Connect with us

Published

on

The value of an average used Tesla has toppled more than $1,500 so far this month, according to a new report.

On Jan. 1, a used Tesla retailed for $37,090, according to data from auto-shopping website CarGurus.

Just 20 days later, as of Jan. 21, the standard used Tesla runs for $35,554, marking a $1,536 decrease so far this month.

For reference, during the same period, CarGurus’ used car index — which takes into account mean average sales price by mileage and market class for an array of gas- and battery-powered vehicles — fell just $377.

The Elon Musk-run EV-manufacturer has had a rough start to 2024, as its share price has also seen a downward trend: Year-to-date, Tesla’s share price has dipped nearly 16%, to $208.80.

Representatives for Tesla did not immediately respond to The Post’s request for comment.

As Tesla has increasingly lost market share to EV-rival BYD — the Chinese EV-maker that dethroned Tesla as the top electric auto-manufacturer in the latest quarter — it has also lost business at car-rental giants like Hertz and SIXT.

Hertz announced earlier this year that it’s scrapping about 2,000 of its EVs — about 80% of which were Teslas, citing high costs associated with repairing the fleet.

As of last week, Hertz was already offering Tesla Model 3s on its website for as little as $18,000.

The rate marks a nearly 50% discount from the $35,000 price tag the Model 3 boasts on Teslas website — another indication of how much the Austin-based manufacturers cars depreciate in value.

Hertz CEO Stephen Scherr even mentioned the declining value of EVs during a call with investors in October.

“The MSRP [manufacturer’s suggested retail price] declines in EVs over the course of 2023, driven primarily by Tesla, have driven the fair market value of our EVs lower as compared to last year, such that a salvage creates a larger loss and, therefore, greater burden,” Scherr said at the time.

Separately, SIXT, Europe’s largest car-rental firm, said last month that it was dropping Teslas from its EV offerings.

Shorty thereafter, SIXT announced plans to buy as many as 250,000 Stellantis vehicles — which will be a mix of combustion-engine, plug-in hybrid and battery-electric vehicles, including Jeeps, Chryslers and Dodges, among others.

A spokesperson for SIXT insisted to The Post last week that its Stellantis order is unrelated to the companys decision to sell its Teslas.

SIXT also attributed its phase-out of Teslas to high repair costs in comparison to their gas-powered counterparts.

EVs involved in a crash typically result in a high repair bill because of their complex features, such as safety sensors in bumpers, which may seem like a luxurious perk when driving but is a costly fix even when it has a minor dent.

Recent data from insights firm LexisNexis Risk Solutions found that drivers pay out about 14.5% more for insurance claims when they switch from a gas-powered car to an electric one like a Tesla which make up the majority of EV sales in the US.

LexisNexis also found that EVs are more likely to be involved in an accident, with the frequency of insurance claims rising 14.3% for drivers who ditch their gas-powered car for an electric one.

Continue Reading

Business

UK economy contracts – with record fall in exports to the US after Trump tariff hikes

Published

on

By

UK economy contracts - with record fall in exports to the US after Trump tariff hikes

The UK economy shrank more than expected in April as the worst of President Trump’s tariffs hit.

The standard measure of economic output (GDP) contracted a sharp 0.3% in April, data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed.

During the month, Mr Trump’s so-called “Liberation Day” applied steep tariffs to countries around the world and sparked a trade war with China, the world’s second-largest economy.

The outcome is worse than expected by economists. A contraction of just 0.1% had been forecast by economists polled by the Reuters news agency.

It’s also down from the growth of 0.2% recorded in March.

Blow for Reeves

It’s also bad news for Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who has made the push for economic growth her number one priority. Speaking to Sky News following the news, she described the figures as “disappointing”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Reeves refuses to rule out tax rises

Additional costs on businesses were also levied during the month, as higher minimum wages and employer national insurance contributions took effect, which businesses told the ONS played a part in their performance.

Why?

The biggest part of the economy, the services sector, contracted by 0.4%, and manufacturing dropped 0.9%.

There was the largest ever monthly fall in goods exported to the United States, the ONS said.

Decreases were seen across most types of goods due to tariffs, it added.

Higher stamp duty depressed house buying and meant legal and real estate firms fared badly in the month.

After a strong showing in the first three months, car manufacturing performed poorly.

Continue Reading

Politics

Economy shock overshadows Reeves’ big day

Published

on

By

Economy shock overshadows Reeves' big day

Sky News’ Sam Coates and Politico’s Anne McElvoy serve up their essential guide to the day in British politics.

Rachel Reeves has said this morning that the latest figures showing the UK economy has shrunk by more than expected are “disappointing”. How much will this overshadow yesterday’s major spending announcement?

The chancellor has now planted Labour’s fiscal flag in the sand – and spending mistakes from here on in certainly cannot be blamed on their predecessors. How will Labour react to a potential internal revolt over disability benefit cuts? And how will the party manage the politics around expected tax rises in the autumn?

Continue Reading

Politics

Did ChatGPT get the spending review right? Treasury minister gives his verdict

Published

on

By

Did ChatGPT get the spending review right? Treasury minister gives his verdict

The chief secretary to the Treasury has called the Sky News-Chat GPT spending review projection “pretty good” and scored it 70%.

Darren Jones compared the real spending review, delivered by Rachel Reeves on Wednesday, and the Sky News AI (artificial intelligence) projection last week.

Sky News took the Treasury’s spring statement, past spending reviews, the ‘main estimates’ from the Treasury website, and the Institute for Fiscal Studies’ projections, and put them into ChatGPT, asking it to calculate the winners and losers in the spending review.

Politics Hub: Tap here for live updates

This was done 10 days ahead of the review – before several departments had agreed their budgets with the Treasury – on the basis of projections based on those public documents. It also comes amid a big debate kicked off by Sky News about the level of error of AI.

The Sky News-AI projection correctly put defence and health as the biggest winners, the Foreign Office as the biggest loser, and identified many departments would lose out in real terms overall.

It suggested the education budget would be smaller than it turned out, but correctly highlighted the challenges for departments like the Home Office and environment.

More on Artificial Intelligence

Watch what happened with Sky’s AI-generated spending review

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

AI writes the spending review

Reviewing the exercise, the author of the real spending review told Sky News that this pioneering use of AI was “pretty, pretty good”.

He added: “I could be out of a job next time in 2027, which to be honest, it’s not a bad idea given the process I’ve just had to go through.”

The Treasury made a number of accounting changes to so-called “mega projects” which AI could not have anticipated, and changed some of the numbers.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sky’s economics editor Ed Conway takes a look at the key takeaways from chancellor Rachel Reeves’ spending review.

Asked to give it a score, Mr Jones replied: “I’m going to give it 70%.”

The spending review includes AI as a tool to save money in various government processes.

Asked if 70% accuracy is good enough for government, he replied: “Well we’re not using your AI. We’ve got our own AI, which is called HMT GPT, and it helps us pull together all the information across government to be able to make better, evidence-informed decisions.”

Continue Reading

Trending