At the end of last year, the UK’s Supreme Court ruled Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s plan to deport asylum seekers who had made the dangerous crossing to the African nation was unlawful.
But Mr Sunak has tried to revive the plan with additional measures – such as signing a treaty with Rwanda over its treatment of those sent there and defining it as a “safe country” – insisting it is a necessary deterrent to “stop the boats”.
Advertisement
Opposition parties are widely opposed to the bill, with Labour calling it a “gimmick” and accusing the government of wasting money on the scheme that has yet to see one person be sent to Rwanda.
However, it has also led to splits in the Conservative Party, with right-wing factions demanding Mr Sunak toughen up the legislation to limit appeals further and to disapply international human rights law in order to see flights get off the ground.
Number 10 has yet to concede, and as a result, the rebel backbenchers have been putting forward amendments to the legislation and defying the government in the voting lobbies.
More amendments are being debated on Wednesday, and further votes will take place tonight, with more rebellions from the government’s own benches expected.
Since the beginning of the year, seven boats containing 263 migrants have crossed the Channel in small boats from France – not including the vessel spotted by Sky News on Wednesday.
Coinbase, Kraken, Ripple, a16z and others pressed the Senate to add explicit protections for developers and non-custodial services in the market structure bill.
Reform’s plan was meant to be detailed. Instead, there’s more confusion.
The party had grown weary of the longstanding criticism that their tough talk on immigration did not come with a full proposal for what they would do to tackle small boats if they came to power.
So, after six months of planning, yesterday they attempted to put flesh on to the bones of their flagship policy.
At an expensive press conference in a vast airhanger in Oxford, the headline news was clear: Reform UK would deport anyone who comes here by small boat, arresting, detaining and then deporting up to 600,000 people in the first five years of governing.
They would leave international treaties and repeal the Human Rights Act to do it
But, one day later, that policy is clear as mud when it comes to who this would apply to.
More on Nigel Farage
Related Topics:
Image: Nigel Farage launched an airport-style departures board to illustrate how many illegal migrants have arrived in the UK. Pic: PA
I asked Farage at the time of the announcement whether this would apply to women and girls – an important question – as the basis for their extreme policy seemed to hinge on the safety of women and girls in the UK.
He was unequivocal: “Yes, women and children, everybody on arrival will be detained.
“And I’ve accepted already that how we deal with children is a much more complicated and difficult issue.”
But a day later, he appeared to row back on this stance at a press conference in Scotland, saying Reform is “not even discussing women and children at this stage”.
He later clarified that if a single woman came by boat, then they could fall under the policy, but if “a woman comes with children, we will work out the best thing to do”.
A third clarification in the space of 24 hours on a flagship policy they worked on over six months seems like a pretty big gaffe, and it only feeds into the Labour criticism that these plans aren’t yet credible.
If they had hoped to pivot from rhetoric to rigour, this announcement showed serious pitfalls.
But party strategists probably will not be tearing out too much hair over this, with polling showing Reform UK still as the most trusted party on the issue of immigration overall.