Connect with us

Published

on

Taylor Swift is reportedly “furious” that AI-generated nude images of her were circulating across social media on Thursday — and she’s weighing possible legal action against the site responsible for generating the photos, according to a report.

“Whether or not legal action will be taken is being decided but there is one thing that is clear: these fake AI generated images are abusive, offensive, exploitative and done without Taylors consent and/or knowledge,” a source close to the 34-year-old pop star told the Daily Mail.

“Taylors circle of family and friends are furious, as are her fans obviously. They have the right to be, and every woman should be,” the source added, noting that the X account that originally posted the X-rated content “does not exist anymore.”

A source close to Swift added, per the news site: “The door needs to be shut on this. Legislation needs to be passed to prevent this and laws must be enacted.”

After the pics took the internet by storm Thursday morning, Swifties banned together and tried to bury the images by sharing an influx of positive posts about the “Shake It Off” singer.

As of Thursday afternoon, the photos in question — which showed Swift in various sexualized positions at a Kansas City Chiefs game, a nod to her highly-publicized romance with the teams tight end, Travis Kelce — appeared to be yanked from the platform.

The crude images were traced back to an account under the handle @FloridaPigMan, which no longer bears any results on X.

The account reportedly garnered the images from Celeb Jihad, which boasts a collection of fake pornographic imagery, or “deepfakes,” using celebrities’ likenesses.

Once posted to X, the images were viewed more than 45 million times, reposted some 24,000 times and liked by hundreds of thousands of people before @FloridaPigMan, a verified account, was suspended for violating the platform’s policy, according to The Verge.

The images were on X for about 17 hours before their removal, The Verge reported.

“It is shocking that the social media platform even let them be up to begin with,” a source close to Swift told the Daily Mail.

X’s Help Center outlines policies on “synthetic and manipulated media” as well as “nonconsensual nudity,” which both prohibit X-rated deepfakes from being posted on the site.

Representatives for X did not immediately respond to The Post’s request for comment. Swift also has yet to comment on the images in question.

Her fanbase had a lot to say on the matter, though, lashing out at legislators for not having more stringent policies surrounding AI’s use in place.

Others lambasted that this incident exposes a larger issue: “Yes the Taylor Swift AI pie is disgusting but so is the all the deepfake porn out there. … It needs to be regulated because it is done without consent,” one X user wrote.

I wish the public was horrified by AI porn without Taylor Swift being involved, but the disgusting thing is this could be the only thing that moves the needle and and gets the ball rolling on a crackdown. Don't ever tell me she doesn't have power to spur change.

“I wish the public was horrified by AI porn without Taylor Swift being involved,” another said. “The disgusting thing is this could be the only thing that moves the needle and and gets the ball rolling on a crackdown. Don’t ever tell me she doesn’t have power to spur change.”

It’s unclear what type of legislation could be brought against @FloridaPigMan, as regulations around AI vary state to state, or if Swift would sue Celeb Jihad, X or the user behind the X account.

Swift previously threatened legal action against Celeb Jihad back in 2011 after it shared another fake nude image, but nothing ever came of it as the site claimed it’s a “satire” rather than a pornographic website — as well as disclaimers that it respects A-listers’ intellectual property, according to the Daily Mail.

Nonconsensual deepfake pornography has also been made illegal in Texas, Minnesota, New York, Hawaii and Georgia, though it hasnt been successful in stopping the circulation of AI-generated nude images at high schools in New Jersey and Florida, where explicit deepfake images of female students were circulated by male classmates.

Last week, Rep. Joseph Morelle (D-NY) and Tom Kean (R-NJ) reintroduced a bill that would make the nonconsensual sharing of digitally altered pornographic images a federal crime, with imposable penalties like jail time, a fine or both.

The Preventing Deepfakes of Intimate Images Act was referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary, but the committee has yet to make a decision on whether or not to pass the bill.

Aside from making the sharing of digitally-altered intimate images a criminal offense, Morelle and Keans proposed legislation also would allow victims to sue offenders in civil court. 

Continue Reading

Politics

Starmer condemned for telling MP ‘she talks rubbish’

Published

on

By

Starmer condemned for telling MP 'she talks rubbish'

Sir Keir Starmer should have reassured and explained his immigration policy to a senior Welsh MP rather than telling her “you’re rubbish”, Labour peer Harriet Harman said.

Speaking to Beth Rigby on the Electoral Dysfunction podcast, Harriet Harman criticised the prime minister for telling Plaid Cymru Westminster leader Liz Saville Roberts during PMQs “she talks rubbish” after she called him out for using “island of strangers” in his immigration speech on Monday.

Baroness Harman said: “He should have actually explained ‘look, this is what we’re getting at. We’re it’s a communitarian message, it’s about neighbourliness, it’s about integration’.

“And he should have done that and reassured her and explained rather than just slapping her down.

“I just think to call across the chamber, ‘you’re rubbish’ – I think a prime minister has the opportunity to be a bit more magisterial in that.”

She said she has “been that woman standing there asking the prime minister a heartfelt and serious question, and had the prime minister say, ‘you’re rubbish'”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Starmer’s speech divides opinion

Baroness Harman added: “I kind of went ‘ouch’ at that point, because I’ve been in that situation myself.

More on Harriet Harman

“I think people do want an explanation and he’s got an explanation and he should have done that rather than hit at the messenger.”

After Sir Keir used the phrase “island of strangers” while announcing a crackdown on immigration, fellow Labour MPs, businesses and industry reacted angrily.

The rhetoric was likened by some critics to Enoch Powell’s rivers of blood speech.

Ahead of PMQs on Wednesday, Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden tried to move the debate away from Sir Keir’s controversial remarks.

“I think we should focus on the policy,” he told Sky News.

“Immigration has contributed a huge amount to the UK, it will in the future, I think the public want a sense of rules around it, that is what the prime minister was speaking about.”

He said the row was “overblown” and he might use the “island of strangers” phrase “depending on the context”.

Continue Reading

Politics

MPs on farming committee call on Rachel Reeves to delay family farm tax

Published

on

By

MPs on farming committee call on Rachel Reeves to delay family farm tax

The UK’s food security and the future of farming lies in Rachel Reeves’ hands, a leading MP has said as a committee called on the government to delay farm inheritance tax changes.

The environment, food and rural affairs (EFRA) committee has released a report calling on the government to delay the reforms for a year until April 2027.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced in the October budget farmers would no longer be allowed to claim inheritance tax relief for farms worth more than £1m from April 2026.

The move prompted multiple protests in Westminster by farmers who said it will threaten the future of thousands of multi-generational family farms.

The EFRA committee, made up of seven Labour MPs and four Lib Dem and Tory MPs, said a pause in the implementation would “allow for better formulation of tax policy and provide the government with an opportunity to convey a positive long-term vision for farming”.

A delay would also protect vulnerable farmers who would have “more time to seek appropriate professional advice”, the MPs said.

farmers protest in central london over inheritance tax - SN screengrab
Image:
There have been multiple protests

The MPs raised concerns the change was announced “without adequate consultation, impact assessment or affordability assessment”, leaving the impact on farms and food security “disputed and unclear”.

More on Inheritance Tax

They said it risks producing “unintended consequences” and threatens to “affect the most vulnerable”.

The MPs have called on the government to consider alternative reforms.

Read more:
Food prices could rise due to inheritance tax rise

Typical family farm ‘would have to spend 159% of its profits for a decade to pay’ tax

Chair of the EFRA Committee Alistair Carmichael said the government should pause and reconsider the farmers' inheritance tax changes
Image:
Chair of the EFRA Committee Alistair Carmichael said the government should pause and reconsider the farmers’ inheritance tax changes

Alistair Carmichael, the Lib Dem chair of the committee, told Sky News: “There is a need for inheritance tax to be reformed.

“The use of land purchase by the super rich as a means of sheltering their wealth is something which is not in the public interest or farmers.

“But this is not the way to go about reform.

“The risk is you see farmers selling out, they will sell out to people who are not going to use land for food production then we risk losing food security – we’ve seen how foolish relying on exports is after Putin’s invasion.”

Jeremy Clarkson arrives in central London to join the farmers protest over the changes to inheritance tax (IHT) rules in the recent budget with introduce new taxes on farms worth more than ..1 million. Picture date: Tuesday November 19, 2024. PA Photo. Farmers have reacted over the inheritance tax changes for farming businesses, which limit the 100% relief for farms to only the first ..1 million of combined agricultural and business property. For anything above that, landowners will pay a 20% tax rate, rather than the standard 40% rate of inheritance tax (IHT) applied to other land and property. PA Photo. Photo credit should read: Aaron Chown/PA Wire
Image:
Celebrities such as Jeremy Clarkson have drawn attention to the outrage

He added “as an outsider looking in”, the way in which the Treasury handled the inheritance tax announcement, after Labour said in opposition they would not change it, “has created a real problem of political authority” for Environment Secretary Steve Reed.

“It’s a problem the Treasury themselves can solve,” he said.

“Their own backbenchers increasingly think they should solve this and our report today gives them an opportunity to do that if they choose to take it.

“It really is up to the Chancellor of the Exchequer. It is over to her now.”

The committee report says before the autumn budget 70% of farmers felt optimistic about their futures, but that fell to 12% after the budget.

The survey, by the Farmers Guardian in March, also found 84% of farmers felt their mental health has been affected by the announcement.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Key points from the budget

Farmers said the government announcing the closure of applications to this year’s sustainable farming incentive with just hours to go, was also a cause.

The committee said there are other ways to achieve reform, and called on the government to publish its evaluation and rationale for not following alternative policy measures.

They also said the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has a pattern of “poor communication and last-minute decision-making following rumours and departmental leaks”.

Continue Reading

Politics

Ukrainian man charged over fires at properties and car linked to Sir Keir Starmer

Published

on

By

Ukrainian man charged over fires at properties and car linked to Sir Keir Starmer

A 21-year-old man has been charged with three counts of arson with intent to endanger life after fires at two properties and a car linked to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.

Roman Lavrynovych, a Ukrainian national from Sydenham, southeast London, is due to appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Friday, the Metropolitan Police said.

The force said officers from the Met’s Counter Terrorism Command led the investigation because of the connections to the prime minister.

Sir Keir Starmer house
Metropolitan Police
Fire Pic: LNP
Image:
Pic: LNP

Emergency services were called to a fire in the early hours of Monday at a house in Kentish Town, north London, where Sir Keir lived with his family before becoming prime minister.

Damage was caused to the property’s entrance but nobody was hurt.

A car was also set alight in the same street last Thursday.

A forensics officer is seen in Kentish Town, north London. Police are investigating a fire at Sir Keir Starmer's house in north London. Picture date: Monday May 12, 2025.
Image:
Forensic workers at a house in Kentish Town owned by the prime minister. Pic: PA


There was another blaze at the front door of a house converted into flats in Islington, also linked to the prime minister, on Sunday.

One person was taken to safety via an internal staircase by crews wearing breathing apparatus, London Fire Brigade said.

The head of the Crown Prosecution Service counter terrorism division, Bethan David, said: “These charges relate to two fires at residential addresses in Islington on Sunday May 11 and in Kentish Town on Monday May 12, as well as a car fire in Kentish Town on Thursday May 8.

“The Crown Prosecution Service reminds all concerned that criminal proceedings against this defendant are now active and that he has the right to a fair trial.”

Continue Reading

Trending