An autonomous Waymo car hit a cyclist in San Francisco yesterday – but luckily the cyclist had only minor injuries. Still, it’s bad news for urban cyclists, and for Waymo, Alphabet’s autonomous vehicle division, which is already having a tough time shaking off the Cruise disaster.
After the accident, Waymo, in counter-Cruise fashion, reported that the company called the police to the scene and subsequently contacted “relevant” authorities about what happened, according to Reuters. I’m guessing crucial moments of video footage won’t go missing this time.
According to the report, the Waymo vehicle was at a full stop at the four-way intersection of 17th and Mississippi in Potrero Hill, with a large truck turning into the intersection. Problem was, the Waymo car went ahead when it perceived it was its turn to enter the intersection, but it didn’t see a cyclist who was behind the truck and crossing into the Waymo car’s path.
After spotting the cyclist, the vehicle braked heavily, but it wasn’t enough to avoid hitting the cyclist, the company said. According to Reuters, a San Francisco Fire Department spokesperson said that a 911 call was made, but that the cyclist was not taken to the hospital and left the scene on their own.
This all falls as Waymo is looking to expand its full driverless robotaxi service in Los Angeles, where it is currently testing rides. The company already has a large fleet of robotaxis in San Francisco, which can be ordered and paid for via its app, and hopes to procure a license in Los Angeles to operate and expand its service.
California, too, has made a prime location for the human-less fleet in that robotaxis are immune from receiving moving violations. California law enforcement can only write traffic violations to humans, not robots, meaning that autonomous vehicles operating in a driverless mode are only susceptible to parking tickets – although some activists and residents are looking to change that in light of the accident involving a pedestrian getting dragged down a street by a Cruise robotaxi that failed to stop.
Waymo had said that it has a permit to operate 250 robotaxis in San Francisco, and that it deploys about 100 of them at any one time. The company also said that this month it would start testing its fully autonomous passenger cars without a human driver on freeways in Phoenix. It also is looking to expand to Austin.
Electrek’s Take
We don’t have particulars yet about why the vehicle didn’t register the cyclist, who presumably was legally traversing the intersection and minding their business before getting creepily rammed by a driverless car. But Google Earth shows that the intersection is relatively flat and wide with a bike lane – and that the accident happened in broad daylight, at around 3 p.m.
In any case, this is bad news for cyclists and for Waymo, which has been working to separate itself from the Cruise disaster. Although all things considered, Waymo has done pretty well for itself so far, and insists that its robotaxis are safer than human drivers – it’s going to have a tougher time making that argument now. And beside, its “we’re safer than human” data is very fresh. No one argues that texting and distracted drivers don’t kill cyclists, but Waymo has tallied just over 7 million driverless miles, and Cruise having had logged 5 million miles before stopping operations. Humans, on average, cause one death about every 100 million miles driven, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety.
Plus, while Waymo wants to officially set up its service in Los Angeles, it is getting plenty of pushback. The Teamsters and three other labor organizations are calling for stricter regulations of driverless cars, which they say threaten jobs of drivers. Plus a new bill is in the California Legislature that would grant cities and counties the authority to regulate or ban altogether companies like Waymo. So it’s looking like an uphill battle for Waymo these days.
Photo credit: Waymo
To reduce your carbon footprint and live more sustainably, consider going solar. EnergySage is a free service that connects you with trusted, reputable installers in your area – without having to give up your phone number until you select an installer. Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way through EnergySage. Get started today!
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Construction at BYD’s new EV plant in Brazil was suddenly halted Monday after authorities found Chinese workers in “slavery-like” conditions. The workers were hired in China by another firm, and BYD has since cut ties. BYD and the firm are now saying the term “slavery” was unjustly used, and some translations may have been misunderstood.
Why construction at BYD’s EV plant in Brazil is halted
Updated 12/26/24: This article has been updated with the latest information, including a statement from Jinjiang Group and comments from BYD’s general manager of public relations, Li Yunfei. Read more below.
According to a statement from the Public Ministry of Labor (MPT), 163 workers at the construction site of BYD’s new EV plant in Salvador, Brazil, were “being held in conditions analogous to slavery.”
Construction on the site was halted on Monday after the findings. According to the authorities, Jinjiang Group, one of the contractors BYD hired to build the new EV plant, hired the workers in China.
BYD released a statement saying it has cut ties with Jinjiang and is assisting the victims as it works with Brazilian authorities. All workers will be transferred to hotels. They will not be able to work and will have their contracts terminated.
Alexandre Baldy, senior vice president of BYD Brazil, said the company remains “committed to full compliance with Brazilian legislation, especially with regard to the protection of workers’ rights and human dignity.”
The MPT statement detailed the extreme “slavery-like” worker conditions. For example, they had one bathroom for every 31 workers, forcing them to wake up at 4 am to get in line to be ready for work at 5:30 am. They slept without mattresses on the bed, and the kitchens operated in “alarming conditions.”
If a worker quit after six months, they would leave the country without any pay after factoring in the cost of a round-trip airplane ticket.
BYD said it has held a “detailed review” over the past few weeks. The Chinese EV giant asked Jinjiang several times to improve the conditions.
A joint virtual hearing of the MPT and MTE is scheduled for December 26. The MPT said the need for new “on-site inspections” has not been ruled out. BYD’s new EV plant is set to begin production next year. Check back soon for more updates on the situation.
Update 12/26/24: Jinjian Group said the portrayal of its employees working in “slavery-like” conditions was inconsistent, and some of the translations may have been misunderstood.
“Being unjustly labeled as ‘enslaved’ has made our employees feel that their dignity has been insulted and their human rights violated, seriously hurting the dignity of the Chinese people,” Jinjiang said in a social media post (via Reuters). The company issued a joint letter to issue an apology.
BYD’s general manager of public relations, Li Yunfei, reposted the statement. Li added that “foreign forces” and some other members of the media were “deliberately smearing Chinese brands.
Mao Ning, a spokesperson for China’s foreign ministry, said the Chinese embassy in Brazil was in talks with leaders in the region to verify the accusations.
BYD is already a top-selling EV brand in Brazil. In October, it launched its first pickup, the Shark PHEV. The pickup is BYD’s sixth vehicle in Brazil, joining other popular models like the Dolphin Mini (Seagull), Yuan Plus, and Dolphin.
Once up and running, which was expected later this year or early 2025, BYD’s Brazil plant will have an annual production capacity of 150,000 vehicles.
Source: Bloomberg, Brazil Public Ministry of Labor
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Now, three years later, it sounds like a deal has been made.
Chinese media are reporting that Eve and Tesla have signed an agreement for Tesla to get cells from a Malaysian factory starting in 2026 (via CNEV Post):
Eve Energy has reached a supply agreement with Tesla for energy storage batteries, and its Malaysian factory is expected to start supplying energy storage batteries to Tesla US in 2026, according to a report in Chinese media outlet LatePost today.
Eve confirmed that it recently signed a deal with “a customer in the Americas” without confirming the customer, but LatePost reached out to them when reporting that Tesla was the customer, and they didn’t confirm nor deny it.
For the longest time, Tesla only had Panasonic as its battery cell supplier. The automaker pioneered using cylindrical li-ion cells in electric vehicles. Prior to Tesla, they were primarily used in personal electronics, like laptops.
At the time, Panasonic was the only cell manufacturer willing to put its cells in Tesla vehicles.
Over the last few years, Tesla has greatly increased its battery cell suppliers, adding contracts with CATL, LG, BYD, Samsung, and now apparently Eve Energy.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Hertz is trying to sell its Tesla cars to renters as it desperately tries to unload its electric vehicle inventory after a massive drop in value.
In 2021, Hertz made a major move to electrify its fleet, ordering 100,000 Tesla Model 3s and later adding Model Ys. This Tesla fleet boosted Hertz’s customer satisfaction, but issues soon arose when Tesla cut prices on the Model 3 and Model Y in 2022 and 2023, sharply reducing resale values.
This hit Hertz hard, as it relies on fleet value for its financial health. While the Model 3 held up to 90% of its value within three years as of 2020, more recent declines saw nearly 50% of that value erased, with Model Y values dropping even more.
You can get some exceptionally cheap Tesla vehicles on Hertz’s website. Of course, they have high mileages over short periods of time and they have been farted in by god knows how many people, but for as low as $17,000 and still under powertrain warranty, it’s not necessarily a bad deal.
But it looks like Hertz is having some issues selling those used Tesla vehicles.
The car rental company has started a new program to reach out to people who are renting its Tesla vehicles to try to get them to keep them.
A recent Hertz renter shared on Reddit an offer that the rental company sent him about keeping his Tesla Model 3 after his rental.
Hertz offered him to buy the 2023 Model 3 with 30,000 miles for just short of $18,000:
More people have received similar offers as per social media posts. It looks like a new program from Hertz to try to unload their Tesla inventory.
Electrek’s Take
These are not necessarily bad deals, but you shouldn’t expect “like new” cars. People tend not to take good care of rental cars.
But it might be a good solution for used car buyers looking to go electric.
At the cost and with fuel savings, this is basically a $12,000 vehicle over a few years.
When buying a cheap used EV, there’s no better way to charge it than with cheap solar power. If you want to make sure you’re finding a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage. EnergySage is a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar – whether you’re a homeowner or renter. They have hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, including some who install Tesla products like Powerwalls. They ensure you get high-quality solutions and save 20 to 30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and you share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.