Connect with us

Published

on

The government has chosen to avoid a showdown with MPs on the ratification of its new treaty with Rwanda, after the House of Lords voted to delay the finalisation of the deal.

While the Lords can only advise on ratification, MPs in the Commons have the power to delay the signing of a treaty – although they have never used it.

Politics latest: UK facing ‘dangerous moment’

Under the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 (CRAG), the government has to lay a treaty before parliament and wait 21 sitting days before an international agreement is ratified. However, this treaty is set to be ratified on 31 January – Wednesday next week.

Critics argue it is “disappointing” the government has not set aside time for MPs to debate the treaty.

The government claims enough scrutiny will be offered by debates on the Safety of the Rwanda Bill, which is based on the treaty.

This bill passed initial votes in the Commons but is awaiting inspection and amending in the House of Lords, with many votes yet to come.

More on Houses Of Parliament

But the home affairs select committee in the Commons recommended there be a debate and a vote on the treaty after it was announced last year.

This was backed by the Conservatives on the committee – including former Tory deputy chair Lee Anderson, who resigned from his Tory party role to try to make the Safety of Rwanda Bill tougher last week.

The treaty contains the agreements upon which the UK government bases its argument that Rwanda is safe in a bid to address the ruling by the Supreme Court last year.

‘We look forward to debating the bill’

Defending the government’s approach, Home Office minister Tom Pursglove said: “The government places great importance in providing opportunity for parliamentary scrutiny.

“We have sought to provide this opportunity during various parliamentary activity, but most notably as part of the passage of the bill which is intrinsically linked and gives legal effect to the treaty.

“Most recently, we have had the two days of Commons committee stage – Tuesday 16 and Wednesday 17 January – on the floor of house, allowing members to scrutinise this policy.

“We look forward to debating all aspects of the bill as it is scrutinised by both houses.”

The opposition voiced in the Lords was unprecedented, when the upper house voted by a majority of 43 against ratification.

However, such a defeat for the government in the Commons would be unlikely due to the size of the government’s majority.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sunak warns Lords over Rwanda Bill

MPs ‘should be able to debate significant treaty’

In its report, the Commons home affairs committee said: “Whatever view one may take of its merits or otherwise, the new UK-Rwanda treaty is clearly of significant legal and political importance.”

It added: “The House of Commons should be able to debate and reach a view on a treaty of such significance.

“This is particularly important in this case, because the treaty could be ratified and have effect even in the absence of the bill becoming an Act for any reason.”

One of the concerns raised about the treaty is whether the measures it said would be established in Rwanda to address concerns voiced by the Supreme Court had actually been put in place – and how this could be monitored.

Dame Diana Johnson, the chair of the home affairs select committee, said: “It is disappointing the government has chosen not to dedicate time in the House of Commons for members to debate the Rwanda treaty.

“Along with the Rwanda bill, the treaty is a key element of the government’s strategy to fundamentally change the UK’s approach to asylum and immigration.

“Given its huge legal and political importance, there should be an opportunity for debate beyond that allowed for the Rwanda bill.”

Read more:
How plan has become a leadership issue
Success harder again after Lords defeat

Lib Dem Lords to vote against bill

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

Richard Atkinson, the vice president of the Law Society of England and Wales, said: “Given the Supreme Court found serious risks in the government’s Rwanda plan, this treaty ought to be scrutinised carefully to ensure the risks identified are fully addressed.

“MPs’ calls for a proper debate on the treaty are being ignored. It’s crucial to debate the substance of the treaty because any shortcomings will fatally undermine the Safety of Rwanda Bill and the government’s wider asylum policy.”

The government has been approached for comment.

Continue Reading

Politics

Roman Storm’s lawyers signal continuance if court allows hacker’s testimony

Published

on

By

Roman Storm’s lawyers signal continuance if court allows hacker’s testimony

Roman Storm’s lawyers signal continuance if court allows hacker’s testimony

The Tornado Cash co-founder is scheduled to go to trial on Monday, but his defense attorneys are still waiting on rulings for motions over witnesses in the case.

Continue Reading

Politics

Migrants deal a win for Starmer – and could help with fight against Reform

Published

on

By

Migrants deal a win for Starmer - and could help with fight against Reform

The bromance between Sir Keir Starmer and President Macron is so apparent – embraces all around.

This is some deft diplomacy from Sir Keir, who has been love-bombing his French counterpart ever since he became prime minister – trying to get closer ties, be it on security, on trade, and now of course on small boats.

And he has got a win today – he’s got President Macron to agree a deterrent deal.

Politics latest: Macron stokes undiplomatic Brexit row

You remember the Conservatives were trying the Rwanda plan to deter people from coming by sending them back to Rwanda, a third country, if they came here illegally.

What the prime minister has agreed with President Macron today is a big deal. It’s a one in, one out deal.

What they’re going to do is, if someone arrives here illegally, they will be sent back to France, and in return, the UK will accept a legitimate asylum seeker. It might be someone who has family ties.

More on Migrant Crisis

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How people smugglers dodge French police

It’s going to start off really small – think of it as a pilot – as they’re going to test it out, see if it works.

It might be just a handful of people being sent back, maybe just under a thousand or so by the end of the year. But they will hopefully, for the prime minister, scale it up and it could become a real deterrent.

Read more from Sky News:
Ex-Tory chairman defects to Reform

Farage hits back at Macron over Brexit row

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Farage reacts to UK-France migrant deal

I’ll leave you with just one more thought: As Prime Minister Starmer and President Macron were doing this deal today, Nigel Farage was in the English Channel documenting illegal migrants making that crossing – 79 people being picked up by Border Force, taken off a dinghy and into Dover.

Polling out this morning by Portland suggests four in 10 voters who are planning on going to Reform would go back to Labour if the prime minister tackles small boats and drives down the crossings.

There is a real political imperative for him to try to start to resolve this problem. It’s going to count at the ballot box – immigration is a top-three issue in this country when it comes to voters.

Continue Reading

Politics

US lawmakers to discuss crypto tax policy amid push to pass three bills

Published

on

By

US lawmakers to discuss crypto tax policy amid push to pass three bills

US lawmakers to discuss crypto tax policy amid push to pass three bills

The hearing notice suggested a focus on a tax framework for digital assets, but did not mention specific witnesses or policies previously proposed.

Continue Reading

Trending