Connect with us

Published

on

Few on Wall Street were optimistic about bonus season this year — but stingy payouts have still managed to leave many disappointed. 

The consensus among most junior bankers is that most faced yet another year of s–tty comp, according to Wall Streets meme master Litquidity.

The finance-focused social-media account has been barraged with junior bankers complaining that bonuses this year were a bloodbath and across the board bad news.

Nowhere was that more evident than at Citi, where employees have been informed roughly 20,000 of their ranks will be culled.

While few expected anything too generous given the state of the bank, the lackluster comp only exacerbated the poor morale. 

Citi bonuses were straight-up disrespectful, one employee complained to Litquidity. 

Another chimed in that Citi payouts were savage across the board, while yet another banker called them absolute st.

For others, layoffs put things in perspective, Bonuses were way down but I still got one.

At Goldman Sachs, one employee said of the rank-and-file, Cant say anyone was really happy.

Another described compensation as unevenly distributed with the partners once again getting a good payout and lower-ranking employees getting shafted.

We said we would pay for performance and thats what guided our comp decisions across our businesses,” Tony Fratto, Goldman’s head of communications said.

At Americas largest bank, JPMorgan, compensation and morale remained relatively stable.

One employee even went so far as to call his bonus awesome. 

While it’s too early to know the overall trend for how each bank paid employees year over year — Bank of America has yet to tell employees their total compensation — the pools at most banks were smaller as a result of a continued slowdown in dealmaking.

Litquidity said the bonus season was expected — in part because of the widespread reports this year would be worse than last.

An annual report from compensation consulting firm Johnson Associates at the end of last year predicted bankers could see bonuses dropping 15% to 25% this season.

Most Wall Street professionals will have to wait another year for a rebound in year-end bonuses, Alan Johnson, managing director of the firm, said. For most it will be another disappointing year. 

Of course, the issue is that most bankers think theyre the exception to the rule and will be the outlier who gets compensated well.

At the same time, many young bankers have inflated expectations after receiving record bonuses for the 2021 fiscal year. 

Essential weekly read to fuel business lunches.

Please provide a valid email address.

By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Never miss a story.

Those payouts had been fueled by record earnings — and a willingness to pay top dollar amid a labor shortage that led to a war for talent.

An annual report from compensation consulting firm Johnson Associates at the end of last year predicted bankers could see bonuses dropping 15% to 25% this season.

Most Wall Street professionals will have to wait another year for a rebound in year-end bonuses, Alan Johnson, managing director of the firm, said. For most it will be another disappointing year. 

Of course, the issue is that most bankers think theyre the exception to the rule — and will be the outlier who gets compensated well. At the same time, many young bankers have inflated expectations after receiving record bonuses for the 2021 fiscal year. 

Those payouts had been fueled by record earnings and a willingness to pay top dollar amid a labor shortage that led to a war for talent.

Indeed, management in 2022 had painted the bonus drought as a one-off, sources said. 

Unfortunately, that doesnt appear to be panning out.

The bar was so low for giving people a small percentage uptick that managers were certain 2023 would be better, a source said.  

Continue Reading

Politics

South Korean court clears Wemade ex-CEO in Wemix manipulation case

Published

on

By

South Korean court clears Wemade ex-CEO in Wemix manipulation case

South Korean court clears Wemade ex-CEO in Wemix manipulation case

After nearly a year of legal proceedings, a South Korean court acquitted former Wemade CEO Jang Hyun-guk of market manipulation charges.

Continue Reading

Politics

Is there £15bn of wiggle room in Rachel Reeves’s fiscal rules?

Published

on

By

Is there £15bn of wiggle room in Rachel Reeves's fiscal rules?

Are Rachel Reeves’s fiscal rules quite as iron clad as she insists?

How tough is her armour really? And is there actually scope for some change, some loosening to avoid big tax hikes in the autumn?

We’ve had a bit of clarity early this morning – and that’s a question we discuss on the Politics at Sam and Anne’s podcast today.

Politics Live: Reeves to reform financial regulations

And tens of billions of pounds of borrowing depends on the answer – which still feels intriguingly opaque.

You might think you know what the fiscal rules are. And you might think you know they’re not negotiable.

For instance, the main fiscal rule says that from 2029-30, the government’s day-to-day spending needs to be in surplus – i.e. rely on taxation alone, not borrowing.

And Rachel Reeves has been clear – that’s not going to change, and there’s no disputing this.

But when the government announced its fiscal rules in October, it actually published a 19-page document – a “charter” – alongside this.

And this contains all sorts of notes and caveats. And it’s slightly unclear which are subject to the “iron clad” promise – and which aren’t.

There’s one part of that document coming into focus – with sources telling me that it could get changed.

And it’s this – a little-known buffer built into the rules.

It’s outlined in paragraph 3.6 on page four of the Charter for Budget Responsibility.

This says that from spring 2027, if the OBR forecasts that she still actually has a deficit of up to 0.5% of GDP in three years, she will still be judged to be within the rules.

In other words, if in spring 2027 she’s judged to have missed her fiscal rules by perhaps as much as £15bn, that’s fine.

Rachel Reeves during a visit to Cosy Ltd.
Pic: PA
Image:
A change could save the chancellor some headaches. Pic: PA

Now there’s a caveat – this exemption only applies, providing at the following budget the chancellor reduces that deficit back to zero.

But still, it’s potentially helpful wiggle room.

This help – this buffer – for Reeves doesn’t apply today, or for the next couple of years – it only kicks in from the spring of 2027.

But I’m being told by a source that some of this might change and the ability to use this wiggle room could be brought forward to this year. Could she give herself a get out of jail card?

The chancellor could gamble that few people would notice this technical change, and it might avoid politically catastrophic tax hikes – but only if the markets accept it will mean higher borrowing than planned.

But the question is – has Rachel Reeves ruled this out by saying her fiscal rules are iron clad or not?

Or to put it another way… is the whole of the 19-page Charter for Budget Responsibility “iron clad” and untouchable, or just the rules themselves?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Is Labour plotting a ‘wealth tax’?

And what counts as “rules” and are therefore untouchable, and what could fall outside and could still be changed?

I’ve been pressing the Treasury for a statement.

And this morning, they issued one.

A spokesman said: “The fiscal rules as set out in the Charter for Budget Responsibility are iron clad, and non-negotiable, as are the definition of the rules set out in the document itself.”

So that sounds clear – but what is a definition of the rule? Does it include this 0.5% of GDP buffer zone?

Read more:
Reeves hints at tax rises in autumn
Tough decisions ahead for chancellor

The Treasury does concede that not everything in the charter is untouchable – including the role and remit of the OBR, and the requirements for it to publish a specific list of fiscal metrics.

But does that include that key bit? Which bits can Reeves still tinker with?

I’m still unsure that change has been ruled out.

Continue Reading

Politics

LA sheriff deputies admit to helping crypto ‘Godfather’ extort victims

Published

on

By

LA sheriff deputies admit to helping crypto ‘Godfather’ extort victims

LA sheriff deputies admit to helping crypto ‘Godfather’ extort victims

The Justice Department says two LA Sheriff deputies admitted to helping extort victims, including for a local crypto mogul, while working their private security side hustles.

Continue Reading

Trending