Microsoft cracked down on the use of the companys free AI software after the tool was linked to creating the sexually explicit deepfake images of Taylor Swift that swamped social media and raised the specter of a lawsuit by the infuriated singer.
The tech giant pushed an update to its popular tool, called Designer a text-to-image program powered by OpenAIs Dall-E 3 that adds guardrails that will prevent the use of non-consensual photos, the company said.
The fake photos showing a nude Swift surrounded by Kansas City Chiefs players in a reference to her highly-publicized romance with Travis Kelce were traced back to Microsofts Designer AI before they began circulating on X, Reddit and other websites,tech-focused site 404 Media reported on Monday.
“We are investigating these reports and are taking appropriate action to address them,” a Microsoft spokesperson told 404 Media, which first reported on the update.
“We have large teams working on the development of guardrails and other safety systems in line with our responsible AI principles, including content filtering, operational monitoring and abuse detection to mitigate misuse of the system and help create a safer environment for users,” the spokesperson added, noting that per the company’s Code of Conduct, any Designer users who create deepfakes will lose access to the service.
Representatives for Microsoft did not immediately respond to The Post’s request for comment.
The update comes as Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said tech companies need to move fast to crack down on the misuse of artificial intelligence tools.
Nadella, whose company is a key investor in ChatGPT creator OpenAI, described the spread of fake pornographic images of the Cruel Summer singer as alarming and terrible.
We have to act. And quite frankly, all of us in the tech platform, irrespective of what your standing on any particular issue is, Nadella said, according to a transcript ahead of an interview on NBC Nightly News interview, which will air Tuesday.
I dont think anyone would want an online world that is completely not safe for both content creators and content consumers.
The Swift deepfakes were viewed more than 45 million times on X before finally being removed after about 17 hours.
A source close to Swift was appalled “the social media platform even let them be up to begin with,” the Daily Mail reported, especially considering Xs Help Center outlines policies that prohibit posting synthetic and manipulated media as well as non-consensual nudity.”
Over the weekend, Elon Musks social media platform took the extraordinary step of blocking any searches involving Swifts name from yielding results even those that were harmless.
X executive Joe Benarroch described the move as a temporary action and done with an abundance of caution as we prioritize safety on this issue.
The ban remained in effect Monday.
The controversy could mean another headache for Microsoft and other AI leaders who are already facing mounting legal, legislative and regulatory scrutiny over the burgeoning technology.
White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre described the deepfakes trend as very alarming and said the Biden administration was going to do what we can to deal with this issue.
The rise of AI deepfakes could emerge as a key theme later this week when Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, TikTok CEO Shou Chew and other prominent tech bosses testify before a Senate panel.
Earlier this month, Rep. Joseph Morelle (D-NY) and Tom Kean (R-NJ) reintroduced a bill that would make the nonconsensual sharing of digitally altered pornographic images a federal crime, with imposable penalties like jail time, a fine or both.
The Preventing Deepfakes of Intimate Images Act was referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary, but the committee has yet to make a decision on whether or not to pass the bill.
The trial of hip-hop mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs has begun, with the process to pick the jurors who will determine his fate now under way.
Combs, wearing a white shirt with a black crew-neck sweater, grey trousers and glasses, his hair and goatee now grey, hugged and shook hands with all his lawyers as he arrived at the federal courtroom in Manhattan, New York, for the start of the proceedings.
The 55-year-old has been held in detention in Brooklyn since he was arrested and charged in September 2024, accused of engaging in sex trafficking and presiding over a racketeering conspiracy over two decades.
He has pleaded not guilty to criminal charges, said all his sexual relationships and encounters were consensual, and strenuously denied all allegations of wrongdoing.
Image: The Metropolitan Detention Center, where Combs is incarcerated. Pic: AP/ Yuki Iwamura
Due to the high-profile nature of the case, the jury selection process is expected to last all this week, with opening statements by the lawyers set to begin next week.
Unlike some other high-profile trials in the US, this one won’t be broadcast live because federal courtrooms, unlike some state courtrooms, don’t allow electronic recordings inside.
Judge Arun Subramanian started proceedings shortly after 9am on Monday (2pm UK time), first making several rulings on what issues experts will be allowed to testify on when they take to the witness stand.
He then gave an overview of the case and began the questioning of prospective jurors one by one – a process known as “voir dire” – with the aim of finding a panel of 12 jurors and six alternates who can be fair and impartial despite heavy media coverage of the case.
Image: There are no cameras in court. Sketch: Elizabeth Williams via AP
Jurors are being asked if they have any views on the prosecution or the defence, if they or someone close to them has been a victim of crime, and their beliefs on hiring sex workers, the use of illegal drugs, hip-hop artists and law enforcement.
They are also being questioned on whether they have heard of names included on a list of individuals, including celebrities, who may be mentioned during the trial. The list is long, the court heard, with the judge saying it reminded him of Lord Of The Rings.
What have potential jurors been asked?
Image: Combs embraced his attorneys in court. Sketch: REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg
One prospective juror said they had heard of actors Michael B Jordan and Mike Myers, but this would not prevent them being fair and impartial should they be selected. Another said they had heard of Kanye West.
The context in which Jordan, Myers, West and other people may be mentioned is not yet known.
Other names that came up included Aubrey O’Day and Dawn Richard – former members of girl group Danity Kane, who were signed to Bad Boy – and singer Michelle Williams.
Several prospective jurors indicated they had seen news reports about Combs, and one prospective juror described a still image she had seen as “damning evidence”. She was rejected from consideration.
Another potential juror was excluded because she said a family member had experienced something that made them feel uncomfortable about hearing the case.
At one point during proceedings, Combs asked for a bathroom break, telling the judge: “I’m sorry your honour, I’m a little nervous today.”
One potential juror said they had seen a joke on social media about baby oil authorities say they found in Combs’ residences during searches in March 2024. They said they could remain impartial.
Throughout the day, as potential jurors were questioned, Combs appeared to express his approval or disapproval, either with a nod or by shaking his head no, to his attorneys.
Image: Brian Steel, one of Combs’ attorneys, pictured outside the court. Pic: REUTERS/David Dee Delgado
What is Combs accused of?
In the indictment listing the formal charges against the rapper, he is accused of a pattern of abusive behavior over two decades, allegedly with the help of people in his entourage.
Prosecutors say he manipulated women into participating in drug-fuelled sexual performances with male sex workers, which he called “Freak Offs”.
Combs and his associates resorted to violent acts, including beatings, kidnapping and arson, when he didn’t get his way, they allege.
Lawyers for Combs say any group sex was consensual, that there was no coercion involved, and nothing that happened amounted to a criminal racket.
If convicted, he faces the possibility of decades in prison.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:53
What is Sean Combs on trial for?
The Cassie video
One issue likely to be featured in the trial is an incident in 2016, when a security camera recorded Combs allegedly kicking and hitting his then girlfriend Cassie Ventura in a Los Angeles hotel hallway.
Cassie filed a lawsuit in November 2023 saying Combs had subjected her to years of abuse, including beatings and rape, but the case was settled the following day.
The hotel footage emerged in May 2024. Shortly afterwards, Combs released a video apology, saying his behaviour in the video was at a time when he had “hit rock bottom” but nonetheless was “inexcusable” and that he was “disgusted” with himself.
One of his lawyers, Marc Agnifilo, has said Combs was “not a perfect person” and that there had been drug use and toxic relationships, but that all sexual activity between Combs, Cassie and other people was consensual.
Jury selection continues today and throughout this week, with the trial expected to last about eight weeks.
Michael Rothstein is a reporter for NFL Nation at ESPN. Rothstein covers the Atlanta Falcons. You can follow him via Twitter @MikeRothstein.
The Trump administration’s 2026 fiscal budget request to Congress eliminates major federal funding for traumatic brain injury (TBI) research and education, potentially undercutting efforts to address head injuries in sports, particularly at the high school and youth levels.
The White House’s proposed budget, released Friday, includes eliminating the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention umbrella agency responsible for TBI research, including the $8.25 million marked for brain injury research and public education about the dangers of concussions. The CDC is facing $3.59 billion in budget cuts.
Although the president proposes the federal budget, it is up to Congress to approve a final budget bill, so the TBI program could be restored or moved to a different agency. The White House did not respond to an ESPN request for comment.
The budget proposal comes after the CDC on April 1 placed all five staffers devoted to administering the government’s main traumatic brain injury program on paid administrative leave, CDC employees told ESPN. Paid administrative leave means the workers are still government employees.
The budget cuts would “roll back decades of progress,” said Dr. Owen Perlman, a brain injury specialist and board member of the Brain Injury Association of America.
Among the items targeted is Heads Up, a concussion-prevention program for youth and high school coaches, athletic trainers and other sports officials. The CDC staffers put on leave administered the program. Forty-five states participate in the program to varying degrees, a CDC official said, asking not to be identified.
Staffers interviewed by ESPN declined to speak on the record, citing fears of administration retribution.
“We’re really worried about the hundreds of thousands of coaches who have to take this training,” the CDC official said. “This is really built in, and we’ve lost the whole team” behind the program.
Some Heads Up training is part of coaches’ and other sports officials’ state compliance requirements. The CDC official said hundreds of email queries are arriving every week asking how to comply as the federal program shuts down. The Heads Up website says more than 10 million people have participated in its online training programs.
Congress first approved TBI research funding in 1996. Legislation to keep the program going expired at the end of 2024, and a House bill to renew it has yet to advance out of committee.
In a 2018 CDC survey, 12% of adult respondents reported experiencing a head injury in the previous 12 months, including but not limited to sports-related activities. A follow-up study was being prepared when the staffers were placed on leave. The research data was part of a program to measure TBI prevalence and boost prevention, care and recovery efforts.
The Heads Up website remained active Monday but offered no clues regarding the program’s endangered status.
“In the last month, I don’t think the public has felt an impact,” a laid-off CDC employee said. “But when those websites, trainings and materials get pulled down or when they can’t be updated, I think that’s when the public will feel it.”
In the proposed White House budget, the National Institutes of Health would retain an institute devoted to overall brain research, although the name would slightly change. The institute focuses on medical issues such as stroke and migraines, and it’s unclear whether TBI programs would be absorbed into it.
Hospitals and universities conducting TBI research funded by the CDC are bracing for potential funding cutbacks.
“We might not [get] the next year of renewal or the next wave of funding. And that’s sad and scary and impactful for all kinds of people, including myself in this project,” said Christine Baugh, an assistant professor at the University of Colorado’s School of Medicine who is studying how parents decide whether to let their children play contact sports and whether brain-injury awareness campaigns influence their decisions.
On April 23, the National Academy of Sciences received orders to cancel work on two TBI workshops, one of which analyzed the risks of repeated head impacts on children. Both workshops had already been held. One of the workshop organizers, Dr. Fred Rivara, a pediatrics professor at the University of Washington, told ESPN that the cancellation affected funding for publishing the information, and he called the potential cuts “tragic.”
“That’s a perfect example of how this change in, or devastation of, funding at the CDC is impacting people,” Rivara said. “They want to know, for sports: What about these repetitive impacts? Are they bad for kids? It’s a perfect example of the impact of this.”
Traumatic brain injuries have lifelong repercussions on a person’s physical, cognitive, emotional and behavioral health, Perlman said.
Even though some states fund TBI-treatment programs independently of the federal government, concerns are growing about a domino effect if Congress fails to renew funding.
“For many people with concussions or certainly moderate or severe brain injuries, there’s no endpoint,” Perlman said. “It’s a lifetime problem, and there needs to be lifetime funding for it.”
The first round of the 2025 Stanley Cup playoffs is complete. Eight of the teams that made the postseason bracket have moved on, and eight others have been eliminated.
Before the second-round series begin, ESPN’s experts have identified their picks for each matchup. Which four teams will move on to the conference finals?
John Buccigross: Panthers in seven Ryan Callahan: Panthers in six Cassie Campbell-Pascall: Panthers in six Sachin Chandan: Panthers in six Meghan Chayka: Panthers in six Ryan S. Clark: Panthers in seven Linda Cohn: Panthers in six Rachel Doerrie: Panthers in six Ray Ferraro: Panthers in six Emily Kaplan: Panthers in seven Tim Kavanagh: Maple Leafs in six Peter Lawrence-Riddell: Panthers in six Steve Levy: Panthers in six Vince Masi: Panthers in six Victoria Matiash: Panthers in six Sean McDonough: Panthers in six Mark Messier: Panthers in six AJ Mleczko: Panthers in six Arda Öcal: Maple Leafs in six Kristen Shilton: Maple Leafs in seven John Thoering: Panthers in six Bob Wischusen: Panthers in six Greg Wyshynski: Panthers in six
Consensus prediction: Panthers (20 of 23 picks)
Metropolitan Division
John Buccigross: Capitals in seven Ryan Callahan: Capitals in seven Cassie Campbell-Pascall: Capitals in six Sachin Chandan: Capitals in six Meghan Chayka: Hurricanes in six Ryan S. Clark: Capitals in seven Linda Cohn: Capitals in six Rachel Doerrie: Capitals in six Ray Ferraro: Capitals in seven Emily Kaplan: Capitals in seven Tim Kavanagh: Capitals in six Peter Lawrence-Riddell: Hurricanes in seven Steve Levy: Capitals in five Vince Masi: Hurricanes in six Victoria Matiash: Hurricanes in six Sean McDonough: Capitals in seven Mark Messier: Hurricanes in six AJ Mleczko: Hurricanes in five Mike Monaco: Hurricanes in six Arda Öcal: Capitals in six Kristen Shilton: Hurricanes in six John Thoering: Capitals in seven Bob Wischusen: Capitals in seven Greg Wyshynski: Capitals in seven
Consensus prediction: Capitals (16 of 24 picks)
Central Division
John Buccigross: Stars in seven Ryan Callahan: Stars in five Sachin Chandan: Stars in six Ryan S. Clark: Stars in seven Linda Cohn: Jets in seven Rachel Doerrie: Stars in six Ray Ferraro: Stars in six Emily Kaplan: Stars in six Tim Kavanagh: Stars in seven Peter Lawrence-Riddell: Stars in six Steve Levy: Stars in seven Vince Masi: Jets in seven Victoria Matiash: Jets in seven Sean McDonough: Stars in six Mark Messier: Stars in six Mike Monaco: Stars in six Arda Öcal: Stars in six Kristen Shilton: Stars in six John Thoering: Stars in seven Bob Wischusen: Jets in seven Greg Wyshynski: Stars in six
Consensus prediction: Stars (17 of 21 picks)
Pacific Division
John Buccigross: Oilers in seven Ryan Callahan: Golden Knights in six Cassie Campbell-Pascall: Oilers in seven Sachin Chandan: Oilers in seven Meghan Chayka: Golden Knights in seven Ryan S. Clark: Golden Knights in seven Linda Cohn: Oilers in seven Rachel Doerrie: Golden Knights in seven Ray Ferraro: Golden Knights in seven Emily Kaplan: Golden Knights in seven Tim Kavanagh: Golden Knights in six Peter Lawrence-Riddell: Golden Knights in six Steve Levy: Golden Knights in seven Vince Masi: Oilers in six Victoria Matiash: Golden Knights in six Sean McDonough: Golden Knights in seven Mark Messier: Oilers in seven AJ Mleczko: Golden Knights in six Mike Monaco: Oilers in six Arda Öcal: Oilers in six Kristen Shilton: Oilers in seven John Thoering: Golden Knights in seven Bob Wischusen: Golden Knights in seven Greg Wyshynski: Oilers in seven
Consensus prediction: Golden Knights (14 of 24 picks)