During a ribbon-cutting ceremony celebrating the opening of Phase 2 at its AMP-1 production facility in Arizona, Lucid Motors CEO Peter Rawlinson briefly teased the automaker’s third model in the works – a mid-size EV that will arrive as a direct competitor to the Tesla Model 3 and Model Y.
Electrek was on location this morning in Casa Grande, AZ, home to Lucid Motor’s AMP-1 production facility, which now houses Phase 2 of the American automaker’s four-phase expansion plan. Since we last visited during the start of Air production two years ago, AMP-1 has expanded from approximately 800,000 square feet in size to over 3.8 million sq. ft.
Phase 2, which will be home to production of Lucid’s second flagship EV – the Gravity SUV, also includes a stamping machine and a second body shop and provides enough room to bring supply chain storage and powertrains in-house rather than building them up the road and trucking the parts over.
To celebrate the massive (on schedule) expansion, Lucid Motors held a ribbon-cutting ceremony mere feet away from the Air’s general assembly lines, attended by Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs and US Representative Juan Ciscomani, amongst several other local mayors and Arizona politicians.
Credit: Scooter Doll
The entire Lucid crew on shift at AMP-1 gathered around the stage as CEO and CTO Peter Rawlinson thanked them for all their efforts that helped get the relatively young automaker to today’s milestone.
Everyone applauded when Rawlinson touted the specs of Lucid’s Air sedan, which, even at its lowest tier trim level, provides better range (419) than its “closest competitor” (ahem, Tesla). The crowd oohed and aahed when Lucid’s CEO discussed the performance and market potential of the ultra-roomy Gravity SUV (for good reason). Still, one quick slide during the hour-long event genuinely caught my eye, and I’m surprised more people weren’t paying attention.
Rawlinson confirmed that a third Lucid model is in the works and physically exists in its development form. It will be a mid-size EV and the company’s first model with mass-market appeal. Better yet, Lucid’s CEO has come out and said this new EV will directly compete with Tesla – more specifically, the Model 3 sedan and Model Y crossover.
Our first peek at a clothed mid-size Lucid model / Credit: Scooter Doll
Lucid’s mid-size Tesla competitor coming, but a ways away
Following the event, a more affordable Lucid model was all I could think about, although there were plenty of other sights and essential people to chat with to pique my interest further.
For example, Lucid’s senior vice president of design and brand, Derek Jenkins, walked me around the Gravity SUV inside and out, which I will follow up on in a separate piece. But as Jenkins and I sat in the front seat of Lucid’s second model, he shared some tidbits of what we can expect to see on what we are now calling “project mid-size.”:
Mid-size is a super exciting program. The whole point of all of this is to establish ourselves in this luxury segment and then take all the attributes, all the capability, and a version of the technology and go mainstream. That’s what that car represents, and it has all of that, surprisingly. So stay tuned. We’re going to say as much as we can as soon as we can, but I will say the design is fairly solidified at this point, but there are still things being reviewed,
Before my tour of AMP-1 Phase 2, I got a few minutes to sit down with Peter Rawlinson, who immediately reminded me that he has made good on his timelines to deliver Air and quadruple the size of AMP-1 by 2024. His next promise? “Gravity is going to be awesome.”
From what we’ve seen so far, it looks like another work of art in design, luxury, and, most impressively, in my opinion, efficiency – not just in kWh, but in space utilization and sheer optimization throughout the SUV.
The Lucid Gravity SUV on display at AMP-1 / Credit: Scooter Doll
While much of the early chat from Rawlinson was regurgitated specs from the presentation or details you can read on Lucid’s website, in the core of the CTO and CEO exists an ethos of “er.” As in, delivering cars that drive faster, go farther, last longer, and eventually are cheaper. Rawlinson shared that strategy with me last time we were in Arizona together, following the launch of Air production, sharing that he understands that the company’s vehicles are expensive, but that’s never been the end game.
The goal is to use that optimized technology and (hopefully) profits from those higher-end model sales to deliver a fully scaled, mass-market EV everyone can enjoy. That’s a similar strategy taken by America’s EV sweetheart Tesla with the Model 3, years after Rawlinson had left following his work on the Model S.
With Gravity production slotted this year and a third EV model design “fairly solidified,” Lucid is now targeting a much more significant chunk of consumers interested in a Tesla, and its CEO is quite open about it. Rawlinson was detailing Lucid’s second AMP facility, which will be erected in Saudi Arabia and have an annual capacity of 150,000 units annually. According to Electrek’s interview with the CEO, it will also be home to the production of the new mid-size model:
‘Mid-size’ is going to be our more affordable car – more of a (Tesla) Model 3, Model Y competitor. That’s coming in just a few years time. It already exists in a design studio, and it’s already with advanced engineering. I’m already working on ‘mid-size’ as I am on Gravity, on the technical side.
I immediately asked Rawlinson if Lucid’s Mid-size model would specifically be targeting the same audience and price range as the Tesla Model 3 and Model Y, which he confirmed and shared the following:
Our mid-size is, for the first time, its overtly going to be a Tesla competitor. Its going to be the Tesla Model 3 and Model Y. It’s our big volume platform and we’re going to do this and this is a few years from now.
I want to be very clear about that – we may be Mercedes’ competitors today, but we’re going Model 3 and Model Y.
“Years away” feels like a decade in the ultra-fast world of EV development, and Lucid will probably have to take a few more lumps before it reaches scaled production of “project mid-size” (remember, the Model 3 almost bankrupted Tesla).
A lot will depend on the success of Gravity – not only in sales but what the unique SUV can bring to Lucid in terms of clout and brand recognition, ideally driving more consumers to learn more about Air and, eventually… hopefully, this new mid-size EV.
Nothing for you Tesla Stans fans to worry about just yet; Lucid has homework to do, but competition breeds innovation, and it’s nice to see another American automaker, at the very least, targeting quality affordable EVs. Let’s hope it can deliver.
Bonus question – What do we think “mid-size” will be called? I’m betting something like “arcane” or “ether, you know, since “Ocean” was already taken. Hey, those could at least make for better code names than “Project mid-size.”
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
For the last few weeks, we’ve been running a sidebar survey about some of the factors that are convincing Electrek readers to add home solar power systems to their homes. After receiving over a thousand responses, here’s what you told us.
When our readers share their great ideas with us, we listen, and our most recent survey asked, “The federal solar tax credit ends after December 31st, but there are still plenty of reasons to go solar. What’s YOUR reason?”
Why YOU choose solar
By the numbers; original content.
Perhaps the most surprising result of this survey is that, with just 32.6% of the votes, “Lowering my monthly utility bills” wasn’t the biggest overall reason for people choosing to go solar. That result proving, if nothing else, that Electrek readers might be willing to spend a little more to do something positive for their environment and their community.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
“Energy independence and less reliance on the grid” was the top reason readers would add a solar system to their homes, with over 25% reporting that they were convinced about the value of solar because, “It’s the right thing to do, climate-wise.”
Surprising, perhaps, not because of the solar panels themselves, but because it really is a buyers’ market these days, especially in sun-rich markets like Texas and Florida, which have flipped the script in recent months, posting huge inventory numbers and plunging real estate prices throughout the 2025 hurricane season.
“With a rate of 6.5% for a $1 million loan, the [monthly] payment is now significantly more than it was two years ago—$6,300 versus $4,200,” according to Ron Shuffield, the Miami-based president and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices EWM Realty. “When we have this conversation with our sellers, they say, ‘Well, why can’t I get what my neighbor got two or three years ago?’ And then we say, ‘Well, because your buyer does not have the same amount of money.’”
In that context, I’d expect sellers would at least try to differentiate their properties with features like home solar and battery energy storage. But, then again, what do I know? You guys know stuff – let us know what you make of this little look into the minds of your fellow readers and what conclusions you’d draw in the comments.
If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Dario Amodei, co-founder and chief executive officer of Anthropic, at the World Economic Forum in 2025.
Stefan Wermuth | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Artificial intelligence startup Anthropic is doing all it can to keep pace with larger rival OpenAI, which is spending money at a historic pace with backing from Microsoft and Nvidia. Of late, Anthropic has been facing an equally daunting antagonist: the U.S. government.
David Sacks, the venture capitalist serving as President Donald Trump’s AI and crypto czar, has been publicly criticizing Anthropic for what he’s called a campaign by the company to support “the Left’s vision of AI regulation.”
After Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark, AI startup’s head of policy, wrote an essay this week titled “Technological Optimism and Appropriate Fear,” Sacks lashed out against the company on X.
“Anthropic is running a sophisticated regulatory capture strategy based on fear-mongering,” Sacks wrote on Tuesday.
OpenAI, meanwhile, has established itself as a partner to the White House since the very beginning of the second Trump administration. On Jan. 21, the day after the inauguration, Trump announced a joint venture called Stargate with OpenAI, Oracle and Softbank to invest billions of dollars in U.S. AI infrastructure.
Sacks’ criticism of Anthropic hits on the company’s very foundation and its original reason for being. Siblings Dario and Daniela Amodei left OpenAI in late 2020 and started Anthropic with a mission to build safer AI. OpenAI had started as a nonprofit lab in 2015, but was rapidly moving towards commercialization, with hefty funding from Microsoft.
Now they’re the two most highly valued private AI companies in the country, with OpenAI commanding a $500 billion valuation and Anthropic capturing a valuation of $183 billion. OpenAI leads the consumer AI market with its ChatGPT and Sora apps, while Anthropic’s Claude models are particularly popular in the enterprise.
When it comes to regulation, the companies have very different views. OpenAI has lobbied for fewer guardrails, while Anthropic has opposed part of the Trump administration’s effort to limit protections.
Anthropic has repeatedly pushed back against efforts by the federal government to preempt state-level regulation of AI, most notably a Trump-backed provision that would have blocked such rules for 10 years.
That proposal, part of the draft “Big Beautiful Bill,” was ultimately abandoned. Anthropic later endorsed California’s SB 53, which would require transparency and safety disclosures from AI companies, effectively going in the opposite direction from the administration’s approach.
“SB 53’s transparency requirements will have an important impact on frontier AI safety,” Anthropic wrote in a blog post on Sept. 8. “Without it, labs with increasingly powerful models could face growing incentives to dial back their own safety and disclosure programs in order to compete.”
Anthropic didn’t provide a comment for this story. Sacks didn’t respond to a request for comment.
U.S. President Donald Trump sits next to Crypto czar David Sacks at the White House Crypto Summit at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., March 7, 2025.
Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters
For Sacks, the priority in AI is to innovate as fast as possible to make sure the U.S. doesn’t lose to China.
“The U.S. is currently in an AI race, and our chief global competition is China,” Sacks said in an onstage interview at Salesforce’s Dreamforce conference in San Francisco this week. “They’re the only other country that has the talent, the resources, and the technology expertise to basically beat us in AI.”
But Sacks has adamantly denied that he’s trying to take down Anthropic in the process of lifting up U.S. AI.
In a post on X on Thursday, Sacks contested a Bloomberg story that linked his comments to growing federal scrutiny of Anthropic.
“Nothing could be further from the truth,” he wrote. “Just a couple of months ago, the White House approved Anthropic’s Claude app to be offered to all branches of government through the GSA App Store.”
Rather, Sacks claimed that Anthropic has cast itself as a political underdog, positioning its leadership as principled defenders of public safety while pursuing a public campaign that frames any pushback as partisan targeting.
“It has been Anthropic’s government affairs and media strategy to position itself consistently as a foe of the Trump administration,” Sacks said.“But don’t whine to the media that you’re being ‘targeted’ when all we’ve done is articulate a policy disagreement.”
Sacks pointed to several examples of what he sees as adversarial actions. He referenced Dario Amodei’s comparison of Trump to a “feudal warlord” during the 2024 election. Amodei publicly supported Kamala Harris’ campaign for president.
Sacks also referenced op-eds the company ran opposing key parts of the Trump administration’s AI policy agenda, including its proposed moratorium on state-level regulation and elements of its Middle East and chip export strategy. Anthropic also hired senior Biden-era officials to lead its government relations team, Sacks noted.
The AI czar took particular umbrage to Clark’s essay and his warnings about the potentially transformative and destabilizing power of AI.
“My own experience is that as these AI systems get smarter and smarter, they develop more and more complicated goals. When these goals aren’t absolutely aligned with both our preferences and the right context, the AI systems will behave strangely,” Clark wrote. “Another reason for my fear is I can see a path to these systems starting to design their successors, albeit in a very early form.”
Sacks said such “fear-mongering” is holding back innovation.
“It is principally responsible for the state regulatory frenzy that is damaging the startup ecosystem,” Sacks wrote on X.
Anthropic has also stayed away from actions that many other tech companies have taken explicitly to appease Trump.
Leaders from Meta, OpenAI, and Nvidia have courted Trump and his allies, attending White House dinners, committing tens of billions of dollars to U.S. infrastructure projects, and softening their public postures. Amodei wasn’t invited to a recent White House dinner involving numerous industry leaders, the company confirmed to The Information.
Still, Anthropic continues to hold major federal contracts, including a $200 million deal with the Department of Defense and access to federal agencies through the General Services Administration. It also recently formed a national security advisory council to align its work with U.S. interests, and began offering a version of its Claude model to government customers for $1 per year.
But Sacks isn’t the only influential Republican tech investor voicing his critique of the company.
Keith Rabois, whose husband works in the Trump administration, waded into the mix this week.
“If Anthropic actually believed their rhetoric about safety, they can always shut down the company,” Rabois wrote on X. “And lobby then.”
Italian logistics specialist Fratelli Foppiani Trasporti has become one of the first operators to deploy the new MAN eTGX electric trucks, taking delivery of a 4×2 semi tractor and a new, 6×2-4 rigid truck packing absolutely MASSIVE battery packs that are ready to get to work.
Those batteries will give the eTGX trucks more than enough range to handle Fratelli Foppiani’s existing 4×2 routes, which go primarily from Corsico (Milan), with routes including Rozzano, Voghera and Brescia. The rigid truck will operate from Busto Arsizio (Varese), serving areas across Milan and Bergamo, Italy.
“This delivery represents a fundamental step forward for sustainable transport in Italy,” said Marc Martinez, Managing Director MAN Truck & Bus Italia. “We are proud to have achieved it together with a long-standing partner such as Fratelli Foppiani, which has once again demonstrated vision and courage.”
Advertisement – scroll for more content
The trucks were delivered during a ceremony at the company’s Corsico headquarters this month, coinciding with the company’s 65th anniversary.
Electrek’s Take
Not shy about the EV part; via MAN.
MAN Trucks’ fleet advisors believe that, in most cases, an electric semi will pay for itself in about three years, thanks in part to Europe’s much higher diesel fuel prices compared to the US (about $6.80/gal compared to $3.70 here, last time I checked).
If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.