckingham Palace has announced.
He was keen to share the details of his diagnosis to encourage other men who may be experiencing symptoms to get checked in line with public health advice, it is understood.
The King had a series of meetings and events planned at Dumfries House in East Ayrshire on Thursday and Friday, which are now being postponed on the advice of his doctor.
In a statement, the palace said: “In common with thousands of men each year, the King has sought treatment for an enlarged prostate.
“His Majesty’s condition is benign and he will attend hospital next week for a corrective procedure.
“The King’s public engagements will be postponed for a short period of recuperation.”
Image: The Princess of Wales has undergone abdominal surgery
The NHS describes a benign enlarged prostate as a condition that can affect how people urinate, and is common among men aged over 50.
Advertisement
“It’s not a cancer and it’s not usually a serious threat to health,” the NHS said on its website.
“Many men worry that having an enlarged prostate means they have an increased risk of developing prostate cancer. This is not the case.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
5:15
The Royal Family’s very eventful 2023
But benign prostate enlargement can sometimes lead to complications, such as a urinary tract infection, chronic urinary retention, and acute urinary retention.
The NHS also said the cause of prostate enlargement is unknown, but it is believed to be linked to hormonal changes as a man gets older.
On its website, the NHS says the treatment will depend on how badly the symptoms are affecting a person’s qualify of life. The main treatments are: lifestyle changes, medicine, catheters, surgery and other procedures.
Most men with urinary symptoms do not need to have surgery, but it may be an option if other treatments have not worked or give the person severe side effects, or their symptoms are severe.
So what are some of the options when it comes to surgery and other procedures?
Transurethral resection of the prostate: This involves removing part of the prostate gland using a device called a resectoscope that’s passed through the urethra (the tube through which urine passes out of the body). It’s suitable for men who have an enlarged prostate.
Holmium laser: This treatment uses a laser to remove the portion of the prostate that is blocking the flow of urine.
Water ablation: There are two types of procedure for this. In the first, water is injected into the prostate using a probe in the urethra. The pressure of the water is then used to destroy some of the prostate tissue, making it smaller.
The second type is very similar except steam, rather than water, is used to destroy prostate tissue.
Greenlight XPS: This is a type of laser that can be used to destroy prostate tissue. The laser is fired through a small tube which is passed up the urethra.
PLASMA system: During this surgery, electrodes are put into the prostate through the urethra and are used to cut out prostate tissue. This surgery is usually offered when symptoms are severe or if other treatments and medicine have not worked.
Source: NHS website
The balance of hormones in a person’s body changes as they get older and this may cause their prostate gland to grow.
The monarch acceded to the throne just 16 months ago after spending 70 years as the heir to the throne, and was crowned last May in Westminster Abbey.
Donald Trump said being the first US president to enjoy a second British state visit was “one of the highest honours of my life”, as he wined and dined with royalty at Windsor Castle.
Wednesday evening’s state banquet came after a day full of pomp and pageantry for Mr Trump, who was treated to a carriage procession, military parade, and plenty more lavish treatment.
Suited and booted for the banquet to bring the day to a close, sat between the King and Princess of Wales, the president thanked the monarch and Queen for their “extraordinary graciousness”.
Mr Trump said it was a “singular privilege” to be the first American president to be granted a second state banquet, adding: “This is truly one of the highest honours of my life, such respect for you and such respect for your country.”
He suggested it might be the last time it happens, adding “I hope it is actually” to laughter.
Image: Pic: PA
Mr Trump’s speech at the banquet followed one from the King, who referenced trade, Ukraine, and environmentalism.
The monarch said the UK and US “fought together to defeat the forces of tyranny” during the First and Second World War, and added: “Today, as tyranny once again threatens Europe, we and our allies stand together in support of Ukraineto deter aggression and secure peace.”
He mentioned trade between the two countries early in the speech, saying: “Today, our alliance spans every field of endeavour and shows vast potential for growth.
“The United Kingdom was your partner in the first trade deal of your administration, Mr President, bringing jobs and growth to both our countries.
“And no doubt we can go even further as we build this new era of our partnership.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
10:46
King gives banquet speech
The King also referenced the environment and said that “in striving for a better world, we also have a precious opportunity to safeguard and to restore the wonders and beauty of nature for the generations who follow us”.
And in more lighthearted comments, the monarch said that “I cannot help but wonder what our forefathers from 1776 would make of our friendship” to audible laughter from the president.
Image: Pic: Reuters
Red Arrows, tech giants and French menu
The dinner capped off Mr Trump’s first day of his state visit to the UK, with the US president joining King Charles to watch a military parade – replete with a Red Arrows flyover – held at Windsor Castle.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:49
King and Queen welcome Trump
He and first lady Melania Trump also paid tribute to the late Queen Elizabeth II at St George’s Chapel, where they laid a wreath at her tomb.
The banquet had 160 attendees, including the Prince and Princess of Wales, Sir Keir Starmer, and a long list of American technology CEOs – including Apple’s Tim Cook, OpenAI’s Sam Altman, and Microsoft’s Satya Nadella.
Sir Keir, meanwhile, has his focus set on talks with Mr Trump at his Chequers country retreat on Thursday.
Photos from Windsor Castle ahead of the banquet showed a lavish arrangement – with a menu in French as has been tradition since the Norman conquests of the 11th century.
Image: Pics: Reuters
Image: Pic: PA
Has the royal Truman Show for Trump been worth the enormous effort?
Trump state visit II has so far been like The Truman Show.
A lavish production and spectacle revolving around just one man, while outside the set of Windsor Castle, beyond the big walls put up to fence it in, the world goes on.
The question is – has it been worth all the enormous effort and expense?
On the relationship between the UK and US, Mr Trump said that “seen from American eyes, the word special does not begin to do it justice,” before adding: “We’re like two notes in one chord or two verses of the same prose.
“Each beautiful on its own, but really meant to be played together. The bond of kinship and identity between America and the United Kingdom is priceless and eternal.
“It’s irreplaceable and unbreakable.”
Image: Pic: PA
Image: Pic: Reuters
He then made a reference to former US president Joe Biden, saying: “We had a very sick country one year ago, and today I believe we’re the hottest country anywhere in the world.”
Mr Trump also told the King he had raised “a remarkable son” in Prince William before saying: “Melania and I are delighted to visit again with Prince William and to see Her Royal Highness Princess Catherine so radiant and so healthy, so beautiful.”
Trump state visit II has so far been like The Truman Show.
A lavish production and spectacle revolving around just one man, while outside the set of Windsor Castle, beyond the big walls put up to fence it in, the world goes on.
The question is – has it been worth all the enormous effort and expense?
Britain’s constitutional monarchy has mustered all its ceremonial might to pull off an extraordinary show.
Image: The King and Donald Trump watch the Red Arrows. Pic: Reuters
Image: The King and President Trump at a military ceremony at Windsor Castle, but the public was not invited. Pic: Reuters
The real world starts crowding back in on Trump on Thursday afternoon when he faces journalists at a closing news conference.
Two words threaten to upset the president’s mood. Jeffrey and Epstein.
The gathering storm surrounding the infamous paedophile soured the mood ahead of this visit and claimed the scalp of Britain’s ambassador in Washington, Lord Mandelson.
MSPs have voted to abolish Scotland’s controversial not proven verdict.
The Scottish government’s flagship Victims, Witnesses and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill was passed on Wednesday following a lengthy debate of more than 160 amendments that began the day before.
The new legislation makes a series of changes to the justice system, including scrapping the not proven verdict; establishing a specialist sexual offences court; creating a victims and witnesses commissioner; reforming the jury process to require a two-thirds majority for conviction; and implementing Suzanne’s Law which will require the parole board to take into account if a killer continues to refuse to reveal where they hid their victim’s body.
Following Royal Assent, the legislation will be implemented in phases.
Image: Justice Secretary Angela Constance and First Minister John Swinney. Pic: PA
Justice Secretary Angela Constance said: “This historic legislation will put victims and witnesses at the heart of a modern and fair justice system.
“By changing culture, process and practice across the system, it will help to ensure victims are heard, supported, protected and treated with compassion, while the rights of the accused will continue to be safeguarded.
“This legislation, which builds on progress in recent years, has been shaped by the voices of victims, survivors, their families and support organisations, and it is testimony to their tireless efforts to campaign for further improvement.
More on Scotland
Related Topics:
“I am grateful to those who bravely shared their experiences to inform the development of this legislation and pave a better, more compassionate path for others.”
Not proven verdict
Currently, juries in Scotland have three verdicts open to them when considering the evidence after a trial, and can find an accused person either guilty or not guilty, or that the case against them is not proven.
Like not guilty, the centuries-old not proven verdict results in an accused person being acquitted.
Critics have argued it can stigmatise a defendant by appearing not to clear them, while failing to provide closure for the alleged victim.
Notable cases which resulted in a not proven verdict include Sir Hugh Campbell and Sir George Campbell, who were tried for high treason in 1684 for being present at the Battle of Bothwell Bridge.
The murder of Amanda Duffy, 19, in South Lanarkshire in 1992 sparked a national conversation around the existence of the not proven verdict and double jeopardy rules.
Suspect Francis Auld stood trial but the case was found not proven by a jury and an attempt to secure a retrial failed in 2016. Auld died the following year.
In 2018, a sexual assault case against former television presenter John Leslie was found not proven.
And in 2020, former first minister Alex Salmond was found not guilty on 12 sexual assault charges, while one charge of sexual assault with intent to rape was found not proven.
Victim Support Scotland (VSS) had earlier urged MSPs to put aside party politics and vote “for the intention of the bill”.
Kate Wallace, chief executive of VSS, believes the act is a “solid foundation” on which to build further improvements.
She added: “The passing of this act represents a momentous occasion for Scotland’s criminal justice system.
“It marks a significant step towards creating a system that considers and prioritises the needs of people impacted by crime.”
VSS worked with the families of Arlene Fraser and Suzanne Pilley to spearhead Suzanne’s Law.
Ms Fraser was murdered by estranged husband Nat Fraser in 1998, while Ms Pilley was killed by David Gilroy in 2010. To date, the women’s bodies have never been recovered.
Before the bill, parole board rules dictated that a killer’s refusal to disclose the information “may” be taken into account.
The new legislation means parole boards “must” take the refusal to cooperate into account.
Image: (L-R) Suzanne’s Law campaigners Isabelle Thompson and Carol Gillies, the mum and sister of Arlene Fraser, alongside Gail Fairgrieve and Sylvia Pilley, the sister and mum of Suzanne Pilley. Pic: PA
Carol Gillies, sister of Ms Fraser, and Gail Fairgrieve, sister of Ms Pilley said: “We have done everything possible to make this change to parole in memory of Arlene and Suzanne, and for other people who have lost their lives in such a horrific way.
“For our families, the passing of this act and the change to parole are momentous.”
The Scottish Conservatives and Scottish Labour voted against the bill.
Although in support of the abolition of the not proven verdict, the Scottish Tories said they had been left with no alternative but to oppose the bill after the SNP rejected a series of amendments.
The party had called for a Scotland-only grooming gangs inquiry; wanted victims to be told if a decision was taken not to prosecute an accused; and for all victims to be informed if a plea deal was struck between defence and prosecution lawyers.
They also wanted Suzanne’s Law to be strengthened, which would have compelled killers to reveal the location of their victim’s body or risk having their parole rejected – ensuring “no body, no release”.
MSP Liam Kerr, shadow justice secretary, said: “This half-baked bill sells the victims of crime desperately short.
“By ignoring many of the key demands of victims’ groups, the SNP have squandered the chance for a long overdue rebalancing of Scotland’s justice system.
“The Scottish Conservatives’ common sense amendments would have given this legislation real teeth but, by rejecting them, the nationalists have delivered a victims’ bill in name only.
“While we back the abolition of the not proven verdict, the SNP’s intransigence on a number of key issues meant we could not support this bill in its final form.”