Connect with us

Published

on

Rishi Sunak has said the UK is “not seeking a confrontation” with Yemen’s Houthi fighters – but it will strike again if their attacks in the Red Sea continue.

Royal Air Force jets took part in a second wave of joint US-UK action against the group on Monday night after further attacks on the vital shipping lane.

Politics Live: Rishi Sunak says UK ‘not seeking confrontation’ with strikes on Houthis

The prime minister told MPs: “We are not seeking a confrontation. We urge the Houthis and those who enable them to stop these illegal and unacceptable attacks.

“But, if necessary, the United Kingdom will not hesitate to respond again in self defence.

“We cannot stand by and allow these attacks to go unchallenged. Inaction is also a choice.”

Four RAF Typhoons and a pair of Voyager tankers were involved in the latest action.

More on Houthi Rebels

Several targets were hit at two military sites north of Yemen’s capital Sanaa.

Mr Sunak said the strikes were aimed at sites the Houthis use to support their attacks on shipping and “all intended targets were destroyed”.

The Houthis, who are backed by Iran, have been targeting shipping they claim is linked to Israel in the context of the conflict with Hamas.

But the UK and allies have warned the attacks are indiscriminate and have included targeting Royal Navy and allied warships.

Middle East latest: Houthis warn UK and US to ‘expect a response’

The Red Sea route leading to and from the Suez Canal is one of the world’s most important shipping routes and there are concerns the cost of diverting vessels away from it, around southern Africa, will fuel inflation and damage the global economy.

Outlining the UK’s wider approach to the situation, Mr Sunak said new sanctions would be announced “in the coming days” and in the long term, the UK must “end the illegal flow of arms to the Houthi militia”.

He said this would include “working closely with our allies and partners to disrupt and deter the supply of weapons and components”.

“We are going to use the most effective means at our disposal to cut off the Houthis’ financial resources where they are used to fund these attacks,” he added.

“We are working closely with the United States on this and plan to announce new sanction measures in the coming days.”

Mr Sunak also said the UK will continue to deliver aid to Yemen, which is embroiled in a civil war.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Labour: ‘We back this targeted action’

Sir Keir Starmer said he backed the “targeted action to reinforce maritime security in the Red Sea”.

He told MPs: “The Houthi attacks must stop. They are designed to destabilise us so we must stand united and strong, they bring danger to ordinary civilians who are working hard at sea, so we must protect them, and they aim to disrupt the flow of goods, food and medicines, so we must not let them go unaddressed.”

It follows criticism that the Labour leader and the Commons speaker were not briefed on the operation ahead of time.

Sir Keir and Sir Lindsay Hoyle were informed by Downing Street at the time of the strikes rather than before – as was the case in the last round of action on 11 January.

MPs will get the chance to debate the situation on Wednesday but will not be given a vote on the military action.

The prime minister’s official spokesman said he was “acting in line with precedence”, given military action is a prerogative matter.

However, many MPs want a vote, as they are are concerned about the conflict in the Middle East escalating.

Labour MP Apsana Begum said the strikes in Yemen “escalates risks” in the region, but the prime minister said it was wrong to “draw a link” between the action in Red Sea and the war in Gaza.

As the prime minister spoke, the government published its legal position on the situation.

It said action to “downgrade the Houthi’s capabilities and deter further attacks was lawfully taken”.

Continue Reading

Politics

Japan wrote the first stablecoin rulebook — so why is the US pulling ahead?

Published

on

By

Japan wrote the first stablecoin rulebook — so why is the US pulling ahead?

Japan wrote the first stablecoin rulebook — so why is the US pulling ahead?

“Japan prizes systemic stability above innovation speed, while the US is signaling a bigger market-opening play,” said Startale Group’s Takashi Tezuka.

Continue Reading

Politics

Binance and Tether are watching Korea closely: Here’s why

Published

on

By

Binance and Tether are watching Korea closely: Here’s why

Binance and Tether are watching Korea closely: Here’s why

Binance and Tether are eyeing Korea’s stablecoin rules that may boost coins pegged to the South Korean won or strengthen USD dominance.

Continue Reading

Politics

Nigel Farage’s deportation plan relies on these conditions – legal expert explains if it could work

Published

on

By

Nigel Farage's deportation plan relies on these conditions - legal expert explains if it could work

Explaining how they plan to tackle what they described as illegal migration, Nigel Farage and his Reform UK colleague Zia Yusuf were happy to disclose some of the finer details – how much money migrants would be offered to leave and what punishments they would receive if they returned.

But the bigger picture was less clear.

How would Reform win a Commons majority, at least another 320 seats, in four years’ time – or sooner if, as Mr Farage implied, Labour was forced to call an early election?

How would his party win an election at all if, as its leader suggested, other parties began to adopt his policies?

Politics latest: Starmer ‘angry’ about Farage’s language on migrant hotels

Highly detailed legislation would be needed – what Mr Farage calls his Illegal Migration (Mass Deportation) Bill.

But Reform would not have a majority in the House of Lords and, given the responsibilities of the upper house to scrutinise legislation in detail, it could take a year or more from the date of an election for his bill to become law.

Reform’s four-page policy document says the legislation would have to disapply:

The United Nations refugee convention of 1951, extended in 1967, which says people who have a well-founded fear of persecution must not be sent back to a country where they face serious threats to their life or freedom

The United Nations convention against torture, whose signatories agree not expel, return or extradite anyone to a country where there are substantial grounds to believe the returned person would be in danger of being tortured

The Council of Europe anti-trafficking convention, which requires states to provide assistance for victims

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Farage sets out migration plan

According to the policy document, derogation from these treaties is “justified under the Vienna Convention doctrine of state necessity”.

That’s odd, because there’s no mention of necessity in the Vienna Convention on the law of treaties – and because member states can already “denounce” (leave) the three treaties by giving notice.

It would take up to a year – but so would the legislation. Only six months’ notice would be needed to leave the European Convention on Human Rights, another of Reform’s objectives.

Read more:
Women and children will be detained under Farage plans
Far right ’emboldened’ says MP as Starmer faces mounting pressure over immigration

Mr Farage acknowledged that other European states were having to cope with an influx of migrants. Why weren’t those countries trying to give up their international obligations?

His answer was to blame UK judges for applying the law. Once his legislation had been passed, Mr Farage promised, there would be nothing the courts could do to stop people being deported to countries that would take them. His British Bill of Rights would make that clear.

Courts will certainly give effect to the will of parliament as expressed in legislation. But the meaning of that legislation is for the judiciary to decide. Did parliament really intend to send migrants back to countries where they are likely to face torture or death, the judges may be asking themselves in the years to come.

They will answer questions such as that by examining the common law that Mr Farage so much admires – the wisdom expressed in past decisions that have not been superseded by legislation. He cannot be confident that the courts will see the problem in quite the same way that he does.

Continue Reading

Trending