Connect with us

Published

on

Government exhibit in the case against former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried.

Source: SDNY

As Sam Bankman-Fried prepares to face sentencing next month for his criminal fraud conviction tied to the epic collapse of FTX in 2022, former customers of the crypto exchange have reasons to believe they could actually recoup their money.

Bankman-Fried, who could spend the rest of his life behind bars, was found guilty in November on seven criminal counts after roughly $10 billion in customer funds from his company went missing. Some of that money went to pay for Bankman-Fried’s lavish lifestyle, but much of it went towards other investments that have, of late, appreciated dramatically in value.

Lawyers representing the bankruptcy estate of FTX told a judge in Delaware last week that they expect to fully repay customers and creditors with legitimate claims. Bankruptcy attorney Andrew Dietderich, who works with FTX’s new leadership team, said “there is still a great amount of work and risk” ahead in getting all the money back to clients, but that the team has a “strategy to achieve it.”

It’s a welcome development for the many thousands of customers (reportedly up to a million) who collectively lost billions of dollars in FTX’s collapse 15 months ago, when the crypto exchange spiraled into bankruptcy in a matter of days. Given the lightly regulated and unsecured nature of FTX — and the crypto industry at large — those clients faced the real possibility that the vast majority of their money had evaporated. Plenty of failed hedge funds and lenders lost virtually everything during the 2022 crypto winter.

Bankman-Fried never believed his company’s situation was that dire.

Even as regulators and federal prosecutors unearthed evidence showing that the 31-year-old entrepreneur and his top lieutenants had been pilfering billions of dollars from customer wallets for years, Bankman-Fried insisted that all the money was still somehow accessible.

“FTX US remains fully solvent,” Bankman-Fried wrote in a Substack post on Jan. 12, 2023, while he was under house arrest at his parents’ home in Palo Alto, California. He said the exchange “should be able to return all customers’ funds.”

In some ways, his narrative appears to be proving true.

Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried arrive for the trial of their son, former FTX Chief Executive Sam Bankman-Fried, who is facing fraud charges over the collapse of the bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange, at Federal Court in New York City, U.S., October 26, 2023. 

Brendan Mcdermid | Reuters

For months, FTX’s new CEO, John Ray III, and his team of restructuring advisors have been clawing back cash, luxury property, and crypto, as well as tracking down missing assets. They’ve already collected more than $7 billion, and that doesn’t include valuables like $26 million in gifts and property to Bankman-Fried’s parents, or the $700 million handed over to K5 Global and founder Michael Kives, who invested FTX cash in companies like SpaceX. Some of those investments have seen a precipitous rise in value.

FTX had been negotiating with bidders about a potential reboot of the company, but those efforts were scrapped last month.

Braden Perry, who was once a senior trial lawyer for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, FTX’s only official U.S. regulator, told CNBC that the decision to repay users in full came afterthe abandonment of efforts to restart the FTX crypto exchange,” in favor of “a focus on liquidating assets to make customers whol​e.”

Getting actual money back in the hands of customers still remains a challenge. While a lot of the value has been recouped and more is to come, divvying up large amounts of cash is a complex process in bankruptcies, particularly when so much of the money is in non-traditional and illiquid assets.

Even Ray was doubtful at the beginning of the process, noting in late 2022 that, “At the end of the day, we’re not going to be able to recover all the losses here.” 

‘Sam coins’ soar

What Ray wasn’t banking on was a huge market rebound. When he made those remarks, crypto was mired in a bear market, with bitcoin trading at around $16,000. It’s now above $47,000.

In September, the bankruptcy team released a status report showing that FTX had $3.4 billion worth of digital assets, with over $1.1 billion coming from its Solana investment.

Solana fits into a category of so-called “Sam coins,” a group that also includes Serum, a token created and promoted by FTX and sister hedge fund Alameda Research. After the dust settled from FTX’s bankruptcy, Solana saw a huge run-up in its price, and it continued to rally after the September report. Since the end of that month, it’s spiked fivefold.

Meanwhile, FTX’s bitcoin stash, which was worth $560 million at the time of the September report, is today valued north of $1 billion.

Bankman-Fried’s investments weren’t limited to crypto. He also used client money to back startups like Anthropic, the artificial intelligence company founded by ex-OpenAI employees. FTX invested $500 million in Anthropic in 2021, before the generative AI boom. Anthropic’s valuation hit $18 billion in December 2023, which would value FTX’s roughly 8% stake at about $1.4 billion.

During Bankman-Fried’s criminal trial in New York, Judge Lewis Kaplan denied the defense’s request that it be permitted to say that FTX’s investment in Anthropic was a smart bet. The bankruptcy estate of FTX has been looking to sell its Anthropic stake, according to a court filing this month.

Sam Bankman-Fried stands as forewoman reads the verdict to the court.

Artist: Elizabeth Williams

In his biography on Bankman-Fried titled “Going Infinite,” Michael Lewis said he was told by an investor interested in bidding for the venture portfolio that “if it was sold intelligently, it should go for at least $2 billion.” Lewis, who published his book late last year, wrote that, based on his back-of-the-envelope math, the $7.3 billion that Ray’s team had come up with didn’t include Serum, some large clawbacks and other venture investments that had appreciated in value.

For FTX customers, being made whole, according to a judge’s ruling, means getting the cash equivalent of what their crypto was worth in November 2022. In other words, they’re not seeing any of the upside of FTX’s investments or being given virtual coins that would allow them to cash out at higher valuations.

Still, some investors have found a way to participate in the FTX’s ongoing odyssey. The market for FTX IOUs lit up last year as it became clear that the bankruptcy estate was cobbling together a lucrative portfolio. One financial firm that had lost around $100 million initially sold its FTX debt for 6 cents on the dollar in a new secondary market out of concern that he may never get a better deal. As of December, those claims were going for more than 70 cents on the dollar.

If customers are eventually made whole, that could play a big role in Bankman-Fried’s appeal, likely following his sentencing, which is set to take place in Brooklyn on March 28. Perry said it could also affect how the judge handles sentencing in the first place.

“Under the federal sentencing guidelines, and even assuming no monetary loss, SBF still faces at least 70 months in prison based on his base level offense, number of victims, sophisticated means, and leadership role,” Perry said.

The massive losses that were originally expected would suggest 30 to years to life, Perry added.

Renato Mariotti, a former prosecutor in the U.S. Justice Department’s Securities and Commodities Fraud Section, told CNBC that judges typically consider the amount of restitution paid to victims at sentencing.

“If the victim is made whole, that is a big plus for the defendant,” said Mariotti. He noted, however, that the extent of the fraud coupled with Bankman-Fried’s false testimony and violation of bond conditions could limit the reduction.

“I usually advise clients to pay restitution before sentencing if at all possible,” Mariotti said.

WATCH: Former SEC Chari discusses Bankman-Fried guilty verdict

Fmr. SEC Chair Jay Clayton: SBF trial is 'one of the largest campaign finance problems in history'

Continue Reading

Environment

The man behind Jaguar’s controversial new EV design has been fired

Published

on

By

The man behind Jaguar's controversial new EV design has been fired

The man behind Jaguar’s radical new EV design, Gerry McGovern, was reportedly fired this week and “escorted out of the office.”

Jaguar design boss who led controversial EV was fired

After unveiling the Type 00 last year, an ultra-luxury two-door EV concept, and what Jaguar claimed to be a preview of its new design, the struggling British automaker almost broke the internet.

The radical, chunky-looking concept came under heavy fire online with comparisons to the Pink Panther and Barbie’s dream car.

Even Tesla’s CEO, Elon Musk, and EV maker Lucid Motors poked fun at the controversial concept. Musk responded to Jaguar’s post on X last year, “Do you sell cars?” mocking its bold attempt at a rebrand.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Jaguar describes the Type 00 as “an indicator of design philosophy and intent for the coming new vehicles.” The concept not only looks like it was created with Grok or some other AI, but it’s also expected to be pretty pricey.

Jaguar-controversial-EV-boss-fired
Jaguar Type 00 made its first public debut in Paris in March 2025 (Source: Jaguar)

During an interview with The Sunday Times last year, former CEO Adrian Mardell said Jaguar’s new luxury EV lineup would likely be priced around £150,000, or nearly $200,000.

According to sources from inside the company, Jaguar’s chief creative officer, Gerry McGovern, was fired on Monday.

Jaguar-controversial-EV-design-boss-fired
Jaguar Type 00 made its first public debut in Paris in March 2025 (Source: Jaguar)

The sources told Autocar and Autocar India that McGovern was “escorted out of the office” and that his position was eliminated immediately.

When asked for more details, a JLR spokesperson responded, “No comment,” while Tata Motors has yet to respond.

The sudden news comes just a week after PB Balaji, former Tata Motors’ CFO, took over as Jaguar Land Rover CEO amid the company’s struggling efforts to turn things around.

McGovern’s departure after 21 years at JLR signals that bigger changes are coming for the ailing British luxury brand.

The first model from Jag’s new EV lineup was expected to be an electric four-door GT, set for production in mid-2026, followed by at least two more luxury EVs. With McGovern out, those plans will likely change. We’ll keep you updated with the latest.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Tesla (TSLA) sales keep crashing in Europe with a single market temporarily saving it

Published

on

By

Tesla (TSLA) sales keep crashing in Europe with a single market temporarily saving it

Tesla’s registration numbers for November 2025 are starting to roll in for European markets, and they paint a stark picture: demand is still collapsing in nearly every major market, with one massive exception that is propping up the entire region.

According to registration data tracked by Electrek, Tesla’s volumes in key European markets are down 12.3% year-over-year.

At first glance, the 12% decline in November might sound like good news, given Tesla’s sales in Europe have been declining by 30% to 40% each month all year, but it doesn’t tell the whole story.

If you exclude Norway, where a specific tax-incentive change is pushing demand forward, Tesla’s sales in the rest of Europe have plummeted by 36.3% – in line with the year-long decline.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

The Norway anomaly vs. the reality

We have been tracking Tesla’s difficult year in Europe for months now, but November’s data shows an unprecedented divergence.

In Norway, Tesla registrations skyrocketed 175% year-over-year to 6,215 units. This massive surge is due to buyers rushing to beat new EV tax changes expected in 2026, which would eliminate tax benefits for more expensive EVs, including virtually all of Tesla’s vehicles.

Norway alone accounted for over 35% of the total tracked volume this month.

Everywhere else, however, the floor is falling out.

Major volume markets are seeing declines of 40-60%:

  • France: Down 57.8% (1,593 units)
  • Sweden: Down 59.3% (588 units)
  • Netherlands: Down 43.5% (1,627 units)
  • Germany: Down 20.2% (1,763 units)

Italy remains the only other bright spot with 58.5% growth, but the volume (1,281 units) is too small to offset the crashes in France and Germany. Unlike Norway, where sales are booming as incentives expire, Tesla’s sales in Italy surged due to a new EV incentive.

It sent Tesla’s sales surging 58%, compared with the broader EV industry, which rose 170% in November due to the new incentives.

Here is the full breakdown of the markets reporting so far:

Market Nov 2025 Nov 2024 Change (Vol) Change (%)
Norway 6,215 2,258 +3,957 +175.2%
Germany 1,763 2,208 -445 -20.2%
Netherlands 1,627 2,881 -1,254 -43.5%
France 1,593 3,774 -2,181 -57.8%
Spain 1,523 1,669 -146 -8.7%
Italy 1,281 808 +473 +58.5%
Belgium 998 1,691 -693 -41.0%
Sweden 588 1,446 -858 -59.3%
Denmark 534 1,054 -520 -49.3%
Portugal 425 801 -376 -46.9%
Austria 406 440 -34 -7.7%
Finland 257 323 -66 -20.4%
Switzerland 242 536 -294 -54.9%

Electrek’s Take

A single market, Norway, is currently saving Tesla’s European sales, but that is clearly temporary. It simply pulled a lot of demand from Tesla’s sales in 2026.

When you strip out the Norway anomaly, a 36% drop in the rest of Europe shows that Tesla’s demand crisis is continuing in Europe.

We are seeing the compound effect of two problems we’ve discussed at length:

  1. Stale Lineup: The Model Y refresh is here, but it hasn’t been enough to stop buyers from defecting to newer, more competitively priced options from Chinese OEMs like BYD and legacy players who are starting to catch up with Tesla with increasingly more competitive offering.
  2. Brand Toxicity: As polls in Germany have shown, Elon Musk’s continued political polarization is actively driving away the core EV-buying demographic in Western Europe. You can see this most clearly in markets like France and Sweden, where the drop is nearly 60%.

Tesla needs more than just price cuts or minor refreshes to stop this bleeding. They need to address the brand issue, or 2026 will be a very long year for the company in Europe.

Keep in mind that those 2025 results are also being compared to Tesla’s 2024 performance, which was already down from 2023. This decline has been going on for 2 years now, it only accelerated in 2025.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

How families could get stuck with higher electric bills if the AI data center boom goes bust

Published

on

By

How families could get stuck with higher electric bills if the AI data center boom goes bust

Homes near a data center in Ashburn, Virginia, US, on Friday, July 25, 2025.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Data centers that haven’t been built yet are driving up electricity prices and could leave consumers on the hook for expensive power infrastructure if demand projections are wrong.

The race to build facilities that provide artificial intelligence has fueled a boom in data centers that train and run large language models, like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude, upending a utility industry that grew used to 20 years of no increase in electricity demand.

But now, some investors and energy market analysts are questioning whether the AI race has turned into a bubble, one that would prove expensive to unravel as new transmission lines and power plants are built to support those data centers.

Consumers served by the largest electric grid in the U.S. will pay $16.6 billion to secure future power supplies just to meet demand from data centers from 2025 through 2027, according to a watchdog report published this month.

The grid is PJM Interconnection, serving more than 65 million people across 13 states, including the world’s largest data center hub in Virginia and fast-growing markets like northern Illinois and Ohio.

About 90% of that bill, or $15 billion, is to pay for future data center demand, according to Monitoring Analytics, PJM’s independent market monitor. This amounts to a “massive wealth transfer” from consumers to the data center industry, the watchdog told PJM in a Nov. 10 letter.

Here's what's happening to electricity bills in states with the most data centers

“A lot of us are very concerned that we are paying money today for a data center tomorrow,” said Abe Silverman, general counsel for the public utility board in New Jersey, one of the states served by PJM, from 2019 until 2023. “That’s a little bit scary if you don’t really have faith in the load forecast.”

Residential electricity prices in September rose 20% in Illinois, 12% in Ohio, and 9% in Virginia compared to the same period last year, according to data from the federal Energy Information Administration. Each of those states are among the top five markets for data centers in the U.S.

The costs associated with securing power for data centers is directly reflected in consumer’s utility bills, said Joe Bowring, president of Monitoring Analytics. “When the wholesale power costs go up, people pay more, when it goes down people pay less,” he said.

Forecast uncertainty

PJM is forecasting 30 gigawatts of extra demand from data centers through 2030, but it’s unclear how much will actually materialize in the end. That’s the equivalent of the average annual power consumption of more than 24 million homes in the U.S.

Data center developers are shopping projects around in different locations before committing to a site, so there is likely duplication in the forecasts, said Cathy Kunkel, a consultant at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA).

Will AI trigger winter blackouts? NERC CEO Jim Robb on the soaring data center power demand

“We’re in a bit of a bubble,” Silverman, the New Jersey official, said. “There is no question that data center developers are coming out of the woodwork, putting in massive numbers of new requests. It’s impossible to say exactly how many of them are speculative versus real.”

Independent power producers such as Constellation Energy, the biggest owner of nuclear plants in the U.S., and Vistra Corp. warned earlier this year that data center demand forecasts are likely inflated.

“I just have to tell you, folks, I think the load is being overstated. We need to pump the brakes here,” Constellation CEO Joe Dominguez said on the company’s earnings call in May.

Meanwhile, Vistra CEO James Burke also said in May that data center demand could be overstated by three to five times in some jurisdictions as developers scout their projects around the country.

‘Stranded cost’

The risk is that utilities invest in expensive infrastructure to meet data center demand, but not all those facilities are eventually built or they end up using less electricity than expected, said Kunkel, the consultant.

“It does tend to be consumers — residential, commercial, and other industrial ratepayers — that end up paying for overbuilt electrical infrastructure,” Kunkel said. The potential problem will come if capacity is built that isn’t needed, that “would tend to leave ratepayers holding the stranded cost bag.”

Data center demand forecasts have declined when utilities implement stricter rules.

In Ohio, for example, American Electric Power recently had requests for 30 gigawatts of electric connections from data centers.

AEP proposed stricter rules “to mitigate the risk that transmission infrastructure will be built for speculative data center projects,” according to a filing with the state utility commission in May 2024.

Amazon to build $3 billion data center in Mississippi: Here's what to know

The AEP rules require data centers to pay for 85% of the energy they claim to need, even if they actually use less, to cover infrastructure costs. It also implemented an exit fee if data centers cancel their project or can’t meet the terms of their contract.

AEP’s data center requests in Ohio dropped by more than half, to 13 gigawatts after the utility commission approved the rules last July.

“When faced with potential financial commitments, the most speculative or uncertain data center projects did not submit load study requests — as was intended,” the Columbus, Ohio-based utility said in a statement.

The number of requests might decline further as the new rules force data centers to make binding contracts, it said.

The Data Center Coalition, a lobbying group for big tech companies, and other industry advocates have opposed AEP’s stricter rules as “discriminatory.”

Meeting demand

There is also a risk that the electrical grid grows less reliable as many large data center projects move forward. The 13 gigawatts of data center requests that AEP views as a more accurate figure, for example, is equivalent to about a dozen large nuclear plants. The infrastructure, in power plants and transmission lines, required to meet that demand is immense, the utility said.

The solution is for PJM to reject data centers’ requests for grid connection if there is not enough power to supply them, Bowring of Monitoring Analytics said. Data centers can either wait until there is enough power to supply them, or they can bring their own generation with them and jump the line, he said.

Monitoring Analytics filed a complaint with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission last week calling on PJM to adopt this approach.

“That will give data centers a clear incentive to bring their [own] generation,” Bowring said. That formula would also help clear up uncertainty over demand forecasts because data centers are unlikely to pay for infrastructure if they are not serious, he said.

Otherwise, the costs that consumers are bearing from data center demand will continue to grow, the watchdog warned FERC in its complaint.

Continue Reading

Trending